Massive Nevada Voter Fraud

Massive Nevada Voter Fraud –Donald Trump lost Nevada, Nov. 8, by 26,434 votes. Maybe he didn’t lose it at all.

Massive Nevada Voter Fraud
Did he win Nevada too?

Newsmax is reporting the U.S. Postal Service certified returned mail from 9,200 persons on the voter roll in State Assembly District 15 which is Clark County. The votes cast in the district were 17,086.

Many of returned names belonged to deceased persons or of celebrities like Edward Snowden who obviously did not live in the district.

The investigation was initiated by Republican Assembly candidate Stan Vaughan who lost his race by 6,942 votes, an ostensible landslide, unless, of course, there were 9,000 fraudulent votes for his opponent in which case Vaughan would have won.

Vaughn said a sample of 200 of the returned names showed that 185 had indeed voted.

Further Vaughan said many including himself was prohibited from voting because the poll worker claimed that he had already did.

Clark County has 42 State Assembly districts most of which were won by Democrats. If there were 9,000 bad votes cast in just one and the Republican candidates themselves were kept from voting, we can add another state to the Trump win column.

Yes, Jill Stein is a hypocrite.

Hat tip Gateway Pundit.

Massive Nevada Voter Fraud

 

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 12-3-16

No Christopher, it was not Sean Connery who was the first James Bond but American Barry Nelson. He did it in 1954 in a television adaption of Casino Royale in which Bond was occasionally called Jimmy. Nelson died in 2007 at the age of 89 while traveling through Bucks County.No Christopher, it was not Sean Connery who was the first James Bond but American Barry Nelson. He did it in 1954 in a television adaption of Casino Royale in which Bond was occasionally called Jimmy. Nelson died in 2007 at the age of 89 while traveling through Bucks County.

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 12-3-16 first James Bond

Carrier Deal Crony Capitalism Not

Carrier Deal Crony Capitalism Not
Tax cuts coming for all.

Carrier Deal Crony Capitalism Not — Some — including some conservatives —are calling Donald Trump’s Carrier deal that kept about a thousand jobs from moving from Indiana to Mexico “crony capitalism.”

The deal gives Carrier about $6 million in tax credits over 10 years along with a $1 million training grant.

Since when do tax cuts upset conservatives? You say it is unfair to other businesses? We suspect any business willing to spend  $16 million-plus to save a facility can drive a similar bargain.

What Trump did to save Carrier is not the cronyism that has poisoned our economy. The Carrier deal is not the same as spending $400 million in tax money to save an obsolete shipyard. It is not giving $188 million in tax money so Jeff Lurie can preen on TV.  It isn’t this garbage passed by the Pennsylvania Legislature back in 2012 that bestowed millions in public subsidies on chosen favorites.

High taxes, health care costs and regulation are why businesses flee the U.S. Any tax cut is a good thing. We fully expect that what Carrier and its employees got is what all U.S. businesses and their employees are going to get when The Donald is inaugurated.

Carrier Deal Crony Capitalism Not

Tom Wolf Shameless Politics

Tom Wolf Shameless Politics

By Leo Knepper

Tom Wolf Shameless Politics
Shameless and cruel

In mid-November, Governor Wolf announced that the Department of Labor and Industry would be laying off employees. According to the Governor, this was due to the intransigence of Senate Republicans in their refusal to pass legislation funding unemployment call centers. On the other hand, Senate Republicans argue that the problem was the Governor’s unwillingness to answer their questions about funding.

Who is in the wrong?

Senator Scott Wagner makes a convincing argument in a column published by the York Daily Record:

“This project [the call centers] was fed approximately $240 million over the last four years with zero accountability. Now the senate is being pressured into throwing another $57.5 million down a black hole without any questions being asked.

“In 2006, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania signed a $106.9 million contract with IBM to be completed in 2009.

“IBM’s contract was to give the state a new computer system to track employee wages, employer taxes, handle unemployment claims, appeals, and payments.

“In July of 2013, the state terminated the contract with IBM because it was $60 million over budget. The $60 million was in addition to the $106.9 million initial contract, and it was 42 months late. What happened with this contract? Who was held accountable for the cancelled IBM contract?

“Later in 2013, the Legislature voted to allocate $60 million per year for four years, and that ends at the end of this year. This was for the same project that was contracted with IBM and then cancelled.

“So let’s recap for taxpayers – $106 million plus another $60 million for IBM.  Add the last four years of $60 million per year for a total of $240 million – all for a grand total of more than $400 million in taxpayer money.”

Senator Wagner is right to question the lack of results from $400 million in taxpayer spending and this line of inquiry is long overdue. You can bet that there will be more confrontations between the Governor and the General Assembly in the coming year. According to the Independent Fiscal Office, there will be a $1.7 billion deficit in the 2017-2018 budget year. The General Assembly must take a close look at past spending in terms of amount and efficacy. If they don’t, Pennsylvanians will face higher tax bills in the future.
Mr. Knepper is executive director of Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania.

Tom Wolf Shameless Politics