Liquor Store Privatization Vote Expected Thurs.

Liquor Store Privatization Vote Expected Thurs. — Activist Bob Guzzardi notes that the bill to privatize was passed out of the House Liquor Control Committee, yesterday, March 18, and a full vote in the State House is expected on Thursday.

He asks that Pennsylvania residents email the below message be emailed to your state representative.

Dear Representative

It is my understanding that you will be voting on HB 790 to privatize the state wine and spirits later this week. I urge you to support privatization. It is time to end the state monopoly and honor consumer choice in Pennsylvania. It is time to end the state’s conflict of interest and get the state out of the booze business. Thank you for supporting privatization.

Sincerely,

Guzzardi describes the points of HB 790 as:

Wholesale Privatization
One year after the legislation is signed into law, wholesale divestiture would occur.  The state would negotiate wholesale licenses to distribute wine and liquor products to stores, bars and restaurants by brand.  After paying a license fee based on valuation, a wholesaler would have the exclusive right to distribute that brand throughout Pennsylvania.

New Privately-Run Wine and Spirits Stores
–         Would allow for 1,200 initial wine and spirits licenses.
–       Beer distributors would have right of first refusal on licenses for one year.  If a distributor gets a wine and spirits license, they would be the one-stop shop to get wine, beer and liquor.
–         After one year, the unclaimed licenses become available to the public on a ‘first-come basis,’ based on number of licenses available in each county; no county will have fewer licenses available than the number of distributors.
–        All license holders must be stand-alone alcohol retail stores, unless owned by distributors.
–         A wine and spirits licensee can hold five licenses in the state, but no more than one per county.
–         Licensees can’t require memberships (that is, Costco, Sam’s Club, etc. would be excluded).

Retail License Cost
·         Licensees can purchase the right to sell wine, spirits or both.
·         The cost of a new license for beer distributors varies based on county classes.  Wine: $7,500 to $37,500; Spirits: $30,000 to $60,000. Distributors can elect to pay this cost over four years with an additional five percent fee.
·         New wine and spirits stores: Wine: $97,500 to $187,500; Spirits: $142,500 to $262,500.
·         Licenses are renewed every two years at a cost of $1,000.
·         Sunday sale permits will be available at annual cost of $1,000.

Greater Convenience through Grocery Stores and Package Reform
·         Grocery stores may purchase a license to sell any quantity of wine.  Prices for these licenses would range, based on county, from $97,500 to $187,500.  Sunday sales permits would also be available.
·         Restaurants may purchase a license to sell up to six wine bottles to go, in addition to beer which they are currently allowed to sell.
·         The gas prohibition is removed, meaning that a gas station that has a restaurant license and sells food will also be allowed to sell small limited amounts of beer and wine.

Closure of State Stores
·         Once the number of privately-operated stores (including grocery stores selling wine) doubles the number of government-run liquor stores in a county, the state stores must close within six months.
·         As the 600 state stores close, the Department of General Services could offer up to 600 additional wine and spirits licenses.
·         The PLCB will have to close all state store operations once it has 100 or less stores remaining.

Benefits for Current PLCB Employees

·         These include: training and education grants, tax credits for businesses to hire displaced workers, and a civil service hiring preference.

Safety
·         Transaction scan devices must be used and employees trained in alcohol safety.
·         State Troopers would be allowed undercover investigations in licensed establishments, something that does not occur in PLCB stores.
·         Only workers age 21 and older may sell alcohol.

How did the committee vote go?

Voting for Privatization were the following state Representatives. If your representative is on this list thank them and ask him or her to continue to support privatization.
Taylor, John – Chair
Delozier, Sheryl M.
Ellis, Brian L.
Kampf, Warren
Killion, Thomas H.
Krieger, Timothy
Lawrence, John A.
Masser, Kurt A.
Miccarelli, Nicholas A. ( not voting)
Mustio, Mark
Payne, John D.
Petri, Scott A.
Reese, Mike
Regan, Mike
Sonney, Curtis G.

Voting against the people’s wishes are the following: If one of these Representatives is your Representative please call and email your displeasure with their attitude toward consumers and ask them what special interest they are serving.

Costa, Paul – Chair
Boyle, Brendan F.
Burns, Frank
Davis, Tina M.
Harhai, R. T.
Kotik, Nick
Mahoney, Tim
Ravenstahl, Adam
Sabatina, John P.
Wheatley, Jake

 

Liquor Store Privatization Vote Expected Thurs 

House Passes Special Ed Bill

House Passes Special Ed Bill — The Pennsylvania House voted unanimously last week in support of legislation to address the state’s distribution of special education funding, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129)

House Bill 2 would create a 15-member legislative commission on special education funding to develop a new formula for distributing any increases in funding over the levels distributed in the 2010-11 school year.

The commission would be expected to develop a more effective funding formula that must meet certain requirements, including: establishing three cost categories for students receiving special education services, ranging from least intensive to most intensive; obtaining a student count for each school district averaged for the three most recent school years to correspond to each cost category; assigning a weight to each category of disability; and developing a fair system for distributing increases among school districts to determine the amount of funding that each school will receive under the new formula.

In addition, the commission would be required to issue a report of its findings no later than Sept. 30.

Currently, state funding for special education is distributed based on an estimate that special education students make up 16 percent of the overall student population in each school district.

House Bill 2 now goes to the Senate for consideration.

 

House Passes Special Ed Bill

Property Tax Independence Act Introduced

Rhetorically asking what Pennsylvanians would be willing to give to completely replace the school district property tax, March 12, State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129)  held up a penny at a Capitol news conference and described how the Property Tax Independence Act (House Bill 76) could accomplish this huge goal with something so small.

Cox and his colleagues were officially introducing the new Property Tax Independence Act that  would replace school property taxes with several other state revenue sources.

The legislation calls for a 1 cent increase in the state sales tax (from 6 percent to 7 percent) and a 1.27-cent increase in the state income tax (from 3.07 percent to 4.34 percent). The plan also would use existing state revenues from gaming and would close special interest loopholes in the state sales tax.

More about the plan can be found on Cox’s website.

Property Tax Independence Act Introduced

Property Tax Independence Act Introduced

Improved Property Tax Independence Act

A bipartisan group of state lawmakers will unveil the new and improved Property Tax Independence Act on noon, tomorrow, March 12,   in Harrisburg, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) who is one of the bill’s sponsors.

Watch the news conference live on Tuesday at noon by visiting www.RepJimCox.com.

Cox introduced a similar bill last year that would have replaced the property tax as a means of funding schools with something less endangering to the shelters of  those who have lost income such as the unemployed or those on fixed income such as the disabled and senior citizens.

Improved Property Tax Independence Act

Improved Property Tax Independence Act

School Tax Rebates Still Being Accepted

Applications for Pennsylvania’s Property Tax/Rent Rebate program are currently being accepted, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

Eligible participants can receive a rebate of up to $650 based on their rent or property taxes paid in 2012. The program benefits income-eligible Pennsylvanians who are 65 years or older, widows and widowers 50 years or older, and those 18 years or older with permanent disabilities.

Renters may earn up to $15,000 annually and qualify for the program, while home owners may earn up to $35,000. Exclude 50 percent of Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, and Railroad Retirement Tier 1 benefits when calculating income.

Residents are reminded to provide all the necessary income, property tax or rental information required to process claims quickly and accurately. Applications are due by June 30, with rebates being mailed after July 1.

Property Tax/Rent Rebate claim forms are available here.

“While the Property Tax/Rent Rebate program helps some homeowners, I remain committed to the complete replacement of Pennsylvania’s archaic school property tax system,” Cox said.

He said that those interested in learning  about the Property Tax Independence Act (House Bill 76), that he is  sponsoring should visit his webite:  http://www.repjimcox.com

The bill would completely replace the school property tax with other funding mechanisms.

School Tax Rebates Still Being Accepted

School Tax Rebates Still Being Accepted

RACP Cut Of $600 Million OK’d By House

RACP Cut Of $600 Million OK’d By House — The Pennsylvania House has passed a measure to put new controls in place to curtail levels of public debt for projects funded by the Redevelopment Assistance Capital Program (RACP), reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

RACP is a Commonwealth grant program administered by the Office of the Budget for the acquisition and construction of regional economic, cultural, civic and historical improvement projects with a focus on job creation. Created in 1999 with an initial debt ceiling of $1.2 billion, the RACP debt ceiling has been raised six times since then, pushing it up to $4.05 billion.

House Bill 493 decreases the RACP debt ceiling from its current $4.05 billion to $3.45 billion, an immediate reduction of $600 million.

In addition, the bill puts in place important transparency measures. Eligible projects must meet specific criteria, including generating substantial increases in or maintaining current levels of economic activity, having substantial regional economic impacts, including at least 50 percent of non-state funding participation and having a total project cost of at least $1 million.

The bill now heads to the Senate.

 

RACP Cut Of $600 Million OK’d By House

RACP Cut Of $600 Million OK'd By House

Pa House Passes CHIP Extension

Pa House Passes CHIP Extension  — The House has approved a measure to extend the state’s Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) through 2015, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

CHIP provides health insurance to uninsured children and teens not eligible for or enrolled in Medical Assistance. The program, established in 1992, is set to expire at the end of this year, without legislative action.

The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, have extended federal funding for CHIP through 2015.

Free CHIP coverage is available to eligible children in households with incomes no greater than 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL); low-cost CHIP coverage is available for those with incomes greater than 200 percent but no greater than 300 percent of the FPL; and families with incomes greater than 300 percent of the FPL have the opportunity to purchase coverage by paying the full rate negotiated by the state.

Currently, 188,317 children are enrolled in CHIP across the Commonwealth. Federal funds pay for approximately two-thirds of the total cost of the program.

House Bill 108 now heads to the Senate for consideration.

 

Pa House Passes CHIP Extension

Pa House Passes CHIP Extension

3 Bills Leave Ed Committee

Members of the Pennsylvania House Education Committee passed three measures aimed at increasing student safety and better allocating funding for special education, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

House Resolution 53 would authorize the formation of a select committee to investigate, review, and make recommendations regarding safety and security in public and nonpublic schools and institutions of higher education in Pennsylvania.

House Bill 555 would require all public schools to include the Megan’s Law website on any transportation-related communication distributed to students, parents and the public, as well as posting the website on schools’ homepages in an effort to offer parents and families information about safe bus and walking routes.

House Bill 2 would create a Special Education Funding Commission to develop a new special education funding formula that better reflects the actual special education populations in Pennsylvania school districts.

All of the measures are before the full House for consideration.

Pennsylvania Encourages Organ Donations

Pennsylvania Encourages Organ Donations — The Pennsylvania House unanimously passed a measure last week to offer tax credits to employers who offer paid leave to workers who choose to donate an organ or bone marrow to someone in need, reports state Rep. Jim Cox (R-129). House Bill 46 would institute the tax credit as one step in removing obstacles that may deter living donors.

The tax credits offered under the bill would be equal to the amount paid out in wages while an employee donor undergoes a transplant procedure and recovery – up to five days. Currently, more than 8,000 Pennsylvanians are in need of an organ or bone marrow transplant.

The bill now heads to the Senate for consideration.

Pennsylvania Encourages Organ Donations

Right To Work Program Unveiled In Pa.

A contingent led by State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R-12) introduced, this morning, Jan. 22, a series of bills that would boost the economy of Pennsylvania and returned needed money to the wallets of the rank and file worker.

One would think it would be a no-brainer for such legislation to pass but that is far from the case as the money to do this good thing would come from the wallets of the state’s union bosses and the campaign funds of the Democratic Party.

Metcalfe was joined on stage in the Capitol media center by at least 37 others including a nurse, a public school teacher and Majority House Whip Stan Saylor (R-94).

The six bills were introduced by their sponsors starting with Metcalfe and HB 50, the Freedom of Employment Act that would make employment no longer conditional upon union membership or paying dues to a union.

Following him was a representative of the Pennsylvania Right To Work who noted that 70 percent of the general public — and 40 percent of union households — supported a prohibition of automatically deducting union dues from workers paychecks which is what now occurs in the state.

State Rep. Fred Keller (R-85) was next with the introduction of his bill, HB 52, that would prohibit labor organizations from collecting compulsory union dues from non-union state workers.  He said the loss to these workers is $600 a year, which over 10 years would cover  a semester of tuition at a state university.

Kevin Shrivers of the National Federation of Independent Businesses -Pa. said with the recent passage of free employment laws in Michigan and Indiana, Pennsylvania must act quickly to avoid losing manufacturers to those states.

Kathy Rapp (R-65) introduced HB 51 that would prohibit labor unions from collecting compulsory union dues from non-union public school employees hence overturning Act 88 of 1988.

“Pennsylvania teachers deserve a better deal,” she said.

While she supports the bans on compulsory union dues, she noted she is not against collective bargaining.

She criticized, as many others later did, Gov. Tom Corbett for his coolness to the issue, and gave a dig to the Republican legislative leaders noting that they have yet to allow an up or down vote on the matter.

Neil Weidman, an English teacher at Garden Spot High School in Lancaster County, was next. He said his conscience prohibits him from joining the teachers union due to the political causes they support, and asked that it be stopped from taking money from his paycheck without his consent.

Gene Barr, who is president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Chamber, addressed the “free rider” claim union leaders use to compel dues from non-members. He pointed out that his organization can’t and shouldn’t be allowed to compel dues from all businesses in the state but that all businesses benefit from the research and legal tasks his group performs.

Barr also described his own union background along with his family’s.

“It’s my view (that) it’s a pro worker (series of bills),” he said.

Justin Davis of the National Right to Work Committee spoke of the morality of changing the law.

“In a free society there is no natural right to compel membership in an organization,” he said.

He noted the bills are not anti-union.

“Good unions don’t need compulsive unionism and bad unions don’t deserve it.”

Simon Campbell, a director on the Pennsbury School Board in Bucks County and president of STOP Teacher Strikes, noted that there are 3,000 public school employees in Philadelphia who are not union members but still must pay union dues. He noted that  the state government has 20,000 non-union employees who have to pay union dues.

He joined in the criticism of Gov. Corbett by pointing out that he kept the compulsory collection of union dues when the approved the contract with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees although he did not need to.

Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) described his bill, HB 53, that would prohibit labor organizations from collecting compulsory union dues from non-union local government employees.

David Taylor, executive director of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association pointed out that $1.6 billion in new investment flowed into Indiana in just six months after it passed right to work legislation. He said it would be greatly disadvantageous to Pennsylvania if it let Ohio beat it in becoming right to work.

Barry Miller, president and CEO, of Associated Builders & Contractors, Keystone Chapter, also described the special advantages Pennsylvania would get if it became right to work.

“Over a third of the U.S. is within a days drive and there is not a right-to-work state connected to us,” he said.

He reiterated the point that compulsory dues don’t benefit workers.

“The only group that benefits from forced union dues is your bosses,” he said.

Rep. Jerry Knowles (R-124) introduced HB 54 which would prohibit private-sector employment from being conditional upon membership or non-union membership in a labor organization and prohibit compulsory dues for non-union members.

He said that 700,000 non-union manufacturing jobs were added to the U.S. economy between 2010 and 2012 while there was a loss of 60,000 union manufacturing jobs.

“I want to issue this challenge to the union bosses: prove your worth,” he said.

Dr. Catherine Fike, a director on the Southmoreland School Board, described the corruption caused by compulsory dues.

“Many of our elected leaders are afraid of angering (unions) because of the amount of money (the can funnel into elections). . . We the taxpayer directly subsidize (this corruption).

She offered a solution.

“To kill the monster cut off the head,” she said.

She said she came from a union background and that once unions were noble organizations.

Steve Bloom (R-199) introduced HB 250 that would give public employees the freedom to quit the union at anytime during the contract. Current law only allows employees to quit their union membership 15 days prior to the end of the contract.

David Nace, vice president of Wickersham Construction & Engineering Co., described first hand the adverse affect forced unionism had on people and how he had to leave western Pennsylvania for Lancaster County to find an entry level job as a young man.

Jennifer Stefano, state director of Americans for Prosperity, joined the criticism of Corbett for his lack of political will.

“You don’t build monuments to committees,” she said.

She explained how political will caused public sentiment to change in Michigan for a right to work law, and itemized examples of violence by local unions.

 

Right To Work Program Unveiled In Pa.