2013 Biggest Losers

There are so many candidates for Biggest Losers of 2013 that they deserved their own column. Here they are:

Losers:

Andy Reid: Kansas City treated the former Philadelphia Eagles coach like the Second Coming, inexplicably ignoring his horrendous big-game record and three-word press conferences. Well, they got exactly what they deserved. Like clockwork, Reid jumped out to a 9-0 start, made the playoffs, and then imploded. His hallmarks of terrible play-calling and horrible time management were on full display as he blew a 28-point lead — the second-worst playoff collapse in NFL playoff history. But hey, there’s always next year — for Reid to do the exact same thing.

Big Ten Football: Speaking of bad football, just look at how pathetic the Big Ten has become. Neither Michigan State nor Ohio State, the conference’s best, would rank better than sixth in the SEC, and that’s being generous. This bowl season, yet again, demonstrated how bad the conference really is: it went 2-5, and, had Georgia and Stanford not defeated themselves with inexcusable dropped passes, the Big Ten would have been 0-7. Add in the dismal performances of its incoming teams (Maryland and Rutgers), and that record would show two more losses. The Big Ten has officially become the Big Who Cares conference.

Miley Cyrus: Talented? Absolutely. Trashy? Yep, and that’s a shame, because Miley would still have a tremendous following, maybe even a bigger one, if she stopped her dignity-be-damned headline grabbing antics.

Some parents want her to still be the wholesome Hannah Montana character that she rode to fame, but that’s not fair, as she has blossomed into a young adult entertainer. But she continually pushes it too far.

The irony is that the more these brash celebrities try to emulate the very best, such as Madonna, the farther they fall from the mark. Madonna showed keen entertainment and business acumen, and always stayed ahead of the curve while creatively pushing the line but never crossing it so as to appear outright trashy. That is what made her such a worldwide icon, a label that fits to this day. Cyrus, on the other hand, is the butt of jokes and will likely be a has-been in five years. Ultimately, talent is still what sells, not gimmicks — a lesson the young Wrecking Ball will soon learn.

Obamacare: Our government messes up virtually everything it touches, and health care will be no exception. The Obamacare website/IT disaster illustrated our government’s propensity to vastly overspend (over $1 billion) on things that either don’t work or are totally inefficient. How people think that bureaucrats making potentially life-and-death medical decisions will work remains a mystery.

Yet, through it all, there is still no alternative offered by the anti-Obamacare Republicans. You can’t beat something with nothing, as the last several elections proved. If the GOP doesn’t learn that message quickly, they will wake up in 2016 as losers yet again. Advice for 2014: Don’t get sick.

New Yorkers: The exodus of money from New York City has already begun, as new Mayor Bill de Blasio has embarked on the liberal pat of “taxing the wealthy” to pay for his “universal” pre-K pet project (and as we know, anytime a politician uses the term “universal,” you know it’s going to be bad).

This writer took issue with former Mayor Michael Bloomberg on several of his signature issues — namely soda bans, anti-tobacco policies and stop-and-frisk. That said, Bloomberg and his  predecessor Rudy Giuliani (both Republicans) presided over a huge renaissance for New York: crime decreased, streets were cleaned, deficits were transformed into surpluses, and the once-stagnant economy roared to life. Unlike many big cities where outgoing mayors leave a trail of disaster for the new guy, New York doesn’t have that problem. There are good reasons that America’s biggest city hasn’t had a Democratic mayor in two decades; de Blasio should heed that lesson and tread lightly.

But he won’t. And sadly, the Big Apple will start to rot. Is it four years yet?

Trial lawyers: The main reason our society has become so selfish is because trial lawyers have ingrained in Americans the belief that they have the “right” to sue for absolutely everything, whether or not there is any fault. Accountability and personal responsibility have disintegrated, and the once-automatic response of helping people in distress has morphed into turning the other way for fear of liability, Good Samaritan laws notwithstanding.

Sure, there is a need for a strong legal advocate when a wrong
has been committed, but we have reached the point where we live in fear
of lawsuits. Spill coffee on yourself? Sue the restaurant. Don’t like
the grade your college professor gave you? Sue. Get fired for not doing
your job? Lawsuit time.

Three recent doozies illustrate how crazy it’s become:

1. The family of former Kansas City Chiefs football player Jovan
Belcher has filed a wrongful death suit against the team, blaming
concussions and possible brain injury for his actions — which included murdering his girlfriend by shooting her nine times while legally drunk
(more than twice Missouri’s legal limit), and killing himself. Tragic as
that is, no one forced Belcher to play football, and all of today’s
players know, or should know, the risk of concussions and brain trauma.
To blame the team (and the league, as many conveniently do) is bad
enough. But to sue? Those people are the ones who need their heads
examined.

2. A pharmacist in Ireland refused to give a potentially
life-saving Epi-pen adrenaline injection to a girl having a severe
allergic reaction to peanuts because the mother didn’t have a
prescription with her. The girl died in the street. Was that non-action
due to an imbecile unable to bend a rule to save a life, or fear of
being sued if he intervened? Either way, it is a horrendous sign of the
times.

3. Perhaps most perplexing is the car commercial where a vehicle
jumps on top of a train to get around traffic. There are four, yes
four, different disclaimers admonishing viewers, “Do Not Attempt,” along
with, “Fantasy. Cars Cannot Jump On Trains.”

Really? Is that what it has come to in this country? Companies
feel it necessary to add disclaimers to shield them from liability in
case some moron attempts to drive his car onto a moving train?

If only we could sue trial lawyers for bringing frivolous lawsuits, and the judges who allow them.

2013 Biggest Losers

 

Winners, Losers 2013

By Chris Freind CHRIS FREIND

It’s that time of year again when we contemplate those in our region who made life more enjoyable over the past year, and, of course, the biggest boneheads of 2013.

Winners

Broomall Fire Company: Sure, these volunteer firefighters are heroes on an everyday basis, since they routinely do things contrary to human nature, like running into places everyone else is trying to escape. And yes, they are always kind enough to give Santa Claus a lift around Marple Township on their fire truck so they can spread much-anticipated Christmas cheer. But this year, they did something extra special.

As Santa was passing by, a beautiful girl with special needs came running down the street with her grandfather to catch a look. Her eyes twinkling with excitement, her smile a mile wide, she was thrilled to have been so close. But as she stood there in awe watching the truck move away, it got better. Much better. The driver stopped the truck, turned around and came back. The whole crew — and Santa himself — then gave the girl the gift of a lifetime, inviting her to ride along with them throughout the neighborhood. There wasn’t a dry eye to be found.

Seeing acts of kindness like that rekindles faith in humanity and restores the true meaning of Christmas where it belongs — in the heart.

Opera Singers At Fellini’s Cafe in Media: It’s all too easy to get caught up in the immense negativity that surrounds us, but dinner at Fellini’s on Opera Night, where the singers — literally right beside you — belt out songs of passion while hitting notes seemingly not possible, makes the bad things immediately melt away. The singers, some of whom rush back to service their tables after performing, leave patrons breathless, stunned by how beautiful, how intense, and how intimate an opera song can be.

Being in downtown Media at Christmastime is spectacular; eating fantastic food even better. But leave it to the passionate Italian opera singers to make that experience priceless.

St. Joe’s Prep High School football team: The underdog Hawks routed a three-time state champion from Pittsburgh to win it all, earning the No. 1 ranking in Pennsylvania and good enough to be 38th best in the country.

And hey, if a Catholic school wasn’t going to win the championship, the Jesuits are the next best thing!

So kudos to the Hawks and best wishes for continued success. Perhaps next year, they will be able to accomplish the one goal that has eluded them — beating my alma mater, Malvern Prep.

Chip Kelly and the Eagles: Truth be told, the Eagles would have made the Winners list even if they had lost to the Cowboys. Kelly has the team, and just as important, the fans, believing again — something that had been woefully lost during the last years of coach Andy Reid. Kelly led the last-to-first transformation with creativity and guts, and now, the Iggles are going to be a very, very tough team to beat, especially in cold Philadelphia weather.

And here’s the best part: Chip actually says more than three words at press conferences. That alone makes him a huge winner in Philly’s book.

Delaware County: Delco scored big by attracting corporate powerhouse Sunoco, which will be vacating its offices in Center City and moving into the Ellis Preserve in Newtown Square.

Gee, I wonder why. Could it be that Delaware County has lower taxes, safer streets, lower taxes, better schools, free parking, lower taxes, easier access, and did we mention lower taxes?

Though, to be fair, Delaware County Council has to watch itself on the tax issue, as businesses and residents have seen a considerable tax spike over the last several years. Take a lesson from Philly. If you want less of something, tax it. Be careful.

Losers

It wasn’t too “taxing” to it figure out this year’s biggest loser, which certainly takes some of the fun out of it. That dubious honor goes to:

Gov. Tom Corbett: He was sitting at a 17 percent approval rating before pushing for, and achieving, a signature item: giving Pennsylvanians what will be the highest gas prices in the nation (an increase of 30 cents per gallon when fully phased). Talk about the gift that keeps on giving. And that’s his answer to win people over?

At least he achieved pension reform before the whole system exploded. Oh, wait. Sorry. He didn’t. Nor did he achieve what should have been a slam dunk — privatizing liquor, an issue on which almost all Pennsylvanians agree. Nor did he lower the country’s second-highest corporate tax rate to attract companies — a win-win since it would have also added union jobs. Instead, he kept trying to outsource the lottery to a foreign firm while consultants (and campaign contributors) reaped millions in taxpayer-financed fees.

But above all, Corbett is the biggest loser because he again deliberately failed to answer questions on the most pressing issue on many inquiring minds — and what will be the most decisive issue of the 2014 election — his handling of the Jerry Sandusky investigation while attorney general.

The Tom and Jerry Show is far from over, and legions of Penn Staters are salivating at the chance to make their voice heard on this issue — at the ballot box.

Philadelphia: What a shame that Philly makes this list every year. A city in a prime location with not one but two major river systems that could be tastefully developed (yet won’t be) continues to stagnate, as its residents and businesses continue their exodus to greener pastures. Sunoco, Citibank and countless others have fled, and with them, Philadelphia’s best and brightest.

And Mayor Nutter’s answer? Tax more, invent new taxes, ignore the pension bomb that will soon explode, and throw more money at a failed school system, all while leading a bloated, massively inefficient and downright hostile government.

