Hypocrite Buttigieg And Islam

Hypocrite Buttigieg And Islam — Pete Buttigieg, the bitter, angry, outspokenly homosexual mayor of South Bend, Ind., has attacked Christians who vote Republican because of Biblical imperatives such as protecting the weak and helpless, not killing, and refraining from destructive sex acts; and that the Democrat Party not merely dismiss these commands but is offended by the very idea of God.

At least God as how Christians know Him.

Buttigieg has been notably silent regarding the hate-filled statements of militant Islamist congresswomen Ilhan Omar (D-MN5) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI13).

Something to consider: Would Buttigieg prefer to be thrown off the building or have it fall on him?

Here’s an LOL to end it: Buttigieg has accused President Trump of “Islamophobia”.

Hypocrite Buttigieg And Islam
Hypocrite Buttigieg And Islam -- Pete Buttigieg, the bitter, angry, outspokenly homosexual mayor of South Bend, Ind., has attacked

Michelle Malkin CPAC Speech

Michelle Malkin CPAC SpeechYesterday, we gave you Alex Jones. Today we return to sanity with Michelle Malkin’s wonderful and powerful speech made at CPAC 2019, yesterday (March 1).

It is being talked about.

CPAC stands for Conservative Political Action Conference.

Michelle Malkin CPAC Speech
Michelle Malkin CPAC Speech

Mexico Paying For Wall After All

Mexico Paying For Wall After All — Joel Pollack on Breitbart points out that President Trump can start building the wall now and can burn through $4.5 billion before even touching the $3.6 billion from his contested national emergency declaration.

Mexico Paying For Wall After All
Ha ha

Pollack says the money available now includes $600 million from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund (Mexican drug lords), $2.5 billion from the Department of Defense to support counterdrug activities, and the $1.4 billion from the just approved budget. Only the money in the budget has restrictions, Pollack says.

Mexico Paying For Wall After All

Drug Cartels Control Pelosi?

Drug Cartels Control Pelosi? — A former Democrat from Arizona is saying his state’s politicians are under the thumb of the Mexican cartels and this control extends to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi from lovely California.

Drug Cartels Control Pelosi?  -- An former Democrat from Arizona is saying his
Why else would she be fighting the Border Patrol?

Jeffrey Peterson, a tech entrepreneur who was picked by then Gov. and future Secretary of Homeland Security  Janet Napolitano for state’s influential  Arizona-Mexico Commission, implies this drug money is the main reason why Speaker Pelosi is fighting tooth-and-nail against President Trump’s proposed border wall.

It certainly makes you think. Perhaps a special counsel is needed to look into this.

Seriously, why is there so much fuss about giving the Border Patrol what they want?

Drug Cartels Control Pelosi?

Democrats Vs Border Patrol

Democrats Vs Border Patrol — President Trump, yesterday (Jan. 25), reopened the government for three weeks without getting the desperately needed wall.

Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats cheered and gloated.

Democrats Vs Border Patrol
Is Democrats vs Border Patrol smart politics?

All you joining the cheering and gloating without really understanding why, ask yourself “What does the Border Patrol want?”

We thought a 2000-mile concrete “big, beautiful” wall was a dumb idea when the President first brought it up on the campaign trail in 2015. He soon walked it back to account for terrain. We shrugged and thought it no longer dumb but not real necessary or desirable.

Well over the last few months with caravans of young men from Central America trying to storm the border, Border Patrol agents unanimously declaring a need for physical barriers; and establishment media lying through their teeth in opposition, we are now completely on board the train.

The wall is needed and President Trump is thankfully not giving up. He will likely and rightly declare a national emergency in three weeks if the Democrats don’t start helping.

Trump-haters why not just concede to give the Border Patrol exactly what it wants — no more, no less. A crisis is eased, other problems like DACA get solved, divisiveness ends and unity is achieved.

Don’t let your hate and ego hurt the country.

And do you really want the debate to become Democrats vs Border Patrol?

Presidential Shout Out For Bunny Welsh

Presidential Shout Out For Bunny Welsh — President Trump at yesterday’s (Jan. 11) border security roundtable described the rampant and twisted human trafficking that is occurring today and the desperate need for a wall.

Sheriff Welsh Gets Presidential Shout Out
Sheriff Bunny Welsh

Seated at his right the whole time was Chester County Sheriff Bunny Welsh who he recognizes at the 10:50 mark. Bunny then describes the tragic death of a Chester County boy due to fentanyl traced to a Mexican cartel.

It’s a great honor Bunny. Stay involved. We need you.

The roundtable can be watched at the below C-Span link. It is worth doing so.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?456900-1/president-trump-national-emergency-shutdown-continues&fbclid=IwAR099fxnqVCY9gLNM5ZLhxl8eLD8an02ZnIg1GC8rhznrMxYtFUy1mtBprk

By the way, did you ever wonder who the sick and twisted Americans are that are creating a market for the women — and children?

Presidential Shout Out For Bunny Welsh
Presidential Shout Out For Bunny Welsh

Resolving The Wall And Opening Government

Resolving The Wall And Opening Government — President Trump gave a measured and presidential address last night as to why we need some kind of barrier on the Mexican border.

Resolving The Wall

Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer gave a response in which they squawked like chickens.

Here’s thought: Why not just ask the Border Patrol what they want and give it to them? Hmmm? Anybody see a downside to that?

If the Dems dig up up a bunch of boots-on-the-ground BP officers who say, “Nah we don’t need a wall (fence, steel slats), we got our horses”, well they win.

Of course, that’s not really what’s happening is it?

And we wonder if Chuck and Nancy ever considered what happens if this shutdown continues for another couple of months and the vast majority of Americans forget it is happening, and, in fact, find themselves even living happier lives.

Just something to think about.

Resolving The Wall And Opening Government

Trump Describes Human Trafficking

Trump Describes Human Trafficking — President Trump had a lengthy ad hoc press conference this morning (Jan. 6) before flying to Camp David.

Trump Describes Human Trafficking

He touched on many issues especially related to “The Wall” and the partial government shut down.

He said he was willing to stop calling it a wall in order to advance the process and to use steel in lieu of concrete. In fact, he said he was in talks with steel makers regarding the project and that it would be great for that industry.

More upsettingly, though, he described the human trafficking that has been occurring on our unsecured southern border. He said woman are bound and have duct tape placed over their mouths as they are brought north to be sold to the sex trade. He also said this happens, very frequently, with children.

He says the wall — excuse us, barrier — will be a significant deterrent to this. The experts agree. The question that bothers us is why don’t the Democrat leaders want to stop it.

A video is below. Don’t expect to see much of it carried by the establishment media.

Trump Describes Human Trafficking

Organ Harvesting Of Migrant Children

Organ Harvesting Of Migrant Children — The Gatestone Institute — which was chaired by  John Bolton from 2013 until March when he was recruited to become President Trump’s National Security Advisor — reported, Nov. 27, that Greek diplomats have been issuing visas to unaccompanied migrant children to facilitate illegal removal of their organs.

In 2011, it was estimated that the illicit ‘organ trade’ generated illegal profits between $600 million and $1.2 billion per year. 

Wonder how many migrant children either unaccompanied or accompanied by adults who aren’t their parents end up the victims of organ harvesters on our southern border.

There are sick and evil people in this world.

Organ Harvesting Of Migrant Children
Organ Harvesting Of Migrant Children

Birthright Citizenship Spawns Tourism

Birthright Citizenship Spawns Tourism

By Joe Guzzardi

Birthright Citizenship Spawns TourismIf President Trump’s promise to end birthright citizenship does nothing else, it will spark the long overdue debate about the constitutional legality of conferring citizenship to all children born on U.S. soil including those delivered by unlawfully present mothers.

Birthright citizenship, also referred to as jus soli or “right of the soil,” has been for decades the improper reading and implementation of the 14th Amendment. Under the jus soli interpretation, children born on American soil, even though their parents are foreign nationals, automatically become U.S. citizens. The opposing argument contends that jus sanguinis should prevail – blood rights that confer birth citizenship only to the children of citizens or lawfully present immigrants.

Facts must be separated from the fiction put forth by media and the pro-immigration lobby. Fact: birthright citizenship is a huge illegal immigration magnet. As a U.S. citizen, a child qualifies for affirmative benefits, free K-12 education, and more affordable in-state college tuition fees. When the child turns 21, he can petition other family members to join him, and thus begin the chain migration process that adds approximately four additional residents per each original immigrant.

From a population growth perspective alone, birthright citizenship is a major driver. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that at least 4.5 million U.S. citizen anchor babies under the age of 18 live in the U.S. CBO’s estimate excludes the millions of over-18 anchor babies or those living overseas with their deported foreign parents. At least another 600,000 citizen childrenwill be born in the U.S. within the next few years, according to CBO.

Fact: birthright citizenship has spawned the disgraceful birth tourism industry wherein wealthy Chinese, Koreans, Turks and others from overseas pay unscrupulous maternity hotel operators room and board while they await their citizen child’s birth.

There are criminal elements in birth tourism. Lying on a visa application – declaring that the visitor is coming to the U.S. as a tourist when her true purpose is to give birth – is a crime. Some of the hotel owners violate municipal building and zoning codes, as well as certain health regulations. Federal agents have launched several California investigations where birth tourism thrives, but their efforts have not deterred those eager to deliver a “U.S. citizen.”

Fact: Only two fully developed countries offer birthright citizenship, Canada and the U.S. Because of abuse and fraud, other advanced nations like Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, France, Germany, the UK, Vatican City and others abandoned automatic citizenship years ago. Those countries recognized birthright citizenship’s folly; the U.S. persists in the untenable practice.

Fiction: The federal government has no legal authority to end birthright citizenship. It appears to be the mainstream media’s near-unanimously held position that they cannot. In its headline story, The Washington Postdeclared that President Trump’s executive order, should he issue it, “would run afoul of the Constitution.” The Associated Press headline was “Trump Far Off Track on Birthright Citizenship,” and The Atlantic wrote, “Trump’s Plan to End Birthright Citizenship Takes Direct Aim at the Constitution.”

Fact: The Supreme Court has never ruled on birthright citizenship, and respected constitutional scholars have politely disagreed over the practice’s legitimacy. Writing in The New York Times, Chapman University Professor John Eastman noted that the Constitution doesn’t mandate birthright citizenship, and that Section 1 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies illegal immigrants’ children – that they must be “subject to the jurisdiction of…” meaning they cannot have allegiance to another nation. Professor Chapman’s detractors contend that the issue is an open and shut case. They demand “Constitutional originalism.” Those born in the U.S. are U.S. citizens, period. Birthright citizenship’s fate is of vital importance to every American and merits an eventual Supreme Court decision, not the controversial Executive Order President Trump proposed. Although it may be too much to expect in today’s political climate, the Supreme Court could finally resolve birthright citizenship’s legality.

Joe Guzzardi is a Progressives for Immigration Reform analyst who has written about immigration for more than three decades. Contact Joe at jguzzardi@pfirdc.org.