Mitchell Report Implies Christine Ford Lies

Mitchell Report Implies Christine Ford Lies — Rachel Mitchell, the well-experienced sex crimes investigator hired by the Republicans to publicly question Christine Blasey Ford regarding the allegations she has made against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, released her report, yesterday, Sept.30.

She all but called her a liar — albeit very respectfully and politely.

“Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened,” she said. She noted that in a July 6 text to the Washington Post, Ms. Ford said it happened in the “mid 1980s”; that her July 30 letter to Senator Feinstein said it happened in the “early 80s”, that her Aug. 7 statement to the polygrapher cites one “high school summer in early 80’s” but she crossed out the word “early” for reasons she did not explain.

“While it is common for victims to be uncertain about dates, Dr. Ford failed to explain how she was suddenly able to narrow the time frame to a particular season and particular year,” Ms. Mitchell said.
She said her failure to remember how she got from the party back to her house raises “significant questions.”

“Dr. Ford’s account of the alleged assault has not been corroborated by anyone she identified a shaving attended—including her lifelong friend,” she said.

“Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of the alleged assault,” she said explaining — among other things –“that according to her letter to Senator Feinstein, Dr. Ford heard Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge talking to other partygoers downstairs while she was hiding in the bathroom after the alleged assault. But according to her testimony, she could not hear them talking to anyone.”

She said that her testimony regarding recent events “raises further questions about her memory.” [Aside, she’s being polite]

Ms. Mitchell noted that Ms. Ford could not remember if she showed a full or partial set of therapy notes to the Washington Post  reporter and does not remember if she actually had a copy of the notes when she texted the Washington Post WhatsApp account on July 6. She noted that “Dr. Ford could not remember if she was being audio- or video-recorded when she took the polygraph. And she could not remember whether the polygraph occurred the same day as her grandmother’s funeral or the day after her grandmother’s funeral.”

Ms. Mitchell noted that Ms. Ford did not provide any therapy notes to the committee.

Perhaps, the most damning thing Ms. Mitchell pointed out was Ms. Ford’s description of the psychological impact of the event.

“The date of the hearing was delayed because the Committee was informed that her symptoms (caused by the event) prevent her from flying,” Ms. Mitchell said. “But she agreed during her testimony that she flies ‘fairly frequently for [her] hobbies and … work.’ She flies to the mid-Atlantic at least once a year to visit her family. She has flown to Hawaii, French Polynesia, and Costa Rica. She also flew to Washington, D.C. for the hearing.”

Ms. Mitchell makes several other points and provides many more details in her report which can be found at this link or on clicking the images below.

Mitchell Report Implies Christine Ford Lies

 

 

FBI Investigation Potential Dem Backfire?

FBI Investigation Potential Dem Backfire? — President Trump has agreed to let the FBI investigation into the already over-investigated and largely refuted allegations that Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh groped Christine Blasely Ford in their high school days.

Does another backfire on the  feudalistic wannabe fascists Democrats loom?

Ms. Ford has said she was uncomfortable with flying. It turns out she is a world traveller.

Does perjury loom?

Ms. Ford says was unaware that the Senate had offered to send committee staff to California to speak to her. Did her lawyers communicate this? Do they face sanctions?

Investigative counsel Rachel Mitchell is getting criticism for going easy on her. She might have done a much better job than many think.

Liars (Democrats) ought to be careful for what they wish.

FBI Investigation Potential Dem Backfire?

FBI Investigation Potential Dem Backfire

Proof Positive Kavanaugh Is Innocent

Proof Positive Kavanaugh Is Innocent — If the slightest doubt remains that federal judge Brett Kavanaugh mistreated women, Laura Ingraham’s tweet should chase it so far away it will never find its way back.

Proof Positive Kavanaugh Is Innocent

Forget the six FBI investigations. If the Clintons couldn’t find anything there was nothing to be found.

Proof Positive Kavanaugh Is Innocent

Sharyn Bovat Says Senator Feinstein Enabled Sex Attack

Sharyn Bovat is revealing on YouTube that she was molested in 1990 by a major donor of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, and that Feinstein enabled the attack and helped cover it up.

We find her very credible.

Watch it below.

Sharyn Bovat Says Senator Feinstein Enabled Sex Attack
Sharyn Bovat
My friend Dianne would never do such a thing!!!!

Adam Schiff Pedophile Or Don’t Throw Stones

Adam Schiff Pedophile Or Don’t Throw Stones — Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA28), who is one of the faces of the Democrat Party, ought to be very careful about throwing stones.

On yesterday’s (Sept 20) Morning Joe show, he said regarding Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh that the GOP is OK with “putting someone who committed attempted rape on the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Really? A 36-year-old allegation rife with vagueness and inconsistencies and with a strong taint of politics equals guilt?

Really?

Hey Congressman, have you done a DuckDuckGo search of your name with “pedophile” added?

Did you see what some rather notable people are implying about you?

Adam Schiff Pedophile

 

Are you really being blackmailed as one best-selling author is claiming?

Should the FBI investigate?

Or maybe we should recognize that bearing false witness is a sin, the presumption of innocence is paramount, and that allegations made without evidence are best ignored.

We’d be very careful about changing the rules. Your opponents will most certainly play by the ones you set and we won’t blame them.

Adam Schiff Pedophile Or Don’t Throw Stones

What If Christine Blasey Ford Is Lying?

What If Christine Blasey Ford Is Lying? — The Republicans are treating with kid gloves Christine Blasey Ford who claims that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh groped her at a high school party 36 years ago, something that Kavanaugh unequivocally denies.

“Dr. Ford shouldn’t be threatened or insulted & she deserves to be heard. I expect my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to be respectful & treat this situation with the sensitivity it deserves . . .,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)  tweeted.

But what if clinical psychologist Ford is a bad person? What if she is cynically lying for a political agenda, indifferent to any lives she ruins? Why is this possibility apparently being rejected?

We’ll grant that threats and insults are never appropriate or productive but it is foolish to deny that great big elephant sitting there in the room. It is highly possible, probable actually, that she is lying through her teeth to advance a political cause.

Yes, women lie and ruin men’s lives.

What If Christine Blasey Ford Is Lying

In fairness to Grassley, he seems to be seething under the skin. Here is a letter he sent to ranking Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

What If Christine Blasey Ford Is Lying?

Pre Roe Abortion Deaths Were Rare

Pre Roe v Wade Abortion Deaths Were Rare — Sen Dianne Feinstein appeared to claim  in this morning’s (Sept. 5) question of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh that between 200,000 and a million women died of illegal abortions in the 1950s and 1960s before a cynical Supreme Court declared it a right in 1973.

If we heard her right she is laughably wrong. There were about 300 deaths due to botch abortions per year in the 1950s which were brought down to less than 200 per year by 1965 due to advances in medicine.

To keep it in perspective, 658 persons died in boating accidents last year.

Pre Roe v Wade Abortion Deaths Were Rare

Pre Roe v Wade Abortion Deaths Were Rare
%d bloggers like this: