Day: October 30, 2014

The global warming debate ends. It is over.

Or should be anyway.

The claim that man is causing Mother Earth to warm is baloney say  the real experts in the field.

John Coleman, meteorologist and co-founder of the Weather Channel, said in a letter to the Hammer Forum held at UCLA on Oct. 23, that:

• There has not been man-made global warming in the past, is none in the present, and there’s no reason to fear that there might be any in the future.
• Efforts to prove the CO2 emissions cause climate change have failed.
• There has been no warming over the last 18 years.
• There is no climate crisis, the oceans aren’t rising, polar ice is increasing, polar bears are increasing, and heat waves and storms are not increasing.
• Climate change is a political and environmental agenda item without basis in science.

It should be noted that the premise of the forum was that global warming is happening and unless you put us self-proclaimed smart types in charge of everything you are all going to die.

Princeton physicist William Happer backed up Coleman with this:

The incredible list of supposed horrors that increasing carbon dioxide will bring the world is pure belief disguised as science.

In 2010 a high-level inquiry by the InterAcademy Council found there was “little evidence” to support the IPCC’s claims about global warming.

It also said the panel had purposely emphasised the negative impacts of climate change and made “substantive findings” based on little proof.

In a related matter, Daniel Botkin, professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology at University of California Santa Barbara has ripped the concept of anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming (AGW) in an article that has appeared on the National Parks Traveler website.

He points out that climate change is cyclical and that sea levels have been rising about a “foot or two  a century” since the end of the last ice age 14,000 years ago.

Ask yourself this: if anthropogenic global warming was happening why are those most concerned about it not screaming to replace carbon-dioxide-pumping coal and natural gas plants with zero-emission nuclear ones? Why are they actually demanding the ripping down of zero-emission hydro-electric dams? Where is the push for telecommuting?

Global Warming Debate Ends — It Was Baloney

Global Warming Debate Ends — It Was Baloney