House OKs Bill Hiking Penalty For Sex Trafficking

House OKs Bill Hiking Penalty For Sex Trafficking — The House recently approved a measure to offer Pennsylvania’s criminal justice system better tools to hold human sex traffickers accountable to the law, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

House Bill 663 would increase the penalties for those who traffic minors from a third-degree felony to a first-degree felony and would make it clear that the penalties apply to trafficking a minor whether or not the perpetrator knew the victim was under the age of 18. In addition, the bill also would charge a parent who sells or trades his or her child knowing the child will be forced into commercial sex as a result with a second-degree felony. The bill would define commercial sex to include any sexual activity in which anything of value is given to or received by another person where the activity is induced by force, fraud or expressed or implied coercion, regardless of the age of the victim. Trafficking charges would apply even if there was no proof of coercion.

If enacted, the bill would give victims the right to sue for damages and attorney’s fees against someone who coerced him or her into or to remain in prostitution or to collect or receive any part of the victim’s earnings from prostitution.

The measure now heads to the Senate.

Kudos. One suspects the right to take the matter to civil court — where unanimous juries and guilt beyond reasonable doubt are not necessary —  might be even more of a deterrent than the increased criminal penalty.  Sex traffickers, after all, are primarily motivated by money.

Maybe our lawmakers might consider letting civil courts be the main venue in fighting the drug trade, as drug dealers are also motivated primarily by money. It would require, though, making drug use legal as victims would not want to face criminal charges when filing their lawsuits.

It would not be a bad idea, either, to give others harmed by drug dealing — family of users, their neighbors, co-workers, employers, employees — standing to sue.

House OKs Bill Hiking Penalty For Sex Trafficking

PepsiCo Beaten Women Are Funny

PepsiCo Beaten Women Are Funny — PepsiCo contracted rapper Tyler, The Creator, to make a commercial for Mountain Dew.

Oh boy, did he. It featured a  white woman with bruises on her face, a brace around her neck and leaning on a crutch trying to pick  her assailant from a police lineup that featured young black men dressed as thugs and a goat. The goat mouths gangster-type threats at her and the ad ends with her fleeing from the room while a detective sips on a Mountain Dew.

PepsiCo pulled the ad and scrubbed it from YouTube as some strangely found it offensive.

It is offensive.

Drink Coke. Heck, drink Sam’s Club or some other store brand. It beats supporting this garbage.

PepsiCo Beaten Women Are Funny

PepsiCo Beaten Women Are Funny

 

PepsiCo Beaten Women Are Funny

Larry Sinclair Or Some Crazy Accusations More Equal Than Others

Larry Sinclair Or  Some Crazy Accusations More Equal Than Others — Herman Cain, the black businessman seeking the Republican nomination for president who was subject to anonymous and unspecific allegations regarding sexual misconduct finally got to face an accuser, Nov. 7, when Sharon Bialek, a Chicago resident with a past history of irresponsible behavior,  held a press conference with her lawyer at her side. Yes, she went into specifics. No corroboration, but there were certainly specifics.

The old, dying but still dangerous, dinosaur old media haven’t stopped talking about it since. Rest assured, though, they will quiet when Cain’s poll numbers drop to a level they deem safe.

Barack Obama, the black senator from Illinois seeking the Democrat nomination for president in 2008, was subject to allegations regarding sexual misconduct and even murder.  On June 18 of that year, Larry Sinclair, a  Chicago resident with a past history of irresponsible behavior,  held a press conference with his lawyer at his side in which he went into specifics. No corroboration. but certainly specifics.

Did the old dinosaurs discuss it for weeks? Don’t be silly. Some crazy, unprovable allegations are just more equal than others.

If you are interested in a fair comparison:

The Sharon Bialek press conference from Nov. 7, 2011.

The Larry Sinclair press conference from June 18, 2008.

Larry Sinclair Or Some Crazy Accusations More Equal Than Others

Larry Sinclair Or Some Crazy Accusations More Equal Than Others

Austin Scott False Rape Charge Lawsuit

Penn State football coach Joe Paterno may give testimony in the federal lawsuit filed by former player Austin Scott who was falsely charged with rape in 2007.

Scott says the case damaged his chances of a career in the NFL.

The case was dropped in 2008 after a judge ruled to allow evidence that his accuser made similar assault allegations against a Moravian College student whom a jury acquitted.

Scott is suing university police, prosecutors and his accuser, whose name has still not been used by the papers covering the matter.

Austin Scott False Rape Charge Lawsuit

Austin Scott False Rape Charge Lawsuit

Austin Scott Ghost Of Duke At PSU?

Austin Scott Ghost Of Duke At PSU? — Former Nittany Lion tailback Austin Scott is suing Centre County, Penn State, District Attorney Michael Madeira, former assistant district attorney Lance Marshall, six Penn State police employees and Scott’s accuser regarding his 2007 rape arrest which resulted in his being suspended from the team.

The charges were dropped as the case was about to go to trial when the judge ruled the defense could present to the jury the accuser falsely accused a man of rape four years earlier.

The accuser’s name was not mentioned in reports of the story in the Allentown Morning Call or the Centre Daily Times.

Scott claims unlawful arrest, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, government liability and conspiracy and says the case destroyed his NFL career.

Scott’s attorney, John Karoly, says the law enforcement failed to make a reasonable effort to exclude unfounded allegations.

One difference between this case and the 2006 Duke lacrosse travesty is that Scott is black and his accuser is white, which might explain why faculty did not take out advertisements practically demanding his conviction.

 

Austin Scott Ghost Of Duke At PSU?

 

Why Won’t The Daily Times Use Her Name?

The Delaware County Daily Times won’t use the name of the woman who blind attorney John Peoples alleges took advantage of his handicap by overcharging his credit card when he used it to pay her for sex.

Why not? She’s Ginger Dayle. She’s right there in U.S. District Judge Edmund V. Ludwig’s decision dismissing People’s complaints against Discover Financial Services alleging the corporation didn’t live up to its agreement to protect him from fraud.

She’s on the the internet. All the world can see it.

Ms. Dayle, fyi,  says she is a fitness instructor and has counter-sued Peoples alleging him of making improper sexual advances.

Regardless, there doesn’t seem to be any dispute that Ms. Dayle in October and November of 2007 charged Peoples’ card 10 times for $1,100 and once for $1,600 which is pretty high for fitness instruction of whatever sort.

While Discover is off the hook, the suits between Peoples and Ms. Dayle were thrown out on a jurisdictional matter and can still proceed in state court.

 http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/09D1154P.pdf

Why Won't The Daily Times Use Her Name?

Why Won’t The Daily Times Use Her Name?

Oprahization Of the Delaware County D.A.

Oprahization Of the Delaware County D.A. — The prosecutors in the Delaware County (Pa) District Attorney’s office seem to be watching Oprah Winfrey when they should be reading Jefferson and Blackstone.

Delaware County Daily Times columnist Gil Spencer had articles, here and here, regarding a father who was brought to trial on various child sex charges solely on the word of a disturbed young neighbor who had a known grudge.

The prosecution had no corroborating evidence and Sherlock Holmes was not needed to see inconsistencies in the girl’s story i.e porn was not found in the house. Nor did there seem to be any consideration — or maybe even investigation — into the history of the accused and accuser, or the accuser’ background.

Fortunately, the jurors had a better understanding of truth and justice than the trained lawyers. The man was acquitted albeit at a cost of $10,000 in legal fees.

And, of course, innocent men can go to jail.

Oprahization Of the Delaware County D.A.