Republicans Remove Confederate Flag

Republicans Remove Confederate Flag
The South Carolina State Capitol on Feb. 18, 2000.

The Delaware County Daily Times, today, July 11, included in the AP story regarding the removal of the Confederate flag from the South Carolina Capitol grounds the twistedly disingenuous and curious claim that the flag “had been defended by white Republican leaders until last month as a symbol of Southern pride.”

Of course, the article omitted any reference to the party that raised the flag nor did it bother to note the party to which Gov. Nikki Haley belonged.

So here is some history. The flag was raised in 1962 over the State Capitol in Columbia by Gov. Ernest Hollings, a liberal Democrat, to defend segregation and Jim Crow. Hollings would go on to become a U.S. senator and  would serve in the Senate until 2005. He was a friend and supporter of Bill and Hillary Clinton and the progressive big government agenda.

In 1996, conservative Republican Gov. David Beasley made a strong push to remove the flag. He failed to win re-election in 1998 because of it. The die-hard sons of the Confederacy pointedly stayed home while the progressives and their tools in the Black establishment supported his opponent, Jim Hodges, who said he would keep the flag where it was.

Hodges, after much national pressure, agreed to remove the flag from the Capitol dome in 2000 to a monument on the State House grounds.

And there it flew until yesterday when it was removed for good  in response to the June 17 Charlestown shootings. The removal was demanded by Gov. Haley, a Republican, and without outside pressure. It was overwhelmingly approved by the overwhelmingly Republican legislature.

The hate from and the lies told by the old media about those whose politics differ from the reporters, photographers, editors and newsreaders are poisoning this country.

Republicans Remove Confederate Flag

Charity For All Monument

Charity For All Monument We always considered the Confederate flag a symbol to allow the losers of a war to maintain some dignity so bumper stickers and belt buckles containing it don't cause us to judge the one sporting them as a racist.  Of course, the one flown on the grounds of the South Carolina capitol is a different matter as it was raised by a friend of Hillary Clinton to defend Jim Crow and it should be taken down.  If they really want that flag to fly in Columbia, S.C. maybe the thing to do is to build a monument inscribed with the words of Lincoln's Second Inaugural just as at the memorial in Washington D.C., with  a bust of Lincoln on the top with the American and Confederate flags on the sides. You can call it the "With Charity For All" Monument.We always considered the Confederate flag a symbol to allow the losers of a war to maintain some dignity so bumper stickers and belt buckles containing it don’t cause us to judge the one sporting them as a racist.

Of course, the one flown on the grounds of the South Carolina capitol is a different matter as it was raised by a friend of Hillary Clinton to defend Jim Crow and it should be taken down.

If they really want that flag to fly in Columbia, S.C. maybe the thing to do is to build a monument inscribed with the words of Lincoln’s Second Inaugural just as at the memorial in Washington D.C., with  a bust of Lincoln on the top with the American and Confederate flags on the sides. You can call it the “With Charity For All” Monument.

And that should solve the problem and finally end the Civil War.

Charity For All Monument

Evil Demeaned By Political Correctness

Dylann Roof -- Evil Demeaned By Political Correctness
Dylann Roof, suspected mass murderer

A 21-year-old twisted soul named Dylann Roof last night, June 17, reportedly murdered nine persons during a prayer service at Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C.

Roof is white and the people he killed were black.

“We believe this is a hate crime; that is how we are investigating it,” said Charleston Police Chief Greg Mullen, in what might have been the dumbest  quote ever made by a law enforcement official.

Mullen’s politically correct statement demeans evil. It wasn’t name calling that Roof is alleged to have done but cold blooded mass murder of kind people.

In Mullen’s defense, he probably had other things on his mind when he said it but what happened last night is no different that what ISIS does routinely in the Mideast. You want to call what they do “hate crime”? The phrasing of Pope Francis is far better.  What happened at the Emanuel AME Church was not a “hate crime” but Satanic barbarism.

Racism appears to be Roof’s motive but don’t consider the victims black or Roof white. The victims are persons as is Roof. Roof is one who has (allegedly) chosen evil.

Skin color is meaningless. The only people to whom it matters are those who want to manipulate others for their own gain.

Forgive the fudging i.e “allegedly” regarding Roof but we remember initially misidentifying the shooter from Sandy Hook.

Evil Demeaned By Political Correctness

 

 

Rachel Dolezal Truth Matters

Rachel Dolezal Truth Matters -- What’s black and white and red all over? An embarrassed Rachel Dolezal. Or at least she should be. Had she not resigned, Dolezal should have been fired, but not because she is white. There is no reason a non-black could not perform extremely well in that capacity; as a matter of fact, according to reports, Rachel Dolezal did just that. The reason she deserved termination is simple: She lied, and in doing so, destroyed her integrity and damaged the reputation of the organization. No matter how well-intentioned she was, deliberately misleading people was unacceptable, and keeping her in that position would have set a terrible example.
By Chris Freind

What’s black and white and red all over? An embarrassed Rachel Dolezal. Or at least she should be.

But the former President of the NAACP chapter in Spokane, who resigned under fire after it was revealed that she was, in fact, white, isn’t blushing at all. Despite duping so many by being a racial chameleon, leaving supporters feeling betrayed, Dolezal stated that she would have done nothing differently, calling her actions ones of “survival.”

Given that this is giving the Bruce/Caitlin Jenner saga a run for its money as the year’s best “you-can’t-make-this-stuff-up” story, where does one begin?

Consider:

1. When asked by the press if she was black, Dolezal replied, “That question is not as easy as it seems. There’s a lot of complexities … and I don’t know that everyone would understand that.”

Sure there are, Rachel. Yep. There are just so many complexities in answering such an extremely simplistic question. Thanks for the patronizing non-answer, but let’s cut out the psycho-babble. The answer is simple: You are white. Period. There are no subtleties here, nor should there be. If the NAACP wouldn’t have hired you because of your skin color, then shame on them. But playing coy with something so obvious serves only to make you look like a lunatic, destroying whatever credibility you have left.

2. Had she not resigned, Dolezal should have been fired, but not because she is white. There is no reason a non-black could not perform extremely well in that capacity; as a matter of fact, according to reports, Rachel Dolezal did just that. The reason she deserved termination is simple: She lied, and in doing so, destroyed her integrity and damaged the reputation of the organization. No matter how well-intentioned she was, deliberately misleading people was unacceptable, and keeping her in that position would have set a terrible example.

3. Dolezal’s parents stated that they are puzzled as to why she would misrepresent her race. Rachel responded by saying that she doesn’t understand why her parents “are in a rush to whitewash some of the work that I have done.”

If that pun was intended, good one! But one has nothing to do with the other. The parents aren’t whitewashing the work Rachel has done, but questioning why she would lie about her racial heritage. Simply put, the end doesn’t justify the means.

4. Following the theme of Jenner’s “transgender” soap opera, the term “transracial” has quickly become the newest politically correct buzz term, ostensibly because Rachel Dolezal said, “I identify as black.” But what does that mean?

You’re white, but because you have an affinity for black culture or history, it’s now perfectly acceptable to represent yourself as black? Because if that’s the case, life just took a turn for the better! If you love Hawaii, and call yourself a native Hawaiian, then that must mean you get all the special privileges afforded to those folks. Same for Native Americans. And while you’re at it, throw in being an American Samoan, because that’ll really help get the kids into college. And of course, being formerly-white-but-now-transracial will make getting minority-only loans infinitely easier, as well as landing a job where minority-hiring quotas are in effect.

America’s entitlement mentality is out of control, but thinking you’re “entitled” to being another race, ethnicity or gender just because you feel like it takes the cake.

5.Rachel Dolezal attended Howard University, a historically all-black college. Did she represent herself as black to gain admission? And did she do the same to obtain government loans, aid, or any type of benefits? If so, losing her job will be the least of her worries, as fraudulently representing your ethnicity for financial gain isn’t just unethical, but illegal.

