Schools Stay Open But Church Must End Choice Hypocrisy

I always try to check my emotions at the door when I begin a column. That’s why I rarely write in the first person. But, hey, I’m also human and a Philly Catholic, so I shed a few tears of joy when it was recently announced that four diocesan high schools and 18 elementary schools were reprieved from their death sentence and would remain open.
I didn’t go to Bonner (mine was the other Augustinian school, Malvern), but a brother, an uncle and a bunch of my friends did. (In fact, my uncle was a member of Bonner’s first graduating class and has three Prendergast – yes, Prendergast – football letters. How’s that for trivia?). And I have an aunt who’s a grad of the school that has, perhaps, the greatest tradition of all – West Catholic.
(Quick tangent: I’m a graduate of Annunciation BVM grade school in Havertown, which a niece and nephew presently attend. Despite meeting or exceeding all of the thresholds laid out by Bishop McFadden in 2009 to remain open, Annunciation is nonetheless being closed. Ignoring the wishes of his congregation, the pastor refused to appeal. Scores of parishioners, encouraged by the 75 percent success rate of the schools that did appeal, as well as West Catholic remaining open even though it did not appeal, have taken their case directly to Archbishop Chaput. You can read their detailed appeal on PaWatercooler.com
Now that a short-term victory for many schools has been achieved, it’s time to push emotion aside and take an objective look at the situation, where more questions than answers remain. What changed? What transpired in 30 days that allowed almost half of the schools to stay open? Was it “faulty information” that the Blue Ribbon Commission received, as some readers allege? Or was it a few deep-pocketed donors stepping up to the plate? And if so, is relying on a handful of wealthy individuals really a sustainable financial solution?
It seems quite a stretch that bad information could be the reason for the turnaround. For that to be true, many schools must have submitted data painting a very negative picture – information subsequently determined to be incorrect (hence the reversals). Outside of a few pastors who lack the desire or energy to further the mission of Catholic education, that scenario doesn’t stand up to the common sense test, since most schools would obviously put their best foot forward in their quest to stay open.
So either the Commission did not request the right information, or completely dropped the ball in analyzing the documents it did receive (as referenced in last week’s column). Either way, given that the Commission’s decisions affected the lives of so many, Philadelphia Catholics had every right to expect more, especially given the composition of the Commission. Its members included former top executives of some of America’s largest banks and insurance companies who were familiar with making tough financial decisions. Something just doesn’t add up, and, fair or not, that is fostering cynicism and fear that future closings are inevitable.
Of course, there is another possibility – that the Commission simply never bothered (or wasn’t allowed?) to contact many of the schools in question. Since more than a few pastors confidentially enlightened me to that situation – why would they lie about something so easily verifiable? – it tends to further cloud the entire decision-making process, both closures and reprieves. And why on earth, if the Commission/Archdiocese realized that the data was incomplete and/or their methodologies flawed, would they not postpone the original announcement in January until they got their house in order?
As a result, many faithful are rolling their eyes (again), wondering how the Archdiocese could look so foolish, while still not communicating any long-term solution. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that, since enrollment has decreased sharply over the last decade while costs have risen, a viable plan must be enacted quickly, or the same situation will arise in the near future.
With that distinct possibility looming, how can the Church avoid it?
1) Start talking about the positive aspects of the Church, restoring the credibility that has been shattered by years of sex scandals, shredded documents and cover-ups. The Roman Catholic Church is the largest provider of social services in the entire world (and second in America behind only the U.S. government) and administers the world’s largest nonpublic school system, yet most people are unaware of those phenomenal achievements – a massive failure in public relations.
The Catholic mission is perhaps the most noble on the planet, and the Church’s history, while certainly not without its darker moments, is a storied one. From its humble beginnings as the church of a fisherman named Peter, Roman Catholicism became the most benevolent and impactful force the world has ever known. It’s time to tell that magnificent story and educate the world – again – on what it really means to be Catholic, while purging every aspect of the scandals which have rocked the church to its very foundations. Unequivocally, pride in Catholic identity leads to fuller schools.
2) The newly created Faith In The Future Foundation – charged with fundraising and being a guiding force on marketing and recruiting for the 17 archdiocesan high schools and assisting parish elementary schools – is a good idea, but only if it offers membership to rank-and-file Catholics with ears to the ground.
Much criticism directed at the Church is that it is too insulated from the pressing issues, and too isolated from the parishioners themselves. If the Foundation is comprised only of millionaires and politically-connected Catholics, it will fail. That is not to invoke “class warfare,” for having intelligent business leaders is imperative, but by definition, most would not be able to relate to the concerns of the masses (no pun intended). If “average” Catholics are not given a dedicated platform to offer their perspective, the rigidness, bureaucracy and stagnation that has come to define the Archdiocese will only worsen. And the exodus of Catholics will accelerate.
3) The Church needs to fight. If you want a true long-term solution to keep schools open and thriving, and believe the best way is by returning to parents some of their tax money (vouchers and tax credits) so they can make the best choice where to educate their children, you are absolutely correct. But it doesn’t happen by itself.
It only happens when political muscle is flexed. It only happens when you play hardball. It only happens when you unabashedly make school choice the Church’s Number One issue in the primary and general election. And it only happens when you make it crystal clear to all legislators who doubt the ferocity of a newly awakened tiger – one that has shed its paper skin – that they will reap the whirlwind for that miscalculation.
Seems common sense, yet the church has been doing the complete opposite. For over a year, Freindly Fire and others have been successfully battling clueless church factions who have been pushing “educational reform” legislation (Senate Bill 1) that would neither educate nor reform. It’s such a worthless bill – written while Ed Rendell was still governor and not amended to include the middle class (at all) despite an infinitely more favorable Legislature and pro-school choice Gov. Tom Corbett – that, had it been passed a year ago, virtually none of the schools slated for closure would have been saved. School choice bills affecting just low-income families are born losers; only when the middle class is comprehensively included will there b
e light at the end of the tunnel to help Catholic schools survive and prosper.
Ironically, the Church – through its lobbying arm, the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference – hurt itself by backing the wrong bill and not being truthful that the middle class was excluded from that legislation. Upon learning that the bill would never affect them or help keep their schools open, many Catholics reacted with palpable anger, setting off another wholly preventable firestorm. One step forward and three back is not the way to achieve political success.
What can be done immediately? Make an extremely aggressive push to have the Educational Improvement Tax Credit (EITC) expansion bill pass the Senate, where “school choice advocate” Sen. Jeff Piccola is selfishly letting it languish (calling it “DOA”) because he can’t pass his low-income voucher bill. Making the sin mortal is that the EITC bill, sponsored by Montgomery County state Rep. Tom Quigley, passed the House by an unheard-of bipartisan vote of 190 to 7 – a year ago! The biggest tragedy is that some of the schools that have been ordered to close might have been saved if this bill had passed last spring. But because of misguided legislative priorities and a total lack of political pressure by the Church, Catholics – and their schools – continue to suffer.
All of the suggested solutions will be for naught if the hierarchy doesn’t learn one lesson very quickly. You cannot grow the church by being inconsistent, and yes, hypocritical, especially to your own people. The Archdiocese has thus far refused to grant school choice to many in elementary schools, instead dictating what schools children must attend. That policy has created an immense backlash, with thousands feeling betrayed since they correctly see the Church pushing school choice for others, but denying it to them. And no amount of spin or enrollment explanations will change that bitter sentiment. Charity starts at home.
Of the countless emails received in the last week – most from loyal Catholics – one message was most common: Keep the faith but fight the corruption.
If grounded church leaders and reinvigorated rank-and-file Catholics keep that in mind while preaching a positive message and a wielding a political sledgehammer, then prayers for keeping Catholic education alive far into the future will undoubtedly be answered.

Lights Back On Windsor Circle

A fallen tree at 101 N. Rolling Road knocked the lights out on Windsor Circle, Springfield, Pa. at 1:46 p.m., today, Feb. 29.

The came back on at 6:05 p.m.
PECO said that only 18 homes were affected which corresponds to the number on the circle.
Hat tip Margaret Lawrence
Lights Back On Windsor Circle

Fannie Mae Wants More $$$

Fannie Mae Wants More $$$ — The government-sponsored Federal National Mortgage Association i.e. Fannie Mae requested this morning, Feb.29, $4.6 billion more in government aid after a $2.41 billion four-quarter loss.

Where are Chris Dodd and Barney Frank when you need them?
Don’t sweat, this font of corruption is still going to get the money.

 
 
 

The Ebb Of Freedom

Ricky Palinko submitted The Ebb Of Freedom about the continuing decline of the loss of our freedom. 

H.R. 347 certainly sounds reasonable until you remember that we have gone 236 years, which have included a Civil War, world wars and various domestic turmoils, without it.

Just when you thought the government couldn’t ruin the First Amendment any further: The House of Representatives approved a bill on Monday that outlaws protests in instances where some government officials are nearby, whether or not you even know it.

The US House of Representatives voted 388-to-3 in favor of H.R. 347 late Monday, a bill which is being dubbed the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. In the bill, Congress officially makes it illegal to trespass on the grounds of the White House, which, on the surface, seems not just harmless and necessary, but somewhat shocking that such a rule isn’t already on the books. The wording in the bill, however, extends to allow the government to go after much more than tourists that transverse the wrought iron White House fence.

Under the act, the government is also given the power to bring charges against Americans engaged in political protest anywhere in the country.

Under current law, White House trespassers are prosecuted under a local ordinance, a Washington, DC legislation that can bring misdemeanor charges for anyone trying to get close to the president without authorization. Under H.R. 347, a federal law will formally be applied to such instances, but will also allow the government to bring charges to protesters, demonstrators and activists at political events and other outings across America.

The new legislation allows prosecutors to charge anyone who enters a building without permission or with the intent to disrupt a government function with a federal offense if Secret Service is on the scene, but the law stretches to include not just the president’s palatial Pennsylvania Avenue home. Under the law, any building or grounds where the president is visiting — even temporarily — is covered, as is any building or grounds “restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.”

It’s not just the president who would be spared from protesters, either.

Covered under the bill is any person protected by the Secret Service. Although such protection isn’t extended to just everybody, making it a federal offense to even accidently disrupt an event attended by a person with such status essentially crushes whatever currently remains of the right to assemble and peacefully protest. 

Hours after the act passed, presidential candidate Rick Santorum was granted Secret Service protection. For the American protester, this indeed means that glitter-bombing the former Pennsylvania senator is officially a very big no-no, but it doesn’t stop with just him. Santorum’s coverage under the Secret Service began on Tuesday, but fellow GOP hopeful Mitt Romney has already been receiving such security. A campaign aide who asked not to be identified confirmed last week to CBS News that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has sought Secret Service protection as well. Even former contender Herman Cain received the armed protection treatment when he was still in the running for the Republican Party nod.

In the text of the act, the law is allowed to be used against anyone who knowingly enters or remains in a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so, but those grounds are considered any area where someone — rather it’s President Obama, Senator Santorum or Governor Romney — will be temporarily visiting, whether or not the public is even made aware. Entering such a facility is thus outlawed, as is disrupting the orderly conduct of “official functions,” engaging in disorderly conduct “within such proximity to” the event or acting violent to anyone, anywhere near the premises. Under that verbiage, that means a peaceful protest outside a candidate’s concession speech would be a federal offense, but those occurrences covered as special event of national significance don’t just stop there, either. And neither does the list of covered persons that receive protection.

Outside of the current presidential race, the Secret Service is responsible for guarding an array of politicians, even those from outside America. George W Bush is granted protection until ten years after his administration ended, or 2019, and every living president before him is eligible for life-time, federally funded coverage. Visiting heads of state are extended an offer too, and the events sanctioned as those of national significance — a decision that is left up to the US Department of Homeland Security — extends to more than the obvious. While presidential inaugurations and meeting of foreign dignitaries are awarded the title, nearly three dozen events in all have been considered a National Special Security Event (NSSE) since the term was created under President Clinton. Among past events on the DHS-sanctioned NSSE list are Super Bowl XXXVI, the funerals of Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford, most State of the Union addresses and the 2008 Democratic and Republican National Conventions.

With Secret Service protection awarded to visiting dignitaries, this also means, for instance, that the federal government could consider a demonstration against any foreign president on American soil as a violation of federal law, as long as it could be considered disruptive to whatever function is occurring.

When thousands of protesters are expected to descend on Chicago this spring for the 2012 G8 and NATO summits, they will also be approaching the grounds of a National Special Security Event. That means disruptive activity, to whichever court has to consider it, will be a federal offense under the act.

And don’t forget if you intend on fighting such charges, you might not be able to rely on evidence of your own. In the state of Illinois, videotaping the police, under current law, brings criminals charges. Don’t fret. It’s not like the country will really try to enforce it — right?

On the bright side, does this mean that the law could apply to law enforcement officers reprimanded for using excessive force on protesters at political events? Probably. Of course, some fear that the act is being created just to keep those demonstrations from ever occuring, and given the vague language on par with the loose definition of a “terrorist” under the NDAA, if passed this act is expected to do a lot more harm to the First Amendment than good.

United States Representative Justin Amash (MI-03) was one of only three lawmakers to vote against the act when it appeared in the House late Monday. Explaining his take on the act through his official Facebook account on Tuesday, Rep. Amash writes, “The bill expands current law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even if the person does not know it’s illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect it’s illegal.”

“Some government officials may need extraordinary protection to ensure their safety. But criminalizing legitimate First Amendment activity — even if that activity is annoying to those government officials — violates our rights,” adds the representative.

Now that the act has overwhelmingly made it through the House, the next set of hands to sift through its pages could very well be President Barack Obama; the US Senate had already passed the bill back on February 6. Less than two months ago, the president approved the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, essentially suspending habeas corpus from American citizens. Could the next order out of the Executive Branch be revoking some of the Bill of Rights? Only if you consider the part about being able to assemble a staple of the First Amendment, really. Don’t worry, though. Obama was, after all, a constitutional law professor. When he signed the NDAA on December 31, he accompanied his signature with a signing statement that let Americans know that, just because he authorized the indefinite detention of Americans didn’t mean he thought it was right.

Should President Obama suspend the right to assemble, Americans might expect another apology to accompany it in which the commander-in-chief condemns the very act he authorizes. If you disagree with such a decision, however, don’t take it to the White House. Sixteen-hundred Pennsylvania Avenue and the vicinity is, of course, covered under this act.

 

Are Hybrids Passe?

Are Hybrids Passe? — Hybrid cars have been steadily losing market share despite the steadily increase pump pain going from 2.8 percent in 2009 to 2.2 percent last year.

Bloomberg Business Week suspects the cause to be drastically improved internal combustion engines which give many economy cars over 40 mpg making it silly to spend the $6,000 extra the battery wagons cost over a standard car.

Stupid Traffic Flow Of Springfield, Pa.

Driving west on Baltimore Pike through Springfield, Delaware County, Pa, one will reach a stoplight flanked by Springfield Square North and South.

A few dozen yards behind  will be an exit from Springfield Square North which could but rarely  disgorges traffic back onto the Pike. Why would  it be used? It only allows right turns hence it merely puts a motorist in line for a light they would likely miss if he just used the main exit.

Now, if that driveway were an entrance on the other hand it would be used probably by more than half of those entering the center cutting down the snarl at the main entrance and bringing relief to those drivers who just want to pass on by.

A few hundred yards beyond Springfield Square is a small strip center across from the termini  of North Chester and Riverview roads. It  has a Starbucks, Talbots dress shop, an AT&T store and an absolutely bizarre traffic flow. The  first driveway, counter-intuitively, is the exit. This means the customers unfamiliar with the site use it as an entrance.
Drivers entering as they should often find themselves face to face on the narrow traffic way with cars leaving the back parking spaces for the exit.

This small center is abuts the larger Olde Sproul Shopping Village  which  has several entrances and exits with a light at the main one.

A small concrete barrier prevents cars from entering the Village from the Starbucks’ center and getting onto the Pike using the traffic light.

Why? Both centers are private property. It is possible the absentee landlords are not aware of the issue. It is possible they don’t care about the issue.

Regardless, the lives of the community could be improved with just a small bit of effort.

Stupid Traffic Flow Of Springfield, Pa.

Stupid Traffic Flow Of Springfield, Pa.

Obama Poster Guy Cops Plea

Obama Poster Guy Cops Plea — Shepard Fairey, the designer of those once-cool Obama “Hope” poster who was last seen on these pages being chased out of Europe as a “Yankee hipster“, has pleaded guilty to criminal contempt stemming from a copyright lawsuit over his iconic poster.

The Associated Press sued Fairey saying he violated the copyright held by the news service regarding the photo on which he based his poster.

Fairey said uh uh, that it was a different photo.

Well, no it wasn’t. But Fairey deleted files and created false documentation to show otherwise and that is why he now faces a six-month prison sentence.

Fairey says lying to the court was the worst thing that he’s ever done.

Actually, the worst thing that he has ever done was in November 2008 when  voted for an complete incompetent to run this country.

Obama Poster Guy Cops Plea
Obama Poster Guy Cops Plea

Suspected Locker Thief Waives Prelim. Hearing

By Pattie Price

Carl Kasarsky, 19, of Marple waived a hearing Thursday before Magisterial District Judge Lee Hunter on the charges of theft by unlawful taking and underage drinking. In exchange for the waiver the charge of receiving stolen property was withdrawn. The charges stem from an incident 3:30 p.m., Feb. 14, at Ellis Athletic Center, 3819 West Chester Pike.
According to the affidavit, Newtown Detective John Newell said Kasarky, who is not a member of the gym, was seen in the men’s locker room looking through several lockers. When Kasarsky saw an employee watching him, he ran and the employee gave chase. The employee was not able to catch Kasarsky but he was able to provide police a description of Kasarsky and the car he got away in.
When the employee returned to the gym, a man reported numerous one-dollar bills were stolen from his wallet while he was working out.
Marple Police were alerted to check their gym parking lots for Kasarsky’s car. Marple Officer Drew Baylor spotted Kasarsky driving around the parking lot of Planet Fitness and he was stopped.
Baylor said Kasarsky appeared to be very nervous. He was then identified by the gym employee and taken into custody.
Kasarsky was in possession of 41 one-dollar bills and several bottles of alcohol were confiscated from the trunk of his car.
Kasarky admitted stealing the money as well as a watch the previous day.
Kasarsky was released after posting 10 percent of $25,000 bail. He is scheduled for a March 22 arraignment in Common Pleas Court.
* * *
Patrick Wynne, 25, of Havertown, waived a hearing on the charges of driving while his license was suspended – DUI related and fleeing or attempting to elude police. In exchange for the waiver the charges of DUI, unlawful to issue false ID, speeding, and reckless driving were withdrawn. The charges stem from an incident 11:30a.m., Nov. 3, on Media Line Road.
According to the affidavit, Newtown Officer Dean Hodges was conducting a traffic detail in the 300 block of Media Line Road when he clocked Wynne at 45 mph. in a posted 25 mph. zone. At first Wynne slowed down but then fled south at a high rate of speed. Wynne turned onto Gradyville Road and wrecked his car in the 3600 block. He attempted to flee but was quickly apprehended.
Two open packets of Suboxone were confiscated and Wynne was transported to Springfield Hospital for a blood test.
Wynne was remanded to the George W. Hill Correctional Facility when he was unable to post 10 percent of $50,000. He is scheduled for a March 22 arraignment in Common Pleas Court.
 * * *
William Steward Jr., 50, of Newtown waived a hearing on the charges of careless driving, driving at an unsafe speed, and criminal mischief. In exchange for the waiver the charges of DUI, reckless driving and speeding were withdrawn. The charges stem from an incident 2:45a.m., Oct. 5, in the 100 block of Bryn Mawr Avenue.
According to the affidavit Newtown Officer Chris Barksdale responded to an accident and learned that Steward was attempting to leave the scene. The vehicle overturned and the front drivers’ wheel was caved in rendering the vehicle incapable of moving.
Steward had a strong odor of alcohol, was sweating profusely, and his pupils were fixed and responses to questions were erratic and rambling. A portable breath test registered a .076 percent blood alcohol level.
Steward was transported to Riddle Memorial Hospital for treatment of minor lacerations.
The accident investigation revealed Steward was traveling north on Bryn Mawr Avenue in the southbound lanes when he lost control and struck a retaining wall an mailboxes after rolling over several times.
* * *
Anthony Liberati, 68, of Newtown plead guilty to harassment and disorderly conduct following an incident 10:23a.m., Nov. 30, on S. Newtown Street Road. In exchange for the waiver the charge simple assault was withdrawn.
According to the affidavit, Newtown Lt. Chris Lunn investigated a road rage incident. Liberati, the driver of a dump truck, sprayed what police believe was mace into the victim’s face. The victim was holding his hands to his face in obvious distress.
Witnesses confirmed Liberati sprayed the victim with what they thought was pepper mace. The victim was transported to Riddle Memorial Hospital for treatment.
Newtown Officer Dean Hodges recovered a mace gun from Liberati’s vehicle.
Liberati was ordered to pay fined and court costs.

American Black Genocide

As Black History Month winds down, here is a tidbit to ponder: blacks made up 12 percent of our population but account for 35 percent of abortions, which is five times the white rate. More than 50 percent of all black pregnancies end in abortion. 
American Black Genocide

Planned Parenthood was founded as the American Birth Control League by Margaret Sanger in part to check the growth of  “stocks that are the most detrimental to the future of the race.

What stocks would they be?

One of the people Mrs. Sanger appointed to the board of the League was her friend Lothrop Stoddard, whose book The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy was widely read and very influential before World War II.

Stoddard lost favor after the war because of his praise of Nazi eugenics policy.

To all my black friends, stop voting Democrat. Those people are trying to kill you.

Ironically, Stoddard was a Republican. Times have changed.

American Black Genocide

 

Wyoming Ponders Aircraft Carrier

Wyoming Ponders Aircraft Carrier — With the Wyoming oil boom in full swing, the state is pondering what steps to take should there be a complete  breakdown of the rest of these United States.

The state legislature passed Friday, Feb. 24, a first reading of House Bill 85 that would create a government continuity task force to investigate as to how the state should prepare for potential catastrophes.

Among the things to be considered are an alternative currency, a military draft and the raising of a standing army, and the acquisition of strike aircraft and an aircraft carrier.

Don’t ask. I don’t know. I’m just reporting what was reported.

How many readers out there know that Wyoming is named for a part of Pennsylvania?

Gertrude of Wyoming by Scotsman Thomas Campbell, the hit poem of 1809, is set there.

It would actually be kind of scary if Luzerne County got an aircraft carrier.

Wyoming Ponders Aircraft Carrier
Wyoming Ponders Aircraft Carrier