It’s gotten so bad that Nutter makes John Street look good. What a legacy.

Weatherpeople: It’s one thing to make a lot of money being wrong so often. But what makes weather anchors so despised is how they overhype every single “weather event” (whatever that even means) to the point where many viewers are downright frightened, especially senior citizens. Ironically, news directors and the weather-morons haven’t yet figured out that their formula is a recipe for disaster. The more they cry wolf, and the more they needlessly scare people in their misguided quest for ratings, the more people tune out — and decreased ratings mean lower ad revenue.

So what are the chances of less babble about radar double scans and Alberta Clippers (seriously, who cares?) and more straight talk on the weather? Sorry to rain on that parade, but a snowball’s chance in hell.

Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

By Chris Freind Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

The Christmas Season is finally here, that festive time of eggnog and good cheer, where “it’s better to give than to receive.”

OK. Scratch that last one, for at least two big constituencies would strongly disagree.

1. Children, since there’s nothing better than ripping open presents after interminably waiting for Santa.

2. Every country on Earth, all salivating at receiving the mother lode of U.S. government intelligence operations, courtesy of Mr. “Secret” Santa himself, former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

At first, Snowden’s actions — exposing the NSA’s massive domestic spying operations — merited him a big Christmas gift, but as the extent of his security breeches become known, he deserves nothing but coal and a jail cell.

The scope of Snowden’s actions, and ultimately who received what information, may never be known, but it is clearly the largest exposure of intelligence secrets in history. Like most stories that garner huge attention, however, many of the major points are being overlooked in favor of juicier, albeit less important, angles. Worst of all, actions are now being contemplated that should not even be on the table, from amnesty for Snowden to severely curtailing U.S. intelligence capabilities.

Let’s review the situation:

1. The NSA is wrong to spy on Americans without probable cause. Period. It is unacceptable that the agency hacked into (or outright demanded) the private data of phone carriers, Internet providers and search engine companies for domestic intelligence-gathering activities. If government agencies need information related to an individual being investigated, they should use the proper — aka legal — channels to conduct their operations. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court (FISA) was established in 1978 for just that purpose.

Trolling through millions of records of law-abiding citizens, just because the agency has the capability, should unequivocally be a violation of the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable search-and-seizure provision. And it’s unnecessary, as FISA courts are highly effective: In 33 years, only 11 of 34,000 FISA warrants were rejected.

Ironically, there’s significant doubt that the NSA’s domestic spying efforts are even productive. Just this week, a federal judge, in stating that the NSA’s actions were likely unlawful, concluded that the government didn’t cite a single instance in which the program “actually stopped an imminent terrorist attack,” according to the Associated Press.

When our government becomes as intrusive as those we fight, it’s time for major changes. So let’s recap — no more unregulated domestic spying.

2. For everyone and everything else, it’s fair game. There should be no restrictions — none — on intelligence-gathering operations conducted outside the United States. And that includes even our staunchest allies.

It is dangerously naïve to believe that our friends will always do the right thing. Self-interest and greed are powerful motivators, and can quickly erode the integrity and common sense of otherwise reasonable people.

Because national security and the lives of millions hang in the balance, the NSA must always adhere to a “trust but verify” approach, achieved through 24/365 surveillance and eavesdropping operations, not just on the bad guys, but everyone.

If it didn’t engage in such operations, we might never have known about the individuals, companies, and yes, friendly governments, that have jeopardized global security by deliberately violating treaties and laws. A good example is those who have secretly helped build Iran’s nuclear program.

And just last week, numerous entities, from Ukraine to the Philippines, were nailed by the U.S. for violating sanctions placed on Iran. That type of information doesn’t come out of thin air, but from aggressive, hard-nosed spying, both human and electronic. Any changes in how we collect and share intelligence as a way to mitigate international fallout from the Snowden leaks would be disastrous and should be resisted at all costs.

3. Hey allies — stop whining! So you got spied upon. So what? Deal with it, but at least be honest. You spy on America, or at least attempt to, on a regular basis. You’re just not very good at it.

Don’t get your underwear in a twist because we’re so much better at it than you. Of course, our status as world leader also makes us your protector, not because we have to, but because it’s the right thing to do. Much the same way that America saved you — and all of humanity — by winning two world wars.

Since no one ever looks to China to save the day when things get dicey, how about this? If any country steps up and fully takes over America’s place on the world stage — militarily, economically, politically — entirely on its own, we’ll stop spying on you.

What’s that? No takers? Well then, maybe you should stop pouting over the NSA listening to your phone calls and eavesdropping on the unfathomably exciting G8 Summit conversations.

The lesson? “Mr. Ed” (Snowden) notwithstanding, don’t kick a gift horse in the mouth.

How Edward Snowden, (a contractor, not even an NSA employee), was permitted access to so many classified documents is something that needs thorough investigation, as well as why his computers were configured to hide his movements.

That aside, had he exposed the domestic spying operations only, one could make the case that his actions were rooted in patriotism and liberty. But he didn’t.

Instead, he has put the security of the world in serious jeopardy, and without question needs to be held accountable and brought to justice.

And that would be the best present of all.

Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

ObamaCare, Dead Plan Walking

By Keith Phucas


Is Obamacare dead? If not, it may be put out of its misery soon by America’s younger generation.
 



