Shapiro’s Republican Pick For Secretary Of State

Shapiro’s Republican Pick For Secretary Of State

By Bob Small

In a case of  seeming  bipartisanship, Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro has chosen Republican Al Schmidt, a member of both the Philadelphia Election Board,and the Philadelphia Parking Authority to be Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State.

The Department of State runs elections.

Al Schmidt and former President Trump remain on opposite sides about the fairness of the 2020 election. Al Schmidt has received many threats to himself  and his family, which should never happen.

Mr. Schmidt has held the minority party seat on the three-person Philadelphia Election Commission since 2011.

Shapiro's Republican Pick For Secretary Of State

After the 2020 election, Trump pressured Schmidt to stop counting the absentee ballots, which Schmidt refused to do.

Most recently, Al Schmidt was the CEO of the Committee of Seventy, a long-standing Philadelphia fair election group.

Originally from Pittsburgh, he has a  BS from Allegheny College and a PhD from Brandeis University.

He moved to Philly in 2005, when his wife was hired by a Philly law firm. He also worked as a  policy analyst for the Presidential Commission on Holocaust Assets under the Clinton administration. He was once executive director of the Philadelphia Republican City Committee.

“He led an informal insurgent faction some called the ‘Loyal Opposition’, which pushed back against what he believed was ineffective Republican Party leadership at the city level.”  

He recently received a Presidential Citizens Medal from President Biden relating to the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

A friend of minew ho’s a Delco conservative shared his perspective “Schmidt should have endeavored to redress grievances by investigating the evidence of election fraud, not dismissing or ignoring it.” My thought is that suspicions about election irregularities  are not addressed by ignoring them.

Shapiro’s Republican Pick For Secretary Of State

Delco Vote Fraud Case Still Alive; Supreme Court Distributes It For Conference, Jan. 20

Delco Vote Fraud Case Still Alive; Supreme Court Distributes It For Conference, Jan. 20 — Greg Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes case before the Supreme Court concerning 2020 vote fraud in Delaware County, Pa. has been scheduled to be distributed for conference on Jan. 20.

“The conference is a private meeting held by the justices each day during argument week,” as per Jay Stephens on Quora. “At the conference, the justices meet, discuss the arguments held, take an initial vote on the merits of the appeal; and the chief justice then assigns one justice the task of writing the opinion reflecting the decisions made in conference.”

Here’s another explanation.

In other words, Greg and Leah’s case is not dead.

The case number is 22-503 and can be tracked here.

It is appealing a decision by Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court and was filed Nov. 22.

The points Greg and Leah are asking the court to address are:

  • Is the spoliation of election materials and evidence, required to be maintained by federal and state law, by election officials to perfect massive election fraud, evidence of said fraud by itself, and/or sufficient to infer adverse verdict?
  • Do duly appointed, certified poll watchers, who have taken an oath to fulfill their lawful duties as intervenors for both the candidates they represent, and the citizenry, have standing to petition the Courts on their own behalf to remedy grievous violations of election law, election fraud, and associated civil law?
  • Does the Court of first remedy in considering alleged grievous election and civil violations (in this case, the Common Pleas Court of Delaware County, Pennsylvania), have a duty to have an evidentiary hearing, and be presented evidence of allegations of massive election fraud that could change the outcome of an election, before ruling there isn’t a “scintilla of evidence” and otherwise ruling on facts not in evidence?
  • Does immediate notification of spoliation and destruction of election materials required to be maintained by federal and state law for 22 months (or as long as litigative controversy is pending), that proves massive election fraud that could change the outcome of an election, require the Court of first remedy to intervene to secure said evidence, as the lawful arbiter to preserve the integrity of the election system?
  • Are lawyers and “esquires” a special class that can unilaterally decide the outcome of litigative controversy without transparency, input, acknowledgement, or permission of petitioners, plaintiffs, and defendants and the citizenry, without public hearing, transcript or accountability?
  • Should both candidates for election represented by counsel, and Pro Se citizen litigants, be afforded the latitude and grace of the Supreme Court of the United States, as final arbiters of the Republic, to curate technically deficient but meritorious cases regarding the most sacred right of voting by the citizenry of the United States in their selection of their elected representatives, given the Court has repeatedly done so for other cases?
  • Is it lawful for public officials to intimidate, harass, and demand civil and criminal sanctions, and against lawful intervenors, candidates, citizens, and their attorneys for having the temerity to challenge grievous election law violations that would change the outcome of elections?
  • Should petitioners lawsuit(s), who hold hard physical evidence, sworn affidavits, whistleblower videos and audio admissions of election officials committing criminal election fraud, documentation, unreconciled returns, and a literal mountain of evidence that approximately 327,000 votes were fraudulently certified in Delaware County, PA, in a presidential election that Joseph Biden allegedly “won” by approximately 80,000 votes, and undercard statewide elections of lesser margins, be considered for public remediation by the United States Supreme Court, or returned to the Court of first remedy (Common Pleas Court of Delaware County, PA)?
  • Is it lawful for the beneficiary(ies) of alleged election fraud to unilaterally investigate and adjudicate said fraud (i.eThe Pennsylvania Attorney General, Josh Shapiro and District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer).
Delco Vote Fraud Case Still Alive; Supreme Court Distributes It For Conference, Jan. 20

Lycoming County Must Surrender Cast Vote File

Lycoming County Must Surrender Cast Vote File — Lycoming County Judge Eric R. Linhardt has ordered the county’s Office of Voter Services to release a digital copy of the cast vote record file for every precinct tabulator and central tabulator used in the 2020 General Election.

The request was made by researcher Heather Honey who says that there were 120,000 fewer registered voters in Pennsylvania in 2020 than there were ballots counted.

And why would Lycoming’s Office of Voter Service even fight the request? Give us another reason besides that they were trying to hide something.

A little tidbit from the Nov. 21 marathon hearing before Judge Barry Dozor regarding the 2022 election really should be more considered.

Gavin Lawn, an observer at the counting center, testified he was inspired to become involved in poll watching after receiving 13 mail-in ballots at his home in 2020. Granted it wasn’t germane to the case at hand but it something to throw at the next vote-fraud denier one should come across.

Lycoming County Must Surrender Cast Vote File
Lycoming County Must Surrender Cast Vote File

Delco Fights Dropbox Camera Request And Loses

Delco Fights Dropbox Camera Request And Loses — The Pennsylvania Office of Open Records has ruled that Delaware County must supply all video surveillance — including body cameras — of ballot drop boxes from the 2020 election.

The request was made by county resident Patricia Bleasdale.

Further, the county must provide the procedure for Board of Election review of video surveillance, and the name of the vendor of the software used to evaluate and identify repeat visitors to drop boxes across all locations.

Also required to be surrendered are the policy/procedure, manuals and memoranda addressing the video surveillance requirement — including verbal directions — governing the preparation and installation of the boxes along with the movement and storage of the boxes through midnight, Nov. 8, 2020.

Well done, Pat Bleasdale.

Now ask yourself all former teenagers, why would the county fight this?

Just a thing to make you go hmmmm.

And while on the subject of Delco drop boxes wouldn’t it be nice to see the surveillance logs from 2022? How many suspicious incidents were noted by those watching? How many times were patrol cars sent to investigate something?

Surely 42 locations watched 24/7 for a month would have warranted something noted as unusual.

Right?

Delco Fights Dropbox Camera Request And Loses
Well Delco make history again?
Delco Fights Dropbox Camera Request And Loses

Supreme Court Dockets Delco Vote Fraud Case

Supreme Court Dockets Delco Vote Fraud Case — The United States Supreme Court has docketed the case of Greg Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes regarding vote fraud in Delaware County, Pa. from the 2020 election.

The Supreme Court docket is the list of cases that a particular session of the court has agreed to consider.

It should be noted that most docketed cases are denied before the plaintiffs can appear before the justices.

Greg and Leah’s case, 22-503, is appealing a decision by Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court and was filed Nov. 22.

They are representing themselves.

Greg and Leah note that the original case filed in Delaware County Common Pleas Court included Dasha Pruett the Republican candidate for Pennsylvania’s 5th Congressional District that year, and the Delco Republican Executive Committee.

Mrs. Pruett left the case when Common Pleas Court dismissed it on Jan. 13, 2021 and sanctioned Greg and Leah. This included fining them $50,000 and trying to get their lawyer, Deborah Silver, disbarred.

Supreme Court Dockets Delco Vote Fraud Case
Leah Hoopes, Emerald Robinson and Greg Stenstrom

The Delco GOP was excised from the case by the Commonwealth Court for not responding to any filing after the initial complaint.

Regarding the sanctions — which can be fairly called lawfare — noted attorney Bruce Castor successfully defended Greg, Leah and Ms. Silver in Commonwealth Court, which dismissed the fines and sanctions.

The points Greg and Leah are asking the court to address are:

  • Is the spoliation of election materials and evidence, required to be maintained by federal and state law, by election officials to perfect massive election fraud, evidence of said fraud by itself, and/or sufficient to infer adverse verdict?
  • Do duly appointed, certified poll watchers, who have taken an oath to fulfill their lawful duties as intervenors for both the candidates they represent, and the citizenry, have standing to petition the Courts on their own behalf to remedy grievous violations of election law, election fraud, and associated civil law?
  • Does the Court of first remedy in considering alleged grievous election and civil violations (in this case, the Common Pleas Court of Delaware County, Pennsylvania), have a duty to have an evidentiary hearing, and be presented evidence of allegations of massive election fraud that could change the outcome of an election, before ruling there isn’t a “scintilla of evidence” and otherwise ruling on facts not in evidence?
  • Does immediate notification of spoliation and destruction of election materials required to be maintained by federal and state law for 22 months (or as long as litigative controversy is pending), that proves massive election fraud that could change the outcome of an election, require the Court of first remedy to intervene to secure said evidence, as the lawful arbiter to preserve the integrity of the election system?
  • Are lawyers and “esquires” a special class that can unilaterally decide the outcome of litigative controversy without transparency, input, acknowledgement, or permission of petitioners, plaintiffs, and defendants and the citizenry, without public hearing, transcript or accountability?
  • Should both candidates for election represented by counsel, and Pro Se citizen litigants, be afforded the latitude and grace of the Supreme Court of the United States, as final arbiters of the Republic, to curate technically deficient but meritorious cases regarding the most sacred right of voting by the citizenry of the United States in their selection of their elected representatives, given the Court has repeatedly done so for other cases?
  • Is it lawful for public officials to intimidate, harass, and demand civil and criminal sanctions, and against lawful intervenors, candidates, citizens, and their attorneys for having the temerity to challenge grievous election law violations that would change the outcome of elections?
  • Should petitioners lawsuit(s), who hold hard physical evidence, sworn affidavits, whistleblower videos and audio admissions of election officials committing criminal election fraud, documentation, unreconciled returns, and a literal mountain of evidence that approximately 327,000 votes were fraudulently certified in Delaware County, PA, in a presidential election that Joseph Biden allegedly “won” by approximately 80,000 votes, and undercard statewide elections of lesser margins, be considered for public remediation by the United States Supreme Court, or returned to the Court of first remedy (Common Pleas Court of Delaware County, PA)?
  • Is it lawful for the beneficiary(ies) of alleged election fraud to unilaterally investigate and adjudicate said fraud (i.eThe Pennsylvania Attorney General, Josh Shapiro and District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer).

Greg and Leah were interviewed by Emerald Robinson, yesterday, Dec. 6 regarding this. Check it out here.

Supreme Court Dockets Delco Vote Fraud Case

Russ Vought Sics IRS On Zuck For Election Violations

Russ Vought Sics IRS On Zuck For Election Violations — Russ Vought, the director of  Office of Management and Budget for President Trump from July 2020 to January 2021 and who now heads the Center for Renewing America, has filed complaints with the IRS concerning Mark Zuckerberg behavior in the 2020 election.

Zuckerberg is the filthy-rich, 1-percenter, OK, .01-percenter, who owns Meta formerly Facebook.

Vought says that Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan made $500 million in tax deductible donations to “nonprofits”in the run ups to the election.

This money was managed by former Obama campaign manager David Plouffe.

Yeah, it’s illegal.

Vought explains things on the Sept. 22 edition of “Mornings with Maria” features anchor Maria Bartiromo here: https://rumble.com/v1lw5sa-russ-vought-sics-irs-on-meta-for-zuck-for-election-violations.html

Russ Vought Sics IRS On Zuck For Election Violations
Russ Vought Sics IRS On Zuck

Leah Hoopes Rebuts Barr Claim On Bannon

Leah Hoopes Rebuts Barr Claim On Bannon –Delco whistleblower Leah Hoopes appeared on Steve Bannon’s War Room, yesterday, Sept. 24, and rebutted former Attorney General Bill Barr’s claim that he investigated and reported on fraud allegations concerning the 2020 Election.

“Bill Barr is a stone-cold liar! I said this from the beginning. There was no report done,” Leah said. “There is no report. It’s in his book he said he had it. He told the president he had it. He’s testified under oath that he had it. That is a stone-cold lie.”

She said she had connected Bill McSwain, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, regarding election irregularities in the suburban Philadelphia county. She said he was willing to investigate until Barr ordered him to stand down.

Gateway Pundit has details here along with links to the Bannon interview and a Newsmax interview with Rob Schmitt she did in November 2020.

Leah Hoopes Rebuts Barr Claim On Bannon
Steve Bannon with Leah Hoopes
Leah Hoopes Rebuts Barr Claim On Bannon

Fulton County Suing Dominion Voting Systems Over Unsecured 2020 Election Machines

Fulton County Suing Dominion Voting Systems Over Unsecured 2020 Election Machines — Patrick Bryne is reporting on Rumble that Fulton County, Pa is suing controversial Dominion Voting Systems which supplies its voting machines.

The suit was filed this morning, Sept. 21, says Bryne.

The county claims that severe anonomolies occurred during the 2020 election in the machines Dominion sold them in 2019. Fulton County says that it was impossible to reconcile voter data with votes cast and counted.

The county says that Dominion failed to meet the conditions of its contract to provide reliable machines hence the county is seeking damages.

An investigation by  Wake Technology Services Inc. of West Chester, Pa. into the machines at the county’s request in February 2021 found numerous significant issues with the machines.

Bryne says the Wake investigation was followed — despite much push back from Dominion and Attorney General Josh Shapiro — by a much more detailed one which external USB drives had been inserted into the machines on several occasions, and that an unauthorized script had been added to the software after it had been certified.

This investigation was revealed Sept. 15, says Byrne.

Also an external IP address associated with Canada was found on the adjudication workstation, which means that at least one of the devices had been connected to the internet, he says.

Byrne’s video is linked to below:

https://rumble.com/v1kykbf-fulton-county-pennsylvania-sues-dominion.html

Fulton County Suing Dominion Voting Systems Over Unsecured 2020 Election Machines
Fulton County Suing Dominion Voting Systems Over Unsecured 2020 Election Machines

Voting Horror Stories Told At Aston Audit The Vote Event

Voting Horror Stories Told At Aston Audit The Vote Event –Rampant vote fraud in Delaware County, Pa. was evidenced yet again when Audit the Vote Pa appeared in Aston yesterday evening (Sept. 1).

About 60 persons crowded the lower room of Gatsby’s Bar & Grill on Pennell Road to hear Toni Shuppe and Karen Taylor explain the problems and solutions.

Mrs. Shuppe said a canvass of the county by election integrity volunteers found that 30 percent of the homes surveyed had phantom registrations which means more voted from the home than were registered.

She said it’s a county’s choice to place the famously insecure drop boxes and not a mandate by the state. Delco has chosen to place 42.

Will they be monitored by county cameras? Mrs. Shuppe said it is a priority to make sure they do. Other interesting ideas were also suggested by the enthusiastic audience.

Mules beware.

Voting Horror Stories Told At Aston Audit The Vote Event
Hatfield, Montco Committeewoman Sandra Levin with Toni Shuppe

She said even an extremist government like Delco’s can be pressured by the citizenry to do the right thing. She cited Allegheny County which has cut its drop boxes to one after angry people swarmed the meetings.

She said educating the public was a key to secure election. She, like Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes, said poll watchers have legally defined powers and must be strong enough to stand up to intimidation. She said judges of election have the legal power to count ballots themselves.

She revealed that the order to stop counting ballots on Election Night 2020 came directly from Pennsylvania’s Democrat-controlled Department of State.

The meeting was sponsored by Delco Conservatives, and in attendance were many committee people and election officials. A Montgomery County woman said she found a 12th drop box in Montco despite the county claiming to have placed just 11. She says they removed it after angry citizens contacted the commissioners.

Montco’s token Republican commissioner, Joe Gale, has been worthless on election integrity matters, one woman said.

Positions for election officials were being filled in Haverford Township by people who didn’t live there, a woman said.

Cameras weren’t set for the drop box in Aston, a man said.

Delaware County GOP lawyers ignored reported problems, a woman said.

Another woman said she sought a lawyer to help expose violations she saw occurring. None, however, would take her case saying the county powers-that-be would try to strip them of their law license.

Atticus Finch does not practice in Delco it seems.

All in all, though, it was an upbeat meeting attended by decent, courageous and indomitable people.

The county Republican establishment should take note albeit one wonders if they’ve become content living soft in second place.

Those wishing to volunteer to help with the Nov. 8 election can sign on at Audit the Vote’s website or with the Delco Conservatives.

Voting Horror Stories Told At Aston Audit The Vote Event

Parallel Election Podcast Topic

Parallel Election Podcast Topic — Face The Culture’s podcast, A Tale of Two Elections, featuring whistleblowing authors Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes is available to the world.

Their The Parallel Election makes the slam-dunk case that vote fraud was real and massive in Delaware County, Pa. and gave the 2020 Presidential Election of Joe Biden.

The panel also featured moderators Stephen Gruen and Kim Kennedy, and myself.

It was revealed that Ingram Content Group reversed its gutless decision to stop the book’s distribution.

Gregory says poll watchers have defined legally enforceable duties and are different than observers.

“What they did in 2020 . . . was they created a class of people called observers,” he said.

Did these observers have any real power?

No.

“You have to stay in a pen, you can’t look at ballots, and just sit there and shut up like a turnip,” Greg said.

The poll watcher, however, has real power.

They have by-right access to the ballots. This right, however, was ignored at the Delaware County counting warehouse in Chester. He said those in charge there made up the rules as they went along, and it took them five hours to fight their way in.

He said Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the powers of poll watchers but this was misquoted by the enforcers in large Democrat-controlled counties.

He said the court ruled that poll watchers as interveners for the citizenry are allowed to challenge ballots and uploading of drives.

“We are allowed to challenge anything that doesn’t have a chain of custody,” he said. “And they are forced to respond. We can even have somebody arrested.”

Again, however, Delaware County’s powers-that-be misconstrued the law.

“Some of the biggest liars and biggest participants in the fraud, were the attorneys,” Gregory said.

He said it must become common knowledge and something well understood by those running our elections what poll watchers and their powers are.

The book harshly criticizes GOP Republican candidate Sen. Doug Mastriano.

So who are they going to vote for?

“We are definitely not voting Shapiro,” Leah says.

A vote is not a love letter,” Greg said.

Leah says their goal is to get the truth to the voters and are staying away from endorsing or promoting any politician.

Gregory’s excellent social media site, Patriot.Online, was mentioned. It’s growing, easy to use and has a strong Southeastern Pa flavor.

Parallel Election Podcast Topic

The book is a must read, especially for Delco residents. Buy it on Amazon , which now has it available on Kindle; other distributers; or, best, at ParallelElection.com.

Give it as a Labor Day present as Christmas may be too late.

Listen online here.

Don’t use Google? Download the interview and use your audio player.

Face The Culture is live on Red State Talk Radio’s Justice Channel, 11 a.m., Saturdays and Sundays, besides its podcasts.

Parallel Election Podcast Topic
%d bloggers like this: