Seal Shows Tampering On Ballot Drop Box In West Grove, Pa.

Seal Shows Tampering On Ballot Drop Box In West Grove, Pa. — A security seal has found altered this morning (May 16) on the ballot drop box at the Avon Grove Library in West Grove, Pa.

Carmela Ciliberti has informed the Chester County Commissioners, Voter Services Director Karen Barsoum, District Attorney Deb Ryan and Sheriff Fredda Maddox and provided photographic evidence.

Ms. Ciliberti is seeking to unseat incumbent John Lawrence in 13th State House District in tomorrow’s Republican Primary.

Seal Shows Tampering On Ballot Drop Box In West Grove, Pa.
The seal at 2:34 p.m., May 15.
Seal Shows Tampering On Ballot Drop Box In West Grove, Pa.
The seal at 9:31 a.m., May 16
Seal Shows Tampering On Ballot Drop Box In West Grove, Pa.
The letter informing those charged with enforcing election law.
Seal Shows Tampering On Ballot Drop Box In West Grove, Pa.

2000 Mules Has Free Link

2000 Mules Has Free Link

Update: 2000 Mules can be found for free on Bitchute as of the morning of May 14: https://www.bitchute.com/video/oUxVva4yWsuu/

Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules can be watched for free, as of now, at his Locals page. Click on “let me view this content first.”

D’Souza describes how Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips from True the Vote used the same purchasable cell phone data that Big Tech sells to advertisers to trace individuals whom they termed “mules” as they went from non-profit (Democrat front) organizations to ballot drop boxes in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan during the 2020 election.

Sounds iffy? They tested this technique by actually solving a murder in Georgia.

And the used official surveillance video of the boxes to corroborate the stuffing.

At about the 32 minute mark of the 1 hour and 28 minute movie the Philly fraud is addressed.

2000 Mules Has Free Link

“In Philadelphia alone, we’ve identified more than 1,100 mules at rates well beyond anything we’ve seen, closer to 50 drop boxes each,” said Phillips. “We saw people driving back and forth to New Jersey across the bridge.”

At 55,000 visits with 3 ballots each — a low estimate that would mean 165,000 illegal votes for Biden.

That explains why election watchers were kept an unwatchable distance from the ballots being counted downtown.

The margin of Biden’s victory was 80,000

Trump is the rightful president.

Watch the movie. You’re allowed to be mad.

And it’s more important the ever to vote.

2000 Mules Has Free Link

Overview Of Election Fraud Findings

Overview Of Election Fraud Findings

By Dr. Robert Sklaroff

It is desirable to convey a sense of what happens during the weekly A.V.A. Zoom-calls by providing a “patter” of the (alphabetized) initiatives of each state (embellished by cites from the Internet); they have been grouped but, otherwise, the titles are self-explanatory.

A few weeks ago, I provided the Opening Prayer for an A.V.A. call in which I concluded Mastriano’s lawn-sign theme [advocating action by a community exercising freedom, quoting John 8:36] was captured in a book published in 1956 by Abba Hillel Silver [Where Judaism Differed]. Another quote therefrom channels how the following hyperlinks were chosen, to wit, that they all encompass action-items based upon pondering facts:

In Judaism, the life of contemplation or of study was of significance only insofar as it led to action. {Multiple quotes from sages reinforce this view.} Judah Halevi warns men not to be beguiled by a species of Greek wisdom “that produces flowers but no fruit.” {Silver condemns Greeks for failing to apply their views of the ethical human into seeking social progress.} 

Anyone wondering “what can I do?” can dip into any of these efforts and recall the points that emerged from the Harrisburg “Election Integrity” Seminar. Anyone querying why these memos are being composed can recognize how many people are contributing their time/resources toward rectifying what The Donald considers the #1 USA priority to be. Anyone doubting the wholesomeness of this wartime initiative can note David Brock’s effort to disbar Trump’s lawyers (so they’ll pay the price for representing someone he hates), a Dem goal that, weeks ago, I strongly suggested be opposed organizationally.

Not surprisingly, doings in three states (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin) dominate, but their activities are often apparent in what’s being pursued elsewhere (even in “red states” that would, at first blush, seem not to be priorities). I suppress my reactions to some of these observations because, often, the media haven’t extracted defensive quotations from Republicans who are blocking progress. Thus, “don’t kill the messenger” when an article is irksome, for it will often serve as a placeholder for what may soon transpire. Tireless heroes (Fincham, Favorito, Gableman in the three states supra, for example) are helping those working in multiple states (to be summarized soon, such as True the Vote); knowing of their works yields ANGER at those who would acquiesce to “let’s move on” postures of too many politicians (particularly statewide Pennsylvania candidates).

ALABAMA Governor Kay Ivey’s Campaign Ad focuses on protect the election process from being stolen like Trump’s election was stolen in 2020. {This is a popular position.}

Sarah Palin took the lead in a crowded field of 50 other Congressional candidates in ALASKA’s special primary election on June 11; the top four candidates will advance to another special election slated for August 16. Ranked choice voting will be used to decide the winner, in line with a 2020 voter-approved new elections system. {The A.V.A. consensus was that this is only desirable for primaries, recalling Lani Guinier’s book.}

Events in ARIZONA are national trendsetters and, here, lengthy citations are intended to illustrate granular detail that other states may wish to emulate (legislative and judicial).}

The Auditor General 71-page Report on Private Funding showed private grant money was accepted for the 2020 election in the SoS’s office, Maricopa, and Pima Counties. Dem SoS Katie Hobbs accepted $5.1M and spent $5M (88%) of it to “combat misinformation” in a media campaign to encourage mail-in voting; Maricopa spent $1.9M on temporary staffing and less than $9K on Covid-19 protection; and Pima spent $950k+ on hazard pay and early voting sites. Regarding Katie Hobbs’ potential prosecution, State Rep. Mark Finchem said, ”She Knowingly Did This. I Don’t See How This Doesn’t End Up In Some Kind of a Conviction.” [BTW, ARIZONA IS TO OFFER DIGITAL DRIVER’S LICENSES ON IPHONES.]  

Activists lamented “disenfranchisement” after the Arizona Governor signed election integrity legislationArizona Republicans Passed HB2492 Requiring ALL Voters To Provide Proof Of Citizenship Upon Registering To Vote. Jovan Pulitzer addressed issues with ERIC and Dr. Shiva Discussed His History and Analysis Identifying 200,000 Ballots in Maricopa County with Signature Issues. The latter is consistent with AZ State Senator Sonny Borrelli claiming unmonitored dropboxes revealed over 733,000 unaccounted-for ballots in Maricopa County’s 2020 Election. This may explain why Maricopa County Supervisors refused to attend a meeting after the State Senate issued a new 2020 Election Subpoena but, ultimately, Maricopa County Complied with it and the Attorney General’s Request. The motivation for these probes is that the Report of Maricopa County Election Network Includes Large Claims that Appear Impossible to Substantiate.  

Attorney General Mark Brnovich will be making arrests based on his Maricopa County 2020 Election Interim Report, for he already referred Criminal Action Against AZ Secretary of State Katie Hobbs For Election Crimes and floated possible future prosecutions because “There are problematic system-wide issues that relate to early ballot handling and verification.”   Recalling the months-long time-delay after the audit and the Senate made referrals to the AG’s office, Tim Griffin opined, “It seems like he is hedging for his U.S. Senate Run.  He talks tough, but there isn’t any action at this time.” [Appended are Brnovich’s cover-letter to Senate President Karen Fann (confirming total inaction) plus a 30-page “best practice” report c/o the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission detailing guidelines on establishing proper chain-of-custody that he cited; the latter carries import that should ripple nationally, even in the absence of dropboxes and their inherent faults.]

A.G. Report 

  • Recommendations: Minimize mail-in ballots which are prone to fraud in line with the Carter-Baker Commission; early ballot signature verification should be strengthened, he cites a sample of 100 signature matches from a 2020 election challenged.  Experts believed between 6% and 11% of the ballot signatures were inconclusive for matching.  He found that the matching was rushed by poorly trained workers.
  • Signature Verification.  Maricopa signature verification is insufficient to guard against abuse. 
  • Chain of Custody.  In the 2020 election, localities were supposed to deal with dropbox ballots in the following manner: 

o    Have two transporters present — one from each party;

o    They were to document the location, date/time of arrival, time of departure, number of ballots, and to secure the container of ballots. 

o    901,976 ballots were collected from drop boxes.  729k+ were collected during early voting, 172k+ were collected from drop boxes at polling locations. 

o    Early Voting Ballot Transportation Statements.  Out of 1,895 Early Voting Ballot Transportation Statements — 381 forms or 20% were missing required info — signatures, missing receiver signatures, missing security seal numbers, missing documentation of courier signatures.  “In other words, it is possible that between 100,000 and 200,000 ballots were transported without a proper chain of custody.”

  • Maricopa County battled the AG’s office and blocked the investigation.  
  • Nonprofits.  He suggests a law that criminalizes members of a nonprofit organization allowing members to engage in ballot harvesting.  He also references the just released auditor general’s report on private money; he indicates that the investigation is ongoing but that Arizona law may have been broken in the acceptance and expenditure of this money.

Tim Griffin noted the legislature may stay in session until April 23 and could pass HB 2780; “this bill is sponsored by Rep. John Kavanaugh and co-sponsors include our friend Rep. Mark Finchem.” It passed the full state House and the Senate Elections Committee, but it may be awaiting a vote in the Senate Rules Committee; it’s alive, per AZ Central. 

This a simple and relatively uncontroversial bill stating that the recorder (election’s clerk) must publish:  [1]—before every election, the names of all registered active & inactive voters; [2]—after every election but before the canvass/certification, the names of those who voted (and their method of voting) with ballot images, and a cast-vote record (confirming batch totals). [https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2780/id/2507582]

[text] Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Title 16, chapter 4, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 16-407.04, to read:

16-407.04. Voter lists; ballot images; cast vote record; ballot storage

NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW:

1.      THE COUNTY RECORDER SHALL PUBLISH TEN DAYS BEFORE THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION A LIST OF ALL VOTERS WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE ELECTION, INCLUDING PERSONS WHO ARE ON THE INACTIVE VOTER LIST. THE COUNTY RECORDER 

2.      SHALL POST THIS INFORMATION ON THE COUNTY RECORDER’S WEBSITE AND SHALL REDACT THE VOTER’S DATE OF BIRTH, DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER, NONOPERATING IDENTIFICATION LICENSE NUMBER AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR PORTION OF THAT NUMBER, AS APPLICABLE, BEFORE PUBLISHING OR POSTING THE LIST.

2. AFTER THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION AND FIVE DAYS BEFORE THE COUNTY CANVASS, THE COUNTY RECORDER OR OTHER OFFICER IN CHARGE OF ELECTIONS SHALL PUBLISH AND POST IN DIGITAL FORMAT ON THE COUNTY’S WEBSITE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

(a) A LIST OF ALL PERSONS WHO VOTED AND THEIR METHOD OF VOTING.

(b) ALL BALLOT IMAGES WITH THE UNIQUE IDENTIFYING NUMBER FROM THE BALLOT.

(c) THE CAST VOTE RECORD IN A SORTABLE FORMAT.

3. EARLY AND PROVISIONAL BALLOT TABULATORS SHALL IMPRINT A UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ON EACH EARLY BALLOT TABULATED SO AS TO ALLOW THE BALLOT IMAGE TO BE LINKED TO THE PHYSICAL BALLOT. EARLY AND PROVISIONAL BALLOTS SHALL BE SEPARATED BY PRECINCT, TABULATED AND STORED BY PRECINCT.� ELECTION DAY BALLOTS ALSO SHALL BE STORED BY PRECINCT AFTER TABULATION.

4. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF ELECTIONS SHALL ENSURE THAT PAPER BALLOTS ARE SORTED AND STORED IN A MANNER THAT ALLOWS FOR CONVENIENT RETRIEVAL.

Leftist ARKANSAS Judge killed Election Integrity Laws.

Mesa County Forensic Exam Report Provided Evidence of COLORADO voting-machines changing votes; the system created new databases partway through the voting process.

Colorado Bill To Mandate Electronic Voting Records Supported By Soros-Backed Secretary of State

FLORIDA COUNTIES ARE INVESTIGATING FELONS VOTING IN THE 2020 ELECTION, and Florida created an election police force to get out ahead of any potential issues.

In GEORGIARepublicans passed a bill to allow law enforcement to investigate election fraud like what occurred in 2020, when Ballot Traffickers used Dem officials’ offices as stopping points during ballot drop runs, provoking outrage from Trump. In that regard, True the Vote threatened legal action after Kemp’s Lackey and GBI Director Vic Reynolds leaked private confidential info of Brave Election Integrity Activists to the Liberal Media. Afterwards, the GA ELECTIONS BOARD APPROVED SUBPOENA POWER FOR A PROBE INTO POTENTIAL 2020 FRAUD and the GA Elections Chief referred 1,600-Plus Non-Citizens for prosecution after they’d tried to vote. Concomitantly, Garland Favorito announced that oral arguments before the Georgia Court of Appeals finally will occur regarding the Fulton County Ballot Inspection case [vide infra], and he updated the lawsuit against the state regarding the new voter registration system. [Also, the GEORGIA GOP WILL TEST SUPPORT FOR BALLOT DROP BOXES AND BUCKHEAD CITYHOOD IN MAY PRIMARY.]

Republican Governor Kemp and Lt. Governor Duncan killed a key Election Integrity Bill to Unseal Ballots [HB1464], which would have made ballots public records and improved chain of custody procedures; also, it included a controversial limit on poll watchers, per VoterGA, that Republican Gunter refused to allow Favorito to discuss. It became the last bill to pass in the House and it moved through the Senate Ethics Committee before reaching the floor for a last-ditch effort to pass much needed election reforms. In the future, the Wolf Alert System c/o the Constitution Party of Georgia will provide updates.

The departing Fulton County (Georgia’s largest jurisdiction) election director (Richard Barron) blasted lawmakers for playing “Old South” politics, getting out-of-town after a Georgia judge ordered Fulton County to “Provide an additional layer of security” for 2020 election records in the Senator Perdue case; he found the scrutiny from running the nation’s sloppiest local election since Broward County Florida’s hanging chads in 2000 to have become too stressful, for he said that the $160,000 salary + benefits wasn’t worth the hassle anymore. [Barron also complained that his staffer, Ruby Freeman, was “visited at home multiple times” because she pulled a suitcase of ballots from under a counting table and counted ballots multiple times.] Under Georgia’s 2021 Elections Law, the state now has increased oversight over such rogue localities and, at the recommendation of the state legislature, the State Election Board appointed a bipartisan performance review panel to investigate whether Baron’s office broke the law in 2020; Barron believes this competence oversight law is adversarial between the state and localities. 

In MICHIGAN, election clerks are already seeing a ramp-up of requests from ERIC for new voter registrations.  “The attempt to stuff the November ballot box has already started,” as ERIC mounts an Under-the-Table Democrat GOTV Drive; a Zuckerberg-Connected Nonprofit Helped Shift Michigan’s 2020 Voting Rules. Two websites provide formal decertification language [https://audityourvote.com/and https://decertifymi.com/]. 

In NEW HAMPSHIRERadical Leftists Crashed a House Hearing Promoting Safeguards to Free and Fair Elections.

In NORTH CAROLINA, OmniBallot is used via an absentee-ballot-request-portal

In TEXAS, there was an election failure in Dallas, when the locality ran into problems with Republican mail-in ballots; on the other hand, the new Texas law allowed for increased poll watcher access, with few reported problems.  Incidence of rejection of mail-in ballots was 2-8% before 2020, under 1% in 2020, and 10% in 2022. Thus, election bureaucrats there and across the country cite such problems to argue their offices are underfunded and need distribution of new federal funds that they can spend indiscriminately.  

In SOUTH DAKOTA, rejection of dropboxes was forced by invoking “Bonds For the Win”; All elected public officials are required to be bonded and they must sign an oath to uphold the Constitution of their State as well as the Constitution of the United States for America. Companies, contractors, and even unions are also required to have a surety bond. We the People – The community for whom the bondholder is OBLIGATED to serve. This info was provided by Patricia Tatem [ptatem416@hotmail.com].

In WISCONSIN, former Trump Attorney John Eastman Pushed for Decertification of the Election Following Recent Discoveries of Extensive Fraud involving Zuckerbucks; he has been joined by GOP Officials in More than Half the Wisconsin Counties. In addition, Wisconsin Congressional District 6 GOP Event Participants Voted to Decertify the 2020 Election Results and for Speaker Vos to Resign; indeed, a Wisconsin Judge Ordered Vos Held in Contempt Over Election Records. Recall that Wisconsin Added 29% of its ENTIRE VOTING POPULATION to the Voter Rolls in the 10 Months Prior to 2020 Election (957,077 New Names); know that Sarah Whitt was the Official Behind the Wisconsin Voter Rolls that Included 3.42 Million Extra Ineligible Voters. Kuto Justice Michael Gableman (who spoke during a Zoom call c/o A.V.A.) who documented the Zuckerbucks Infiltration of the 2020 Election and Tianna Epps-Johnson from the CTCL. [Rep. Ramthun is in pursuit.] In addition, Erick Kaardal, Special Counsel for Thomas More Society, filed a complaint with the Elections Commission on Behalf of a Senior Whose 2020 Vote was Stolen.

Catherine Engelbrecht from True the Vote Testified in Front of Campaigns and Elections Committee that 107 Ballot Trafficking Suspects in Wisconsin Visited the Ballot Drop Boxes over 2,000 Times in the Two Weeks before the 2020 Election, that 7% of Ballots Cast at Ballot Drop Boxes in 2020 (137,000+ Votes) were trafficked, and that 14 Ballot traffickers Also Participated in One or More of the Violent Riots in 2020.

Overview Of Election Fraud Findings Overview Of Election Fraud Findings Overview Of Election Fraud Findings Overview Of Election Fraud Findings Overview Of Election Fraud Findings Overview Of Election Fraud Findings
Overview Of Election Fraud Findings

Seth Keshel Damning Delco Reveal

Seth Keshel Damning Delco Reveal — Seth Keshel is a former Army intelligence captain who became a civilian statistical analyst and made waves with claims that election fraud was massive in 2020.

He has now finished his study of Delaware County, Pa. and it shows that high and likely fraud occurred in almost every municipality excepting for Democrat strongholds. (see image).

Seth Keshel Damning Delco Reveal
Click to expand

The conclusion is based on the degree of divergence from trends in voter registration as established by publicly available county and state data.

Of course one can always respond with “lies, damn lies and statistics” but one would then have to ignore the videos of Delaware County officials describing rigging and voting violations: the undeniable breaks in chain of custody; claims of massive fraud contemporaneous with Election Night; overturning of duly passed election laws by executive fiat backed by judicial fiat; unprecedented delays in vote counting; Delco voting judges not being giving Voter Books prior to election; etcetera.

But hey, there is probably some other explanation, right? LOLOL

What bothers us most is the silence of the local Republican leaders. If they make a movie about it they can call it Silence of the Sheep as Silence of the Lambs has been taken.

How to cut, copy and recreate courtesy of The Federalist
Seth Keshel Damning Delco Reveal

Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa

Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa — The partisan Democrat Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled four days ago (March 21) in favor of Dominion Voting Systems that neither Fulton County nor the Pennsylvania Senate can audit their machines as they saw fit.

This overturned a Commonwealth Court ruling.

The Supremes said the audit must be done in a specified lab.

This ruling at first glance seems reasonable until it dawns on one that the restrictions will likely lead to a predetermined outcome and they really aren’t necessary to safeguard a false positive.

And that there really isn’t a lab available with the accreditation insisted upon by the court.

What would be a legitimate concern would be if the audit was not transparent and recorded, and unobservable by Dominion and other opponents.

That was obviously not the case.

That Dominion was allowed to be a party is especially troubling. Why would there even be a question that election transparency takes precedence over the intellectual property, or any concerns, of a private corporation.

Those machines should be considered public property. Anybody, much less a government, should be allowed to look at every bell and whistle on the machine, and every percent sign and parenthesis on the software.

When a media consortium investigated the Y2K Florida election, there was no fuss.

That an investigation into Dominion is being inhibited is almost proof positive something is hidden.

So where are the screams of outrage coming from Republican leaders? Why hasn’t Silent Joe Gale said something? Tom McGarrigle? Anybody? Maybe they did. If so they just whispered. That is not good enough.

Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa
Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa -- The partisan Democrat Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled four days ago (March 21) in favor of Dominion Voting

House Vote Fraud Preventions Slipped Into Lame Senate Amendment In Pennsylvania

House Slipped Vote Fraud Preventions Slipped Into Lame Senate Amendment In Pennsylvania— The Pennsylvania Senate passed, April 27, SB 106 which was to be an amendment to the state Constitution that would merely end separate elections for candidates for governor and lieutenant governor and have them run on a single ballot. It would be an unnecessary and insignificant change as to how we are governed but the inside-baseball types thought it neat.

Anyway, on Dec. 15, just before the session ended, the State House overwhelmingly approved it but with additions. These included:

— A 21-day limit on emergency declarations by the governor.

— A requirement to present “valid identification prior to voting, regardless of voting method”

— The auditing of elections, including the administration of elections, certification of election machines, the accuracy of the list of registered voters, the administration of voter registration and election results.

The bill is now back in the Senate where it sits.

Constitutional amendments in Pennsylvania require approval of the same wording in consecutive sessions of the legislature, and then approval by the voters via a ballot question.

Don’t expect them to happen anytime soon, but this shows that while there may be corrupt deep staters in the Republican Party, there are good guys too.

House Slipped Vote Fraud Preventions Slipped Into Lame Senate Amendment In Pennsylvania-- The Pennsylvania Senate passed, April 27, SB 106 which was
House Slipped Vote Fraud Preventions In Lame Senate Amendment In Pennsylvania

Voter ID Downside II

Voter ID Downside II — Probably more than 99 percent of our readers are strong proponents of photo voter ID and we recently carried a column by Bob Small that swims against that tide.

We are certainly not against a requirement to show a photo before voting, but we have become far less fanatical about it.

If the precinct workers are honest the rule is not needed and if the precinct workers are otherwise the rule is not going to matter.

See Georgia, which has a photo ID requirement for voting.

The concern we have is that Pennsylvania patriots are ignoring far more crucial matters regarding election integrity with their zeal for photo identification, namely state-wide certification of poll watchers and transparent election machinery and software.

Long-standing Pennsylvania law restricts poll watchers to the county in which they reside. What is wrong with state-wide certification for them? Why shouldn’t an appropriately certified Philadelphia Democrat be allowed to make sure things are copacetic in the voting in Franklin County? And vice-versa, of course. Only a racist can oppose such a thing.

Regarding transparent election machinery, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania — which appears to be better described as the Supreme Court of Soros– has blocked an audit of Fulton County voting machines.

The State Legislature wanted it. Fulton County wanted it. Commonwealth Court was OK with it. Why block it?

Well, the Democrat Party opposed it as did Dominion Voting Systems, the supplier of the machinery.

But why would they oppose it? All an audit would show was that the system was honest and the results were fair, right? RIGHT?

It shouldn’t need to be said but voting transparency should always take precedence over the secrets of corporations.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is a white supremacist, and likely a homophobic misogynist who hates Mexicans.

Which gets us to a rather interesting thing going on in Pennsylvania legislature and might be the buried lead.

In April, the Pennsylvania Senate passed SB 106, an amendment to the state Constitution which would end separate elections for candidates for governor and lieutenant governor and have them run on a single ballot. It would be an unnecessary and insignificant change to how we are governed but the inside-baseball types thought it neat.

Anyway, in December, just before the session ended the State House added to the bill:

— A 21-day limit on emergency declarations by the governor.

— A requirement to present “valid identification prior to voting, regardless of voting method”

— The auditing of elections, including the administration of elections, certification of election machines, the accuracy of the list of registered voters, the administration of voter registration and election results.

The bill is now back in the Senate where it sits. The amendments require approval of the same wording in consecutive sessions of the legislature, and then approval by the voters via a ballot question.

Don’t expect them to happen anytime soon, but this does show that while there may be corrupt deep staters in the Republican Party, there are good guys too.

Voter ID Downside II
Voter ID Downside II

Delco Election Fraud Case Number

Delco Election Fraud Case Number — The lawsuit by Ruth Moton, Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes alleging substantial and significant election law violations in Delaware County, Pa. during the 2020 election now has a case number, CV-2022-000032 and title, Moton et al v. Boockvar, Kathy et al.

The filing date was Jan. 6.

The defendants include former Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, Delaware County, the Delaware County Board Elections, the Delaware County Bureau of Elections and numerous officials, including Chief Custodian and Voting Machine Warehouse Supervisor James Savage.

