Seeing is Believing

The Roar

Seeing is Believing

I sadly mentioned, “never say never” and “seeing is believing” in my last submission.  These cautious phrases, from an article that was a bit presupposing, became regrettably pertinent to the ruling in the recent Obama ballot hearing in Georgia.

With this stunning decision, we all should take a step back and consider its magnitude.  Just how, in light of the evidence submitted, did Judge Mahili arrive at such a unprecedented conclusion.  His finding placed a recent State court decision over a Supreme Court ruling which has stood for well over 135 years.  This conclusion was so distant from the rule of law that it appears to be more of a case of judicial banditry rather than judicial deliberation based upon the defense of our nation’s Constitutional law.

Who can ignore the arrogance and Obama’s intent to deceive when entering a political contest in which he had to realize that he could not pass its constitutional requirements?  How does one gain the support from a major political party when it must be assumed that along with the aspiring candidate, others too were fully aware of the candidate’s shortcomings?  How to proceed? Why would this endeavor take place, when in fact that same political party had a popular and experienced alternative with immeasurable voter appeal?

That was approximately four years ago.  Now, the “whys” not only continue but take on a completely different shade of meanings.  We are compounding this obvious violation as if this monumental slip never took place.  Instead of saying, “oops, we made a mistake which we will rectify,” pro Obama forces seem arrogant with their continuation of such a basic and easily verified Constitutional violation.  Their position conveys a “so what” stance.

Combating our pre Civil War history, by proving that we are indeed free of such lingering sentiments, the democrat party wedged this appeal into our public subconscious and rode the ensuing emotional wave to victory.  Obama’s appeal seemed both personal and historical.

Only one problem.  Their creation became a hungry tiger which they tried to hold by its tail.   While the stratagem bore the expected election results, the subject threw off his reins for a head turning fevered pace.  This impatience out distanced the gradualist policies of his promoters.  Looking back to day one, this seems to be the probable case.

Today, after years of virtually never ending claims of an illegal Presidency, the requirement of being a “natural born citizen” has finally overtaken the bluster and fury from the birth certificate debate.  Comparing the two, it becomes evident that the birth issue was a stalling tactic which diverted much attention and weakened the public zeal for any conclusion with Obama’s birth qualifications.  Now, seemingly out of the blue, comes the issue of meeting the Constitutional requirements of being a “natural born citizen.”  Aside from its validity, the public now has a notion that it also will fail.  Also, the puzzling absence of Trump stirs futility.

Now consider just how patently easy the answer is to this question.  Even the absurd admission from Obama himself, that his father was not a citizen, is now ignored by this latest judicial injustice.  In its place, Judge Mahili cites a 2009 Indiana Court of Appeals ruling which incorrectly redefined the term “natural born citizen” to be children born within in the U.S.  This is insane since the Constitution explicitly differentiates between citizen and “natural born citizen” through its stipulation of “natural born.”

Judge Mahili is just the latest to emerge into the light of day while supporting this illegal Presidency.  At this late stage, it seems that the decision to support and defend Obama’s re-election bid has been made.  As such, any and all measures are now on the table.  This is not necessarily the manner in which this ongoing American transition was meant to take place but once this stallion was foolishly unbridled, the party had no other choice than to ride it to the end

Faced with an impatient President who very well may have America’s decline on his “things to do” list, what stands between his conquest and our freedom’s future may well rest upon those who place country over self, truth over promises.  The truth is that the constitution requires that presidential candidates must be “natural born citizens.”  This has been upheld and defined by our Supreme Court in 1875.  It is unbelievable that Obama first entered into this charade but more so, now that this issue has come out of the shadows, his audacity is something more than just a normal ambition.   It reflects upon  lawless actions!

One Presidential ballot in the sovereign State of Georgia may lead the charge for Constitutional integrity.  And its banner is truth and peace through a lawful remedy.  Sign me up.

Jim Bowman, author of,
This Roar of Ours