Paycheck Protection Benefits Teachers

 By Matthew J. Brouillette Pope Says Redistribute Wealth

Pennsylvania’s AFL-CIO union boss Rick Bloomingdale is absolutely right that there is a “war on workers” here in Pennsylvania—he should know, because he is waging it. His recent opinion piece on PennLive tries, and fails, to defend the indefensible, getting the facts wrong in the process.

What has Bloomingdale so upset?

It’s a proposal that would simply stop using public resources to collect union campaign contributions and political money for government unions.

Far from an attack on workers, this reform would actually give union members a stronger voice in how their dues and campaign dollars are spent. It is not anti-union. It is pro-worker.

If Rick Bloomingdale were interested in protecting the middle class, he’d be standing alongside teachers like Rob Brough rather than against them.

Just ask Rob Brough, a teacher in Pennsylvania who must pay fees to a government union, the Pennsylvania State Education Association, in order to keep his job.

“Their agenda and political ideals are counter to what I believe, and it is a kick in the teeth every time my dues are withdrawn from my hard-earned paycheck and handed off to some organization that I would never contribute to of my own free will,” Brough said.

Shouldn’t the PSEA have to look Rob in the face, ask him for his $680 in dues, and then explain how the union plans to spend it? Since Rob is forced to pay this money to keep his teaching job, isn’t it fair that he should be empowered to have a stronger voice in how his money is spent on politics?

Right now, the leaders of the PSEA and other government unions don’t have to do that. They can use taxpayer resources to collect campaign contributions and political money directly out of employees’ paychecks.

Not only is this unfair to taxpayers; it hurts the very workers government unions claim to represent. Union members are harmed because union bosses don’t have to explain the unions’ political expenditures to members.

That’s what the legislation Bloomingdale references would fix. And he’s wrong that it would affect “all unions”—it only affects government unions, the ones that represent people whose salaries we taxpayers pay.

Bloomingdale argues that ending this special legal privilege for government unions and requiring them to play by the same rules as everyone else “singles out unions only for unnecessary and burdensome rules and restrictions.”

In reality, it is teachers like Rob who are singled out for onerous and unfair restrictions on their hard-earned money—not union bosses.

Imagine if the National Rifle Association or Planned Parenthood demanded taxpayers pay for the collection of their lobbying funds and campaign contributions. They would be ridiculed and rejected – and rightfully so.

Government unions enjoy this same benefit of using your township, borough, city, and state tax dollars to collect their political money and deny union members the ability to hold their union bosses more accountable. No other private or political organization enjoys this financial and political privilege.

Unions can – and should – play by the same rules as everyone else. One questions how viable and relevant government unions are today if, as Bloomingdale implies, they are so dependent on taxpayer subsidies that they would have to close up shop should they lose this exclusive legal privilege.

Paycheck protection would do one thing: Stop the use of taxpayer resources for politics. That, in turn, would set teachers free, allowing them to make their own choices with their own money. It won’t end collective bargaining or keep unions from collecting dues. They would simply have to do it themselves.

Protecting the paychecks of union members and taxpayers is supported statewide. No less than three separate polls of Pennsylvanians reveal overwhelming support for ending Bloomingdale’s exclusive legal privilege.

One survey of likely voters revealed that 79 percent of voters (and 75 percent of union members) agree that unions should not be permitted to use taxpayer-funded resources to collect government union dues.

The public gets it because no other political group enjoys such privileges on the taxpayers’ dime. There is no greater pro-worker and pro-taxpayer proposal than ending the taxpayer-funded collection of dues and campaign contributions for government unions.

If Bloomingdale were truly interested in protecting the middle class, he’d be standing alongside teachers like Rob Brough rather than against them.

Matthew Brouillette is president and CEO of Commonwealth Foundation

Paycheck Protection Benefits Teachers

 

Factory Tours Mean Richer Teachers

A bill designed to make it easier for public school teachers to get more money has moved through State House committee and is now before the full body. Factory Tours Mean Richer Teachers -- House Bill 1816 would allow teachers, guidance counselors and other school administrators to receive  education credits if they visit certain manufacturing facilities for in-person tours and orientation programs, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).  Education credits allow teachers to advance a step in the pay scale so it looks like they may soon be able to tour Yeungling Brewery and get a permanent raise.

House Bill 1816 would allow teachers, guidance counselors and other school administrators to receive  education credits if they visit certain manufacturing facilities for in-person tours and orientation programs, reports State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).  Education credits allow teachers to advance a step in the pay scale so it looks like they may soon be able to tour Yeungling Brewery and get a permanent raise.

The only bright side would be the taxpayer would not have pay the teacher’s college tuition bill which would be the usual route to this raise.

Factory Tours Mean Richer Teachers

Obamacare Means Less SEIU Hours

Obamacare SEIUObamacare SEIU — Local 1 in Chicago of the notoriously Democrat-supporting and fashionably progressive Service Employees International Union has gone on strike because the janitorial company Professional Maintenance has cut hours.

Why did Professional Maintenance cut hours? For the same reason a whole lot of other companies are cutting hours — the looming Obamacare mandates.

We are almost wishing we could cry for these fools but the pain they are inflicting on themselves, they inflicted on the rest of us.

In other news from the “progressive” front, Venezuela is experiencing hyper-inflation (45.4 percent in August) and has a toilet paper shortage.

Expect that here unless the Tea Party faction of the GOP winds up victorious.

Obamacare SEIU

 

Union Membership Labors

 Union membership labors

By Chris Freind

Talk about freeloading. The nine of 10 Americans who aren’t part of organized labor still took full advantage of Labor Day, that hallowed holiday honoring unions, aka “the working class.”
And since those 90 percent aren’t considered “working people” (meaning they must not work) every day is clearly a holiday for them. So relaxing on Labor Day just seems like sticking it to the unions.

What else is new? Public-sector unions are seeing their salaries, benefits and pensions under constant threat of reform from dastardly Republicans trying to stave off bankruptcy. The nerve!

For some unions, that might mean paying more than, God forbid, 5 percent of their health care costs, even though most in the private sector pay far more.

Far “worse,” some Republicans want to allow public union members to negotiate with their prospective employer individually, with free market-type incentives allowing for a fair offer for both employee and “employer” (the taxpayer).

An offer is made and the individual accepts or declines, same as in the private sector. Accountability and efficiency would increase, and unmotivated, bureaucratic sloths would be eliminated.

Sound fair? It is, and it’s called the elimination of collective bargaining. But union leaders demonize its supporters while fighting to continue a system that is completely broke, even opposing attempts to replace antiquated pension plans with 401(k)s. The result? Only 11 percent of the workforce is now unionized, and the decline continues.

Despite a complete inability to articulate its message, the GOP is not anti-labor. It just happens to be the one cleaning up the mess, especially in states like Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin. Noticeably absent is soon-to-implode Pennsylvania, where Gov. Tom Corbett has pursued a business-as-usual policy.

For decades, unions have reaped the rewards of Ponzi-style pay-me-later deals made between union bosses and gutless politicians interested only in self-preservation. But the piper has finally come calling.

Math doesn’t lie. There simply isn’t enough money to continue paying high wages and lavish benefits. It’s either reform or bankruptcy. There’s no third option.

Originally, joining a public-sector union was a trade-off: You wouldn’t make as much, but received a healthy pension and job security. But all that changed after millions in union dues were used to defeat politicians who dared cross labor.

Now, salaries of many public workers are higher than those in the private sector, with pensions so extravagant that Wall Streeters blush with envy.

But with an economy still in shambles, tax revenue down, and baby boomer retirements skyrocketing, the pension system has become permanently unsustainable.

Is it right to reform pensions and benefits? Don’t public-sector union members deserve what they were promised?

At the risk of seeming callous, that’s irrelevant. There isn’t enough money. Period. Unlike the feds, states and municipalities can’t print cash so cutbacks are inevitable, especially on big-ticket items like labor and pension costs.

The alternative is far worse: Bankruptcy. And municipalities can and are declaring. In towns nationwide, including Detroit, the message is simple: Agree to reforms, or risk losing everything. Yet unfathomably, that message is lost on the teachers union in America’s eighth-largest school district (Philadelphia), which is refusing any pay concessions despite a massive deficit, making the district one of the nation’s foremost candidates for bankruptcy. Obviously, it’s not fair. Rank-and-file union members were promised an unfulfillable bill of goods by long-gone hacks. But to paraphrase JFK, anyone who believes in fairness is seriously misinformed.

Unions are not being singled out, as the private sector has fared far worse, with considerably higher job losses and some pensions returning pennies on the dollar. That’s not fair either, but it’s reality. So what now?

Union leaders should tone down the hype, stop the personal attacks, and enter the real world. Reforms are imminent, not because of political principle, but because the money is gone. Failure to be reasonable will result in a protracted battle the unions cannot win, guaranteeing unnecessary pain.

Union bosses are supposed to represent their members’ interests, so it would behoove the rank-and-file to hold their leaders accountable, which they haven’t done. On the two issues that mattered most — defeating NAFTA and Most-Favored-Nation trading status for China — union leaders batted zero. Ironically, both passed under Bill Clinton. Yet labor still blindly supports the Democrats, who take their votes for granted.

Want to stop the union bleeding? Repair the roof now, while there’s still a little sunshine, and don’t wait until the monsoon strikes.

There will never be a perfect “union,” but if reforms aren’t made quickly, there could soon be a Labor Day with no labor. And we’ll all be the poorer for that.

Union Membership Labors

Dems Picked Criminal For Civil Service Commission

Dems Picked Criminal For Civil Service Commission — Delaware County Democrats are under fire for appointing Anthony Serody — who murdered his former girlfriend last week — to Folcroft Borough’s Civil Service Commission the duties of which include overseeing testing of new police officers  despite Serody’s long criminal rap sheet.

The Democrats will have to replace Serody as he shot himself after killing the woman.

Court records show that Serody had been charged with numerous crimes including robbery, theft, aggravated assault, witness retaliation, reckless endangerment, ethnic intimidation, burglary, receiving stolen property, and obstruction of justice  over two decades in Philadelphia and Venango County albeit he was only convicted of escape in 1993,  and of trespassing last year.

So how did he get the post? It appears it was related to his membership in Laborers Local 332.

It is necessary for national unity that Democrats learn to stop accepting violent, women-hating bullies into their ranks and to recognize that there is no point to win-at-all-cost thinking.

Dems Picked Criminal For Civil Service Commission

Dems Picked Criminal For Civil Service Commission

Newspaper Guild Buyout Package

Philadelphia Inquirer gossip columnist Dan Gross resigned, Jan. 16, as head of the Newspaper Guild of Greater Philadelphia to take a  buyout package.

“My decision was not based on fear but on opportunity,” he said.

Perhaps he has gotten an offer to captain an Italian cruise ship.

Interstate General Media L.L.C., the parent company of the Inky, Daily News and Philly.com,  has told the 550 members of the Guild. whose rank and file includes newsroom and advertising employees. that it wants to cut $8 million in wages and benefits from their contract which expires in October.

Those greedy capitalistic war pigs. Look for the union label! Strike brothers!

And welcome to Obamaworld where your pay is less and your costs are more.

 

Newspaper Guild Buyout Package

Right To Work Program Unveiled In Pa.

A contingent led by State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R-12) introduced, this morning, Jan. 22, a series of bills that would boost the economy of Pennsylvania and returned needed money to the wallets of the rank and file worker.

One would think it would be a no-brainer for such legislation to pass but that is far from the case as the money to do this good thing would come from the wallets of the state’s union bosses and the campaign funds of the Democratic Party.

Metcalfe was joined on stage in the Capitol media center by at least 37 others including a nurse, a public school teacher and Majority House Whip Stan Saylor (R-94).

The six bills were introduced by their sponsors starting with Metcalfe and HB 50, the Freedom of Employment Act that would make employment no longer conditional upon union membership or paying dues to a union.

Following him was a representative of the Pennsylvania Right To Work who noted that 70 percent of the general public — and 40 percent of union households — supported a prohibition of automatically deducting union dues from workers paychecks which is what now occurs in the state.

State Rep. Fred Keller (R-85) was next with the introduction of his bill, HB 52, that would prohibit labor organizations from collecting compulsory union dues from non-union state workers.  He said the loss to these workers is $600 a year, which over 10 years would cover  a semester of tuition at a state university.

Kevin Shrivers of the National Federation of Independent Businesses -Pa. said with the recent passage of free employment laws in Michigan and Indiana, Pennsylvania must act quickly to avoid losing manufacturers to those states.

Kathy Rapp (R-65) introduced HB 51 that would prohibit labor unions from collecting compulsory union dues from non-union public school employees hence overturning Act 88 of 1988.

“Pennsylvania teachers deserve a better deal,” she said.

While she supports the bans on compulsory union dues, she noted she is not against collective bargaining.

She criticized, as many others later did, Gov. Tom Corbett for his coolness to the issue, and gave a dig to the Republican legislative leaders noting that they have yet to allow an up or down vote on the matter.

Neil Weidman, an English teacher at Garden Spot High School in Lancaster County, was next. He said his conscience prohibits him from joining the teachers union due to the political causes they support, and asked that it be stopped from taking money from his paycheck without his consent.

Gene Barr, who is president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Chamber, addressed the “free rider” claim union leaders use to compel dues from non-members. He pointed out that his organization can’t and shouldn’t be allowed to compel dues from all businesses in the state but that all businesses benefit from the research and legal tasks his group performs.

Barr also described his own union background along with his family’s.

“It’s my view (that) it’s a pro worker (series of bills),” he said.

Justin Davis of the National Right to Work Committee spoke of the morality of changing the law.

“In a free society there is no natural right to compel membership in an organization,” he said.

He noted the bills are not anti-union.

“Good unions don’t need compulsive unionism and bad unions don’t deserve it.”

Simon Campbell, a director on the Pennsbury School Board in Bucks County and president of STOP Teacher Strikes, noted that there are 3,000 public school employees in Philadelphia who are not union members but still must pay union dues. He noted that  the state government has 20,000 non-union employees who have to pay union dues.

He joined in the criticism of Gov. Corbett by pointing out that he kept the compulsory collection of union dues when the approved the contract with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees although he did not need to.

Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) described his bill, HB 53, that would prohibit labor organizations from collecting compulsory union dues from non-union local government employees.

David Taylor, executive director of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association pointed out that $1.6 billion in new investment flowed into Indiana in just six months after it passed right to work legislation. He said it would be greatly disadvantageous to Pennsylvania if it let Ohio beat it in becoming right to work.

Barry Miller, president and CEO, of Associated Builders & Contractors, Keystone Chapter, also described the special advantages Pennsylvania would get if it became right to work.

“Over a third of the U.S. is within a days drive and there is not a right-to-work state connected to us,” he said.

He reiterated the point that compulsory dues don’t benefit workers.

“The only group that benefits from forced union dues is your bosses,” he said.

Rep. Jerry Knowles (R-124) introduced HB 54 which would prohibit private-sector employment from being conditional upon membership or non-union membership in a labor organization and prohibit compulsory dues for non-union members.

He said that 700,000 non-union manufacturing jobs were added to the U.S. economy between 2010 and 2012 while there was a loss of 60,000 union manufacturing jobs.

“I want to issue this challenge to the union bosses: prove your worth,” he said.

Dr. Catherine Fike, a director on the Southmoreland School Board, described the corruption caused by compulsory dues.

“Many of our elected leaders are afraid of angering (unions) because of the amount of money (the can funnel into elections). . . We the taxpayer directly subsidize (this corruption).

She offered a solution.

“To kill the monster cut off the head,” she said.

She said she came from a union background and that once unions were noble organizations.

Steve Bloom (R-199) introduced HB 250 that would give public employees the freedom to quit the union at anytime during the contract. Current law only allows employees to quit their union membership 15 days prior to the end of the contract.

David Nace, vice president of Wickersham Construction & Engineering Co., described first hand the adverse affect forced unionism had on people and how he had to leave western Pennsylvania for Lancaster County to find an entry level job as a young man.

Jennifer Stefano, state director of Americans for Prosperity, joined the criticism of Corbett for his lack of political will.

“You don’t build monuments to committees,” she said.

She explained how political will caused public sentiment to change in Michigan for a right to work law, and itemized examples of violence by local unions.

 

Right To Work Program Unveiled In Pa.

 

Right To Work Plan Unveiling For Pa.

Pennsylvania State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) has announced that he and several colleagues will hold a news conference 11 a.m., Jan. 22 in which they will  unveil a package of legislation known as the Open Workforce Initiative.

This initiative would empower Pennsylvania workers by providing them with more freedom to decide whether or not to join a union, says Cox.

Stay tuned.

Right To Work Plan Unveiling For Pa.

Right To Work Plan Unveiling For Pa.

 

Bruce Castor Right To Work

Montgomery County Commissioner Bruce Castor, who some are touting to take on Gov. Corbett in the 2014 GOP primary, has penned support for right to work. Bruce Castor Right To Work

Right to work means unions can’t make an employer deduct union dues or service fees from an employee’s check. The money to pay for the salaries of union leaders must be given voluntarily without compulsion. It’s about time a Republican came out in support of the worker and against special interests.

Thank you, Bruce.

Below is the letter:

By his recent signing of legislation making Michigan the 24th state to prohibit unions from forcing workers to join and pay dues, Rick Snyder joined Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker as a beacon of leadership.

The measure approved by Gov. Snyder, known as Right to Work, will give the Wolverine State a much-needed economic boost. The premise is simple: giving workers freedom makes them more prosperous. Research by the Commonwealth Foundation shows that Right-to-Work states, on average, have higher employment and per-capita income (adjusting for cost of living) than forced unionism states.

Another key component of worker freedom is paycheck protection, which protects public sector union members from having dues automatically deducted from their paychecks. It also prevents their dues money from being used for political purposes without their consent. Paycheck protection holds public sector unions fully accountable to their members, which ensures they get the greatest amount of take-home pay possible while getting the level of representation they want.

With Pennsylvania’s economy and personal income growth lagging, it’s time to give our workers the freedom they want and deserve to prosper. It’s mind-boggling that we are still a forced unionism state when nearly three-fourths (72 percent) of our residents favor right-to-work legislation, according to a 2011 survey by the Manhattan Institute.

All that is needed to give our workers freedom and more prosperity is the kind of leadership and courage that has been shown in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Bruce Castor Right To Work

Why PA Has School Strikes

Taxpayer activist Bob Guzzardi informs us that Mike Vereb, member of Republican State House leadership and the representative for the 150th District, has taken $16,500 since 2008 from PSEA-PACE, which is the public school teachers’ union.

Guzzardi notes that members of House Republican Leadership with exception of Sandra Major (R-111) caucus chairwoman have received substantial payments from PSEA-PACE. For more information  visit  https://www.campaignfinanceonline.state.pa.us/pages/CFReportSearch.aspx

And this is why commonsense educational and tax reform never seems to prevail in Pennsylvania.

Why PA Has School Strikes

Why PA Has School Strikes