The suit claims that:

Defendants intentionally and fraudulently conspired to destroy, delete, secrete, and hide November 3, 2020, election data, materials, and equipment to prevent discovery of election fraud and election law violations in Delaware County, which the Defendants also conspired to commit and did commit while carrying out the November 3, 2020, election. In furtherance of this conspiracy, Defendants intentionally created chaos surrounding the November 3, 2020, election so that they would be able to then carry out the acts of election fraud and the election law violations described herein undetected.

Defendants did this, in part, by placing incompetent or underqualified individuals with no training in positions of responsibility so that they would be able to hide their fraud under the pretense of the incompetence of election day workers/volunteers in the event the election fraud and election law violations were discovered.

Moreover, when a May 21, 2021 Right to Know (RTK) request for election information and data was made with respect to information that is by federal and state law to be kept and preserved, the Defendants fraudulently and intentionally deleted, changed, adulterated, manipulated and/or obscured the information, data, and materials produced in response to the RTK request in order to hide their fraud and election code violations because they knew that they could not reconcile the previously fraudulently reported November 3, 2020 election results with the actual responsive information that they had in their possession and which they were required to preserve and produce in response to the Right to Know request.

Plaintiffs know this to be the case and can document this and demonstrate this by showing, among other things, that November 3, 2020 election, data materials, and equipment was destroyed including but not limited to V-Drives, Return Sheets, machine tapes/proof sheets/result tapes, Mail-In Ballots, Ballots Destroyed, voting machines, hard drives, paper documentation, Blue Crest data, correspondence concerning the November 3, 2020 election.

Further the suit notes that Delaware County was the last count to submit its presidential vote total in Pennsylvania “potentially changing November 3, 2020 election results in numerous races”.

The suit says that before Delco’s submission, Donald Trump was leading Joseph Biden by 7,515 votes, and that Delco’s tally showed a difference of 88,070 votes between the candidates favoring Biden.

Remember, this suit does not address the apparent vote fraud in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and even Montgomery County.

Delco Election Fraud Case Number
Delco Election Fraud Case Number

Delco Republicans Silent On Election Lawsuit

Delco Republicans Silent On Election Lawsuit — It’s Nov. 23, five days after numerous Delaware County agencies and individuals were sued over election misconduct relating to the 2020 General Election.

Nary a peep has been heard from the traditional media, which we expected as the traditional media has long since stopped being the means of informing the public, and is now merely a puppet for protecting the powerful.

What we did hope, granted a scant hope, was that the Republican leadership would start making some noise.

So much for that. Their silence is loud.

You would think they could find it in themselves to bring this up:

123. On and after November 3, 2020, the Delaware County Return Board was missing necessary November 3, 2020, election data, materials, results, and equipment which was needed to reconcile all Delaware County precincts and certify the November 3, 2020, election. [Exhibit J].

Or this:

124. On or about November 3, 2020, the Delaware County Return Board (and individual members including various Defendants) discovered numerous election law violations, and/or incidents of election fraud, and referred numerous precincts to the District Attorney for investigation. [Exhibit K].

Or this:

162. Specifically, James Allen conspired with James Savage to “get rid” of the “pads and second scanners” from the November 3, 2020, election. [Exhibit GG].
163. James Savage encouraged a private conversation to continue the conversation of the removal of the pads and scanners due to other Delaware County employees and Regina Miller who were present and witnessed James Savage state that he was aware that the plan of destruction of November 3, 2020, election “was a felony.” [Exhibit GG].

Or especially this:

177. The Delaware County Right to Know Response Revealed that there were 125 out of 428 missing tally tapes scanner 1; 138 out of 428 precincts had 2 scanners and out of 138, 42 were missing tally tapes; out of the 428 precincts, 137 are missing ballot count tapes for scanner 1; out of 138 precincts with two scanners, 49 are missing ballot count tapes for scanner 2; 108 out of 428 precincts are missing write-in report tapes for scanner 1; 44 out of 138 that had two scanners are missing write-in reports for scanner 2; 255 out of 428 are missing open poll tapes for scanner 1; there are 92 out of 138 precincts missing open poll tapes for scanner 2; there are 233 out of 138 precincts missing open poll tapes for scanner 2; there are 233 out of 428 precincts missing zero report tapes for scanner 1; there are 89 out of 138 missing “zero” report tapes, which means that the machines may not have been zeroed out from a previous election; there are 41 out of 428 precincts that are not reconciled; 82 out of 428 precincts that submitted return sheets with no provisional ballot numbers; there are 73 out of 428 precincts that submitted return sheets with no spoiled ballot count; there are 53 out of 428 precincts that submitted return sheets with no spoiled ballot count; there are 53 precincts out of 428 that had unused ballot return counts and had a discrepancy of plus or minus 20. [Exhibit N].

Do the Republicans ever want to win in this county again? Do the citizens want to allow San Francisco-style looting to come here?

Here is a link to the lawsuit.

Here it is below.

Delco Republicans Silent On Election Lawsuit
Delco Republicans Silent On Election Lawsuit

DELCO ELECTION SUIT BOMBSHELL

Delco Election Suit Bombshell — Suit Filed By Greg Stenstrom, Leah Hoopes, Ruth Moton Against Delaware County, Numerous Officials

Delco Election Suit Bombshell — A lawsuit by Gregory Stenstrom, Leah Hoopes and Ruth Moton was filed yesterday, Nov. 18, in Delaware County Common Pleas Court against Delaware County, Pa., former Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, the Delaware County Board Elections, the Delaware County Bureau of Elections and numerous officials, including Chief Custodian and Voting Machine Warehouse Supervisor James Savage.

Stenstrom and Ms. Hoopes were Delaware County Board of Elections certified poll watchers and observers at the counting center. Ms. Moton, was a 2020 candidate for the 159 District in the State House.

The suit claims that:

Defendants intentionally and fraudulently conspired to destroy, delete, secrete, and hide November 3, 2020, election data, materials, and equipment to prevent discovery of election fraud and election law violations in Delaware County, which the Defendants also conspired to commit and did commit while carrying out the November 3, 2020, election. In furtherance of this conspiracy, Defendants intentionally created chaos surrounding the November 3, 2020, election so that they would be able to then carry out the acts of election fraud and the election law violations described herein undetected.

Defendants did this, in part, by placing incompetent or underqualified individuals with no training in positions of responsibility so that they would be able to hide their fraud under the pretense of the incompetence of election day workers/volunteers in the event the election fraud and election law violations were discovered.

Moreover, when a May 21, 2021 Right to Know (RTK) request for election information and data was made with respect to information that is by federal and state law to be kept and preserved, the Defendants fraudulently and intentionally deleted, changed, adulterated, manipulated and/or obscured the information, data, and materials produced in response to the RTK request in order to hide their fraud and election code violations because they knew that they could not reconcile the previously fraudulently reported November 3, 2020 election results with the actual responsive information that they had in their possession and which they were required to preserve and produce in response to the Right to Know request.

Plaintiffs know this to be the case and can document this and demonstrate this by showing, among other things, that November 3, 2020 election, data materials, and equipment was destroyed including but not limited to V-Drives, Return Sheets, machine tapes/proof sheets/result tapes, Mail-In Ballots, Ballots Destroyed, voting machines, hard drives, paper documentation, Blue Crest data, correspondence concerning the November 3, 2020 election.

Further the suit notes that Delaware County was the last count to submit its presidential vote total in Pennsylvania “potentially changing November 3, 2020 election results in numerous races”.

The suit says that before Delco’s submission, Donald Trump was leading Joseph Biden by 7,515 votes, and that Delco’s tally showed a difference of 88,070 votes between the candidates favoring Biden.

Remember, this suit does not address the apparent vote fraud in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and even Montgomery County.

Maybe the most shameful thing is the silence of the Delaware County Republican Party leadership. Truthfully, you can have an easy life in second place if it’s an easy life you want. See: Philadelphia Republican Party.

Please don’t equate Republican with good. Political parties are means, not ends, and being active in one does not automatically confer virtue, or imply that you love truth, justice and this nation.

Also, not every one mentioned in the suit is a villain. Regina Scheerer, Cathy Craddock and Marilyn Heider are good citizens, grandmoms and patriots, and were most certainly doing their best.

Tip to the plaintiffs: We are confident that they are as convinced the election was stolen as any of us.

Here is a link to the lawsuit.

And here it is below.

DELCO ELECTION SUIT BOMBSHELL
%d bloggers like this: