Paycheck Protection Benefits Teachers

 By Matthew J. Brouillette Pope Says Redistribute Wealth

Pennsylvania’s AFL-CIO union boss Rick Bloomingdale is absolutely right that there is a “war on workers” here in Pennsylvania—he should know, because he is waging it. His recent opinion piece on PennLive tries, and fails, to defend the indefensible, getting the facts wrong in the process.

What has Bloomingdale so upset?

It’s a proposal that would simply stop using public resources to collect union campaign contributions and political money for government unions.

Far from an attack on workers, this reform would actually give union members a stronger voice in how their dues and campaign dollars are spent. It is not anti-union. It is pro-worker.

If Rick Bloomingdale were interested in protecting the middle class, he’d be standing alongside teachers like Rob Brough rather than against them.

Just ask Rob Brough, a teacher in Pennsylvania who must pay fees to a government union, the Pennsylvania State Education Association, in order to keep his job.

“Their agenda and political ideals are counter to what I believe, and it is a kick in the teeth every time my dues are withdrawn from my hard-earned paycheck and handed off to some organization that I would never contribute to of my own free will,” Brough said.

Shouldn’t the PSEA have to look Rob in the face, ask him for his $680 in dues, and then explain how the union plans to spend it? Since Rob is forced to pay this money to keep his teaching job, isn’t it fair that he should be empowered to have a stronger voice in how his money is spent on politics?

Right now, the leaders of the PSEA and other government unions don’t have to do that. They can use taxpayer resources to collect campaign contributions and political money directly out of employees’ paychecks.

Not only is this unfair to taxpayers; it hurts the very workers government unions claim to represent. Union members are harmed because union bosses don’t have to explain the unions’ political expenditures to members.

That’s what the legislation Bloomingdale references would fix. And he’s wrong that it would affect “all unions”—it only affects government unions, the ones that represent people whose salaries we taxpayers pay.

Bloomingdale argues that ending this special legal privilege for government unions and requiring them to play by the same rules as everyone else “singles out unions only for unnecessary and burdensome rules and restrictions.”

In reality, it is teachers like Rob who are singled out for onerous and unfair restrictions on their hard-earned money—not union bosses.

Imagine if the National Rifle Association or Planned Parenthood demanded taxpayers pay for the collection of their lobbying funds and campaign contributions. They would be ridiculed and rejected – and rightfully so.

Government unions enjoy this same benefit of using your township, borough, city, and state tax dollars to collect their political money and deny union members the ability to hold their union bosses more accountable. No other private or political organization enjoys this financial and political privilege.

Unions can – and should – play by the same rules as everyone else. One questions how viable and relevant government unions are today if, as Bloomingdale implies, they are so dependent on taxpayer subsidies that they would have to close up shop should they lose this exclusive legal privilege.

Paycheck protection would do one thing: Stop the use of taxpayer resources for politics. That, in turn, would set teachers free, allowing them to make their own choices with their own money. It won’t end collective bargaining or keep unions from collecting dues. They would simply have to do it themselves.

Protecting the paychecks of union members and taxpayers is supported statewide. No less than three separate polls of Pennsylvanians reveal overwhelming support for ending Bloomingdale’s exclusive legal privilege.

One survey of likely voters revealed that 79 percent of voters (and 75 percent of union members) agree that unions should not be permitted to use taxpayer-funded resources to collect government union dues.

The public gets it because no other political group enjoys such privileges on the taxpayers’ dime. There is no greater pro-worker and pro-taxpayer proposal than ending the taxpayer-funded collection of dues and campaign contributions for government unions.

If Bloomingdale were truly interested in protecting the middle class, he’d be standing alongside teachers like Rob Brough rather than against them.

Matthew Brouillette is president and CEO of Commonwealth Foundation

Paycheck Protection Benefits Teachers

 

Education Bills Jan 2014 Before Pa Senate

The Pennsylvania House, last week, sent several education bills to the Senate according to State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) Education Bills Jan 2014 Before Pa Senate

House Bill 1411, also known as SchoolWATCH, would direct the Pennsylvania Department of Education to create a searchable online database detailing the revenues and expenditures of traditional, charter and cyber school districts across the Commonwealth. The bill follows the model of PennWATCH, which was created to allow Pennsylvania residents to see how tax dollars are being used by state agencies.

House Bill 1741 would require school boards to provide at least 48 hours of public notice prior to voting upon any proposed collective bargaining agreement or employment contract.

House Bill 1738 would create a commission to study basic education funding and develop a formula that takes into account each school district’s market value/personal income aid ratio, equalized millage rate, geographic price differences, enrollment levels, local support and other factors.