With no apparent incentives for young adults to sign up on the health care exchanges, it’s a safe bet that unless enrollment figures rise dramatically, the Affordable Care Act stratagem will ultimately fail — fail, that is, because it cannot attract sufficient numbers of young people
to the exchanges to subsidize the older, less healthy enrollees.


Obamacare is too big not to fail.

With more and more sick older folks enrolled, but few young’uns, up and up go premiums to dizzying heights. All that’s left to do is stand back and
watch the death spiral rise, right? Then watch it all come tumbling
down. Well, at the moment, it’s difficult to predict the future sequence
of events.

But why in the world would adults in their 20s — “Young Invincibles” or “Millennials” (ages 18 to 34) seen as essential for Obamacare to work financially — enroll on Healthcare.gov given the federal exchange’s poor performance, security concerns and high premium offerings? 


Besides, many Millennials can stay on their parents’ health care plan until they turn 26.


Oh, and here’s one more reason why there’s no big hurry to sign up for health coverage now — the law forbids discriminating against anyone with a preexisting condition, so the uninsured can wait until they fall ill and land in the hospital before signing up for coverage. How convenient.

Obamacare’s true believers, who earnestly believed the president’s signature law would actually make insurance affordable for all, must be wondering what the hell happened to detour his signature achievement onto this twisted course.

Read more at Delco Conservative

Global Warming Solutions

By Chris Freind

Priceless campaign ad No. 112 against Tom Corbett: His nominee to head the Department of Environmental Protection stating climate change isn’t harmful.

Unlike so many political commercials that deliberately mislead or outright lie, this one will be clear cut, right out of the donkey’s mouth (the animal fits, even though he’s a Republican). Chris Abruzzo, the guv’s pick for DEP secretary, actually told that to the Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee.

“I’ve not read any scientific studies that would lead me to conclude there are adverse impacts to human beings, animals or plant life at this small level of climate change,” Abruzzo said.

He would be right, except for these: Significant human health problems; melting polar ice caps; warming oceans; rising sea levels; species that have gone extinct; animals appearing in regions where they’ve never been before; and extreme weather patterns resulting in record storms, floods and droughts, all associated with climate change.

Therefore, since advocating such a viewpoint about Earth’s global warming is incomprehensible, maybe Abruzzo was talking about climate change on another planet. Uranus perhaps?

The immediate implication is a no-brainer. It’s the latest nail in Corbett’s political coffin, which already has a record-setting number of career-ending spikes in it.

The more troubling aspect is that yet another Republican believes human activity plays little or no role in climate change caused by global warming, and therefore, the issue doesn’t need further addressing. It’s no wonder the GOP finds itself on the losing end of so many elections, since its position alienates the Great American Middle, who always decide general elections.

That’s not to suggest that Republicans should adopt a different position because it would help them win, but because it’s common sense.

That the Earth is warming is indisputable. The question is what’s behind that change. Is it a cyclical phenomenon occurring every 500 or 1,000 years, or more? Quite possibly, but difficult to ascertain since accurate record keeping didn’t begin until relatively recently.

Or is it because human activity has pumped hundreds of billions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere?

The rational answer is both. So why not err on the side of caution — reasonably — to cut down on emissions while protecting American jobs and economic competitiveness?

Sounds logical enough, but it’s not easy when both sides cling to extreme positions, whether its espousing job-killing proposals or claiming adverse impacts don’t exist.

An American living in Mexico City was experiencing respiratory distress and, upon examination in the U.S., was told she needed to quit smoking three packs of cigarettes a day. There was only one problem. She had never smoked.

The unchecked pollution emanating from our southerly neighbor and most of the world’s manufacturing nations are wreaking havoc on people’s health and the environment. And since air and water currents don’t adhere to political boundaries, rampant pollution affects everybody.

It’s in our interest to solve these problems, so here’s how we can:

1. Scrap our trade policies. The Unites States has made stellar progress over the last several decades in cutting down on pollution. Lake Erie was once a dead zone, and the Cuyahoga River caught fire because of the widespread industrial waste that oozed into it, yet, now these waterways are success stories because Americans were committed to cleaning up the environment. That effort continues, but it’s not without cost.

By definition, it’s more expensive to operate a factory when adhering to strict environmental regulations, an issue compounded when competing with overseas companies who have no such laws to follow (or where they are unenforced).

We can’t physically force sovereign nations to cut back on pollution and institute environmental regulations on par with ours, but we can force their hand by leveraging our position as the world’s largest economy. But to do that, we must scrap trade policies that sell out America and leave our companies at a major disadvantage. Free and fair trade sound nice, but we have neither, and that must change.

From the threat of tariffs to the elimination of foreign aid and military support, we have the muscle. But we need the will. Money talks, and since we have more than anyone else (at least for now), we need to leverage that advantage to level the environmental playing field. In doing so, everyone wins.

2. Never sign a treaty that restricts America’s carbon emissions while giving “developing” nations a free pass. In addition to the devastating impact it would have on American jobs, such treaties (such as Kyoto) are only a finger in the dike. We aren’t the unchecked polluter, and continue to become “greener,” so why penalize Americans for doing the right thing?

3. No unfunded government mandates. Sure, reducing a factory’s emissions is important, but having the government mandate a billion-dollar scrubber be installed in a finite period of time results in job loss, lack of growth (and hiring), and for some companies, a one-way ticket out of America. Tax credits and market-based incentives for such pollution control initiatives are an infinitely better solution.

The government will never gain converts by taxing them into submission; instead, it needs to incentivize them to play ball. Many companies want to go green and reduce their carbon footprint, but can do so only if the measures they undertake are cost-effective. To help ensure that, Congress must reduce the world’s highest corporate income tax. Failure to do so is a tragic disincentive for corporations to become more environmentally responsible.

4. Don’t listen to anything Al Gore says. No disrespect to the inventor of the Internet, but why should we follow someone who proselytizes the virtues of greenness and the evils of the gas combustion engine, yet whose carbon footprint is larger than Montana?

5. Use more natural gas — a lot more — while mandating safe fracking techniques. America sits atop a virtually limitless supply of gas, which produces a mere fraction of oil’s emissions. From power plants to vehicles, the use of natural gas would not only substantially reduce greenhouse gases, but bolster America’s national security, reducing dependence on Middle Eastern oil barons. This extremely cheap, abundant energy would resurrect our manufacturing base while keeping American dollars where they belong. Here.

6. Stop ceding the environmental issue to extremists hell-bent on returning America to the Stone Age. Preserving the environment for our children and grandchildren isn’t radical. It’s the right thing to do.

The GOP should take a lesson from Teddy Roosevelt’s playbook, as he successfully epitomized what a true Republican should be: A capitalist not afraid to take on big business that, left unchecked, would run rampant over the environment; a leader who prioritized preservation and responsible stewardship of the land; and a politician who, above all, carried a big stick.

A stick that could be used to whip into shape those who don’t think climate change is a major issue.

Visit BillLawrenceDittos.com for Global Warming Solutions
Visit BillLawrenceOnline.com for Global Warming Solutions
Visit BillLawrenceTrivia.com for Omnibits

Our Physical God


By Fr. Frank Pavone

It’s Christmas time again, and the Church focuses on the Incarnation, a word coming from the Latin “in carne,” which means, “in the flesh.” Christmas is God in the flesh: no longer only an eternal Spirit who fills the universe, but our brother, whom we can hear, see, and touch.

One of the reasons he did this was to empower us to love him, and to love our neighbor.

The first Christians learned how to love, because the source of love, the Christ who sacrificed himself, was personally known to them. They saw and touched him.

“That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched – this we proclaim concerning the Word of life.  The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it…” (1 John:1:1-2).

And when commanded not to speak about Jesus, they replied, “We cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard.’” (Acts 4:20).

This contact with the humanity of Christ speaks to us of what we are to do now for the unborn. It is the contact with the human reality of their lives, and the human tragedy of their deaths, that is to impel us in our self-sacrificing love for them.

It is not the “nuance” of the super-sophisticated that impels self-sacrificing, life-giving action. It is contact with the humanity we serve. It is facing the injustice that oppresses human lives, and then making a human response to it that springs from the depths of our own humanity, grounded in the God who gave that humanity to us.

That is why we need to look at the pictures of the victims of abortion — Not simply at the pictures of the living baby in the womb, but the pictures of what abortion does to that baby (see both at Unborn.info).

The last thing supporters of abortion want to talk about is abortion. You will not hear them describe the procedure, much less show people what it looks like.

In his homily on July 3, Pope Francis said,

“We find Jesus’ wounds in carrying out works of mercy, giving to our body – the body – the soul too, but – I stress – the body of your wounded brother, because he is hungry, because he is thirsty, because he is naked, because he is humiliated, because he is a slave, because he’s in jail because he is in the hospital…Those are the wounds of Jesus today. …We need to touch the wounds of Jesus, we must caress the wounds of Jesus, we need to bind the wounds of Jesus with tenderness, we have to kiss the wounds of Jesus, and this literally. Just think of what happened to St. Francis, when he embraced the leper? The same thing that happened to Thomas: his life changed. ”

Let us touch the sufferings of the baby who is in danger of abortion, and be changed into fearless warriors for them.

Read and listen to this column online at Priestsforlife.org/columns/4824-our-physical-god

Comments on this column? Go to Askfrfrank.com

Fr. Frank’s columns are podcast. See Priestsforlife.org/podcast

Remember to support our work at Priestsforlife.org/donate

Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

By Chris Freind Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

There’s both good news and bad.

The bad: Phoenixville Area School District has a need to expand, but has had trouble finding space it likes.

But fear not. There is good news that might solve the problem.

Eminent domain could be used to seize the houses of all the district’s school board members, thereby meeting the necessary classroom space requirements.

That may seem unfair, but hey, the rights of the individual are trumped by what’s deemed by the elite to be in the public’s (or their own) best interest. And it would be perfectly legal, since the government can take private property in order to develop both public and other private property, pretty much any way it sees fit.

Seem far-fetched? Too intrusive in a free country?

Think again.

The tragic reality is that the Phoenixville School District already has found a solution. Jettisoning the possibility of developing any of the 95 other tracts of land it considered, the District decided to instead seize the Meadow Brook Golf Club in order to build a new school, one that can be located near the high school so that a “learning village” can be created. Whatever that means.

In doing so, the district is seizing an 80-year old business — albeit one that might have been on the market anyway — and kicking property owners off land that had been in their family since 1896. And don’t hold your breath that there will be just compensation, since the district is willing to pay substantially less than what the owners had requested. The family was asking $8 million for the site and wouldn’t budge from that number, despite a recent district assessment of $3.725 million. The district offered $5 million.

Here’s the worst part: On Nov. 14, the school district voted to invoke eminent domain without even informing the property owners beforehand — who only discovered what had happened by reading it in the local newspaper. Pending a successful appeal (the prospect of which seems extremely bleak), the property changes hands on Dec. 15.

So because of Big Brother’s ever-increasing reach, over a century’s worth of memories, not to mention numerous jobs, will be obliterated in the span of just 30 days.

If that’s not the definition of classless, what is?

The truly disturbing part is that, while immoral and wrong, this is legal. But even more frightening is that no one is safe from eminent domain’s reach. In the past, government would seize property only for public works projects, but in 2005, the ball game changed — big time.

In a ruling that many consider one of the worst U.S. Supreme Court decisions in history, five mind-numbingly obtuse justices decided that citizens’ land could be taken by the government for private economic development, even if those properties were not in areas of blight or decay.

The criteria? When local or state officials think the public would benefit That’s enough leeway to dock a battleship.

Forget the original intent of eminent domain, which actually had the public’s best interest in mind when considering public projects, such as utilities, railroads and highways.

It seems those things, while necessary, just aren’t sexy enough for some of today’s pols.

Where’s the fun in just building a road when you can construct a mall with all the perks that come with being mayor or councilman in that location?

And when houses are bulldozed to make way for a plush resort — with wealthy land developers lining the campaign pockets of politicians who decide such matters — is that in the public’s interest?

As then-Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her dissent to the eminent domain decision, the “specter of condemnation hangs over all property. Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory.”

In other words, the rich and powerful get what they want, the politicians make out, and small property owners — 99.9% of Americans — get squashed.

Somehow, it’s doubtful the Founding Fathers had this in mind.

Most home and business owners are neither wealthy nor influential, so their options are extremely limited.

Fighting City Hall means huge legal fees with no guarantee of success. Loans are still difficult to obtain, so those victimized by misguided eminent domain judgments often are forced to tap into their retirement accounts to survive. And those on fixed incomes, many of whom previously only worried about property taxes, face the prospect of writing a mortgage or rent check for the rest of their lives, because self-interested politicians want their pet projects to come to life.

The use of eminent domain in America was supposed to be a last resort. When it had to be employed, landowners were to be given fair compensation, and, in most cases, the greater public good was easily recognized. The Blue Route (I-476) is a prime example. After years of court battles, the project was finally given the green light, and the highway remains one of the most important infrastructure improvements in Pennsylvania history.

But it is unfathomable that in today’s “Amerika,” eminent domain has evolved into the weapon of choice for greedy, corrupt or simply misguided politicians and school boards.

It’s time for the newly comprised high court to revisit this contentious issue. In doing so, it would have the historic opportunity to right a huge wrong, and put the “c” back in “America.”

Chief Justice Roberts, the floor is yours.

Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

ObamaCare Challenge

By Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D.

Here is the newly-uploaded ObamaCare Homepage; see if you can register!

With all due respect to those who fantasize that ObamaCare
is self-destructing, it should be noted that it’s fully-funded [thanx
to Mike Fitzpatrick] and will begin to distribute “goodies” [subsidies]
in a month; nevertheless, “hope springs eternal” and, thus,
emerging-data are worth distilling and disseminating. Again, to save
time [as occurred with the “Racism”-themed “blast”], categorization
after an intro will be provided, with key-concepts grouped and
juxtaposed, affording the reader a database that can be used to
corroborate conclusions drawn in analyses/syntheses of this
transformational [irreversible?] effort. {ObamaCare
doesn’t officially kick off until 1/1/2014, yet millions of Americans
are already at each other’s throats over it; research from the U.S.
Census Bureau shows that the country is now more divided than at any
other time in history since the Civil War era.
..and BHO must now feel self-satisfied.}  The GOP’s Health Care Compact tersely conveys an alternative to this crass exertion of Big Government.

This is the compilation major Healthcare Policy Articles disseminated on Nov. 25 by The Market Institute, [c/o the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, of which this physician is a member]; readers may want to check-out/explore this website:

Healthcare.gov
is not CGI’s first bungled IT contract. They were tasked with building
out a gun registry website in Canada that ultimately did not work and
cost Canadians $80 million (Heritage Foundation Blog).

Independent undercover investigations into so called ObamaCare “Navigators” have revealed instances of fraud (Heritage Foundation Blog).

ObamaCare is supposed to influence smokers to quit tobacco use, but the
opposite effect is occurring. Because of facing higher insurance
premiums due to their tobacco use, smokers are opting out of health
coverage altogether (Fox News).

Concerns over Healthcare.gov
are not going away with the end of November deadline approaching for
the website fix, but analysts think the government has until March to
really get the website working because that is when most young people
will be looking to enroll (National Journal).

Congressional Democrats are worried the White House is not taking the
electoral blowback of the fledgling ObamaCare rollout seriously enough.
There is cause for concern however, as the President and his namesake
law are polling at all-time lows (Politico).

Dr. Sklaroff  has been a consistent, and prescient,  critic of the “Affordable” Care Act since it was proposed. Read more from him here.

ObamaCare Challenge

America Being America

By Chris Freind America Being America

On a recent morning in Munich, Germany, an American hailed a cab. The driver, considerably younger than his mid-60s passenger, immediately recognized that his fare was from the States. Exuding a pride that broke out into a huge smile, he exclaimed, “Ich bin ein Berliner,” showing his keen awareness of JFK’s famous words in Berlin in 1962.

Such stories drive home the point that, despite our problems, America still means so incredibly much to the rest of the world. Truth is, if not for the incalculable blood and treasure the United States expended defending freedom, much of Europe and Asia would still be in rubble, its citizens living under tyranny.

It’s all too easy to get caught up in our issues, falling victim to pervasive negativity while forgetting our illustrious past and losing sight of all that we do right. This Thanksgiving, rather than selling ourselves short, let’s give thanks for the blessing of living in the most benevolent nation the world has ever known.

America’s past is certainly not without its faults, from slavery to internment camps, and from mistreatment of Native Americans to supporting brutal foreign leaders. But through it all, America is a nation that has uniquely conquered so many of its demons, expelling them in an attempt to rectify mistakes, to make things better — to make things right.

That liberalism (small “l”) has not gone unnoticed around the world. America, for virtually its entire existence, has been a beacon of hope for millions who crave freedom, tolerance and a fresh start.

When the Irish suffered during the potato famine, they didn’t head east to the much-closer Europe, but to the distant shores of America. In the aftermath of the Vietnam War, countless Southeast Asians, including many who fought against us, sought refuge in the safe confines of America. Millions who flee persecution and death from tyrants risk life and limb to make America their home. And why? Because America offers even the poorest and most downtrodden the opportunity to carve out a life not just of existence, but one whose standard of living is more than most would ever dare dream.

Like JFK, Ronald Reagan re-instilled faith in America, both at home and abroad, when he spoke in glowing terms of our nation as the “shining city on a hill,” whose potential and promise were limited only by one’s imagination. How right he was.

Just as President Kennedy intimately connected with a Europe in the middle of the Cold War, reassuring free peoples and inspiring those trapped behind the wall, so did Reagan when he bonded with millions by challenging General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this wall.”

And that is exactly what happened. Because of America’s resolve, the wall of oppression fell, freeing more people from authoritarian rule than at any point in world history.

America remains the rock star of the ages, with the world wanting our blue jeans and Coca-Cola. Even more, they want to emulate us and everything we stand for; they want to be “American” in every sense.

Upon their nation’s surrender in World War II, many Japanese soldiers feared what their American captors might do to them. And the Americans did plenty.

They accorded the exact same medical treatment to the Japanese as to their own soldiers. They openly shared cigarettes with their prisoners — something that Japan prohibited when the tables had been turned. They fed the Japanese the same food that the Americans received. In short, despite many wartime atrocities committed by the Japanese against American POWs, America treated its vanquished foe with unprecedented restraint.

Most telling, during the surrender ceremony on the battleship Missouri, the Japanese officers were absolutely mystified as to how much dignity the Americans allowed them to maintain — certainly not expected since the United States was under no obligation, having achieved total victory.

It is exactly that kind of benevolence — doing the right thing because it is the right thing to do, with no strings attached — that still carries the day and earns the admiration of the world.

Throughout most of history, victors enslaved their conquered peoples and laid waste to their lands. Yet America has always done the opposite, pouring untold billions into Japan, Germany, Italy, and later, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Unlike most countries, America, for the most part, has left the nations with which it warred and occupied better off than when it found them.

And when famines and disasters strike, it is always America that is first in, leading the way. While we’re still waiting for other nations to send aid for Katrina and Sandy, the United States has sent people, supplies and billions to help fellow humans in need: Haiti after its devastating earthquake; Thailand after the Christmas tsunami; Japan after its tidal wave and nuclear disaster; and most recently, leading the relief effort after the most powerful typhoon on record smashed the Philippines.

On that last point, one has to look only at how the world’s two biggest economies responded to the Philippines disaster, which left thousands dead and millions homeless, to see which has the true moral authority. America immediately sent millions in money, manpower, and aid, opened airports, rebuilt roads and sent an aircraft carrier to coordinate rescue, relief and reconstruction operations.

China sent $100,000. And no, that’s not a misprint. That was the incomprehensibly meager contribution from the world’s second largest economy to its neighbor.

So on this Thanksgiving, let’s say a prayer of thanks for who and what we are, and another prayer that America’s beacon of hope always remains lit.

And God help us all if we fall.

Here’s a toast to America! Happy Thanksgiving!

America Being America

 

Corbett Gas Tax Path To Single Digit Approval

By Chris Freind Corbett Gas Tax Path To Single Digit Approval

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

A hearty round of applause to Pennsylvania’s Republican-controlled House and Senate! By granting GOP Governor Tom Corbett his most highly-sought prize — the nation’s highest gas and diesel taxes — the legislature has ensured two things: 1. Tommy Boy will lose next year’s election by an even bigger margin, and 2. he is now likely to achieve the impossible: an approval rating in the single digits.

To be fair, the last one’s not all that hard, since he was already in the toilet at a historically low 17 percent approval.

About the only thing more monumental than the rear-ending Corbett just gave his citizens via the second-largest tax increase in state history is his “bi-partisan” legacy, as no one has done more for the Democratic Party.

By being himself, the Governor has already presided over the GOP losing the Attorney General’s office for the first time in history (his former position, where he botched the Jerry Sandusky investigation). Additionally, under his “leadership,” Republicans have lost 10 percent of their senators, Democrats won the other two statewide offices (Treasurer and Auditor General), and Corbett’s hand-picked U.S. senate candidate — who supported both Barack Obama and Joe Sestak — got crushed in last year’s primary, coming in an embarrassing third.

Corbett’s insistence on the tax- and fee-laden transportation bill, now law, will, quite possibly, give the Democrats control of the Senate for the first time in decades and seriously erode the House’s sizable majority.

If that’s a “victory” for Corbett, what the hell’s a defeat?

Are the House and Senate also responsible for this debacle? Of course. They caved in, playing the go-along, get-along game. But it’s Tom Corbett on whose shoulders this disaster squarely falls.

And not only will it be a disaster of epic proportions, chasing jobs and revenue out of Pennsylvania, but it was wholly avoidable. Let’s review:

1. First and foremost, Corbett says his transportation law, which will increase gasoline prices by over 28 cents per gallon while diesel will skyrocket as much as 20 cents higher per gallon than prices in the next highest state, won’t violate his campaign pledge of no new taxes. And apparently the increases in drivers license, registration and title fees, as well as a six-fold increase in moving violation penalties, don’t count as “taxes” either.

He can play semantics all day long, but a tax is a tax is a tax.

Even though Corbett is generally considered one of the most intellectually-challenged politicians in the nation, that one hits a new low. He has already violated his pledge by raising taxes several times, but now he expects us to believe that the mammoth spike at the pump won’t be directly caused by the bill he pushed? Maybe the Toronto mayor isn’t the only one using mind-altering substances.

2. The tax increase was completely unnecessary. The Harrisburg think-tank Commonwealth Foundation spells it out: Pennsylvania spends $71,000 per road mile, 11th highest of any state; state highway spending exceeds $660 per person, more than 26 other states; and transportation spending has doubled over the last 17 years. That’s not too shabby.

Maybe if Corbett hadn’t bailed out a shipyard to build ships with no buyers, spent taxpayer money to build a baseball stadium for the Yankees’ AAA affiliate, wasted millions on legal fees to stop the NCAA sanctions against Penn State (which he favored before he was against them), and dished out huge consulting fees trying to outsource the lottery to a foreign firm (just to name a few), there would be enough money to avoid our getting bent over the oil barrel.

3. Corbett says this legislation will create 50,000 jobs and save 12,000 others. But wait. He always claimed that government doesn’t create jobs — only the private sector does. Guess that was campaign rhetoric, just another example, on a very long list, of Corbett’s say-one-thing-but-do-the-opposite existence.

Let’s be very clear here. Massive tax increases never create jobs. In this case, the reason is obvious. Since 100 percent of everything we buy gets delivered via truck, and trucks use lots of gas and diesel fuel, trucking companies will be shelling out substantially more in fuel costs. One of two things will happen: A) some will go out of business, as numerous companies did when fuel costs spiked in 2008 (translation for Corbett: loss of jobs), or some will move out of Pennsylvania to more tax-friendly states (loss of jobs). And as has been the case since the Phoenicians, business taxes and fees will be passed along to the consumer, and small businesses will be forced to raise prices and lay off employees (loss of jobs).

That should have been a simple enough concept, but since Corbett and many legislators have never worked in the private sector, never had to meet a payroll, and never experienced the catastrophic results of a huge tax increase, what did we expect?

4. Millions will gas up in border states, depriving Pennsylvania of any gas tax revenue (anytime New York does something better, you know it’s bad). But this is nothing new, as billions in revenue are lost as Pennsylvanians buy liquor elsewhere to avoid the 18 percent Johnstown Flood Tax (the tax to rebuild that city from the 1936 flood), and sales tax on top of that, so why should buying gas in other states be any different?

5. Another half-billion will go into that bottomless pit known as public transit. Great. So busses will continue to operate with 2 people on board and SEPTA once again gets away with not having to operate like an efficient business. And why should it? The taxpayer bailouts never end!

6. More of our tax money will go toward the Pennsylvania Turnpike, despite five consecutive years of toll hikes. During that time, tolls have risen a whopping 70 percent for drivers paying cash and 35 percent for EZ PASS, yet more of our money is now thrown into that black hole. Nothing like perpetuating a massive failure.

7. Despite the predictions of so-called “political experts” who think Corbett will benefit from this tax hike, nothing could be further from the truth. No one ever votes on transportation funding at the ballot box. Sure, polls showed that people wanted their bridges and roads repaired — but those surveys conveniently left out the part about gas taxes going through the roof. When that tidbit is mentioned, support tanks.

Yet Corbett thinks that people will reward him for the privilege of sitting through endless construction and congestion, while seeing their gas gauge constantly scream “cha-ching.”

If the Governor were a comedian, he would be a gas. But since we’re getting the “close your eyes” gas nozzle treatment, it’s no laughing matter.

But there’s a bright spot. At least his single digit approval will be.

Corbett Gas Tax Path To Single Digit Approval