Right To Know Law Changes Being Pondered

Right To Know Law Changes Being Pondered — State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) reports that changes are being considered to Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law

A hearing was held recently by the House State Government Committee during which testimony was taken from  representatives from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records, the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors and Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs.

The Right-to-Know Law governs access to public information for each Commonwealth agency, local agency, judicial agency and legislative agency.

Right To Know Law Changes Being Pondered

Toomey Motion To Force Budget To Comply With Law Fails

Toomey Motion To Force Budget To Comply With Law Fails — Sen. Pat Toomey recently took to the  Senate floor to present a “motion to recommit” the bill funding the Transportation and Housing and Urban Development departments because they called for spending 10 percent more than last year and failed to comply with bipartisan budget caps as required by law. The spending  was even higher than the President requested. The motion failed.

Thank you Harry Reid and the rest of the money-grubbing Democrats.

Toomey notes that Federal  spending has doubled since 2000. Kids, get ready for a crummy future.

Toomey Motion To Force Budget To Comply With Law Fails

Riley Cooper And The Pompous Who Judge To Feel Holy

By Chris Friend

Philadelphia Eagle Riley Cooper really stepped in it.

He
uttered one of the most vile, racist, and derogatory slurs out there,
one that not only hurts a particular ethnic group, but “….
dampens the aspirations of (its) people.”

And here’s the
thing. I guarantee Cooper said this word many, many more
times than just once.

No amount of sensitivity training will
prevent him from saying it again. And that’s the way it should be,
for he is not alone, as millions from New York to Dallas to yes, even
Washington, utter this word around the kitchen table and even in
public.

“Redskins.”

Now known just as the “R”
word.

That’s not a joke, as 10 United States congressmen, in
demanding that the Washington Redskins name be changed, actually
wrote “…Native Americans throughout the country consider the
R-word a racial, derogatory slur akin to the N-word among
African-Americans.”

And right there, in black and white, is
precisely why we cannot move ahead with race relations, and why,
whenever a racial controversy erupts, it not only isn’t handled
with an appropriate response, but often provokes a counter-productive
backlash.

Enter the Riley Cooper saga.

On a fateful night in June, Cooper made two mistakes. First, he
actually attended a Kenny Chesney concert. That alone is cause for
concern.

But then came the big one, when he was caught on
video having an altercation with a security guard and using the
N-word. Not good. Not good at all.

True, he was not on the
clock, per se, but when you are a public figure, you need to
inherently understand that the clock never stops. It’s not Riley
Cooper the private citizen saying that slur, but Cooper the Eagle,
Cooper the NFL player. And yes, Cooper the white guy in a league
that is two-thirds black.

Can’t let that go, and can’t
chalk that up to anything but what it is: a major mistake.

But
here’s the bigger problem. While appropriate consequences have
been administered – fines, public humiliation, shame and even a
bounty placed on his head – that isn’t enough to some. They want
more. A lot more.

And to what end? Should he really be
suspended or even kicked out of the league, as some are advocating,
or arrested for hate speech, just for saying a bad word, offensive
as it may be? Have we really gotten to the point – where speech will
get you fired, thrown in jail, or worse?

Does he really need
“sensitivity training,” as he will undergo? And honestly, does
anyone actually believe that will help in any way? Of course not,
but it’s all part of the charade, the “feel good” measures we
employ in the name of improving race relations, all while doing
absolutely nothing of substance to identify, let alone solve, the
real racial problems.

It has gotten so preposterous that the
paternalistic services of Philadelphia District Attorney Seth
Williams have been requested to teach Cooper, and everyone else, a
lesson. (Glad to see he has nothing better to do with his time in
crime-plagued Philly.) Yes, insane as it sounds, the Eagles asked
Williams to recommend charities and community-service programs that
could benefit from Cooper’s time (and money). The D.A. will also be
in touch with other city officials to do “what they can do to
help (Cooper) and to use this as a teachable moment, not only for
him, but maybe for the city as a whole to deal with racism and
insensitive language.”

Sound like a guy running for mayor
soon?

Frankly, the last thing we need is the City of
Philadelphia telling anyone what to do, how to act and what to say.
God help us.

