Category: Delco

Delco Election Concerns Aired In 9-Hour Hearing Before Judge Dozor — Update: Judge Dozor has ruled that certification can proceed. Delaware County Common Pleas Court Judge Barry Dozor presided over a remarkable nine-hour hearing, yesterday, Nov. 21, concerning the request by Leah Hoopes, Gregory Stenstrom and Nicole Missino that certification of the Pennsylvania county’s certification of votes from the Nov. 8 election be postponed until Nov. 28 so a hearing could be held at which evidence could be presented regarding election irregularities.

Well, the hearing was basically held but limited to specific allegations made in the plaintiffs filing, namely that 2,778 records of requests for mail-in ballots were deleted by the county; at least 194 voter registration records of individuals who voted were deleted; a partisan third-party was allowed to control and tabulate mail-in ballots; and the chain of custody was adulterated by detouring the election-night journey of the county’s physical ballots and v-drives for six hours into a closed building, where poll watchers were prohibited from entering, before continuing the delivery to the centralized counting center at the Wharf Building in Chester.

These claims were generally, and reasonably, explained by the County during the course of the day but other troubling points were brought up.

Judge Dozor, who deserves great praise, is expected to rule today.

Mrs. Hoopes and Stenstrom were certified poll watchers while Mrs. Missino was the Republican candidate for the 165th District in the State House.

They represented themselves. Attorneys are notably reluctant to take vote fraud cases in Delco for fear of repercussions. Deborah Silver, a previous attorney for Mrs. Hoopes and Stenstrom, faced an attempt to disbar her which reportedly cost her $20,000 to beat.

The plaintiffs lack of experience led them to make mistakes. They were unable to call expert witnesses including data expert Robert Martini, who was unable to present a report which we are including at the end of this article. Martini, as a fact witness, testified, however, that the machine tape in the 1st Precinct of Marple’s 7th Ward was missing a hashcode.

This is a legitimate concern. If it happened there it likely happened elsewhere and reveals a security issue.

Mrs. Missino was unable to get into the record the voters who told her that their votes were never tallied.

Joan Weber, an entrepreneur who had been director of finance for Conde Nast, was unable to testify regarding the strange shrinkage in the tally for mail-in ballot requests she recorded from the state’s OpenDataPa website.

Julie Yu, whose report of election day ballots being taken unexpectedly from the Springfield Library dropbox to the county-owned “Flagship Building” at 2 W Baltimore Pike, in Media, might have made the most significant claim. The ballots had been expected to go to the counting center at the Wharf in Chester. The change caused suspicion regarding the the chain of custody.

James Allen, the county director of election operations, testified the change was due to Act 88 that was passed by the state legislature in July.

To get funding provided by the act, the county had to agree to, among other things, that it post on its publicly accessible Internet website an unofficial number of absentee ballots and mail-in ballots received for the election by 12:01 a.m.

This required election night procedures for the collection of dropbox ballots to be changed for logistical reasons, Allen said.

In previous elections — and in the weeks before election night — dropbox ballots were and are collected by county employees using vans and taken directly to the counting center. The new constraints led to the election night dropboxes being collected by two-person teams using private cars, with at least one member of the team being a county employee, according to Allen. Rather than being taken directly to Chester these ballots were first gathered at the Flagship Building.

Mrs. Hoopes, in her cross-examination, got Allen to admit that the change was never made public and that the county guidelines actually called for the ballots to go to Rose Tree Park on election night.

Things like this are what causes suspicions to arise.

Laureen Hagan, chief clerk of the Bureau of Elections, testified that the county never deletes requests for mail-in ballots. It remained unanswered as to why 2,778 such requests appear to have been deleted.

Stenstrom testified that he saw a cart of between 20,000 and 30,000 pre-canvassed ballots without pedigree at the Wharf on Election Night and that at 8:05 p.m., about 25,000 votes almost immediately appeared with lopsided margin for Democrats.

The logic and accuracy testing for the scanning machines was a big issue throughout the day with attorneys Nick Centrella, representing the Election Board, and William Martin, representing the County, desperately trying to keep it out.

Mrs. Hoopes got it on record that Delco was not following state protocols in its testing. She also got it on record that the county followed directives from their information technology guy rather than what was prescribed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.

Gavin Lawn, an observer at the counting center, testified he was inspired to become involved after receiving 13 mail-in ballots at his home in 2020. He said during his scheduled shift on Nov. 9, the door to the counting room was locked despite their being people inside.

Stenstrom said that he’d like the Judge to let him compare the ballot images from the scanner with the Department of State database to ease any concerns about the election being rigged. He said this could be done quickly and easily using off-the-shelf software without affecting the integrity of the machine.

There is no reason not to let citizens be allowed this access.

County solicitor Martin implied the plaintiffs and their supporters were merely sore losers motivated entirely by a dislike for mail-in ballots rather than legitimate concerns about the election.

About 40 people packed Courtroom 7 with another reported 80 in an overflow courtroom. About 20 stayed the whole nine hours.

Again kudos to Judge Dozor for the effort to address concerns.

And kudos to Stenstrom, Mrs. Hoopes, and Mrs. Missino and their supporters who — unlike Martin — were not paid for the nine hours.

