Bridge Over Troubled Christie

And so it begins! The 2016 presidential election is officially under way as we witness the first huge issue for the Republican frontrunner, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Opponents on both the right and left are hammering him over the “Bridgegate” scandal in which he is engulfed, and we will soon see how much intestinal fortitude the big man really has.

Cutting through the media hype, here is a frank analysis of the situation:

1. We can’t overstate the obvious. First, if Christie discovered the truth behind lane closures on the George Washington Bridge but covered it up, his presidential aspirations end immediately. Far worse, if he ordered, or agreed to, the closures, he would face impeachment, and probably indictment.

Second, (and from this point let’s assume Christie didn’t know anything), the abject stupidity of those who closed several lanes on the world’s busiest bridge for political retribution (because the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee didn’t endorse Christie) may not be the dumbest thing ever, but since it could affect world history, ranks in the top three.

Here’s the kicker: If anyone was going to be blamed for the four days of gridlock — where a 30-minute commute turned into four hours on the first day of school and the anniversary of 9/11 — it wouldn’t have been the Fort Lee mayor, but Christie himself. Even the most nonpolitical person knows that closing lanes on the George Washington Bridge is an order that comes only from the top.

So let’s recap: Here’s a plan that engages in retribution that hurts your own guy, gets you fired and will possibly land you in federal prison. Brilliant.

2. It was totally unnecessary. The re-election strategy was sound — tout bipartisan support in “blue” New Jersey as a trump card for the forthcoming presidential campaign. And Christie succeeded. So what if a few didn’t “play ball?” An endorsement (or lack thereof) by the mayor of Fort Lee has not, nor will it ever, affect national electoral politics. So why not just ignore him? Christie was going to win in a landslide, so anything jeopardizing that monumental victory was simply idiotic.

A comparison of Bridgegate and Watergate is in order. President Richard Nixon, like Christie, was a shoe-in for re-election, so there was no need to expend one second on anything that could derail the campaign and, ultimately, the administration. Whether rooted in paranoia or revenge, both actions show an unprecedented arrogance bordering on psychotic.

3. Christie’s staff — not just those responsible, but all who knew — showed an unconscionable lack of foresight. Common sense tells us that at least some other high-ranking officials close to Christie knew what had transpired, even if they had nothing to do with it. If their mission was to insulate Christie by giving him plausible deniability, they were woefully wrong. These things can never be kept under wraps, as it’s usually not the crime, but the cover-up that bites one in the derriere.

A trusted adviser should have told the governor everything, sparing no detail, so that a press conference could have been held — in October, before the election — shedding light on the situation, firing those involved, and apologizing to the Fort Lee mayor. That way, Christie would have been in front of the scandal, managing it on his terms and preventing it from spiraling out of control. Instead, because staff presumably chose to hide it, the story has a life of its own, and Christie finds himself on the defensive, with the seed of doubt now sown as to “how much he really knew.”

Most ironic, had Christie jumped on this before the election, he would have won by an even bigger margin.

Too bad for the governor that his people forgot the adage that “the truth shall set you free.”

4. Because of No. 3, the floodgates now open. Legitimate or not, attacks on Christie are coming from every direction on issues from A to Z, which will cumulatively take their toll on his up-to-now impenetrable armor. Before Bridgegate, these criticisms wouldn’t stick to Christie, whose stellar track record and brash charisma were enough to slam opponents into the dirt. But that doesn’t cut it anymore. Christie is bleeding and sharks from both parties are circling. Employing the “if you throw enough stuff against the wall, something will stick” attack mentality, Christie’s adversaries have him on the defensive for the foreseeable future.

5. Despite his tough-guy persona, Christie has never been tested by adversity. He had universal support in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Yes, he faced a Democratic Legislature and accomplished great things, but expectations for success in a hyper-partisan atmosphere were low. He faced a weak, underfunded opponent for re-election and, truth be told, got lucky when facing a beleaguered and unpopular Jon Corzine in 2009, when it was a fantastically good time to be a Republican.

Times like these separate the men from the boys. How Christie responds to the largest crisis of his life will determine if higher office remains viable.

6. Christie already faced the “Seinfeld factor” nationally. While Seinfeld’s New York humor played well on both coasts, much of it was lost on Americans in the heartland. Likewise, Christie’s brusque, in-your-face style would have been a significant obstacle to overcome in Middle America. Now matters are compounded exponentially, as dispelling the stereotypical rough-and-tumble New York/New Jersey political image, to which we on the coasts are desensitized, just got that much harder. Translation: This stuff doesn’t play well in places like Iowa and New Hampshire.

7. Can we please stop the double standards from both sides? The left is making this out as far worse than the IRS scandal, in which the agency targeted conservative political activists, and many on the right want to give Christie a pass because “he didn’t know about it.” They’re both off-base.

Christie supporters can’t have it both ways. If they exonerate the governor because they believe he was kept in the dark, the same courtesy must be extended to the president, since there is no hard evidence that he knew about the IRS actions. Yet, the right continues to blame Obama for what transpired. And while any form of political retribution using taxpayer-funded entities is flat-out wrong (and illegal), closing traffic lanes doesn’t remotely compare to deliberately targeting political opponents via the IRS. Yet, the outcry on the current scandal seems disproportionately greater than that of the IRS debacle. Go figure.

As an aside, it’s not surprising that some on the right are reveling in Christie’s troubles because he “isn’t conservative enough,” hoping the scandal knocks him out of the presidential race. That mentality is imbecilic, especially since, outside Christie, the GOP’s field is so weak. Once again, the right has shown its preference for infighting over winning. Well, congratulations. You just made Hillary the biggest winner of Bridgegate.

The road for Christie may become a bridge to nowhere. Many have a hard time believing that he didn’t know, given the direct involvement of his deputy chief of staff, campaign officials and his handpicked high school friends at the port authority. Whatever the truth, the Democrats now have some killer ads in their arsenal.

But if there is one man capable of not just surviving but beating the scandal, it’s Chris Christie. His bull-in-a-china-shop, say-it-like-it-is style has earned him millions of loyal supporters, but it’s his penchant for telling the truth and taking risks that most shun that should earn him something else: Our trust. And I, for one, still love the ring of “President Christie.” Keep fighting, governor.

Bridge Over Troubled Christie

 

Biggest Winners Of 2013

Biggest Winners Of 2013

By Chris Freind

We have discussed the biggest losers from last year, so now it’s time to spotlight those who won —though not always conventionally.

Political Correctness: A winner every year, PC has shown its incredible ability to not just persevere, but thrive, thanks mainly to people not demanding an end to the insanity. Sure, we’ve heard about crazy elementary school suspensions, stupid workplace rules, and educators banning tag and ballplaying — which only permits them to feel good about themselves, while making their students miserable — but perhaps the best PC story of the year recently took place in Texas.

Young school students had made Christmas cards for bedridden veterans, yet VA officials, in a move that made Scrooge look downright angelic, refused to allow the children’s holiday wishes into the hospital because they contained those vile and offensive phrases “Merry Christmas” and “God Bless You.” Yep, surely those who sacrificed so much for their country would have gotten sick to their stomachs after receiving such insensitive handmade cards.

How do the people who make such rules still have jobs, and who are the idiots that follow them?

We have become a nation of pansies, scared to take on the extremely small but very vocal PC police who day in and day out erode the freedoms so many died to protect. Losing rights forcibly is bad enough, but voluntarily giving them away is inexcusable. Here’s hoping political correctness doesn’t make next year’s Winners list.

Ohio Kidnapper Ariel Castro: The man who kidnapped, tortured and repeatedly raped three women while holding them captive for more than ten years finally did something right — he killed himself in prison. Not only did he spare taxpayers millions of dollars, but infinitely more important, he gave finality to the unimaginable terror those victims felt every day for a decade. Nothing could ever come close to righting the wrongs committed against those poor women, but knowing that Castro no longer draws breath is the next best thing. Hopefully he started a trend among his ilk currently in jail.

Are you listening Jerry Sandusky?

Dennis Rodman The Comic: The former NBA star has made his fourth trip to North Korea to pal around with his best buddy, leader Kim Jong Un, even singing him a Happy Birthday song. Rodman’s diplomatic skills were on full display during a CNN interview in which he exploded in a rant about an American held captive by Jong Un. Unfortunately, his sentiments were impossible to comprehend because of his significant trouble speaking the English language (sure hope his Korean is better), actually making him more incoherent than Joe Biden. To top it off, his too-many-piercings-to-count are simply mesmerizing. Thank God his hair isn’t still purple.

Since he continually shrugs off the fact that North Korea is the most repressive regime on the planet, states his “love” for Jong Un, and labeled his trip a great idea for the world, Rodman has shown that, yes, Virginia, there is life after professional sports — in the comedic arts.

Democratic Party (national): The Dems just got a mammoth boost for 2016 as leading Republican Chris Christie finds himself in a controversy that might, just might, have the power to send his presidential campaign on a bridge to nowhere. After weeks of rumors, there seems to be a smoking gun in the widening “Bridge-Gate” scandal. At issue is alleged retribution by Christie’s office, his campaign and his hand-picked officials at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey against Democratic Mayor Mark Sokolich of Fort Lee (where the roads of the town lead onto the George Washington Bridge — the world’s busiest).

Apparently, Christie’s forces were angry that Sokolich didn’t endorse their man, who wanted to tout bipartisan support as a path to the presidential nomination.

So, in an act that can only be described as mindboggling, three lanes of the bridge were closed for four days, including the first day of school and the anniversary of 9/11. The result was unparalleled gridlock, where a normal half-hour commute became four hours, emergency workers were unable to respond to calls, and school buses arrived hours late, all prompting calls of help from Sokolich that went gleefully unanswered.

These theoretically intelligent people can’t — just can’ t— have been that stupid. If it turns out they were, Christie will be hard-pressed to bridge the widening gap between his credibility and being the (very large) butt of jokes. You can’t have your cake and eat it too, and this may be one cake too many for the Guv.

Democratic Party (Pennsylvania): As if Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania’s beleaguered Republican Governor, didn’t have enough problems, such as hovering near single-digit approval. Now comes word that on the “Farm Families For Corbett” campaign website, where it reads, “Pennsylvania Farm Families Endorse Tom Corbett,” the farmers in the photos aren’t actually Pennsylvanians. In fact, they’re not even Americans, but Canadians. Too bad Canucks can’t vote, ehhh Tommy?

Since agriculture happens to be the state’s number one industry, pollsters are wondering if a politician can somehow attain a negative approval rating. Neat, ehh?

Kate Middleton (if she’s pregnant): Back in July, this columnist, in an open letter to Duchess Kate, implored her to become pregnant again as an example for the West to have more children and reverse its negative birthrates: “We know you have your hands full, but at the risk of sounding anxious, please do us a favor — have another child. Quickly. And two or three more after that.”

Well, the rumors are flying that William and Kate will be new parents again later this year. If true, that would be a stellar move for the Royal Family. Not only would it bolster British pride, but would set the stage for more families wanting more children, and, hopefully, lead to reform of anti-family tax policies so prevalent in America, Europe and Japan. It would also send the needed message that family is more important than material things. If dynamic world leaders like William and Kate choose to make family life and having children their priority issues, the West’s decline, might, just might, being reversed. God Save the Queen.

Nelson Mandela and Margaret Thatcher: Two of history’s most inspirational leaders passed away last year, individuals whose achievements make them ultimate winners.

Thatcher’s bold actions were legendary: staring down and helping defeat the Evil Empire (freeing millions behind the wall), retaking the Falkland Islands, jumpstarting a stagnant British economy, and, epitomizing her steely determination, declaring to doubters, “You turn if you want to…this Lady’s not for turning.”

Above all, her unwavering resolve recaptured something that had been so tragically lost — British pride. Farewell Iron Lady.

And then there was Mandela, a larger-than-life figure who endured isolation, imprisonment and torture with a dignity nearly impossible to comprehend. For 27 years he toiled in a South African jail, yet never gave up on his dream of freedom — not his own, but for all peoples in South Africa. In pursuit of that goal, he learned his adversary’s language and culture, constantly educated himself on the issues, and advocated peaceful reforms. Upon his release, when he could have called for violence against his oppressors, Mandela instead worked hand-in-hand with them, earning him the Nobel Peace Prize.

Nelson Mandela’s legacy is one that will forever inspire the oppressed to fight for equality and democracy. In his quintessential humbleness, Mandela once stated, “Do not judge me by my successes, judge me by how many times I fell down and got back up again.”

But with all due respect, Mr. Mandela, if anyone’s successes should be judged, they are yours. Rest in peace.

Biggest Winners Of 2013

2013 Biggest Losers

There are so many candidates for Biggest Losers of 2013 that they deserved their own column. Here they are:

Losers:

Andy Reid: Kansas City treated the former Philadelphia Eagles coach like the Second Coming, inexplicably ignoring his horrendous big-game record and three-word press conferences. Well, they got exactly what they deserved. Like clockwork, Reid jumped out to a 9-0 start, made the playoffs, and then imploded. His hallmarks of terrible play-calling and horrible time management were on full display as he blew a 28-point lead — the second-worst playoff collapse in NFL playoff history. But hey, there’s always next year — for Reid to do the exact same thing.

Big Ten Football: Speaking of bad football, just look at how pathetic the Big Ten has become. Neither Michigan State nor Ohio State, the conference’s best, would rank better than sixth in the SEC, and that’s being generous. This bowl season, yet again, demonstrated how bad the conference really is: it went 2-5, and, had Georgia and Stanford not defeated themselves with inexcusable dropped passes, the Big Ten would have been 0-7. Add in the dismal performances of its incoming teams (Maryland and Rutgers), and that record would show two more losses. The Big Ten has officially become the Big Who Cares conference.

Miley Cyrus: Talented? Absolutely. Trashy? Yep, and that’s a shame, because Miley would still have a tremendous following, maybe even a bigger one, if she stopped her dignity-be-damned headline grabbing antics.

Some parents want her to still be the wholesome Hannah Montana character that she rode to fame, but that’s not fair, as she has blossomed into a young adult entertainer. But she continually pushes it too far.

The irony is that the more these brash celebrities try to emulate the very best, such as Madonna, the farther they fall from the mark. Madonna showed keen entertainment and business acumen, and always stayed ahead of the curve while creatively pushing the line but never crossing it so as to appear outright trashy. That is what made her such a worldwide icon, a label that fits to this day. Cyrus, on the other hand, is the butt of jokes and will likely be a has-been in five years. Ultimately, talent is still what sells, not gimmicks — a lesson the young Wrecking Ball will soon learn.

Obamacare: Our government messes up virtually everything it touches, and health care will be no exception. The Obamacare website/IT disaster illustrated our government’s propensity to vastly overspend (over $1 billion) on things that either don’t work or are totally inefficient. How people think that bureaucrats making potentially life-and-death medical decisions will work remains a mystery.

Yet, through it all, there is still no alternative offered by the anti-Obamacare Republicans. You can’t beat something with nothing, as the last several elections proved. If the GOP doesn’t learn that message quickly, they will wake up in 2016 as losers yet again. Advice for 2014: Don’t get sick.

New Yorkers: The exodus of money from New York City has already begun, as new Mayor Bill de Blasio has embarked on the liberal pat of “taxing the wealthy” to pay for his “universal” pre-K pet project (and as we know, anytime a politician uses the term “universal,” you know it’s going to be bad).

This writer took issue with former Mayor Michael Bloomberg on several of his signature issues — namely soda bans, anti-tobacco policies and stop-and-frisk. That said, Bloomberg and his  predecessor Rudy Giuliani (both Republicans) presided over a huge renaissance for New York: crime decreased, streets were cleaned, deficits were transformed into surpluses, and the once-stagnant economy roared to life. Unlike many big cities where outgoing mayors leave a trail of disaster for the new guy, New York doesn’t have that problem. There are good reasons that America’s biggest city hasn’t had a Democratic mayor in two decades; de Blasio should heed that lesson and tread lightly.

But he won’t. And sadly, the Big Apple will start to rot. Is it four years yet?

Trial lawyers: The main reason our society has become so selfish is because trial lawyers have ingrained in Americans the belief that they have the “right” to sue for absolutely everything, whether or not there is any fault. Accountability and personal responsibility have disintegrated, and the once-automatic response of helping people in distress has morphed into turning the other way for fear of liability, Good Samaritan laws notwithstanding.

Sure, there is a need for a strong legal advocate when a wrong
has been committed, but we have reached the point where we live in fear
of lawsuits. Spill coffee on yourself? Sue the restaurant. Don’t like
the grade your college professor gave you? Sue. Get fired for not doing
your job? Lawsuit time.

Three recent doozies illustrate how crazy it’s become:

1. The family of former Kansas City Chiefs football player Jovan
Belcher has filed a wrongful death suit against the team, blaming
concussions and possible brain injury for his actions — which included murdering his girlfriend by shooting her nine times while legally drunk
(more than twice Missouri’s legal limit), and killing himself. Tragic as
that is, no one forced Belcher to play football, and all of today’s
players know, or should know, the risk of concussions and brain trauma.
To blame the team (and the league, as many conveniently do) is bad
enough. But to sue? Those people are the ones who need their heads
examined.

2. A pharmacist in Ireland refused to give a potentially
life-saving Epi-pen adrenaline injection to a girl having a severe
allergic reaction to peanuts because the mother didn’t have a
prescription with her. The girl died in the street. Was that non-action
due to an imbecile unable to bend a rule to save a life, or fear of
being sued if he intervened? Either way, it is a horrendous sign of the
times.

3. Perhaps most perplexing is the car commercial where a vehicle
jumps on top of a train to get around traffic. There are four, yes
four, different disclaimers admonishing viewers, “Do Not Attempt,” along
with, “Fantasy. Cars Cannot Jump On Trains.”

Really? Is that what it has come to in this country? Companies
feel it necessary to add disclaimers to shield them from liability in
case some moron attempts to drive his car onto a moving train?

If only we could sue trial lawyers for bringing frivolous lawsuits, and the judges who allow them.

2013 Biggest Losers

 

Winners, Losers 2013

By Chris Freind CHRIS FREIND

It’s that time of year again when we contemplate those in our region who made life more enjoyable over the past year, and, of course, the biggest boneheads of 2013.

Winners

Broomall Fire Company: Sure, these volunteer firefighters are heroes on an everyday basis, since they routinely do things contrary to human nature, like running into places everyone else is trying to escape. And yes, they are always kind enough to give Santa Claus a lift around Marple Township on their fire truck so they can spread much-anticipated Christmas cheer. But this year, they did something extra special.

As Santa was passing by, a beautiful girl with special needs came running down the street with her grandfather to catch a look. Her eyes twinkling with excitement, her smile a mile wide, she was thrilled to have been so close. But as she stood there in awe watching the truck move away, it got better. Much better. The driver stopped the truck, turned around and came back. The whole crew — and Santa himself — then gave the girl the gift of a lifetime, inviting her to ride along with them throughout the neighborhood. There wasn’t a dry eye to be found.

Seeing acts of kindness like that rekindles faith in humanity and restores the true meaning of Christmas where it belongs — in the heart.

Opera Singers At Fellini’s Cafe in Media: It’s all too easy to get caught up in the immense negativity that surrounds us, but dinner at Fellini’s on Opera Night, where the singers — literally right beside you — belt out songs of passion while hitting notes seemingly not possible, makes the bad things immediately melt away. The singers, some of whom rush back to service their tables after performing, leave patrons breathless, stunned by how beautiful, how intense, and how intimate an opera song can be.

Being in downtown Media at Christmastime is spectacular; eating fantastic food even better. But leave it to the passionate Italian opera singers to make that experience priceless.

St. Joe’s Prep High School football team: The underdog Hawks routed a three-time state champion from Pittsburgh to win it all, earning the No. 1 ranking in Pennsylvania and good enough to be 38th best in the country.

And hey, if a Catholic school wasn’t going to win the championship, the Jesuits are the next best thing!

So kudos to the Hawks and best wishes for continued success. Perhaps next year, they will be able to accomplish the one goal that has eluded them — beating my alma mater, Malvern Prep.

Chip Kelly and the Eagles: Truth be told, the Eagles would have made the Winners list even if they had lost to the Cowboys. Kelly has the team, and just as important, the fans, believing again — something that had been woefully lost during the last years of coach Andy Reid. Kelly led the last-to-first transformation with creativity and guts, and now, the Iggles are going to be a very, very tough team to beat, especially in cold Philadelphia weather.

And here’s the best part: Chip actually says more than three words at press conferences. That alone makes him a huge winner in Philly’s book.

Delaware County: Delco scored big by attracting corporate powerhouse Sunoco, which will be vacating its offices in Center City and moving into the Ellis Preserve in Newtown Square.

Gee, I wonder why. Could it be that Delaware County has lower taxes, safer streets, lower taxes, better schools, free parking, lower taxes, easier access, and did we mention lower taxes?

Though, to be fair, Delaware County Council has to watch itself on the tax issue, as businesses and residents have seen a considerable tax spike over the last several years. Take a lesson from Philly. If you want less of something, tax it. Be careful.

Losers

It wasn’t too “taxing” to it figure out this year’s biggest loser, which certainly takes some of the fun out of it. That dubious honor goes to:

Gov. Tom Corbett: He was sitting at a 17 percent approval rating before pushing for, and achieving, a signature item: giving Pennsylvanians what will be the highest gas prices in the nation (an increase of 30 cents per gallon when fully phased). Talk about the gift that keeps on giving. And that’s his answer to win people over?

At least he achieved pension reform before the whole system exploded. Oh, wait. Sorry. He didn’t. Nor did he achieve what should have been a slam dunk — privatizing liquor, an issue on which almost all Pennsylvanians agree. Nor did he lower the country’s second-highest corporate tax rate to attract companies — a win-win since it would have also added union jobs. Instead, he kept trying to outsource the lottery to a foreign firm while consultants (and campaign contributors) reaped millions in taxpayer-financed fees.

But above all, Corbett is the biggest loser because he again deliberately failed to answer questions on the most pressing issue on many inquiring minds — and what will be the most decisive issue of the 2014 election — his handling of the Jerry Sandusky investigation while attorney general.

The Tom and Jerry Show is far from over, and legions of Penn Staters are salivating at the chance to make their voice heard on this issue — at the ballot box.

Philadelphia: What a shame that Philly makes this list every year. A city in a prime location with not one but two major river systems that could be tastefully developed (yet won’t be) continues to stagnate, as its residents and businesses continue their exodus to greener pastures. Sunoco, Citibank and countless others have fled, and with them, Philadelphia’s best and brightest.

And Mayor Nutter’s answer? Tax more, invent new taxes, ignore the pension bomb that will soon explode, and throw more money at a failed school system, all while leading a bloated, massively inefficient and downright hostile government.

It’s gotten so bad that Nutter makes John Street look good. What a legacy.

Weatherpeople: It’s one thing to make a lot of money being wrong so often. But what makes weather anchors so despised is how they overhype every single “weather event” (whatever that even means) to the point where many viewers are downright frightened, especially senior citizens. Ironically, news directors and the weather-morons haven’t yet figured out that their formula is a recipe for disaster. The more they cry wolf, and the more they needlessly scare people in their misguided quest for ratings, the more people tune out — and decreased ratings mean lower ad revenue.

So what are the chances of less babble about radar double scans and Alberta Clippers (seriously, who cares?) and more straight talk on the weather? Sorry to rain on that parade, but a snowball’s chance in hell.

Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

By Chris Freind Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

The Christmas Season is finally here, that festive time of eggnog and good cheer, where “it’s better to give than to receive.”

OK. Scratch that last one, for at least two big constituencies would strongly disagree.

1. Children, since there’s nothing better than ripping open presents after interminably waiting for Santa.

2. Every country on Earth, all salivating at receiving the mother lode of U.S. government intelligence operations, courtesy of Mr. “Secret” Santa himself, former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

At first, Snowden’s actions — exposing the NSA’s massive domestic spying operations — merited him a big Christmas gift, but as the extent of his security breeches become known, he deserves nothing but coal and a jail cell.

The scope of Snowden’s actions, and ultimately who received what information, may never be known, but it is clearly the largest exposure of intelligence secrets in history. Like most stories that garner huge attention, however, many of the major points are being overlooked in favor of juicier, albeit less important, angles. Worst of all, actions are now being contemplated that should not even be on the table, from amnesty for Snowden to severely curtailing U.S. intelligence capabilities.

Let’s review the situation:

1. The NSA is wrong to spy on Americans without probable cause. Period. It is unacceptable that the agency hacked into (or outright demanded) the private data of phone carriers, Internet providers and search engine companies for domestic intelligence-gathering activities. If government agencies need information related to an individual being investigated, they should use the proper — aka legal — channels to conduct their operations. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court (FISA) was established in 1978 for just that purpose.

Trolling through millions of records of law-abiding citizens, just because the agency has the capability, should unequivocally be a violation of the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable search-and-seizure provision. And it’s unnecessary, as FISA courts are highly effective: In 33 years, only 11 of 34,000 FISA warrants were rejected.

Ironically, there’s significant doubt that the NSA’s domestic spying efforts are even productive. Just this week, a federal judge, in stating that the NSA’s actions were likely unlawful, concluded that the government didn’t cite a single instance in which the program “actually stopped an imminent terrorist attack,” according to the Associated Press.

When our government becomes as intrusive as those we fight, it’s time for major changes. So let’s recap — no more unregulated domestic spying.

2. For everyone and everything else, it’s fair game. There should be no restrictions — none — on intelligence-gathering operations conducted outside the United States. And that includes even our staunchest allies.

It is dangerously naïve to believe that our friends will always do the right thing. Self-interest and greed are powerful motivators, and can quickly erode the integrity and common sense of otherwise reasonable people.

Because national security and the lives of millions hang in the balance, the NSA must always adhere to a “trust but verify” approach, achieved through 24/365 surveillance and eavesdropping operations, not just on the bad guys, but everyone.

If it didn’t engage in such operations, we might never have known about the individuals, companies, and yes, friendly governments, that have jeopardized global security by deliberately violating treaties and laws. A good example is those who have secretly helped build Iran’s nuclear program.

And just last week, numerous entities, from Ukraine to the Philippines, were nailed by the U.S. for violating sanctions placed on Iran. That type of information doesn’t come out of thin air, but from aggressive, hard-nosed spying, both human and electronic. Any changes in how we collect and share intelligence as a way to mitigate international fallout from the Snowden leaks would be disastrous and should be resisted at all costs.

3. Hey allies — stop whining! So you got spied upon. So what? Deal with it, but at least be honest. You spy on America, or at least attempt to, on a regular basis. You’re just not very good at it.

Don’t get your underwear in a twist because we’re so much better at it than you. Of course, our status as world leader also makes us your protector, not because we have to, but because it’s the right thing to do. Much the same way that America saved you — and all of humanity — by winning two world wars.

Since no one ever looks to China to save the day when things get dicey, how about this? If any country steps up and fully takes over America’s place on the world stage — militarily, economically, politically — entirely on its own, we’ll stop spying on you.

What’s that? No takers? Well then, maybe you should stop pouting over the NSA listening to your phone calls and eavesdropping on the unfathomably exciting G8 Summit conversations.

The lesson? “Mr. Ed” (Snowden) notwithstanding, don’t kick a gift horse in the mouth.

How Edward Snowden, (a contractor, not even an NSA employee), was permitted access to so many classified documents is something that needs thorough investigation, as well as why his computers were configured to hide his movements.

That aside, had he exposed the domestic spying operations only, one could make the case that his actions were rooted in patriotism and liberty. But he didn’t.

Instead, he has put the security of the world in serious jeopardy, and without question needs to be held accountable and brought to justice.

And that would be the best present of all.

Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

ObamaCare, Dead Plan Walking

By Keith Phucas


Is Obamacare dead? If not, it may be put out of its misery soon by America’s younger generation.
 



With no apparent incentives for young adults to sign up on the health care exchanges, it’s a safe bet that unless enrollment figures rise dramatically, the Affordable Care Act stratagem will ultimately fail — fail, that is, because it cannot attract sufficient numbers of young people
to the exchanges to subsidize the older, less healthy enrollees.


Obamacare is too big not to fail.

With more and more sick older folks enrolled, but few young’uns, up and up go premiums to dizzying heights. All that’s left to do is stand back and
watch the death spiral rise, right? Then watch it all come tumbling
down. Well, at the moment, it’s difficult to predict the future sequence
of events.

But why in the world would adults in their 20s — “Young Invincibles” or “Millennials” (ages 18 to 34) seen as essential for Obamacare to work financially — enroll on Healthcare.gov given the federal exchange’s poor performance, security concerns and high premium offerings? 


Besides, many Millennials can stay on their parents’ health care plan until they turn 26.


Oh, and here’s one more reason why there’s no big hurry to sign up for health coverage now — the law forbids discriminating against anyone with a preexisting condition, so the uninsured can wait until they fall ill and land in the hospital before signing up for coverage. How convenient.

Obamacare’s true believers, who earnestly believed the president’s signature law would actually make insurance affordable for all, must be wondering what the hell happened to detour his signature achievement onto this twisted course.

Read more at Delco Conservative

Global Warming Solutions

By Chris Freind

Priceless campaign ad No. 112 against Tom Corbett: His nominee to head the Department of Environmental Protection stating climate change isn’t harmful.

Unlike so many political commercials that deliberately mislead or outright lie, this one will be clear cut, right out of the donkey’s mouth (the animal fits, even though he’s a Republican). Chris Abruzzo, the guv’s pick for DEP secretary, actually told that to the Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee.

“I’ve not read any scientific studies that would lead me to conclude there are adverse impacts to human beings, animals or plant life at this small level of climate change,” Abruzzo said.

He would be right, except for these: Significant human health problems; melting polar ice caps; warming oceans; rising sea levels; species that have gone extinct; animals appearing in regions where they’ve never been before; and extreme weather patterns resulting in record storms, floods and droughts, all associated with climate change.

Therefore, since advocating such a viewpoint about Earth’s global warming is incomprehensible, maybe Abruzzo was talking about climate change on another planet. Uranus perhaps?

The immediate implication is a no-brainer. It’s the latest nail in Corbett’s political coffin, which already has a record-setting number of career-ending spikes in it.

The more troubling aspect is that yet another Republican believes human activity plays little or no role in climate change caused by global warming, and therefore, the issue doesn’t need further addressing. It’s no wonder the GOP finds itself on the losing end of so many elections, since its position alienates the Great American Middle, who always decide general elections.

That’s not to suggest that Republicans should adopt a different position because it would help them win, but because it’s common sense.

That the Earth is warming is indisputable. The question is what’s behind that change. Is it a cyclical phenomenon occurring every 500 or 1,000 years, or more? Quite possibly, but difficult to ascertain since accurate record keeping didn’t begin until relatively recently.

Or is it because human activity has pumped hundreds of billions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere?

The rational answer is both. So why not err on the side of caution — reasonably — to cut down on emissions while protecting American jobs and economic competitiveness?

Sounds logical enough, but it’s not easy when both sides cling to extreme positions, whether its espousing job-killing proposals or claiming adverse impacts don’t exist.

An American living in Mexico City was experiencing respiratory distress and, upon examination in the U.S., was told she needed to quit smoking three packs of cigarettes a day. There was only one problem. She had never smoked.

The unchecked pollution emanating from our southerly neighbor and most of the world’s manufacturing nations are wreaking havoc on people’s health and the environment. And since air and water currents don’t adhere to political boundaries, rampant pollution affects everybody.

It’s in our interest to solve these problems, so here’s how we can:

1. Scrap our trade policies. The Unites States has made stellar progress over the last several decades in cutting down on pollution. Lake Erie was once a dead zone, and the Cuyahoga River caught fire because of the widespread industrial waste that oozed into it, yet, now these waterways are success stories because Americans were committed to cleaning up the environment. That effort continues, but it’s not without cost.

By definition, it’s more expensive to operate a factory when adhering to strict environmental regulations, an issue compounded when competing with overseas companies who have no such laws to follow (or where they are unenforced).

We can’t physically force sovereign nations to cut back on pollution and institute environmental regulations on par with ours, but we can force their hand by leveraging our position as the world’s largest economy. But to do that, we must scrap trade policies that sell out America and leave our companies at a major disadvantage. Free and fair trade sound nice, but we have neither, and that must change.

From the threat of tariffs to the elimination of foreign aid and military support, we have the muscle. But we need the will. Money talks, and since we have more than anyone else (at least for now), we need to leverage that advantage to level the environmental playing field. In doing so, everyone wins.

2. Never sign a treaty that restricts America’s carbon emissions while giving “developing” nations a free pass. In addition to the devastating impact it would have on American jobs, such treaties (such as Kyoto) are only a finger in the dike. We aren’t the unchecked polluter, and continue to become “greener,” so why penalize Americans for doing the right thing?

3. No unfunded government mandates. Sure, reducing a factory’s emissions is important, but having the government mandate a billion-dollar scrubber be installed in a finite period of time results in job loss, lack of growth (and hiring), and for some companies, a one-way ticket out of America. Tax credits and market-based incentives for such pollution control initiatives are an infinitely better solution.

The government will never gain converts by taxing them into submission; instead, it needs to incentivize them to play ball. Many companies want to go green and reduce their carbon footprint, but can do so only if the measures they undertake are cost-effective. To help ensure that, Congress must reduce the world’s highest corporate income tax. Failure to do so is a tragic disincentive for corporations to become more environmentally responsible.

4. Don’t listen to anything Al Gore says. No disrespect to the inventor of the Internet, but why should we follow someone who proselytizes the virtues of greenness and the evils of the gas combustion engine, yet whose carbon footprint is larger than Montana?

5. Use more natural gas — a lot more — while mandating safe fracking techniques. America sits atop a virtually limitless supply of gas, which produces a mere fraction of oil’s emissions. From power plants to vehicles, the use of natural gas would not only substantially reduce greenhouse gases, but bolster America’s national security, reducing dependence on Middle Eastern oil barons. This extremely cheap, abundant energy would resurrect our manufacturing base while keeping American dollars where they belong. Here.

6. Stop ceding the environmental issue to extremists hell-bent on returning America to the Stone Age. Preserving the environment for our children and grandchildren isn’t radical. It’s the right thing to do.

The GOP should take a lesson from Teddy Roosevelt’s playbook, as he successfully epitomized what a true Republican should be: A capitalist not afraid to take on big business that, left unchecked, would run rampant over the environment; a leader who prioritized preservation and responsible stewardship of the land; and a politician who, above all, carried a big stick.

A stick that could be used to whip into shape those who don’t think climate change is a major issue.

Visit BillLawrenceDittos.com for Global Warming Solutions
Visit BillLawrenceOnline.com for Global Warming Solutions
Visit BillLawrenceTrivia.com for Omnibits

Our Physical God


By Fr. Frank Pavone

It’s Christmas time again, and the Church focuses on the Incarnation, a word coming from the Latin “in carne,” which means, “in the flesh.” Christmas is God in the flesh: no longer only an eternal Spirit who fills the universe, but our brother, whom we can hear, see, and touch.

One of the reasons he did this was to empower us to love him, and to love our neighbor.

The first Christians learned how to love, because the source of love, the Christ who sacrificed himself, was personally known to them. They saw and touched him.

“That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched – this we proclaim concerning the Word of life.  The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it…” (1 John:1:1-2).

And when commanded not to speak about Jesus, they replied, “We cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard.’” (Acts 4:20).

This contact with the humanity of Christ speaks to us of what we are to do now for the unborn. It is the contact with the human reality of their lives, and the human tragedy of their deaths, that is to impel us in our self-sacrificing love for them.

It is not the “nuance” of the super-sophisticated that impels self-sacrificing, life-giving action. It is contact with the humanity we serve. It is facing the injustice that oppresses human lives, and then making a human response to it that springs from the depths of our own humanity, grounded in the God who gave that humanity to us.

That is why we need to look at the pictures of the victims of abortion — Not simply at the pictures of the living baby in the womb, but the pictures of what abortion does to that baby (see both at Unborn.info).

The last thing supporters of abortion want to talk about is abortion. You will not hear them describe the procedure, much less show people what it looks like.

In his homily on July 3, Pope Francis said,

“We find Jesus’ wounds in carrying out works of mercy, giving to our body – the body – the soul too, but – I stress – the body of your wounded brother, because he is hungry, because he is thirsty, because he is naked, because he is humiliated, because he is a slave, because he’s in jail because he is in the hospital…Those are the wounds of Jesus today. …We need to touch the wounds of Jesus, we must caress the wounds of Jesus, we need to bind the wounds of Jesus with tenderness, we have to kiss the wounds of Jesus, and this literally. Just think of what happened to St. Francis, when he embraced the leper? The same thing that happened to Thomas: his life changed. ”

Let us touch the sufferings of the baby who is in danger of abortion, and be changed into fearless warriors for them.

Read and listen to this column online at Priestsforlife.org/columns/4824-our-physical-god

Comments on this column? Go to Askfrfrank.com

Fr. Frank’s columns are podcast. See Priestsforlife.org/podcast

Remember to support our work at Priestsforlife.org/donate

Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

By Chris Freind Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

There’s both good news and bad.

The bad: Phoenixville Area School District has a need to expand, but has had trouble finding space it likes.

But fear not. There is good news that might solve the problem.

Eminent domain could be used to seize the houses of all the district’s school board members, thereby meeting the necessary classroom space requirements.

That may seem unfair, but hey, the rights of the individual are trumped by what’s deemed by the elite to be in the public’s (or their own) best interest. And it would be perfectly legal, since the government can take private property in order to develop both public and other private property, pretty much any way it sees fit.

Seem far-fetched? Too intrusive in a free country?

Think again.

The tragic reality is that the Phoenixville School District already has found a solution. Jettisoning the possibility of developing any of the 95 other tracts of land it considered, the District decided to instead seize the Meadow Brook Golf Club in order to build a new school, one that can be located near the high school so that a “learning village” can be created. Whatever that means.

In doing so, the district is seizing an 80-year old business — albeit one that might have been on the market anyway — and kicking property owners off land that had been in their family since 1896. And don’t hold your breath that there will be just compensation, since the district is willing to pay substantially less than what the owners had requested. The family was asking $8 million for the site and wouldn’t budge from that number, despite a recent district assessment of $3.725 million. The district offered $5 million.

Here’s the worst part: On Nov. 14, the school district voted to invoke eminent domain without even informing the property owners beforehand — who only discovered what had happened by reading it in the local newspaper. Pending a successful appeal (the prospect of which seems extremely bleak), the property changes hands on Dec. 15.

So because of Big Brother’s ever-increasing reach, over a century’s worth of memories, not to mention numerous jobs, will be obliterated in the span of just 30 days.

If that’s not the definition of classless, what is?

The truly disturbing part is that, while immoral and wrong, this is legal. But even more frightening is that no one is safe from eminent domain’s reach. In the past, government would seize property only for public works projects, but in 2005, the ball game changed — big time.

In a ruling that many consider one of the worst U.S. Supreme Court decisions in history, five mind-numbingly obtuse justices decided that citizens’ land could be taken by the government for private economic development, even if those properties were not in areas of blight or decay.

The criteria? When local or state officials think the public would benefit That’s enough leeway to dock a battleship.

Forget the original intent of eminent domain, which actually had the public’s best interest in mind when considering public projects, such as utilities, railroads and highways.

It seems those things, while necessary, just aren’t sexy enough for some of today’s pols.

Where’s the fun in just building a road when you can construct a mall with all the perks that come with being mayor or councilman in that location?

And when houses are bulldozed to make way for a plush resort — with wealthy land developers lining the campaign pockets of politicians who decide such matters — is that in the public’s interest?

As then-Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her dissent to the eminent domain decision, the “specter of condemnation hangs over all property. Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory.”

In other words, the rich and powerful get what they want, the politicians make out, and small property owners — 99.9% of Americans — get squashed.

Somehow, it’s doubtful the Founding Fathers had this in mind.

Most home and business owners are neither wealthy nor influential, so their options are extremely limited.

Fighting City Hall means huge legal fees with no guarantee of success. Loans are still difficult to obtain, so those victimized by misguided eminent domain judgments often are forced to tap into their retirement accounts to survive. And those on fixed incomes, many of whom previously only worried about property taxes, face the prospect of writing a mortgage or rent check for the rest of their lives, because self-interested politicians want their pet projects to come to life.

The use of eminent domain in America was supposed to be a last resort. When it had to be employed, landowners were to be given fair compensation, and, in most cases, the greater public good was easily recognized. The Blue Route (I-476) is a prime example. After years of court battles, the project was finally given the green light, and the highway remains one of the most important infrastructure improvements in Pennsylvania history.

But it is unfathomable that in today’s “Amerika,” eminent domain has evolved into the weapon of choice for greedy, corrupt or simply misguided politicians and school boards.

It’s time for the newly comprised high court to revisit this contentious issue. In doing so, it would have the historic opportunity to right a huge wrong, and put the “c” back in “America.”

Chief Justice Roberts, the floor is yours.

Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

ObamaCare Challenge

By Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D.

Here is the newly-uploaded ObamaCare Homepage; see if you can register!

With all due respect to those who fantasize that ObamaCare
is self-destructing, it should be noted that it’s fully-funded [thanx
to Mike Fitzpatrick] and will begin to distribute “goodies” [subsidies]
in a month; nevertheless, “hope springs eternal” and, thus,
emerging-data are worth distilling and disseminating. Again, to save
time [as occurred with the “Racism”-themed “blast”], categorization
after an intro will be provided, with key-concepts grouped and
juxtaposed, affording the reader a database that can be used to
corroborate conclusions drawn in analyses/syntheses of this
transformational [irreversible?] effort. {ObamaCare
doesn’t officially kick off until 1/1/2014, yet millions of Americans
are already at each other’s throats over it; research from the U.S.
Census Bureau shows that the country is now more divided than at any
other time in history since the Civil War era.
..and BHO must now feel self-satisfied.}  The GOP’s Health Care Compact tersely conveys an alternative to this crass exertion of Big Government.

This is the compilation major Healthcare Policy Articles disseminated on Nov. 25 by The Market Institute, [c/o the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, of which this physician is a member]; readers may want to check-out/explore this website:

Healthcare.gov
is not CGI’s first bungled IT contract. They were tasked with building
out a gun registry website in Canada that ultimately did not work and
cost Canadians $80 million (Heritage Foundation Blog).

Independent undercover investigations into so called ObamaCare “Navigators” have revealed instances of fraud (Heritage Foundation Blog).

ObamaCare is supposed to influence smokers to quit tobacco use, but the
opposite effect is occurring. Because of facing higher insurance
premiums due to their tobacco use, smokers are opting out of health
coverage altogether (Fox News).

Concerns over Healthcare.gov
are not going away with the end of November deadline approaching for
the website fix, but analysts think the government has until March to
really get the website working because that is when most young people
will be looking to enroll (National Journal).

Congressional Democrats are worried the White House is not taking the
electoral blowback of the fledgling ObamaCare rollout seriously enough.
There is cause for concern however, as the President and his namesake
law are polling at all-time lows (Politico).

Dr. Sklaroff  has been a consistent, and prescient,  critic of the “Affordable” Care Act since it was proposed. Read more from him here.

ObamaCare Challenge