Montco Wrongly Credits Ex And Now Wants Her Home Says Woman

Montco Wrongly Credits Ex And Now Wants Her Home Says Woman — There are two sides to domestic disputes but this is Elaine Mickman’s. And if her ex-husband is earning millions and has cut his child off, shame on him. The government should not even need to be involved for him to help his son. Of course, the truly troubling thing is Ms. Mickman’s claim that Montco officials are seeking her assets because of what she says is a phony overpayment recorded for her ex-husband by a county employee. We will be keeping an eye on it and we doubt the matter is over.

To the Editor

My youngest child’s support was prematurely and illegally terminated December 2018 by Domestic Relations without due process and a required hearing that I “timely” and properly requested in writing.

Montgomery County has been silencing and suppressing my reports of employee corruption when the fraud is anti-family, harms me, endangered my child(ren), and caused the County and state to lose millions of dollars of Federal Title IV-D Matching Funding for many years, begging to wonder what or why would employees do this, and why would public officials ignore complaints and remain complicit other than “currying favors” to receive “personal benefits”.

My 2003 child support case evolved into Domestic Relations employee(s) substituting Montgomery County as a party to my case after the Support Obligor (father/my Ex residing in UK since December 2002) withdrew his Jan. 28, 2019 Petition seeking for me (100 percent physical time custodial/residential caretaker) or our minor autistic son, the child support recipient, to pay father/Ex child support because a county employee entered a $550,000 credit for Ex.

This action violated Federal Regulations/Codes which requires support payments to be sent in to the state automated system and disbursed to the custodial/residential caretaker. The credit created a “phony” overpayment so that my child or myself owes Ex child support!

I received zero divorce settlement and I have a zero-earning capacity by court order. I also was medically approved by Social Security as Permanently Disabled because I have four crushed cervical discs in my neck from domestic abuse, therefore I am dependent upon SSI (Social Security Disability).

I have been a full-time homemaker mom for 37 years without employment history since I was 19 years old.

After I raised Federal Regulation and Code violations in my Answer/Response objecting and refuting Ex’s Jan. 28, 2019 Petition, he withdrew his Petition on Feb. 11, 2019, most likely because he doesn’t want to bring attention since he earns millions of dollars per year and was defeating the entry of large child support orders.

Regardless that Ex withdrew his Petition Feb. 11, 2019, Montgomery County substituted itself as a party to my case by continuing to charge the child support so that I, or my child owe the County child support since Montgomery County has been operating an “asset-forfeiture” scheme to “collect” as much money as possible to “line their own pockets/pensions” while funding a new half- billion dollar judicial “campus”, BUT financially burdening the residents, especially targeting those in family court, with supporting a “sanctuary city”.

FYI, Pennsylvania law 23 Title 4604 prohibits liens on the primary residence public assistance recipients, therefore the County would have to illegally Sheriff my house to seek the “phony” overpayment created by corrupt Montgomery County employees, but the County can also incarcerate a person for non-payment of child support or suspend their Driver’s License.

The County Officials have violated their Oath by “assaulting” and/or abandoning the PA Constitution.

This is not complex or complicated. Corrupt County employees are abusing their positions, power, and authority, for no explainable reason other than receiving “personal benefits”, BUT at the loss of Federal funding for the County and state, and at the suffering and hardship of my child and myself.

I have records as proof, and have a sworn statement documenting what occurred, as well as that of a witness to the proceedings.

(You can’t make this stuff up)

Regards, Elaine Mickman

Montco Wrongly Credits Ex And Now Wants Her Home Says Woman
Montco Wrongly Credits Ex

One thought on “Montco Wrongly Credits Ex And Now Wants Her Home Says Woman”

  1. Everything in Elaine Mickman’s statement is true. I am a first-person witness to the abuse she has suffered during Domestic Relations proceedings. I accompanied Elaine on three different occasions. One before Hearing Officer Sharon Harcarik and two before Support Master Patricia Coucher. The first time I was to accompany Elaine was before Support Master Mindy Harris, but I was unlawfully denied entry. While Elaine was in that hearing with Mindy Harris, I demanded to meet with Gary Kline, Director of Domestic Relations. I did meet with him. He was rude, condescending and insulting to Elaine.

    Gary Kline is retiring this month after 20 years of abusing his position and authority. He will leave without an investigation or retribution.

    Let’s not forget about the judges, under the leadership of President Judge Thomas DelRicci. The judges write the illegal orders that Gary Kline follows. The judges summarily block due process by denying appeals.

    As I said, I am a witness to what Elaine describes. Why is no one else asking for an investigation?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.