6. The NAACP is way behind the times, as the “C” stands for “colored” people — a term long since considered offensive to blacks. And while the organization should correct that, maybe it’s time to go all the way and change the name to NAAAP — the National Association for the Advancement of All People. Advocating special treatment for some — not all — smacks of discrimination, especially reverse discrimination, and has a counterproductive effect. When other races feel alienated, the racial gap widens, which has a detrimental effect on everyone, including, and sometimes especially, blacks.

To achieve racial harmony, we must start viewing ourselves as Americans, and only Americans. Not Hispanic, African-American, Asian-American, or white. Just Americans, with equal opportunity for all, and special treatment for none.

But unfortunately, selective discrimination has been deemed acceptable, even trendy. Far from creating racial accord, as its advocates naively believe, it has created a flashpoint in the powder keg of America’s race relations.

There are no white caucuses in our legislatures or NAAWPs, nor should there be. By their nature, they would be divisive and exclusionary. Yet they are just as divisive, and just as exclusionary, when used by other ethnicities. Once a race — any race — feels that it is not afforded equal rights, tensions flare, often uncontrollably.

Rather than learning our lesson, we are marching in the opposite direction, with too many — on all sides — playing the race card at the drop of a hat, often for ulterior motives.

The solution is for strong leaders of all races to unite and demand colorblindness in America, from policing to entertainment, and from education to the workplace. Tragically, though, too many succumb to cowardice, eschewing tough stands in favor of feel-good rhetoric, which placates the masses but solves nothing.

As a result, we are reverting to when people were judged by skin color. Resurrecting such barriers, however well-intentioned, has no place in an America striving to right the wrongs of its past.

Trumpeting color is demeaning to the very people it is designed to help. Instead of uniting, it divides. Instead of equality, it promotes the notion of special privilege based on color. Instead of building upon the American spirit of competiveness and achievement — may the best person win — it robs all people of dignity and respect.

Sadly, we are coming full circle: separate and unequal; separate but equal; equal; and now separate again. That’s not why so many — both black and white — sacrificed so much in the fight for civil rights.

Let’s whitewash the controversy about Rachel’s Dolezal’s race and instead focus on building a nation where people are not judged by their skin, but, as a famous man once said, by the content of their character.

No principle could be more … black and white.

Rachel Dolezal Truth Matters

Black White Child Poverty Rate Same *

Here’s a fact the progressives who control the establishment voices and who seek to keep the country in permanent division try to keep hidden: The poverty rate for black and white children is exactly the same at 8 percent IF the children are in a married couple family. Black White Child Poverty Rate Same -- The poverty rate for black and white children is 8 percent IF the children are in a married couple family

For white children in single-mother families it is 33 percent. For black children in single-mother families it is 49 percent.

It should be further noted that 54 percent of white children are in married couple families compared to just 17 percent of black children.

Solving the nation’s poverty and crime problem is not as complicated as some would have us believe.

Black White Child Poverty Rate Same *

Tom Burlington Sues Fox29

Award-winning TV reporter Tom Burlington, who is white, is claiming that racism is the basis of Philadelphia’s Fox 29 failure to renew his contract in 2007.

And the lawsuit that he filed in 2009 has been finally green-lighted to go to trial.  U.S. District Judge Barclay Surrick wrote a memorandum last month This case has been pending for over five years. We will not further delay its resolution by permitting “piecemeal review and its attendant delays and waste of time.”

What Burlington says happened is that during a June 23, 2007 discussion about a possible story regarding a mock funeral of the word “nigger” by the Philadelphia Youth Council of the NAACP, Burlington said “nigger.”

Burlington was to co-anchor the show that night with Joyce Evans, who did not attend the meeting. It came back to Ms. Evans, who is black, what he said. She made a complaint the next day to the station’s Assistant News Director, Leslie Tyler, who is also black.

Joyce Evans Tom Burlington Sues Fox29
We kind of doubt that Joyce Evans understands what it’s like to be called a “nigger” at least by a white person.

Burlington claims that Ms. Evans told him “Because you’re white you can never understand what it’s like to be called a nigger and … you cannot use the word nigger”

Burlington says Ms. Evans then encouraged fellow employees to denounce him to management.

