Pennsylvania Presidential Popular Vote Bill Pushed By Extremist Dems

Pennsylvania Presidential Popular Vote Bill Pushed By Extremist Dems— SB 270 was introduced, yesterday, July 9, to give Pennsylvania’s 20 electoral votes to the popular vote winner for President

The bill compels Pennsylvania to join The Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote plan being pushed by wannabe dictators.

The sponsors are extremist Democrats Daylin Leach (17), Steven Santarsiero (10), Wayne Fontana (42), Judith Schwank (11), Vincent Hughes (7) and Andrew Dinniman (19).

The Electoral College was largely devised by liberty-loving Founding Father Alexander Hamilton who considered it a bulwark against  “cabal, intrigue, and corruption.”

He was absolutely right. How many Americans are convinced in their hearts that massive vote fraud occurs in Democrat controlled big cities and college campuses? Probably about half. Think about it. Really, why the objection to a citizenship question on the census? Why the fight to keep illegals from being deported?

A close popular vote would never be accepted by the losing side.

Only fools or despots want to get rid of the Electoral College.

By the way, Hillary Clinton did not win the majority of the popular vote in 2016. Only a true fool can think 48.2 percent is a majority. Since 1992, only George W. Bush in 2004 and Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, got more than 50 percent of the vote. Only Obama in 2008 got more than 52 percent.

Hat tip Bobby Lawrence

Pennsylvania Presidential Popular Vote Bill Pushed By Extremist Dems
Pennsylvania Presidential Popular Vote Bill Pushed By Extremist Dems

3 thoughts on “Pennsylvania Presidential Popular Vote Bill Pushed By Extremist Dems”

  1. Just what we need, to render Pennsylvanians votes meaningless by joining an unconstitutional agreement.

  2. The Electoral College was largely devised by liberty-loving Founding Father Alexander Hamilton who considered it a bulwark against “cabal, intrigue, and corruption.”

    I consider this one of the most important sentences in your post, Bill. The Electoral College has worked for 231 years. Why should we throw it away now? You have a very astute perspective on this subject and I must say I agree with you.

  3. These drives to circumvent the Electoral College will probably not pass Constitutional muster, either.

    Progressives are still in concussion protocol from the 2016 election.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.