Corrupt Hillary Or How We Really Dodged A Bullet

Corrupt Hillary Or How We Really Dodged A Bullet
We dodged a bullet

Corrupt Hillary Or How We Really Dodged A Bullet — As Democrats become ever more unhinged over President Trump’s glorious swamp draining, another revelation of Hillary Clinton’s unabashed corruption has occurred. Yes, we really dodged a bullet.

Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina says then Secretary of State Clinton made a personal call to to pressure her to keep Muhammed Yunus as chairman of the country’s Grameen Bank.

Bangladesh law prohibits civil servants from working beyond the age of 60. Yunus was 70 in March 2011 when the call was made.

The bank’s nonprofit Grameen America, which Yunus chairs, had given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative.  Grameen Research, also chaired by Yunus, donated between $25,000 and $50,000.

Why would a “nonprofit charity” donate to another “nonprofit charity”? The answer is when the “nonprofit charity” is not a “nonprofit charity” but a means of getting rich. A small bribe here can often garner greater lucre there.

By the way, have you seen where donations to the Clinton Foundation have dropped like a brick?

Corrupt Hillary Or How We Really Dodged A Bullet

Hypocrite James Comey Fired From Swamp

Hypocrite James Comey Fired From Swamp
Thank you, President Trump

Hypocrite James Comey Fired From Swamp — Thank you President Trump. The swamp is being drained. If you really want to sow confusion, now, among the angry swamp dwellers, pardon your foe, Martha Stewart.

She is a convicted felon for doing things far less vile than last year’s Democrat presidential candidate.

And the guy who prosecuted her? That’s right, the same guy who was just peachy with Hillary Clinton’s greed, corruption and treasonous irresponsibility.

What did James Comey say about Martha’s prosecution?

If it was Jane Doe she would have been prosecuted . . . there were 2,000 cases by the Justice Department that year for providing false statements during an investigation. I thought of my hesitation about the case due to someone being rich and famous, and how it shouldn’t be that way. I decided we had to do it.”


Good riddance James Comey, you swamp-dwelling hypocrite.


Paris Agreement Bad For USA

Paris Agreement Bad For USA — There are some — including reportedly daughter Ivanka — pushing President Trump to keep the USA in the Paris Agreement as committed to by President Obama. The agreement puts restrictions on the use of energy in the guise of stopping “climate change”.

Hopefully, The Donald is strong enough to stand up to the pressure.

The Paris Agreement is not about saving the world. It is about shackling the economy of the United States to weaken her and make her more malleable to the will of international plutocrats.

The biggest polluters like China, India and Russia do not hesitate to ignore the obligations to which they have agreed.

Obviously, pollution is a bad thing and obviously it is desirable to limit greenhouse gases. We do not, however, have to submit to internationalists to achieve these ends and it is unwise to do so.

The globalist plan does not inhibit the lifestyles of the rich and connected. The Obamas (and rich and greedy land-owner Bruce Springsteen) still get to party on Good Friday on $300 million yachts. Leonardo DiCaprio still gets to take charter jets to pick up environmental awards. Al Gore still gets to live in $9 million California mansions.

But working families for whom an extra $200 per year actually means something will have to pay more for energy and food so  these people can feel holy and righteous.

And for Chinese tyrants to get stronger.

Please, Mr. President get us out of this vile pact.

Paris Agreement Bad For USA

Paris Agreement Bad For USA

¿Quién es John Galt? Él es Donald Trump

¿Quién es John Galt? Él es Donald Trump — Forget Nutrisystem, Marie Osmond. Start pushing socialism.

During the last year, 73 percent of Venezuelans have lost weight. That’s because 93 percent of them can’t afford to buy enough food.

That’s how far the once rich country has fallen since the social justice types took it over in 1999.

¿Quién es John Galt?

Él es Donald Trump

¿Quién es John Galt? Él es Donald Trump

¿Quién es John Galt? Él es Donald Trump

Swamp Smears Are SOP

Swamp Smears Are SOP — Erick Prince’s book Civilian Warriors is the story of the Blackwater security firm now called Academi.

He says that when Democrats accuse it is less about revealing truth and solving problems, and more about the acquisition of profit and political power.

He notes, for instance, that lawyers for those suing Blackwater colluded with Congressional Democrats to safely spread maliciously false claims without fear of being sued for defamation.

Which gets us to this week’s circus.

Democrats and their media auxiliaries have been claiming the Russians “hacked” the election which implies that Donald Trump’s victory is illegitimate.

First, they claim the connection was found via “wiretapping”.  When Trump tweeted in agreement, however, it dawned on them that an administration spying on the other party’s candidate is a serious abuse of power, and hence repudiated their original claim.

Yesterday, March 20, FBI Director James Comey and NSA Director Mike Rogers testified before the House Intelligence Committee. There was no evidence that the Russians changed votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, North Carolina or Ohio, they said.

One kind of wishes someone asked if there was any indication that illegals voted in Nevada, New Hampshire, Virginia, California, New York or Illinois. One also would have like to see Comey answer if the feds investigated whether any dead people voted in Chicago.

Comey, by the way, would not say that Trump’s wiretap claim was false.

Also at the hearing, it was revealed that Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Attorney General Loretta Lynch had the power to unmask sources U.S. citizen in data collected by the NSA. This means they could have leaked it to the press.

Another potential source for leaks is James Clapper who was Obama’s Director of National Intelligence. Clapper was reputedly there when Donald Trump was given a since-discredited bizarre dossier presumably showing that Russia had blackmail material on him. The dossier was leaked to friendly press. Comey would neither confirm or deny that Clapper was at the meeting.

Clapper is infamous for his perjury before Congress in March 2013 that the National Security Agency had not collected data on millions of Americans without warrants.

The lie was the final straw for Eric Snowden who then went public with proof that they did.

Quick tip, Mr. President: Pardon Snowden. The enemy of your enemy is your friend.

Clapper, of course, was never charged for his lie. Swamp dwellers protect their own.

Final point, those who are not complete fools agree that it was impossible for the Russians — or anybody — to hack the voting machines and change votes. They claim instead that the Russians released unflattering information about Hillary Clinton via Wikileaks. Among the more damning tidbits were her telling foreign interests at Banco Itau in a private speech that her “dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”, and telling Goldman Sachs principles that (Chinese) President Xi is doing much more to try to assert his authority, and I think that is also good news.”

Xi, of course, is the guy trying to turn the South China Sea into a personal lake.

Would the FBI have investigated if she had won? LOL. Swamp dwellers protect their own.

Swamp Smears Are SOP

Swamp Smears Are SOP





Mark Levin Chastises Brian Stetler

Mark Levin Chastises Brian Stetler — CNN’s Brian Stelter merely did what he was born to do, namely defend the deep-state establishment, when he graspingly sought to defend the Obama Administration against charges that it used national security protocols in a futile attempt to stop the election of Donald Trump.

Radio host Mark Levin, who grew up in Springfield, Montco, takes him to task regarding his hypocrisy and failed journalism in this open letter:

Did you listen to my show on Thursday, before President Trump tweeted? Did you watch my appearance on Fox and Friends Sunday morning? I know you are ticked I did not appear on your show, despite your numerous requests. Your ad hominem attacks about “right wing” radio host and conspiracy theory stuff … incredible.

I simply put together the stories that YOUR profession reported, on the public record. Do you deny there were two FISA applications? Do you deny the first was turned down? Do you deny the second was approved? It’s called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. It is about surveillance. The fact that we cannot discern all the details because of the secrecy, except for what the media have revealed and selective leaks by the government, should cause you to want to know more, not to trash those who point it out.

And yes, we can make several logical implications based on events and experience. A FISA application is a big deal. One, or two in this case, that involve campaign surrogates, or a server or computer related to a candidate or campaign, etc., is a big deal. President Obama’s statement is not a definitive statement of anything, other than he, personally, did not order a wiretap, which I never claimed. But that does not mean he was unaware of surveillance activity by several of his departments, even through routine reports to the president, such as the Daily Intel Briefing or information conveyed to him or his staff via the Justice Department re the FBI counter-intelligence activities. As for Clapper, despite his past dissembling before Congress, he may not have been aware of what was taking place since the FBI counter-intel operation reportedly sought the warrant. The Daily Intel Briefing might provide useful information in that regard as well.

Of course, the release of the FISA applications would also shed a lot of light on events, assuming YOU believe reports that they were filed.

Furthermore, Clapper has said, as recently as yesterday, that no connections between the Russians and the Trump campaign have been found. I am extremely critical of Russia, Putin, and the efforts to influence our election, although I do not believe they succeeded. That said, how would Clapper know of no connections if he, as former Director of National Intelligence, didn’t look? On what is that based?

Your lack of curiosity and dishonesty about such matters and in dealing with me demean you and your profession. You are free to circulate this communication to whomever you wish, as I am making it public.

Mark Levin Chastises Brian Stetler

Mark Levin Chastises Brian Stetler

Deep State Election Interference

Deep State Election Interference
Fear me, swamp dwellers

Deep State Election Interference — Federal agents raided the homes of the daughter and a supporter of Congressmen Curt Weldon three weeks before the 2006 election giving the race to Democrat Joe Sestak.

Neither the daughter, nor Charlie Sexton, the supporter, nor Weldon were ever charged. 

Weldon was in line to become House Armed Services Committee chairman and his agenda included investigating Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger for the theft of national security documents from the National Archive and for arranging a retroactive presidential waiver for Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz who had illegally transferred  sensitive technology to China.

Two laters later, federal charges were brought against Alaska Republican Sen. Ted Stevens which led to his conviction a week before the 2008 election. The race was won by just 3,953 votes by Democrat Mark Begich who provided a necessary vote for Obamacare and other expansions of the Deep State bureaucracy.

Stevens’ conviction was voided after it was learned that the FBI concealed evidence that would have led to an acquittal. No matter. He was out of power and the mission was accomplished.

Now it is found that the Obama Administration had wiretapped Donald Trump a month before the 2016 election. Shades of Watergate. Where is the outrage from the good government crowd?  Silly question. The “good government” crowd was never about good government but the advancement of the Deep State whose denizens are now desperately reaching for straws to keep the swamp from being drained.

A decade or two ago, there would be no panic. Victory would be ordained. Trump would never had even reached office much less the nomination to create the fuss in the first place.

But the world has shifted. The enablers like the Washington Post and the New York Times and the network news have but a fraction of their influence and the blanket cover they once provided is now flimsy and filled with holes.


Deep State Election Interference



Stradley Ronon Boasts About Val

Stradley Ronon Boasts About Val
A screenshot of the press release.

Stradley Ronon Boasts About Val — Stradley Ronon, the Philadelphia-based octopus that can be a poster child for the Deep State, has put out a release about how one of its trusted officers now heads the Pennsylvania Republican Party.

“Stradley Ronon Partner Valentino F. DiGiorgio III was elected Chairman of Pennsylvania’s Republican Party during the state party’s convention in Hershey, Pennsylvania,” they bragged. “. . .Val is co-chair of Stradley Ronon’s public finance and banking practice groups. He handles all legal aspects of financial services, including commercial lending and tax-exempt financing for 501(c)(3) entities, governmental units and other entities.”

Before Democrat Josh Shapiro was elected Pennsylvania Attorney General last November he had been a counsel at Stradley Ronon. You think he might still be on their quick dial?

Wonder whose interests are Shapiro and DiGiorgio more inclined to consider in making policy: The law firm/lobbyist with whom they are connected or the average citizen?

OK, we don’t wonder.

The Trump voter still has work to do in taking back the country.

Stradley Ronon Boasts About Val

Pardon Edward Snowden To Help Drain The Swamp

Pardon Edward Snowden
Pardon Citizenfour

Pardon Edward Snowden — President Trump has dumped serious hate on whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Wonder if he still feels that way.

Snowden revealed in May 2013 that American intelligence services were spying on just about every American phone call and email. It turns out this includes those of cabinet members if those cabinet members aren’t part of the right club.

Two days ago, Feb. 13, 2017, Michael Flynn was forced from his job as Trump’s National Security Advisor after intelligence bureaucrats leaked to anti-Trump publications intercepted communications showing that he had discussed easing Obama-imposed sanctions on Russia with that nation’s ambassador.

The leak was a clear violation of the law, — far clearer, in fact, than the one that Snowden is accused of doing.

The scary thing, though, is that the swamp-dwellers who took down Flynn also want Snowden locked up for life.

We think The Donald is just starting to understand how deep that swamp really is. Bringing Citizenfour home and saying all is forgiven would significantly help with draining it.

Snowden, by the way, is not kissing up to either Trump or benefactor Vladimir Putin. Check out his interview with Katie Couric.


Pardon Edward Snowden To Help Drain The Swamp



Strike the King Better Kill Him, CIA

Strike the king you better kill him.

Bummer CIA. You missed.

Strike the King Better Kill Him, CIA
Hey CIA, you missed.

As did the rest of the Washington/Wall Street swamp.

The government-connected media has been filling the airwaves all week with reports that Russia “hacked” our election. It’s based on CIA claims that leave dupes with the implicit conclusion that Donald Trump is not a legitimate president.

“Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency,” according to the government (i.e. Obama Administration) report. “We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.”

The claim has seriously underwhelmed cyber security people.

And the guy who is taking over in a couple of weeks is not happy so expect a lot of out-of-work spy types.

What should be especially disconcerting to the intelligence community is that conservatives who have had an almost knee-jerk instinct to defend it are now starting to say, well, maybe the progressives have a point about them.

Especially damning is the realization that the “intelligence” agencies tasked to understand what is going on in the world are either clueless about what is happening outside the little swamp in which they live, or they are so terrified of losing their wealth and power they are resorting to desperate measures to undermine a duly elected president.

If you are really concerned as to whether the Russians “hacked” into the Democrat National Committee database to reveal that Hillary Clinton told foreign groups that her campaign promises are lies and had squelched a primary opponent via unfair party manipulation, ask yourself if you’d rather had not known she did these things.

Ask yourself  if the intelligence community was really concerned about security why did it tolerate the Secretary of State having a private email server not subject to government oversight and in violation of every protocol imaginable, not to mention common sense.

Ask yourself why the Russians (and the Saudis and the Chinese) wouldn’t want someone to whom they siphoned millions for tangible benefits.

Ask yourself why the Democrat Party would twist arms so badly to get this person as their nominee.

Jan. 20 can’t come soon enough.

Strike the King Better Kill Him, CIA