He said he was forced to meet with the station’s Department of Human Resources, Ameena Ali, who is black. She asked him to give his side of the story. He did verbatim. “Tom, you’re still saying that word; why are you doing that?” said said according to court papers.

Burlington was suspended.

Tom Burlington Sues Fox29
We have no doubt that Tom Burlinton understands what Franz Kafka was getting at when he wrote The Trial.

Burlington says he apologized to the station’s black employees, was given a stern warning in writing, and made to undergo racial-sensitivity training.

It wasn’t enough. The station told Burlington on July 12, 2007, after 20 years his contract would not be renewed.

Ms. Evans remains the anchor of the weekend “Fox 29 News at Six.”

Hopefully, Burlington takes these gutless fools and bigots for everything they have. While it is sign of immaturity and low intelligence to be pointlessly offensive — which Tom Burlington by all accounts  wasn’t — it is a sign of evil to be merciless.

Speech codes and political correctness have no place in true journalism, which the establishment media has long since stopped practicing.  It is time to start destroying them. Speech codes and political correctness, that is. The old media is doing just a fine job destroying itself. Enjoy your vacation Brian Williams. What are the odds comedian Jon Stewart replaces him?

Tom Burlington Sues Fox29

Philly Paramedic Calls Police “Real Enemy”

Philly Paramedic Calls Police "Real Enemy"

Marcell Salters, a Philadelphia Fire Department paramedic, posted the above picture on Instagram with the caption “Our real enemy…need 2 stop pointing guns at each other & at the ones that’s legally killing innocents.”

Salters is paid by the city of Philadelphia and has to work on a daily basis with Philadelphia Police.

The image comes from a music video for “Hands Up” a rap song by Uncle Murda and Maino.

Salters then doubled down and said in a since-deleted Facebook post: “never did or will like police.. . .Because of what i do i have to work with them but dont have to like them,”

Mayor Michael Nutter appropriately condemned Salters calling what he did “reprehensible”  and directed Fire Commissioner Derrick Sawyer to investigate. Salters posted the photo off duty, but If it is found that, as expected, Salters made a comment about the post while on duty he will be disciplined.

The song “Hands Up” is a response to the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, black men who died last summer at the hands of white police officers.

Brown was shot, Aug. 9,  while charging Ferguson, Mo. Police Officer Darren Wilson after committing a strong-arm robbery of a convenience store

Garner died after police wrestled him to the ground when he became upset while being arrested on July 19 for selling cigarettes illegally in Staten Island, New York City.

Garner is the more sympathetic figure as his crime did not involve hurting anyone and he did not appear to be trying to hurt the arresting officers.

Still, police are not the ones who write the often stupid laws they are required to enforce and it borders on slander to say that murder — the desire to see the subject dead rather than in custody — was in the arresting officers’ hearts in either of these instances.

Through the first nine months of this year, Chester, Pa. had 24 murders with all of the victims being black. As the city’s population is but 34,000 this gave it one of the highest murder rates in the world.

On Sept.26, a massive sweep by police netted 35 men — all black — who were running a drug gang in the city.

We believe there has not been a murder in the city since.

The police are not the enemy of blacks.

Philly Paramedic Calls Police “Real Enemy”

Holder Ferguson Response Fails To Mention Fed Charges

Attorney General Eric Holder in the wake of the Nov. 24  grand jury exoneration of Officer Darren Wilson for the Aug. 9 shooting of Michael Brown released his blueprint for a federal response.

He said the steps they were taking were:

  1.  Creating a new task force to promote the expansion of 21st century community-oriented policing.
  2.  Reforming how the federal government equips local law enforcement, particularly with military-style equipment.
  3.  Advancing the use of body-worn cameras and promoting proven community policing initiatives.

Notice what’s not on the list? That’s right, no federal civil rights charges.

It’s actually what was predicted by those who know the law.

It’s a shame that President Obama wasted the time of those Ferguson protestors by implying the shooting was racially motivated and unjustified.

Here is Holder’s Dec. 2 press release:

Following Michael Brown’s tragic death, millions of people across the nation and around the world have focused their attention on unfolding events in Ferguson, both grieving together and making their voices heard.

In recent days, many have been captivated by ongoing developments, anguished emotions, peaceful protests — and, too often, deeply unfortunate images of unnecessary destruction. And this tragic incident has sparked a necessary, national conversation about the need to ensure trust and build strong relationships between law enforcement officials and the communities they serve.

Events in Ferguson have revealed a deep distrust between a community and its police force. But this reality is not limited to one location. Other communities around this country know this struggle all too well. And it’s abundantly clear that every single one of us has a role to play in tackling this problem together, as a nation — to identify those things that bind us, and to be honest with one another about the things that continue to divide us.

In August, President Obama ordered a review of federal funding and programs that provide equipment to state and local law enforcement agencies. Yesterday, the Administration released that review’s findings — and announced key next steps to strengthen the trust in and effectiveness of the policing of our communities.

Learn more about yesterday’s announcements, and the findings of the Administration’s review.

Here are the next steps we’re taking:

  1. Creating a new task force to promote the expansion of 21st century community-oriented policing.
  2. Reforming how the federal government equips local law enforcement, particularly with military-style equipment.
  3. Advancing the use of body-worn cameras and promoting proven community policing initiatives.

I know this has been a difficult time for people in Ferguson, and for many others across the country. It will take time for things to get better. But as I assured Ferguson residents during my visit there, in August, the Obama administration is firmly committed to making the progress we need — and that all of our citizens deserve.

The changes that the President announced yesterday are exactly the sorts of programmatic steps that will bring the right people together to engage in a constructive, national conversation — so we can build trust, address persistent concerns, and protect public safety while respecting the rights of every American.

Last Tuesday, addressing the public, the President said, “[to] those who are prepared to work constructively, your President will work with you.” I am committed to answering the President’s call to see this through — as are the men and women of the United States Department of Justice.

Learn more about yesterday’s announcements here — and spread the word to anyone who wants to know how we’re moving forward as a nation.

Thank you,

Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Holder Ferguson Response Fails To Mention Fed Charges

Holder Ferguson Response Fails To Mention Fed Charges

Ferguson Considerations

Ferguson Considerations
By Chris Freind

Right on cue, Ferguson, Mo., erupted in chaos after the “No Indictment” grand jury verdict.

Two things are abundantly clear:

A. The system worked. Despite the certainty of riots, and the very real threat of harm to themselves should they not indict, the 12 grand jury members had the courage to make the right call.

B. Modern America has shown its true “colors” yet again, regressing further from the high point of the civil rights movement. A growing faction, through their actions and words, have completely rejected the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., wanting nothing to do with his belief in a colorblind society. Instead, they are choosing to fight, literally, for a segregated America, one that favors one class over another. To so callously trample on the sacrifices made by America’s civil rights pioneers is abominable.

Here are the black-and-white observations of the Ferguson debacle:

1. What genius decided to tell the world that the grand jury reached a verdict, but wouldn’t announce the decision until hours later? Doing so only increased the tension and allowed protesters to mass at key locations. Most idiotic, why would they wait until after dark to announce it?

Everything should have already been secured, begging the question: What the hell have they been doing for the last week? The evening announcement simply defied belief because it gave rioters the tactical advantage of operating with near-impunity, since the night provided a cloak of invisibility to their actions and identities. Brilliant.

2. What’s the point of mobilizing Patton’s Third Army if you take a hands-off approach from the get-go? Doing so was either sheer incompetence or a deliberate attempt to placate the masses. So the message is, no matter how big law enforcement’s presence, you can riot with without consequence if you just yell “racism” and “police brutality.” The bad guys gamed the system, and those in charge took the bait. So much for the National Guard and the governor’s “state of emergency.”

3. The national media has shown itself to be a laughingstock. The sensationalistic and often shoddy reporting is bad enough (sorry, but there were never “tanks” rolling through Ferguson). But their stammering, constant redundancy and overall inarticulateness demonstrated that without the crutch of a teleprompter, many are pathetic. And they should also get their hearing checked, since many kept asking questions that had already been answered. (For the last time: the vote of the grand jury, by statute, is confidential. Stop asking that question.)

4. Critics accused the prosecutor of giving too much information to the jurors. No, that’s not a joke, but an actual complaint. So in other words, providing every piece of evidence to get to the bottom of what really happened was a bad thing. The only people who could possibly make that argument are those whose minds were made up months ago, facts be damned.

5. Speaking of facts, only the grand jury had them. They sifted through mounds of testimony and physical evidence to determine which witnesses were credible, and just as important, which were not. Yet that is completely disregarded by many who, rather than accept the truth, want to blame everyone and everything for Michael Brown’s death. The rule of law is clear, and the grand jury made the right decision. The spectacle of people resorting to violence under the fallacy that racism was involved is more appropriate for some other spot on the globe. That behavior is inherently un-American.

6. Some have been protesting since the shooting took place Aug. 9. Since the jurors were the only ones with full knowledge of what occurred, what was actually being protested?

7. The Brown family didn’t help their cause by recently testifying before the United Nations Committee on Torture: “… we have to bring it (the shooting incident) to the U.N. so they can expose it to the rest of the world, what’s going on in small-town Ferguson.” They certainly have the right to disagree with the grand jury and the entire judicial process, but this is still America. We don’t answer to the United Nations for issues involving domestic law. That was a major mistake, as it alienated many who may have been sympathetic to the family’s plight.

8. The feds’ investigation is ongoing, but it shouldn’t be, as it violates Constitutional protections against double jeopardy. And the odds could well be stacked unfairly against Officer Darren Wilson if federal grand jurors, after witnessing the bedlam in Ferguson, are afraid of being responsible for another riot. We’ve seen it before, when Los Angeles policemen were imprisoned when a federal jury found them guilty in the Rodney King case after they were acquitted by the state. To think the federal jurors didn’t base their decision in light of the L.A. riots that followed is fantasy.

9. Finally, no matter which “side” one takes, Brown’s death is a tragedy. It’s time to address the many issues that have been given lip service but, in truth, ignored for so long, from education to incarceration. That conversation is one that requires difficult work, and can only be solved if people are willing to look at reality. But don’t hold your breath, for as a wise man once said: “There’s what people want to hear, there’s what people want to believe, there’s everything else – and then there’s the truth.”

The black and white truth is that, unless we genuinely commit to working together in a colorblind way, America will continue to burn.

Ferguson Considerations

2012 Lessons Still Have Merit

Donna Ellingsen of Chester County submitted a couple of links concerning commentary by Bryon Donalds written a few months after Obama’s 2012 victory.

They still have merit and are worth reading. Here they are:

http://www.shestokas.com/guest-commentary-reflections/byron-donalds-the-talk-part-i-what-happened-in-the-2012-elections/

http://www.shestokas.com/guest-commentary-reflections/byron-donaldsthe-talk-part-ii-the-same-mistakes-by-the-gop/

Donalds is black and one of his points is that Republicans can win black voters if they put a little effort into it.

And of course, he’s right.

There are indications that this is starting to occur — thank you Rand Paul.

Skin color and ethnicity, ultimately, are irrelevant. What only makes them important in the short term are subjective things which can be fairly summed up in one word: bigotry.

Democrat activists — or their leaders anyway — count on keeping people divided and hateful of each other to keep their large, tax-funded rice bowls filled. They expect blacks, who have far more in common with Tea Party types than those who live in wealthy exclusive communities that now overwhelmingly vote D, to never catch on.

They will.

There has been scaremongering about some reports that America will lose its “white” majority by 2050.  Leaving aside the tendency that these predictions fail, we would infinitely rather live in a land run by freedom-loving, Christian-conservative Black/Latino/Asians/mixed than one by “progressive”, feudalistic, “I-think-I’m-smarter-than-you” whites.

Thank you Donna.

Byron Donalds 2012 Lessons Still Have Merit

Byron Donalds
2012 Lessons Still Have Merit