And there remains, Mr. Martin, no reason — or state mandate — for the county to have unsupervised dropboxes accessible 24/7. Poorly monitored screens of images from solar-powered cameras do not cut it for supervision and the only reasons not restrict the boxes to government buildings during business hours are reasons that raise suspicions.

Here is the report Robert Mancini prepared regarding voting issues in Delaware County:

Delco Election Concerns Aired In 9-Hour Hearing Before Judge Dozor

Delco Election Abnormalities Being Discussed Now — Greg Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes are on Rumble right now discussing the certification of ballots in Delaware County, Pa.

The interviewer are Nick Moseder and The Gateway Pundit’s Brian Lupo 

Leah, Greg and Nicole Missino are asking for emergency motion for a temporary restraining order to delay the certifying of Delaware County, Pa. results.

A hearing is scheduled for 11 a.m., Monday, Nov. 21, in Delaware County Common Pleas Court.

The plaintiffs are saying, among other things, is that physical ballots and v-drives were reportedly taken to a closed building without observers present and kept there for six hours before being taken to the counting center. This would shatter the chain of custody along with breaking the law that the ballots go directly to the counting center.

Here is the link to the interview: https://rumble.com/v1v847o-pa-voters-seek-to-stop-the-certification-w-leah-hoopes-and-gregg-stenstrom.html

Delco Election Abnormalities Being Discussed Now

Delco Court Gives Half-Win To Election Integrity Activists — A hearing this morning, Nov. 4, before Delaware County Common Pleas Court (Pa) Judge Spiros E. Angelos left complainants Leah Hoopes, Gregory Stenstrom and Nicole Missino with a half-win.

Maybe less than half as Judge Angelos dismissed their request for an emergency injunction to allow poll watchers greater access to the Wharf counting center in Chester.

Still, he allowed their complaint to remain standing and while he didn’t allow the witnesses prepared by the petitioners to testify or allow their evidence to presented, he let them give lengthy statements over two days along with detailed and persuasive answers to the rebuttals made by attorneys Manly Parks and Nick Centrella of Duane Morris law firm who represented the county election board.

Further, Parks conceded a major request by the plaintiffs that election day run-down sheets be posted for poll watches and allowed to be photographed, and that poll watchers should have by-right access to voting machine tapes.

Parks said this was already the law hence an injunction was unnecessary. The plaintiffs noted that this law was largely being ignored by judges of elections. Parks pledged to instantly react when made aware of such circumstances.

So, he is on record.

The plaintiffs also asked that the vDrives, which are USB drives for voting machines, be better secured as chain of custody issues were a big problem in the 2020 election.

Parks pledged that the vDrives will be transported in sealed and secure packages signed by the appropriate officials. He did not, however, concede to include the vDrive’s serial numbers as sought by Stenstrom.

Stenstrom — who along with Mrs. Hoopes, wrote The Parallel Election regarding what happened in Delaware County in 2020 –said only two or three people are required to steal an election and the officials in charge of oversight might not even be aware it’s happening.

A standing-room crowd of about 30 people packed Courtroom 10, today, with about 20 spending all day in the courthouse, yesterday.

The plaintiffs agreed Judge Angelos treated them fairly, which differed from their experiences before County Council and the Board of Elections.

Yesterday, Parks began by asking the case be dismissed as neither Mrs. Hoopes nor Stenstrom had standing to sue — the state Supreme Court ruled just Tuesday that only candidates and parties have such right — and pointed out significant problems with their paperwork.

The plaintiffs, neither of whom is an attorney, were representing themselves.

Judge Angelos agreed with Parks regarding the law but gave the pair leeway to fix things.

The deadline for relief is 5 p.m. today as Election Day is Tuesday.

Working throughout yesterday they found a candidate, Mrs. Missino, willing to join them and revised their complaint.

Few of the supporters and witnesses — one of whom came from Lancaster County — left them.

The Lancaster County witness was Mike Miller who notes that his county’s voting machines rejected thousands of ballots which had to be retranscribed by hand, and that his GOP primary challenge to Senate Caucus Leader Ryan Aument had even been left off of many.

Mrs. Missino is the Republican candidate for the 165th District State House seat which is now held by Jen O’Mara.

She said that numerous residents of her district had expressed serious concerns during her door-to-doors. She said she wanted the evidence to be presented and, hopefully, rebutted.

Unfortunately, she didn’t get her wish.

Perhaps the most damning thing about the process was that the plaintiffs during their two years of struggle were rejected by most, frightened, local attorneys, and that an attempt was made to disbar the one they they did hire, Deborah Silver.

Ms. Silver was in the courtroom, yesterday, albeit as a supporter and not an attorney.

That there is a dearth of those versed in the law willing to take a case with political implications out of fear for career and comfort is an extremely concerning sign regarding the state of the Republic.

Even Jeffrey Dahmer had a lawyer.

Mrs. Hoopes said they will try and appeal the dismissal of the injunction in the few short hours left.

Delco Court Gives Half-Win To Election Integrity Activists

Poll Watcher Passion In Delco — Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes, whistleblowers and authors of The Parallel Election, held a poll watchers training session, last night, Oct. 20 at the Haverford Recreation CREC building attended by almost 50.

Greg, of Glen Mills, and Leah, of Bethel Township were certified poll watchers and observers at the Delaware County (Pa) Wharf Counting Center in 2020. Their book is an expose of what they saw. It can be purchased on Amazon or, best, at www.parallelelection.com.

Passion was high as the event lasted more than three hours. Nobody left and several stayed for questions after it ended. No fee was charged. It was pure patriotism by the presenters and the attendees, most of whom appeared to have come from Delco, albeit one woman was from Bucks County.

Emphasis was placed on the legal powers and rights of poll watchers — yes, Christine Reuther, poll watchers have them, see below — and detail was given as how to exercise these powers and rights.

Poll watchers may take photos of return sheets after voting has ended and demand a copy of the machine tape. It was stressed that they do so.

The presenters said poll watchers can expect bullying by party officials but this can be countered by knowledge of the law. It was recommended they have copies of the appropriate laws and rulings with them.

Poll watchers are representatives of candidates or parties. The attendees were told they must make the candidates understand they have to act early and quickly to address concerns.

One big concern is that Delco sent out 42,000 vote-by-mail ballots on Oct. 7 and 8, but the logic and accuracy testing of the scanning machines was not done until Oct. 11. Greg says this was not an innocent mistake. The county’s goal is to have the ballots fail while being scanned allowing them to be curated and replaced with votes for the chosen.

Candidates who feel they don’t fall in that category should start filing injunctions now.

Special thanks to Joy Schwartz for the work she did in promoting and organizing things.

Poll Watcher Passion In Delco

Leah Hoopes Rebuts Barr Claim On Bannon –Delco whistleblower Leah Hoopes appeared on Steve Bannon’s War Room, yesterday, Sept. 24, and rebutted former Attorney General Bill Barr’s claim that he investigated and reported on fraud allegations concerning the 2020 Election.

“Bill Barr is a stone-cold liar! I said this from the beginning. There was no report done,” Leah said. “There is no report. It’s in his book he said he had it. He told the president he had it. He’s testified under oath that he had it. That is a stone-cold lie.”

She said she had connected Bill McSwain, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, regarding election irregularities in the suburban Philadelphia county. She said he was willing to investigate until Barr ordered him to stand down.

Gateway Pundit has details here along with links to the Bannon interview and a Newsmax interview with Rob Schmitt she did in November 2020.

Leah Hoopes Rebuts Barr Claim On Bannon

Delco Vote Fraud Case Taken To Commonwealth Court — Greg Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes have filed an appeal with Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court after their suit against former Secretary of State Kathy Bookvar and others was dismissed by Delaware County Common Pleas Court.

Stenstrom and Mrs. Hoopes have written a book The Parallel Election exposing what happened that can be purchased on Amazon and other booksellers, or at at www.parallelelection.com.

In a statement posted on Patriot Online, Stenstrom said:

Filed our Appeal to the Commonwealth Court of PA yesterday for the Common Pleas case the Judge ruled was “moot” because the Nov 2020 election is “over,” and we should all “move on.” We anticipated the probability of that brazen move well in advance, and had the book in queue. We originally filed the case (our 2nd) in November 2021, but it took us until Jan 2022 to get it fully entered in the docket, and play their “guess where to serve us” game. They initially wouldn’t let us file the exhibits and evidence at all, and stopped us for assorted different reasons that we had to overcome. One of the biggest obstacles was that most lawyers only file Microsoft Word or PDF documents, and the Court only accepts files up to a 25 megabytes – which is very small and not suited for photos, never mind videos. Most of our exhibits exceeded those size limitations by a lot, and the court also initially choked on modern video and audio formats. It’s an antiquated system by any standard and I’m sure they would prefer to still be using typewriters and blurry copy machines, but time and technology move on. We had to eventually abandon filing electronically online via file uploads, and bring USB’s and CD’s to the courthouse. Then we suffered six months of lies by the Solicitors, Council members, and Board of Elections officials, as they just made up some of their most venomous accusations against us. After trying for months unsuccessfully to dismiss us for alleged technical and procedural errors, they resorted to a double secret probation “internal” investigation with the DA saying everything was “fabricated” and a “fiction” and there would be no criminal charges, and then refusing to release the completed investigation as required by law to hide the fact that they never did one. As if, Leah and I had hired a large crew of Delco “Doppelgängers,” CGI experts and forgers to craft the 104 page complaint with 98 exhibits of videos, audios, photos, and documents of defendants laughingly admitting they fabricated the entire election and destroying and shredding evidence on camera. The biggest problem they have, is regardless of their video and audio admissions of fraud, they cannot produce any of the election materials required to prove they conducted an honest vote in 2020 because they destroyed it. The biggest rabbit holes that Leah and I avoided but swallowed up so many others were focusing on ballots – that were mostly forged in key Counties – and router, network, and machine logs that were forensically wiped, if they ever even allowed them to be created in the first place. We’ll file our SCOTUS appeal soon, as well.

Delco Vote Fraud Case Taken To Commonwealth Court