The US Has Stopped Making Cents

The US Has Stopped Making Cents

By Bob Small

Yhe Philadelphia Mint, Nov. 12, said goodbye to the lowly penny, which had a 232 year run.

The reason for discontinuance is “Over the past decade, the cost of producing each penny has risen from 1.42 cents to 3.69 cents per penny”

As to the values, pennies made before 1982 have more value.

Those pennies were made from copper, while those after 1982 are zinc and copper. More modern pennies tend not to have the same worth as their earlier counterparts.

Charmy Harker, “the penny lady” recommended people interested in valuation buy A Guide Book of United States Coins 2026 .

The penny was “ first authorized by the Coinage Act of 1792/

There was a January DOGE recommendation to end penny production because  making 4.5 billion pennies in 2023 cost taxpayers more than $179 million.

Evidently, there is not a very vibrant “penny lobby”, if one exists at all. A previous effort was proposed by Sen. McCain and Mike Enzi in 2017 .

Businesses may choose to round up or down to the nearest nickel.

Rounding up to a nickel may raise costs for shoppers. One study by researchers at the Richmond Federal Reserve estimated that could cost consumers $6 million annually. For comparison, Canada stopped one cent coins in 2012, New Zealand in 1990, and the UK suspended production. In 2024.

Wake Forest Economics Professor Robert Whaples, makes the point that “the last time we got rid of a coin was the halfpenny, and that was all the way back in 1857. “

He wonders how long the nickel will survive.

The Pittsburgh-based grocery chain Giant Eagle was willing to give a gift card worth twice the value of the pennies. A similar deal was available in Syracuse, N.Y.

According to Copilot AI, they can’t locate any Delco Stores offering this service.

Malicious cow William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-3-25

Malicious cow William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-3-25

 Kyv kpireep fw r gizetv ze re fczxrityp zj efk jf urexviflj kf kyv glsczt nvcwriv rj kyv rgrkyp fw r tzkzqve ze r uvdftirtp.
Tyricvj uv Dfekvjhlzvl 

Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit puzzle: The malicious cow disturbs the entire herd.
Ukrainian Folk Saying

malicious cow disturbs the entire herd. Ukrainain Folk Saying

Malicious cow William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-3

Court with a fool William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-2-25

Court with a fool William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-2-25

Iwt bpaxrxdjh rdl sxhijgqh iwt tcixgt wtgs.
Jzgpxcpxc Udaz Hpnxcv  

Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit puzzle: If a wise person goes to court with a fool, the fool rages and scoffs, and there is no peace.
Proverbs 29:9

Court with a fool William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-2-20

Visit Rights-Right.com, where you can find Cryptowit Quote Puzzles by William W. Lawrence Sr.

$100K Visa Fee Is Peanuts for Indentured Servitude

$100K Visa Fee Is Peanuts for Indentured Servitude

By Joe Guzzardi

President Donald Trump, on Sept. 19, issued his Proclamation entitled “Restrictions on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers” that imposes a $100,000, one-time fee for most new non-immigrant visa petitions filed after September 21 and restricts the ability of certain other H-1B visa holders to enter the U.S. The Proclamation applies only to petitions that have not yet been filed and not to aliens who already hold current, valid H-1B visas. Per the order, employers must now provide proof of payment when filing H-1B petitions, with enforcement overseen by the U.S. Departments of State and Homeland Security. The administration’s goal is to end the visa’s abuse and thereby ensure that only the most highly skilled foreign workers are selected for entry while encouraging employers to prioritize Americans.

The industry’s immediate response to the Trump administration’s abrupt but forceful action was widespread confusion as some H-1B visa holders cancelled plans to re-enter or scheduled return flights to the U.S. before the proclamation’s Sept. 21 effective date. However, for the H-1B’s countless critics who have been crying foul since the Immigration Act of 1990 created the American job-killing visa, cautious optimism prevailed.

The fee has had the desired effect of dampening employer enthusiasm for cheaper foreign labor. Walmart, America’s largest private-sector employer with approximately 1.6 million workers on its domestic payroll — a total that includes about 2,400 H-1B visa holders — announced that it would temporarily suspend hiring new H-1Bs.

Four decades ago, Congress, craven employers, and pro-immigration expansionists sold the visa as a vital stopgap measure for companies that could not fill essential jobs with domestic workers. But their fairy-tale vision contrasted sharply with reality. Using the H-1B program to facilitate the offshoring of U.S. jobs and replace U.S. workers is the exact opposite of the program’s advertised purpose of helping employers fill temporary labor shortages with workers possessing skills that are in short supply domestically. If it were operating as intended, the program should, when necessary, bring in skilled workers to complement the U.S. labor force. While in some cases H-1B workers are skilled and benefit the U.S. economy, the data showed early in the program’s history that a large percentage of visas were used to undercut and replace U.S. workers to boost corporate profits.

$100K Visa Fee Is Peanuts for Indentured Servitude
Maxine Waters and Mark Zuckerberg

Prospective IT employers were understandably shocked at the new $100,000 fee. Before the Proclamation, the H-1B petition fee could range from approximately $460 to about $4,460. But visa critics were pleased at the hike because for decades, independently published research reports from conservative and liberal think tanks proved that unscrupulous employers underpaid and overworked their H-1B labor force. Ten years ago, President Jimmy Carter’s labor secretary Ray Marshall called the H-1B “one of the best con jobs ever done on the American public and political systems. The supporters argue that we have a shortage of college-educated workers. Well, there’s no evidence of that in the numbers…” During the decade since Marshall scorned the H-1B, the only significant change is that IT employers have gone on a dramatic firing spree, dismissing older, experienced native-born professionals while the annual lottery has admitted 85,000 new workers year after year. Some employers are exempt from the annual 85,000 cap, including universities and their affiliated nonprofit entities, nonprofit research organizations, and government research organizations. Because of the corporate exceptions, the arriving H-1B total far exceeds 85,000.

Of the top H-1B employers, many visas went to outsourcing firms — about one quarter of the annual 85,000 allotment. In 2024, at least 95,000 workers at U.S.-based tech companies were laid off; layoffs hit a peak in 2023 when around 200,000 tech workers were fired. Today, the tech job market is horrible. Over 200 tech companies have laid off 91,000 employees, yet the visa lottery persists as if the market were tight.

The five domestic corporations with the most H-1Bs include Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Tata Computer Services, with J.P. Morgan narrowly missing the top tier. Most enjoyed excellent fiscal 2024 net earnings: Microsoft, $88 billion, a 22% increase over 2023; Meta, $62 billion, up 59% year-over-year; Amazon, $60 billion. All could easily afford $100,000. But now the question the corporate titans must answer is why pay $100,000 for a foreign-born employee when recent college graduates or fired, unemployed workers could be hired for $0.00 and without immigration procedural headaches. Well-paid, white-collar IT jobs should go to Americans, not Indians who comprise 73% of the total or Chinese nationals, 13%.

$100,000 is a bargain basement deal for employers. Since the visa is valid for three years and includes an automatic three-year renewal, the company will pay about $16,666 per year over a six-year term for an indentured worker. Instead of serving its original purpose, the H-1B visa is a vehicle that suppresses wages, erodes job security, and sidesteps fair employment practices. For years, as it has laid off hundreds of thousands of talented, experienced U.S. engineers, the tech industry has vigorously lobbied Congress, pleading that without its annual overseas worker allocation, their businesses would teeter on the brink of collapse. So, put up or shut up. If the H-1Bs are as imperative to corporate survival as its advocates claim, then the $100,000 is pocket change.

Joe Guzzardi is an Institute for Sound Public Policy analyst. Contact him at jguzzardi@ifspp.org

Associate November with COPD William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-1-25

Associate November with COPD William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 11-1-25

Wt o kwgs dsfgcb ucsg hc qcifh kwhv o tccz, hvs tccz fousg obr gqcttg, obr hvsfs wg bc dsoqs.
Dfcjsfpg 

Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit puzzle: My goal is people associate November with COPD awareness month.
Danica Patrick

My goal is people associate November with COPD awareness month. Danica Patrick

Visit Rights-Right.com, where you can find Cryptowit Quote Puzzles by William W. Lawrence Sr.

Holy Myrrh-Bearers Basket Raffle

Tickets are now on sale for the Holy Myrrh-Bearers Basket Raffle which will occur at the church’s annual Feast of Saint Nicholas Luncheon, Dec. 7.

They start at $2 each for a regular basket and but one can get 17 for $20.

Grand prize basket tickets are $5 or five for $20.

One does not have to be present to win.

The church is at 900 Fairview Road, Swarthmore, Pa.

Services are 5 p.m., Saturdays and 10 a.m., Sundays.

Holy Myrrh-Bearers Basket Raffle

Shootings at the Edges

Shootings at the Edges

By Bob Small

Recently, an “interested observer of political developments”, as she likes to be called, mentioned the murders of Aaron Danielson and Michael Reinoehl and the group “Patriot Prayer”. Let’s start with some definitions. Many persons affiliated with various groups do not define themselves as “extreme” only those on the other side. For context, would we consider the perpetrators of The Boston Tea Party, of Harpers Ferry, of January 6th, etc. as “extremists” ?

Do we fail to listen to anyone on what we consider the “opposite side”.

Consider this from the article On the Booing of La Sonnambula: There is a phenomenon known as “epistemological panic,” in which people who are faced with something they don’t understand react not with curiosity and a desire to learn more but rather with fear and defensiveness.

This brings us to two violent responses by men representing competing ideologies who, unlike the late Charlie Kirk, needed to use swords rather than words.

“On Aug. 29, 2020, Aaron Danielson, an American supporter of the far-right group Patriot Prayer,] was shot and killed,” allegedly by Michael Reinoehl, who was subsequently killed by a federally led fugitive task force”. Reinoehl was a self-identified anti-fascist.

“At a memorial held in a park in Vancouver, Washington, Patriot Prayer founder Joey Gibson urged mourners not to seek vengeance, saying: “I know that Jay would not want that. Jay wants us to stand up for what we believe in, and he does not want any more violence, guys.”

There are 10 pages to this article and it makes fascinating reading.

Joey Gibson founded Patriot Prayer. He has a degree in psychology from Central Washington University.

We couldn’t find a current electronic home for Patriot Prayer.

One reason might be Facebook’s removal of it’s pages.

What does this have to do with our upcoming election? If you’re a Democrat or Republican and unsatisfied with your party’s selections, you might just consider researching who their opposition is and whether they’re a better choice. If you’re a Republican and you’re unsatisfied with your Party’s selections, you might just consider an earlier involvement, like pre-primary, in the selection process. Either way, casting your vote due to “epistemological panic” will not lead to a better choice. Full Disclosure; The only current Democrat I would vote for now is named John K Fetterman.

See also: What Patriot Prayer and Antifa stand for.

Shootings at the Edges

Halloween 1924 Was Baseball Barnstorming At Its Best

Halloween 1924 Was Baseball Barnstorming At Its Best

By Joe Guzzardi

On Halloween night, parents now must decide between the traditional activity—taking the youngsters trick-or-treating—or a newer option: watching the World Series, the fall classic that once ended in mid-September. World Series viewing is only practical for West Coast kids; the Los Angeles Dodgers’ Tyler Glasnow threw Game Three’s first pitch at 8:42 PM EDT. Fans know that if MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred could have his way, the league would play regular season games on Christmas Eve in Auckland, New Zealand. Picture Manfred’s fantasy: robots calling the plays at all four corners and players’ uniforms adorned from collar to cleat with advertisements—walking billboards.

Until Manfred realizes his dream, he’ll content himself with adding new teams to the existing leagues. With expansion and the diluted talent pool anticipated before the end of the decade, there could be a major reshuffling of existing leagues to address concerns over brutal travel schedules. Candidates for new franchises include Nashville, Salt Lake City, a possible return to Montreal, or the long shot: Mexico City. Manfred will need to mandate domed stadiums before awarding new franchises. Post-season weather delays are inevitable as games are played later and later in autumn.

Disgruntled fans yearning for true baseball should turn back the pages to relive the greatest Halloween baseball ever played. On October 31, 1924, three Hall of Famers—Babe Ruth, Walter Johnson, and Sam “Wahoo” Crawford—played an exhibition game for the ages. Ruth won his only batting crown that year, hitting .378. He led the league with 46 home runs and drove in 121 runs. Highlighted by the Bambino’s cloud-busting 550-foot home run, with a second four-bagger added for good measure, Ruth, his otherworldly homer, and the game live on in legend in tiny Brea, California.

Johnson, the “Big Train,” was a local hero. His family moved from Humboldt, Kansas—Johnson’s birthplace—to Olinda, California, just east of Brea, a small oil boomtown. As a frolicking teenager, Johnson rode his black mare “Tar,” worked the rough-and-tumble oil fields, and began pitching for the Union Oil Wells, a company team where he forged his future as a MLB 417-game winner.

Just a few weeks after Johnson’s Senators won the 1924 World Series against the New York Giants, the 36-year-old “Big Train” faced off against Ruth, who toed the slab and pitched a complete-game 12-1 victory. The game, part of the Johnson-Ruth barnstorming tour, was played in brilliant Southern California sunshine. In honor of the big day, schools were closed, shops shuttered, Boy Scouts directed traffic, and fans from nearby towns rushed to see baseball played by the best. Though the evidence is lost to time, rumors persist that the Hall of Fame duo led the town’s first-ever Halloween parade. The Brea Bowl erected two thousand seats to accommodate the town’s 1,500 residents, but 15,000 showed up. Those without seats settled for gathering around primitive radio crystal sets. An Anaheim Bulletin headline—”All roads lead to Brea for Monster Athletic Contest”—summed up the pregame excitement. The Los Angeles Times dubbed it “the greatest deluxe sandlot game Southern California has ever seen.” After all, the Dodgers’ move from Brooklyn to Los Angeles and the Giants’ shift from New York to San Francisco were more than three decades away.

But Johnson, just days after his triumphant seventh-game World Series win, disappointed his hometown rooters with his substandard pitching performance. With only a day’s rest from an exhibition in Oakland and hampered by semi-pro catcher “Bus” Callan’s limited experience, Johnson was shelled—eight runs on eight hits, including four home runs. Later in his life, Callan revealed a secret about Ruth and his homers. Early in the game, Johnson told his catcher that the fans wanted to see Ruth do what he does best—hit the ball out of sight. During Ruth’s first two at-bats, Johnson grooved fat pitches that, to the fans’ glee, the Sultan of Swat blasted.

After the game, Johnson and Ruth visited Hollywood, with Douglas Fairbanks giving the two a set tour of his latest movie, “The Thief of Bagdad.” The Brea exhibition was the last game of the barnstorming season, beating the November 1 deadline set by baseball commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis.

Ruth operated at full throttle on his swing west, playing to an estimated 125,000 fans in 15 cities. “He made 22 scheduled speeches, headed four parades, judged a boxing match, drove a golf ball 353 yards, visited eighteen hospitals and orphan asylums,” Marshall Smelser wrote in his 1975 biography, “The Life That Ruth Built.”

Postscript: When the Orange Freeway and the Brea Mall opened in the 1970s, the town turned into a magnet for shoppers and home buyers. Single-story houses now stand where the Brea Bowl once hosted Ruth and Johnson.

Compared to Ruth, Johnson is underappreciated. Consider this partial list of his records: nine consecutive 300+ innings pitched, 110 shutouts won, 35 1-0 shutouts, 65 shutouts lost, 12 seasons leading the league in shutouts, and highest batting average for a pitcher, .433.

Ruth and Johnson died too young. Johnson passed at age 59 from a brain tumor in 1946, and Ruth, aged 53, succumbed to cancer in 1948. Watch Johnson pitch to Ruth here.

Joe Guzzardi is a Society for American Baseball Research scholar. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com

Halloween 1924 Was Baseball Barnstorming At Its Best

Charlie Brown is the William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 10-31-25

Charlie Brown is the William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 10-31-25

Pb jrdo lv shrsoh dvvrfldwh Qryhpehu zlwk FRSG dzduhqhvv prqwk.
Gdqlfd Sdwulfn

Charlie Brown is the one person I identify with.

Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: Charlie Brown is the one person I identify with. C.B. is such a loser. He wasn’t even the star of his own Halloween special.
Chris Rock

Check out the Dom Giordano Show on WPHT 1210 AM

Pennsylvania High Stakes Supreme Court Election

Pennsylvania High Stakes Supreme Court Election

By Joe Guzzardi

On November 4, four high-profile races will provide insight into how well the voting public has warmed to Trump 47’s agenda. The first three — Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial campaigns, as well as California’s Prop 50, which seeks to redraw the state’s congressional districts to favor Democrats — have been highly publicized. In Virginia and New Jersey, GOP underdogs have closed to within the margin of error that the once-prohibitive favorites enjoyed. Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill faces off against former state assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli in New Jersey, and in Virginia, ex-congresswoman Abigail Spanberger goes up against Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears. Governor Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50 is rated a toss-up; Californians have grown tired of the sanctuary state’s love affair with illegal aliens under Newsom and his predecessors.
Flying under the national radar, but equally crucial to the GOP’s long-term success, is defeating three incumbent activist Democratic Pennsylvania Supreme Court members who fostered extremist positions outside their authority to rule on, with then-Governor Tom Wolf’s convenient, tacit blessing.

As Pittsburgh-based Washington Examiner journalist Salena Zito reported, the GOP’s drop to its current 5–2 Senate minority position began 10 years ago when all three state court seats were open. Pennsylvania Democrats held a registration advantage of roughly one million voters and enjoyed abundant donor cash. The three Democratic candidates — Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht — raised more than $5.6 million combined, more than double what their Republican and independent opponents collected prior to the general election.

Pennsylvanians of both parties suffered when, in 2015, the GOP lost the Supreme Court majority. The three losses marked a dramatic setback for Pennsylvania Republicans. Although the fear at the time was that the defeat would ripple into the 2016 U.S. Senate and presidential races and undermine the party’s hold on the state legislature, those concerns proved unfounded. The following year, President Donald Trump carried Pennsylvania, Sen. Pat Toomey won reelection, and Republicans performed strongly overall.

Nevertheless, the court’s left-leaning composition had major negative consequences. In one of its most significant moves, in 2018 the court struck down the state’s congressional map just seven years after it had been approved by a bipartisan legislature, then it unilaterally redrew the districts in a way that tilted the balance of power toward Democrats.

The court also exasperated many voters — particularly Republicans, independents, and moderate Democrats — with rulings that expanded the executive branch’s power to impose draconian COVID restrictions and extend mail-in ballot counting deadlines by three days after the polls closed. Pennsylvania was one of the first states to impose a stay-at-home order; Wolf worked closely with his state Secretary of Health, Rachel Levine, to make decisions about elderly COVID care that had fatal results for some senior citizens. By the summer of 2020, around 70% of Pennsylvania’s COVID deaths occurred in nursing homes, leading to renewed criticism that Wolf and Levine readmitted infected patients back into nursing homes and that the Wolf/Levine administration had stopped nursing home health inspections. In a recent Pittsburgh Post-Gazette op-ed, state constitutional scholar Bruce Ledewitz wrote that after the 2015 redistricting that affected elections and COVID-19, the court “has favored Democratic Party interests.”

Pennsylvania High Stakes Supreme Court Election
Former PA Governor Tom Wolf and his Secretary of Health Rachel Levine

The so-called retention vote on the three incumbent judges requires a straight yes or no; none face challengers, and none are allowed to campaign. Should the three lose, Governor Josh Shapiro has the authority to appoint their replacements — assuredly liberals like those voted out and himself. But the rub for Shapiro is that his appointments need approval from the Republican-controlled state Senate.

Only one justice, Democrat Russell Nigro in 2005, has failed a retention vote, an indication of the high bar Republicans must overcome. But keenly aware of the important stakes, the GOP is pouring resources into getting out the “No” vote, and Democrats including Shapiro are stepping up their efforts in kind. Shapiro has waded knee-deep into the state Supreme Court race, a race both parties admit has far-reaching implications for the upcoming 2026 midterms, the 2028 presidential race, and future post-2030 Census redistricting in the swingiest of swing states. A potential 2028 presidential contender himself, Shapiro is featured in a newly launched ad that endorses the three Democratic justices while warning Pennsylvanians that “the threats to our freedoms are very real” — a curious appeal given the statewide COVID shutdowns of schools, churches, and businesses that unilaterally stripped away citizens’ constitutionally protected liberties.

Pennsylvania High Stakes Supreme Court Election
Kamala Harris and Josh Shapiro

Campaign spending on the 2015 race topped $16 million, making it the most expensive state Supreme Court election in U.S. history at the time. Analysts predict the 2025 total spending will exceed the amount spent a decade ago. If even two of the justices are voted out, the GOP would secure a 4–3 Supreme Court majority and would therefore have the upper hand should the 2026 and 2028 elections result in contentious litigation. Also up for grabs: one Superior and Commonwealth court seat, 18 district attorney races, and 32 sheriff races. The stakes for Pennsylvanians are high, and voter turnout — historically low — will be key.

Joe Guzzardi is an Institute for Sound Public Policy analyst. Contact him at jguzzardi@ifspp.org