Julius Caesar was bald. This bothered him.
SB 167 Paycheck Protection — Leo Knepper of Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania has let us know that bills providing for paycheck protection moved out of the Senate State Government Committee, Jan. 31, on a party line vote.
Senate Bill 166 prohibits the use of dues collected from members of public unions to be used for political causes. It specifically exempts “negotiation, resolution, arbitration, administration or enforcement” of collective bargaining agreements.
Senate Bill 167 prohibits the use of dues to be used for politics and voids all provisions in collective bargaining agreements allowing it.
“Currently, government unions can deduct contributions for their political action committees (PACs) and dues money that will be used for political purposes directly from government employees’ paychecks,” says Knepper. “In other words, the unions are using taxpayer funded systems to collect money for politics.
“Why should it be legal for unions to use the public payroll system for political purposes, but illegal for former-Speaker John Perzel to use the constituent data system to help sway elections?” he said.
Our question: Why should the state even collect union dues? If the money has to be deducted automatically, it’s a pretty good indication that the union member is not thrilled with the leadership?
Why should union dues that more often than not merely enrich union bosses be a requirement for membership in the first place?
SB 167 Paycheck Protection
William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 2-2-17
Itqz Otqwtah emi ftq xazs iuzfqd, tq emi m iuzfqd nxqmw mzp pmdw mzp nqdqrf ar tabq. Kqf iq wzai ftmf iuzfqd ue vgef mzaftqd efqb uz ftq okoxq ar xurq. Ngf efmzpuzs tqdq myazs ftq bqabxq ar Bgzjegfmizqk mzp nmewuzs uz ftq imdyft ar ftqud tqmdfte mzp tqmdfe, U oagxpz’f uymsuzq m nqffqd rmfq ftmz m xazs mzp xgefdage iuzfqd.