Worse are those who not only think he isn’t being punished
enough, but that his apology isn’t genuine. When did we become so
damn judgmental and almighty? Who the hell are we to look into a
man’s soul and self-righteously proclaim that his sincerity isn’t
real? Who gave us the power – the “right” – to tear a person down
without end, to ruin a career, to destroy a life, to be so bold as to
turn a deaf ear to an apology – all because we don’t see and hear
exactly what we want?

His apology was sincere enough for many
if not all of his black teammates – who, by the way, showed immense
class and dignity in how they handled this affair – yet it’s not
good enough for those in the cheap seats.

That arrogance is
astounding, and ironically, vastly diminishes the really important
point.

The amount of overkill on Cooper, who you would think
ran a lynch mob, is totally backfiring. Many Americans, who would
normally feel that what he said was wrong and needed swift action –
so long as the punishment fit the crime – have now become so turned
off by the piling-on that they feel empathy for Cooper. Instead of
his words being wrong, plain and simple, the collective mentality is
becoming, “OK. No big deal. Enough already. Play ball.”

Is
Riley Cooper a racist? Absolutely no idea, though his teammates say
he isn’t. Either way, his words are a big deal. But because we
can’t see the forest through the trees, unable to focus on what is
important, Cooper is increasingly viewed as a victim. A valuable
lesson is lost, but personal agendas (however warped they are) are
being accomplished.

That arrogance isn’t limited to
race, but increasingly prevalent throughout society.

Look at
the cavalcade of politicians and commentators publicly demanding that
Anthony Weiner withdraw from the New York mayoral race because his
lewd “sexting” while a congressman continues to haunt him.

Last
time I checked, we live in a democracy, and the only ones who get to
decide who stays and who goes into public office are the people.
Period. Not blowhards, and not political hacks. Just the people. If
Weiner leaves the race, that should be his, and only his, decision.
But once again, we see the audacity of “leaders” who think they,
and not the people, know what is best.

And what better example
of a counter-productive backlash than the election of former KKK
leader David Duke to the Louisiana state Legislature in 1989? Duke,
with his racist past, was all but certain to lose, but President
George Bush, Ronald Reagan, and the Republican National Committee
stuck their noses where they didn’t belong – in other people’s
business – and effectively scolded anyone who would vote for Duke.
The result? David Duke won, not because the people were bigots, but
because they resented overkill and outside interference.

Prime Rib in Florida Today’s Meal

Prime Rib in Florida Today’s Meal — Today’s meal by Chef Bill Sr. was a delicious prime rib roasted on an unfamiliar grill. The sides were provided by Petty’s Meat Market of Melbourne, Fla.

The wine was a simple Woodbridge Cabernet-Merlot purchased conveniently at a Winn-Dixie supermarket.

Oh Sen. Erickson, if only Pennsylvanians could get wine at supermarkets but one’s cronies must be appeased one supposes even if they are not capitalists.

Heap Screamin’ Red Over Redskins

By Chris Freind

 

Life is good.

Summer is in full swing, the Trayvon/Zimmerman soap opera is finally fading away, government is probably reading only half our emails now, and the excitement of football is in the air.

Most important, though, is that America apparently has solved all of its problems. Otherwise, how could you possibly explain the fact that a cadre of congressman — both Republican and Democrat — recently sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder, every league team, and Redskins sponsor FedEx urging them — demanding, actually — that the Redskins name be changed because it was so racially demeaning to Indians. Oops. Native Americans. Sorry.

Really? That’s the most
dominant issue consuming our elected officials? Granted, if we had an
Indian nickel for every boneheaded thing Congress does, we’d all be
millionaires. But those congressmen need to be scalped for this one, and
publicly admonished until they turn red-faced with embarrassment.

This
is no time for peace pipes. We must, without reservation, not just hold
down the fort but go to war with those riding roughshod over hallowed
American traditions — fighting the people who love nothing more than to
chop away at things no one actually finds offensive. As with most issues
though, we lack a political chief brave enough to tackle this type of
political correctness. The biggest irony? If a leader painted this
picture as the insanity that it is, it wouldn’t be his last stand, but a
feather in his cap, because the vast majority of Americans recognize
that using Indian names isn’t offensive, but complimentary.

“Native Americans throughout the country consider the `R-word’ a racial, derogatory slur akin to the `N-word’ among African-Americans or the `W-word’ among Latinos,” the congressional letter states.

OK, a
little help on this one. Members of the United States Congress honestly
think “Redskin” is akin to the N-word? That may not be the stupidest
thing ever said, but it’s definitely top three. And the “W-word?” What
the hell is that? Since there are a whole lot more derogatory names for
Latinos, if you actually have to pause, pondering what the big “W” is
(and I’m still not 100 percent sure), I’d say these folks are making up a
problem where one doesn’t exist.

But of course, this insanity
doesn’t end with the Redskins (though they seem to have it the worst, as
they are also in a legal battle to maintain protection of their
Redskins trademark. Thankfully, Snyder has, to this point, resisted the
pressure and pledged to keep the name intact.

A recent debacle
unfolded in New York as the Mets, who had worked for months with the
American Indian Community House in planning a Native American Heritage
day at the ballgame, abruptly canceled the event because — are you ready
for this? — they were playing the Atlanta Braves! What playing the
Braves has to do with canceling the event is any rational person’s
guess, as is how anyone could find the festivities offensive in the
first place.

A Mets spokesman said “… our multicultural days and
nights are celebratory versus political in nature,” though it remains
unclear how Native American Heritage day is political. The result? No
singing, no dancing, no Indians. So instead of celebrating a spectacular
culture, opening the eyes of thousands to Native American traditions in
a positive way, the people got nothing, and the Indians got tomahawked
again.

While political correctness chalks up another win, how is that helpful in any way?

And
it’s not just sports where this warped mentality is taking hold, but
the classroom. Walk into any kindergarten during reading time, and you
will see the children gathered ‘round the teacher, all sitting
“crisscross-applesauce” on the floor. That used to be called
“Indian-style,” but the PC gods had a pow-wow and determined that such a
term was derogatory and racist, despite not a single child ever saying,
“I sat Indian-style today, so I hate Native Americans.”

Even
worse than the assault on Indian names is when otherwise intelligent
people give in so easily. St. John’s University was, and is, a top-notch
school that had never been associated with institutional racism or
bigotry of any kind, yet changed its team name from “Redmen” to “Red
Storm.” And if you’re going to cave, at least come up with a name that
has meaning. Outside of the red storm on Jupiter (or is it Uranus?),
what is a “Red Storm?”

Has it dawned on anyone to actually ask
the forgotten people — aka the Indians themselves — if they feel
offended? That doesn’t often happen, because when it does, turns out
many tribes welcome the use of Native American names. A Sports
Illustrated poll found that 83 percent of Native Americans have no
problem with the use of Indian names and mascots for sports teams.

But
that didn’t stop the deity known as the NCAA from imposing mandates
several years ago to jettison Indian names, threatening severe sanctions
for any school that kept names, logos, and mascots, as they were deemed
“hostile and abusive.” And if a university didn’t play ball? They would
be banned from hosting post-season championships and face forfeiture of
games, among other penalties.

Where does the craziness end?
What’s next? Animal rights groups demanding Penn State eliminate the
Nittany Lion because felines feel offended being identified with Jerry
Sandusky? Don’t laugh, because that’s exactly the type of political
correctness driving our country.

How can we expect to move forward as people when all we ever do is search for things which divide, rather than unite, us?

Were
Indians considered low man on the totem pole, stripped of their land
and human dignity — sometimes brutally — by early Americans? Without
question, as atrocities committed against them were unspeakable. No
reparations and no apology can ever fully right those wrongs.

But
America, despite the errors of its past, has shown the most remarkable
resilience of any nation in history not just to learn from its mistakes,
but to make things right and yes, better, for future generations. We
have seen triumphs for the descendants of the Irish and Italian
immigrants who faced major discrimination; the Chinese who built the
railroads under deplorable conditions; the Japanese interned during
World War II; the blacks who were enslaved; and yes, Native Americans.

Rather
than needlessly reopening old wounds, maybe those pushing political
correctness to satisfy their own personal agendas should take a hard
look at the everlasting tribute to Native Americans in the United
States. What more of an honor could there be to the Indian values of
hard work, conservation, respect of traditions, and pride than the fact
that 28 states are named for Indian tribes or words as well as numerous
professional sports teams (and at one time scores of colleges), and
countless high schools and businesses?

It’s time to stop this foolishness, for if we don’t, it will not end with the Indians. Watch out, Fightin’ Irish.

Jennifer Hammond Lawrence R.I.P.

Jennifer Hammond Lawrence of Indian Harbour Beach, Fla., died Thursday, July 25 from a cardiac arrest. She was 44.

She is survived by her husband, Robert; daughters Kyley and Skyler, parents DeAnn  and Richard; brothers, Chris, Tim, Phil, and Jon;  and sister Ann Fernandez.

A service will be held 11 a.m., Monday, July 29 at Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church in Indian Harbour Beach.

 

Jennifer Hammond Lawrence R.I.P.

Jennifer Hammond Lawrence R.I.P.

 

 

Jennifer Hammond Lawrence


Jennifer Hammond Lawrence of Indian Harbour Beach, Fla., died Thursday, July 25 from a cardiac arrest. She was 44.

She is survived by her husband, Robert; daughters Kyley and Skyler, parents DeAnn  and Richard; brothers, Chris, Tim, Phil, and Jon;  and sister Ann Fernandez.

A service will be held 11 a.m., Monday, July 29 at Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church in Indian Harbour Beach.

Huma Stands By Her Man

huma abedin and Hillary
Huma is the one on the left.

Huma Abedin stood meekly by, July 22, as her man,  disgraced Congressman Anthony “Hey Everybody, Look At My” Weiner, made a last ditch bid to salvage a chance to be mayor of New York.

So why? She was Deputy Chief of Staff to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and helped guide policy in Egypt, Syria and the Mideast. She’s now part of the transition team to the woman who might become the next president of the United States. Why is she putting up with this bozo?

And why aren’t the Islamic nutjobs threatening to kill her? Weiner is a Jew for Pete’s sake. A Jew who is humiliating her before the world; who is turning her into a joke. How can her family  bear the shame? Her father, Dr. Syed Zainul Abedin — thank Allah that he’s not alive to see this —  worked for terrorism financier Abdullah Omar Naseef. Her mother, Saleha, is a leader in the Muslim Sisterhood, which is the ladies auxiliary for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Oh, the pain and shame she must be going through. I wonder why she doesn’t seem more upset.

Huma Stands By Her Man

Chris Freind: Duchess Kate: May we have another?

By Chris Freind

Dear Duchess Kate,

Congratulations on your new baby — and our new hope!

We know you have your hands full, but at the risk of sounding anxious, please do us a favor — have another child. Quickly. And two or three more after that. Perhaps more than anyone else on the planet, you hold the key, by your position and charisma, to lead us out of our literal death spiral. The negative birthrates of Europe, Japan, and yes, America, have placed us on a collision course with the end of an empire — not colonialism, but the greatest, most benevolent civilizations the world has ever known. Not to heap any more pressure on you, but freedom, respect for the rule of law, and the spirit of nationalism hang in the balance.

Oh, in case you’re having trouble agreeing on a name, Prince Christopher has a nice ring to it.

Sincerely,

The West

Interestingly, the bankruptcy of Detroit and the new royal baby — assuming William and Kate are not one-and-done-ers — are interrelated. If the royal couple can inspire those in negative-birthrate countries to once again go forth and procreate, tragedies like the one in Detroit could be avoided in the future.

Detroit, like most big American cities (and many European countries), has been horrifically managed for decades. As despair increased due to lack of jobs, productive workers left for greener pastures, such as Texas and Arizona, where job growth has been explosive. Those left behind, from retirees to those unwilling to start a family (thus no future workers), could not afford the escalating pension obligations and other costs that always accompany the promise of a “guaranteed” social safety net.

The result? Collapse.

It’s no different in Western nations whose economies are hanging by a thread — tragedies of their own making because of ill-advised cultural, economic and political decisions. As a result, birthrates have been steadily plummeting, and all have fallen well below the 2.1 children per family threshold necessary just to achieve zero population growth.

For nations in this precarious situation, there are three courses of action, but only one true solution:

1. They can import labor, typically from Asia, Africa and the Middle East. This massive immigration flow, particularly in Europe, produces a destabilizing effect in those countries because most permanent foreign workers have no desire to assimilate and become “European.” Instead, they often view Euro-culture with outright disdain, despite enjoying freedoms most would never even dream about in their home countries. It is similar, but not quite as pronounced — yet — in America, with millions of illegal immigrants swearing allegiance to countries other than the United States.

The underlying tensions between indigenous populations and the workers they import continue to simmer just below the surface, occasionally bursting through, but for the most part, held in check by misguided labels of xenophobia. Too often, political correctness is employed to assuage the “offended” immigrants, swinging the pendulum unfairly away from Europeans and their hallowed traditions and cultural norms. Adding fuel to this “Balkanization” powder keg is when relatively well-heeled immigrants living in Europe engage in terrorism, such as when they bomb trains in London and Madrid.

If this policy continues unabated, Europe will either fade away without so much as a whimper, becoming unrecognizable in fifty years as its indigenous population declines by several hundred million, or it will engage in an ultra-nationalistic backlash of immense proportions, with bloodshed on a grand scale. European history all but guarantees it.

2. Countries such as Japan can continue to abhor immigration while starving itself to death. Japan has the most elderly population on Earth, and the most negative birthrate, yet absolutely eschews immigration, for mostly cultural reasons.

So a country that in the mid-19th century spectacularly entered the world stage, eventually becoming the second-largest economy on Earth in 1990 (despite being smaller than California), is now a sad shadow of itself, with half as many children than in 1950, yet having eight times as many senior citizens.

Anyone care to look at how Japan is faring? While the tsunami/nuclear issues haven’t helped, Japan has been significantly diminishing for decades, a pace which is only accelerating.

3. Countries can take a hard look at their anti-family policies and correct them. And if dynamic world leaders like William and Kate choose to make family life and having children their priority issues, the situation can be reversed. But both must go hand-in-hand, as neither one by itself can be successful.

And it’s no easy task, as there are many reasons for negative birthrates.

While not apologizing for capitalism, for it is the fairest economic system on earth, it is inarguable that too many in the West have succumbed to materialistic gluttony, coupled with “it’s all about me” and “do whatever makes you feel good” attitudes.

Such mentalities are anathema to getting married, having children, and being diligent parents, for it is much easier to go with the flow without the commitment and cost — aka “baggage” — of children.

And since many countries offer lavish, “guaranteed,” government-funded retirement plans, the incentive for having children to eventually take care of the parents is washed away.

Yet, there are millions who want several children, but are forced to have none or just one because of immoral tax codes. And make no mistake; when the government takes more than half of what people and businesses earn, even from the grave via inheritance taxes, that is absolutely immoral.

If crushing taxes were reduced, placing a higher level of income back where it belongs — with the people — more families could survive on one salary, allowing them to afford their dream of a larger family and reversing the negative birth trend.

Healthy populations in Western nations will produce more than they consume, and become a rising tide that lifts all boats. But it’s not just lost productivity that is a casualty of negative birthrates, but the loss of those who will never exist: Brilliant scientists who will never find a cure for cancer or discover other planets; teachers who will never inspire their students to believe that the sky’s the limit; doctors who will never comfort and cure their patients; and artists who will never leave their audiences breathless, searching for words to describe out-of-this-world performances that bring out the humanity in all of us.

It is inevitable that nationalistic spirit dies when a nation experiences population decline. While nationalism has unfortunately become a dirty word for some, to be beaten back at every turn, it is nonetheless mandatory for the cohesiveness of a people. In the same way that the Olympics bring out the very best in folks, where love of country and pride in one’s national identity makes for peaceful rivalry, hearty camaraderie and great sportsmanship, nationalism on a political scale drives the engine of innovation, creation and competition. And that’s the way it should be.

But as the spirit of optimism disintegrates, a new threat rises in the East, as enemies sworn to oppose freedom multiply by the millions, menacing what is left of the West. One can only hope that smarter leaders will emerge, unshackling the bonds holding population growth hostage. And with that, a royal family that is royally large.

Duchess, congratulations, and please keep them coming!

Homeschooled Kids Best Educated

Homeschooled Kids Best Educated — An excellent article by Jack Kelly on Phillyburbs.com reveals that homeschooled kids score in the 89th percentile in reading, the 86th percentile in science, the 84th percentile in language, math, and social studies.

Public schoolers are in the 50th percentile in these categories.

About 2 million children are home schooled. Since 1999, the number being home schooled has increased 7 percent a year. Enrollment in public schools fell 5 percent between 2005 and 2010.

A mercenary willing to harm a child for better pay will never care as much as a parent.

Homeschooled Kids Best Educated

Homeschooled Kids Best Educated