House Bill 1816 would allow Pennsylvania’s teachers, guidance counselors and other school administrators to receive necessary continuing education credits if they visit certain manufacturing facilities. These visits would take educators to manufacturers for in-person tours and orientation programs in manufacturing facilities with the goal of ensuring students are more familiar with available opportunities in the modern high-tech manufacturing industry.

House Bill 1878 would create the Pennsylvania Workforce Investment Strategy (Pa WInS) program, which would offer tax credits to businesses to organize and collaborate with each other to address common personnel needs and training shortfalls and then develop employee training programs and implement them with readily-available pre-existing infrastructure.

Education Bills Jan 2014 Before Pa Senate

 

We Won’t Kill Anybody: Overcoming Civil Rights Disconnect

We Won’t Kill Anybody: Overcoming Civil Rights Disconnect
By Father Frank Pavone

Our nation again approaches the Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday, and I will again be with Dr. King’s family on that day.

Many people understand the connection between the civil rights movement and the pro-life movement thanks to the work of Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. Her father, Rev. A.D. Williams King, was Martin’s brother. She began working with me full time at Priests for Life as our Director of African-American Outreach in 2004.

She and I have been together with her family at many events both happy and sad, including the annual observances of the national Martin Luther King Jr. holiday at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, and the 50th anniversary celebration of the “I Have a Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. On these occasions, we have been privileged to enjoy some of the most soaring oratory of our day, and some of the most articulate speeches about civil rights, justice, equality and freedom that one can ever hear. Time and time again, I have been energized and inspired by these speeches, and moved to recommit myself to the pursuit of justice and equality for every human being.

But therein also comes the pain and a glaring disconnect. The deepest human emotion and commitment to justice is evoked as speaker after speaker decries violence in the streets, senseless shootings, vast numbers of young people in prison, social inequities and economic injustices, and the horrors of war — to mention a few. But what is never mentioned is the violence of abortion, and the need to secure justice and equality for the child in the womb. Alveda and I have both felt the disconnect so intensely at these gatherings that, amidst the loud applause, we sometimes say out loud, “And the children too! Don’t forget the children in the womb!” We were indeed gratified when, on a single occasion (the MLK Holiday observance at Ebenezer in January of 2013), the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, in his keynote address, mentioned the need to protect all life, including the womb.

That is the kind of consistency that then gives credibility to the cry for justice and equality in all the other contexts that are mentioned.

At that recent 50th Anniversary celebration, we heard the assertions,  “There are still too many lives taken by violence… I dream of a world that does not hold anyone back…We can’t move ahead while some people are falling behind…We must protect the most fundamental rights we have…” No reference was made to the right to life of the youngest children.

And hence the pro-life movement declares today, “There are indeed too many lives taken by the violence of abortion… We dream of the world that does not hold the unborn back…We can’t move ahead while children in the womb are falling behind…We must protect the most fundamental right we have, the right to life.”

On Christmas of 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. preached the following words: “The next thing we must be concerned about if we are to have peace on earth and good will toward men is the nonviolent affirmation of the sacredness of all human life. Every man is somebody because he is a child of God…Man is more than …whirling electrons or a wisp of smoke …. Man is a child of God, made in His image, and therefore must be respected as such….And when we truly believe in the sacredness of human personality, we won’t exploit people, we won’t trample over people with the iron feet of oppression, we won’t kill anybody.”

Indeed, we won’t kill anybody, including the children in the womb.

Father Pavone’s website can be found here.

A Novena in Reparation for Roe vs. Wade is being held through Jan. 22.  The prayer is:

God and Father of Life,
You have created every human person,
And have opened the way for each to have eternal
life.

We live in the shadow of death.
Tens of millions of your children have been
killed
because of the Roe vs. Wade decision legalizing
abortion.

Father, have mercy on us.
Heal our land
And accept our offering of prayer and penance.
In your love for us,
Turn back the scourge of abortion.

May each of us exult in hearts full of hope
And hands full of mercy
And work together to build a culture of life.

We pray through Christ our Lord. Amen.

PCMH Bill Passes Pa House

PCMH Bill Passes Pa HouseThe Pennsylvania House, this week, unanimously sent to the Senate a measure to  improve patient care and reduce health care costs through the development of a Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Advisory Council for the state’s Medicaid program, says State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

House Bill 1655 promotes the PCMH model that allows a primary care physician or nurse practitioner to act as the primary  contact for medical care. This model is especially effective for those with chronic diseases that require one or more specialists. Doctors, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists and others would communicate to ensure the patient is receiving coordinated care, which includes making sure the patient does not undergo duplicative testing, receive important routine exams, and is alerted when immunizations are needed.

Twenty-six other states have  launched PCMH initiatives within their Medicaid programs on a state or regional level. Private insurers also are already using PCMH models.

 PCMH Bill Passes Pa House

Chris Christie Fight Now

 By Chris Freind

An letter to Gov. Chris Christie

Dear Gov. Christie:

By now we’ve heard, ad nauseam, all the “what if’s” regarding your embattled governorship. What if you knew that lanes on the George Washington Bridge were closed for political retribution? What if you covered it up? Most damning, what if you ordered it?

The pundits on both sides, of course, are having a field day predicting your political future as governor and possible presidential candidate. But most of them are agenda-driven and don’t know their heads from their derrieres, so their input is largely irrelevant.

Since much of what will unfold in Bridgegate is out of your hands, the real question isn’t what might happen to you, but what you will do to retake control in order to win back your credibility and rebuild your national image. If you play your cards right, governor, the current slide can be reversed and your second term can meet the same level of success as the first — as you remain a viable national candidate.

Here’s how:

It is imperative that you get back to your roots — immediately. Use your ace-in-the-hole that no other politician in America has, but all envy: being a “regular guy,” aka, just being Chris Christie. Your unique ability to speak directly to the people — articulately, brusquely, and, when needed, right in their faces, be they voters, press or opponents — has met with unparalleled success.

From eschewing the teleprompter and talking off-the-cuff on a wide range of issues in a way that even the most non-political person can understand, to your self-deprecating humor, the “Christie model” is exactly what Americans are seeking. As your last election showed, while many may disagree with you, they support you anyway because they know where you stand. People will choose conviction and passion in their leader any day over spineless, vacillating hacks.

Why mention this? Because too often we see individuals, businesses and sports teams deviate from the game plans that earned them success. Rather than stay the course, many completely change who they are in a misguided attempt to meet a new challenge or survive a crisis. Chris Christie cannot achieve success — and can’t beat this scandal — if he tones down his press conferences, appears more stoic, and keeps quiet until the storm passes. You must be stronger than the storm — or your career will soon be a bridge under troubled waters.

So with all due respect, Guv, go after your critics, hard, right now. Take the fight to them by addressing the accusations head-on.

Who better a spokesman than you to tout the strength and fortitude of New Jerseyans who faced literal hell getting their state back on track? Who is more identifiable with Jersey than the man who spearheaded the reconstruction efforts? And who demonstrates to a nation in desperate want of bipartisanship the true meaning of “working together,” shoving political considerations aside and reaching across the aisle to get things done, helping people and businesses get on their feet again?

Absolutely no one. So don’t run from those things; embrace them.

And, using campaign money, launch a series of ads that not only tout your accomplishments but blast the hacks who, believing you are weakened, are criticizing you and your family for appearing in public service ads that promoted a rebuilt New Jersey after Sandy’s devastating blow. (Just as the entire Gulf region did after the BP oil spill).

Political opportunists are already requesting federal investigations into the public service ads, but, more disconcerting, they are doing so without so much of a whimper from you, governor. Say it ain’t so! Don’t let them get away with it — or we all lose.

The hacks are already trying to derail your second-term agenda by using Bridgegate to marginalize you, despite the overwhelming number of Garden staters who just sent you back to Trenton. It’s time to off take the gloves, as only Chris Christie can, and beat them to a pulp.

Tell them that their tactics will not be tolerated, that you will unequivocally not allow New Jersey to stagnate for the next four years, and that the successes already achieved, but need to be expanded upon, will not rot away because of partisan politics.

Your opponents, Republican and Democrat, are smelling blood, hurling everything they can at you — legitimacy and truth be damned — in the hopes of a knockout. And the pundits say you have to “play nice” to get through this challenge.

So do the opposite. Unleash holy hell and tell them to reap the whirlwind, as Chris Christie isn’t going away. Be the bull in a china shop that we have not just come to expect, but love. By addressing the criticisms, and outright slander, in the way that only you can, you will rekindle support overnight with the only ones who really matter: the people.

I have championed many of your causes (pension reform, fiscal responsibility, strong leadership in the face of seemingly impossible odds) and, as a fair commentator, have also been critical (the helicopter flap, the weight issue, taxpayer money for Seaside Heights businesses, and your handling of the DRPA).

But above all, I, along with millions, respect your aggressiveness and no-nonsense, tell-the-truth approach. Therefore, I implore you, governor, to remain true to who you are and go with what brought you. It’s your only way to avoid being on a bridge to nowhere.

The 2016 election is fast approaching. It would be a great disservice to all Americans if Chris Christie were not among the candidates. Godspeed, governor.

Chris Christie Fight Now

 

Obamacare Liberation Manifesto

The chat below represents a spontaneous chat this morning (Jan. 17) on Facebook. I called it a manifesto, because it seems only right wingers have them (sarcasm noted). The names have been altered for the sake of their privacy;

Pat Carfagno: Its not something I like to make the focus of my life, but I have MS. I had wonderful health insurance and pharm coverage. I have all but lost my pharm coverage with the advent of Obamacare and its affect on private insurance. It is so restrictive as to be useless for someone with chronic illness. A broad look at the changes shows the deliberate isolation of specialty drugs from folks like me. Where the insurance that I worked for, was once a successful attempt at personal responsibility, I am now to be responsible for 50 Grand a year out of pocket. It might as well be a million.

I assure you all that I am not alone in this. As the year progresses, more and more people will discover that they have been targeted for costs savings by insurance companies with the permission and blessing of Obamacare. The chronically ill will find out first. It is only as boomers are diagnosed with illness will they find out that they have been similarly targeted.

There is a “free drug” program for me to apply for. Then, at the end of your life, (or before) the government comes to liquidate your assets for your “privilege” of getting “free” drug. I will not bankrupt my family for the ‘common good’.

Note that this confiscation is what politicians mean when they use the phrase “means testing”.

Yippee.

Still waiting for paperwork (application). But its already been months. It seems as if you can have free drug on the taxpayers dime. The drug company will “give” you drug, but the taxpayer fully reimburses the drug company for the full 50 grand. I will not be part of such an evil thing by participating even though this decision may have a profound effect on my quality of life.

(responses)

Sam: Government at it best! Just like Social security, medicare etc.\

Anna: A woman that has a hysterectomy had to carry it…just in case. A women over the age of 65 has to carry it…CHILDREN may have to carry it as well…just in case. Idiocy. Real. True. Idiocy.

Beth: The libs have turned America into a communal village, next we’ll be sharing bathrooms. I just abhor what the socialist/Marxist are doing to this Nation.

Pat Carfagno; I thank God that he is in charge of the plan of my life and not any man.

I am posting this chat because I think the posts linked together make an especially coherent explanation of the situation Americans will find themselves in sooner, rather than later, which I have thus far been unable to express. Note that the taxpayer will now pay the drug company for their products rather than the private drug insurance program in which I have been enrolled.

Note further that elite leftist pattern of having our children pay
for their elders freebies remains in overdrive in this and all
government ponzi schemes.

God Save Us.

Pat Carfagno’s Freedom Radio Rocks can be found here.

Obamacare Liberation Manifesto

Bridge Over Troubled Christie

And so it begins! The 2016 presidential election is officially under way as we witness the first huge issue for the Republican frontrunner, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Opponents on both the right and left are hammering him over the “Bridgegate” scandal in which he is engulfed, and we will soon see how much intestinal fortitude the big man really has.

Cutting through the media hype, here is a frank analysis of the situation:

1. We can’t overstate the obvious. First, if Christie discovered the truth behind lane closures on the George Washington Bridge but covered it up, his presidential aspirations end immediately. Far worse, if he ordered, or agreed to, the closures, he would face impeachment, and probably indictment.

Second, (and from this point let’s assume Christie didn’t know anything), the abject stupidity of those who closed several lanes on the world’s busiest bridge for political retribution (because the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee didn’t endorse Christie) may not be the dumbest thing ever, but since it could affect world history, ranks in the top three.

Here’s the kicker: If anyone was going to be blamed for the four days of gridlock — where a 30-minute commute turned into four hours on the first day of school and the anniversary of 9/11 — it wouldn’t have been the Fort Lee mayor, but Christie himself. Even the most nonpolitical person knows that closing lanes on the George Washington Bridge is an order that comes only from the top.

So let’s recap: Here’s a plan that engages in retribution that hurts your own guy, gets you fired and will possibly land you in federal prison. Brilliant.

2. It was totally unnecessary. The re-election strategy was sound — tout bipartisan support in “blue” New Jersey as a trump card for the forthcoming presidential campaign. And Christie succeeded. So what if a few didn’t “play ball?” An endorsement (or lack thereof) by the mayor of Fort Lee has not, nor will it ever, affect national electoral politics. So why not just ignore him? Christie was going to win in a landslide, so anything jeopardizing that monumental victory was simply idiotic.

A comparison of Bridgegate and Watergate is in order. President Richard Nixon, like Christie, was a shoe-in for re-election, so there was no need to expend one second on anything that could derail the campaign and, ultimately, the administration. Whether rooted in paranoia or revenge, both actions show an unprecedented arrogance bordering on psychotic.

3. Christie’s staff — not just those responsible, but all who knew — showed an unconscionable lack of foresight. Common sense tells us that at least some other high-ranking officials close to Christie knew what had transpired, even if they had nothing to do with it. If their mission was to insulate Christie by giving him plausible deniability, they were woefully wrong. These things can never be kept under wraps, as it’s usually not the crime, but the cover-up that bites one in the derriere.

A trusted adviser should have told the governor everything, sparing no detail, so that a press conference could have been held — in October, before the election — shedding light on the situation, firing those involved, and apologizing to the Fort Lee mayor. That way, Christie would have been in front of the scandal, managing it on his terms and preventing it from spiraling out of control. Instead, because staff presumably chose to hide it, the story has a life of its own, and Christie finds himself on the defensive, with the seed of doubt now sown as to “how much he really knew.”

Most ironic, had Christie jumped on this before the election, he would have won by an even bigger margin.

Too bad for the governor that his people forgot the adage that “the truth shall set you free.”

4. Because of No. 3, the floodgates now open. Legitimate or not, attacks on Christie are coming from every direction on issues from A to Z, which will cumulatively take their toll on his up-to-now impenetrable armor. Before Bridgegate, these criticisms wouldn’t stick to Christie, whose stellar track record and brash charisma were enough to slam opponents into the dirt. But that doesn’t cut it anymore. Christie is bleeding and sharks from both parties are circling. Employing the “if you throw enough stuff against the wall, something will stick” attack mentality, Christie’s adversaries have him on the defensive for the foreseeable future.

5. Despite his tough-guy persona, Christie has never been tested by adversity. He had universal support in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Yes, he faced a Democratic Legislature and accomplished great things, but expectations for success in a hyper-partisan atmosphere were low. He faced a weak, underfunded opponent for re-election and, truth be told, got lucky when facing a beleaguered and unpopular Jon Corzine in 2009, when it was a fantastically good time to be a Republican.

Times like these separate the men from the boys. How Christie responds to the largest crisis of his life will determine if higher office remains viable.

6. Christie already faced the “Seinfeld factor” nationally. While Seinfeld’s New York humor played well on both coasts, much of it was lost on Americans in the heartland. Likewise, Christie’s brusque, in-your-face style would have been a significant obstacle to overcome in Middle America. Now matters are compounded exponentially, as dispelling the stereotypical rough-and-tumble New York/New Jersey political image, to which we on the coasts are desensitized, just got that much harder. Translation: This stuff doesn’t play well in places like Iowa and New Hampshire.

7. Can we please stop the double standards from both sides? The left is making this out as far worse than the IRS scandal, in which the agency targeted conservative political activists, and many on the right want to give Christie a pass because “he didn’t know about it.” They’re both off-base.

Christie supporters can’t have it both ways. If they exonerate the governor because they believe he was kept in the dark, the same courtesy must be extended to the president, since there is no hard evidence that he knew about the IRS actions. Yet, the right continues to blame Obama for what transpired. And while any form of political retribution using taxpayer-funded entities is flat-out wrong (and illegal), closing traffic lanes doesn’t remotely compare to deliberately targeting political opponents via the IRS. Yet, the outcry on the current scandal seems disproportionately greater than that of the IRS debacle. Go figure.

As an aside, it’s not surprising that some on the right are reveling in Christie’s troubles because he “isn’t conservative enough,” hoping the scandal knocks him out of the presidential race. That mentality is imbecilic, especially since, outside Christie, the GOP’s field is so weak. Once again, the right has shown its preference for infighting over winning. Well, congratulations. You just made Hillary the biggest winner of Bridgegate.

The road for Christie may become a bridge to nowhere. Many have a hard time believing that he didn’t know, given the direct involvement of his deputy chief of staff, campaign officials and his handpicked high school friends at the port authority. Whatever the truth, the Democrats now have some killer ads in their arsenal.

But if there is one man capable of not just surviving but beating the scandal, it’s Chris Christie. His bull-in-a-china-shop, say-it-like-it-is style has earned him millions of loyal supporters, but it’s his penchant for telling the truth and taking risks that most shun that should earn him something else: Our trust. And I, for one, still love the ring of “President Christie.” Keep fighting, governor.

Bridge Over Troubled Christie

 

Omnibit Trivia 1-17-14

January 17, 2014 Omnibit Trivia by William W. Lawrence Sr.

Mike Fink, the famous riverboat man, was a fighter and a boozer. One time, he and another heavy drinker took turns shooting at full whiskey glasses perched on top of their heads. Fink never did like the other gentleman. He aimed a couple of inches below the whiskey glass and put a hole in the middle of his forehead.