American Poor Don’t Exist

Forbes.com is claiming   American poor don’t exist and is basing the claim on this study by the Brookings Institution.

That’s right, there is no poor in the United States. The war on poverty is over. We won.

Of course,  Brookings, a liberal-leaning think tank that is called most influential in the world,  doesn’t really say it that way. In fact, it claims that “millions of Americans live on less than $2 a day — a threshold commonly used to measure poverty.”

Forbes, however, rebuts it pointing out income, as officially defined, is a bad metric as it does not account for the various government subsidies provided such as SNAP and Section 8 housing vouchers.

More significantly, it points out that the $2 a day standard when applied to  developing countries is based on consumption, not income.

When this standard is applied to the United States, it is found that consumption is the same for those who report zero income and those who report $20 per day income — which is adjusted to account for the values of the many different currencies.

According to global standards, middle class is between a globally adjusted $12 and $50 per day.

So, yes, there is no poor in America which is something that could easily be determined by driving through the lowest-income neighborhood one can find and counting the dish antennas, window air conditioning units, cars parked on the street, and observing the absence of malnutrition among the residents.

Suffering in the United States is not caused by lack of material things. It is caused by making stupid choices and living in proximity to those who exalt in making such choices.

American Poor Don't Exist

American Poor Don’t Exist

CNN Rejects Glenn Beck, 550 Jobs Lost

The Wrap.com is reporting that unwatched CNN is about to layoff 550 employees because, well, nobody watches it — unlike Fox News — and advertisers feel it is stupid to waste money on commercials nobody sees.

The Wrap.com is also reporting that one time CNN employee Glenn Beck, who is now worth an estimated $100 million due to his success with The Blaze, has made two offers to help but neither went anywhere.

One of the offers involved The Blaze taking over the network’s HLN spot on the channel list.

In 2012, Beck made an offer to buy Al Gore’s Current TV network. Gore, instead, chose to sell it to Al Jazeera.

Apparently misogynistic propagandist for jihad and terror are more palatable to him and his kind than people who have Christian values and believe in free markets.

In fairness, The Wrap is saying one person at CNN has told it talks are not dead. Still when reports of massive layoffs come after reports of a rejected deal, one does connect dots.

Hat tip Ed Driscoll at PJMedia.com.

CNN Rejects Glenn Beck, 550 Jobs Lost

CNN Rejects Glenn Beck, 550 Jobs Lost

 

Comcast Customer Support Is Criminal

Comcast Building Lobby Comcast Customer Support Is CriminalComcast Customer Support Is Criminal. The lobby of the Comcast Building in Philadelphia

Aaron Spain of Chicago was a Comcast customer. He found himself displeased with the product provided by the Philadelphia communications giant and tried to cancel.

He went through the sign-in garbage, got hold of a service rep and was put on hold.

He waited 3 hours and 20 minutes before trying on a different phone. What did he find? He found that the office was closed for the day.

Pretty funny, Aaron, huh?

Actually, the joke is going to be on Comcast. This isn’t the first cancellation horror story  circulating the web involving the liberal — it owns MSNBC and its campaign contributions skew heavily to Democrats— corporation.

Violating contracts leads to legal action, and fraud leads to being charged with crimes.

We suspect lawyers will soon be contacting Mr. Spain, and politically astute state attorney generals will start calling for investigations.

If you own stock in the company sell it now.

Here is the video Aaron put on on YouTube documenting his experience.

 

 Comcast Customer Support Is Criminal

H8ers Torment Bloomsburg Bridal Shop

Victoria Miller owns W.W. Bridal Boutique in Bloomsburg, Pa. A lesbian couple asked her to provide wedding gowns. She declined saying she did not approve of same sex marriage on religious grounds.

Rather than just nodding and taking their business elsewhere as most would do if offended by a store, they launched a hate campaign forcing Ms. Miller to take down her social media sites and hire a lawyer.

Some ignorant types are  going to say that discriminating on these matters is the same as discrimination against blacks in the Jim Crow era. It’s not. The Jim Crow discrimination was mandated by law. Jim Crow was big government that prevented free enterprise i.e. the opening of a store that would serve all to compete with the white-only one.

What Ms. Millier did is no  different than a black baker refusing to decorate a cake with a Confederate flag to celebrate the founding of the Ku Klux Klan.

Nobody is taking about stopping the opening of a bridal shop to cater to same sex couples.

H8ers will H8 though whether they be white supremacists or gay activists.

H8ers Torment Bloomsburg Bridal Shop

H8ers Torment Bloomsburg Bridal Shop in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania OKs Tesla But Keeps Ban On Ford

Tesla Model S Pennsylvania OKs Tesla But Keeps Ban On Ford

Pennsylvania OKs Tesla But Keeps Ban On Ford

SB 1409 allowing Tesla Motors of California to sell its hip electric cars directly to customers in Pennsylvania became  Act 125 on July 9.

Today’s, Aug. 11, The Philadelphia Inquirer had a story praising the new law that amended the 1983 Board of Vehicles Act prohibiting car makers to sell directly to customers.

We think it’s great too, but why can’t Ford, GM, Toyota etc. have the same right?

Mark Gillen (R-128) who with Daryl Metcalfe (R-12) were the only nays in the State House wondered why Tesla gets this special privilege.

Good point Mark.

Pennsylvania OKs Tesla But Keeps Ban On Ford

Swiss Minimum Wage? Nope

Switzerland, a nation that has one of the highest standard of livings and one of the highest life expectancies in the world, does not have a minimum wage law.

The unemployment rate is 3.2 percent and hasn’t been over 4 percent for years.

Minimum wage law laws do not help workers. They don’t help anybody.

Swiss Minimum Wage? Nope

Swiss Minimum Wage? Nope

 

Business Card Admits

A free networking event for business men and women will be held 4:45 to 7 p.m., Thursday at Ocean Prime Restaurant, 124 S. 15th St., Philadelphia.
A business card provides admission and about 100 people are expected.
To RSVP or for information: email  adcomtimes@aol.com .

Business Card Admits

Business Card Admits

Advertising Booms In 2014

Advertisers worldwide will spend $545.40 billion on paid media in 2014,  reports eMarketer.com.

This is a 5.7 percent increase over last year which, more than doubles the growth rate of 2. 6percent from a year ago.

It sites  the FIFA World Cup and the Winter Olympics as factors in the boom but also notes the steady increases in online and mobile advertising “as consumers globally shift their attention to digital devices.”

eMarketer notes that the US is by far the leader in total media ad spending at $180 billion.  On a per capita basis, the U.S. also leads at $565 which is $26.13 more per person than second place Norway.

 

Advertising Booms In 2014

 

Advertising Booms In 2014

Avrum Lapin Finding Emerging Donors

By Avrum Lapin

 

I am often surprised, even after three decades in the fundraising industry , by the often slow and resistant responses from many leading organizations in the Jewish community to the demands of the new circle of lead and major donors. Emanating from an ill – perceived notion of history and position, or from a sense of entitlement, many oganizations are slow to recognize that the emerging “class” of major donors – increasingly entrepreneurs and creators of ideas and solutions – is quite different from those who preceded them , and expect different things from the organizations and causes t hat they support.

Let me enumerate a few areas where things have continued to evolve and , in doing so, are transforming the narrative and many ways in which the nonprofit world functions and communicates.

1. Survival (or even existence) is not a goal. –Focus is on results Just because an organization exists does not automatically entitle it to support. Just because an organization has been around for a decade or a century no longer compels a donor to give. Donors are more interested in what you do, not so much that you have been doing it for years. The pace of change is so rapid today , and new actors pop up regularly and are aggressively competing for and entering the space historically occupied by traditional “ legacy” organizations. This phenomenon is happening largely because they tend to be more focused, they bring visions to the discussion that are contemporary , appealing and functional in today’s multi – channel world, and are more agile and less encumbered in their operations . Groups that do not see or resist this trend do so at their peril.

2. Loyalty is no longer the sole determinant of support We live in an increasingly competitive philanthropic marketplace – one that, as noted above, values outcomes , not only history or position. Understanding this should motivate organizations large and small to think about how they allocate resources and how that frames and communicates their “selling propositions.” And let’s stay with the notion of “selling.” We live increasingly in a transactional world, where value is determined by what you do, not only what you say you have done. And while we try not to be totally cynical, I am always struck by the number of times I see a prospective donor turn down a cause that should, by objective measure – including giving history, be a “slam dunk,” and who resists making the gift because of (lack of) efficiency, mission creep, market share, etc. Connecting with Major Donors

3. Bang for the Buck – Investing Charitable Dollars I was approached recently by a major donor at the close of a n event who asked me about my thoughts regarding the consolidation of asks for related organizations that occupy the same or overlapping program space . He complained that they were competing for resources, potentially diminishing the impact of the dollars that were donated to achieve a goal – not just support an organization. My response was the following: what was historically called the charitable are na has become the philanthropic marketplace , and that as a marketplace it is increasingly a venue where ideas compete and organizations were being rewarded at the intersection of relationship and results , not on relationship and history alone.

He went on to ask if I thought that we could create an appeal that would raise funds to achieve a goal and a solution, not necessarily fund a particular organization, and decide as part of the activity where the funds would be directed. He felt that the diminishment of loyalty and the focus on results would make it successful. I am thinking about it as well. In this vein, I also reiterate something that I have written and spoken about for years…the need for all successful nonprofits to invest energy and purpose in a business plan. This dynamic document concretizes the vision and makes it actionable financially. It demonstrates, with accountability, how it that vision would be realized and implemented over the ensuing months and years, with programmatic and financial milestones, deliverables and projected outcomes. And it would meet the expectations of many of today’s emerging major donors who seek to use their philanthropy to “invest” rather than just to “give.” While the functional end product for the organization may be the same – at least for the time being , the prompt for the donor is quite different. They want to see something happen rather than just funding an organization to do something.

Today’s emerging major donor is stepping up to leadership at a time w here the marketplace is still governed to some degree by uncertainty. This drives the expectation that, while they are prepared to be charitable, they want to see their money work and put to good and productive use. Successful nonprofits today must accommodate this imperative because it is not going away; in fact it is intensifying and becoming ever sharper. We therefore encourage our friends , many of who m lead very important organizations throughout the nonprofit world, to embrace this challenge. To continue to expect support because you believe that you should have it simply won’t work anymore.

Avrum Lapin is the President at The Lapin Group , LLC, a prominent fundraising consulting firm located in suburban Philadelphia

Finding Emerging Donors

Finding Emerging Donors

Overspending Bugs Moms

Moms say overspending on unplanned items are the most frustrating part of shopping with or for their family reports eMarketerer.com.

Overspending Bugs Moms

Overspending Bugs Moms