Telling Statistics About Health Care

Telling Statistics About Health Care Sent courtesy “Uncle Dave” via Kate Rainey.

1.A recent “Investor’s Business Daily” article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
U.S.           65%
England    46%
Canada     42%

Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
U.S.          93%
England   15%
Canada     43%

Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
U.S.          90%
England    15%
Canada     43%

Percentage referred to a medical specialist
who see one within one month:
U.S.           77%
England    40%
Canada      43%

Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
U.S.         71
England   14
Canada     18

Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in “excellent health”:
U..S.         12%
England     02%
Canada      06%

Check this last set of statistics!!

2..The percentage of each past president’s cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.

Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt………………. 38%
Taft…………………………. 40%
Wilson …………………….. 52%
Harding…………………….. 49%
Coolidge………………….. 48%
Hoover ……………………. 42%
F. Roosevelt……………….50%
Truman…………………… 50%
Johnson…………………… 47%
Nixon………………………. 53%
Ford……………………….. 42%
Carter……………………… 32%
Reagan……………………..86%
GH Bush………………….. 51%
Clinton ……………………. 39%
GW Bush…………………. 55%

And the winner is:

Obama……………… 08%

 

 

Telling Statistics About Health Care

Chuck Woolery explains how to solve our budget mess

Reader Fran C submitted  this link where Chuck Woolery explains how to solve our budget mess.

You know this country has problems when game show hosts can figure things out but those whom we elect to lead us struggle with the simple.

 

Chuck Woolery explains how to solve our budget mess

Men And Women At The ATM

Men And Women At The ATM Courtesy of Ricky Palinko

Men and Women using drive up ATM machine

Male :

Pull up to ATM
Insert card
Enter PIN
Take cash, card and receipt
Drive away

Female :

Pull up to ATM
Back up and pull forward to get closer
Shut off engine
Put keys in purse
Get out of car because you’re too far from machine
Hunt for card in purse
Insert card
Hunt in purse for grocery receipt with PIN written on it.
Enter PIN
Study instructions.
Hit “cancel”
Re-enter correct PIN
Check balance
Look for envelope
Look in purse for pen
Make out deposit slip
Endorse checks
Make deposit
Study instructions
Make cash withdrawal
Get in car
Check makeup
Look for keys
Start car
Check makeup
Adjust mirror
Start pulling away
Stop
Back to machine
Get out of car
Retrieve card and receipt
Get back in car
Put card in wallet
Put receipt in checkbook
Enter deposits and withdrawals in checkbook
Clear area in purse for wallet and checkbook
Check makeup
Adjust mirror again
Put car in reverse
Put car in drive
Drive away from machine
Drive three miles
Release parking brake

Larry Weathers R.I.P.

Larry Weathers Jr.  died yesterday, Jan. 6, 21 months after being diagnosed with  metastatic melanoma. He was 80.

Mr. Weathers was the proprietor of Weathers Motors the auto dealership at 1187 Baltimore Pike, Middletown Township, Delaware County, Pa.

It was started as Weathers Dodge in 1922 by his father, Lawrence Sr., on land next to his family’s grocery store. It remained a Dodge dealership until May 2009 when Chrysler — with the federal government now holding a significant stake in it — announced that franchise agreements wouldn’t be renewed with 789 dealerships nationwide.

Rather than fold, Mr. Weathers and his son, Lawrence III, turned it into Weathers Motors, which has become a very highly regarded auto repair shop and dealer of used vehicles.

R.I.P. Mr. Weathers.

Larry Weathers R.I.P.

Larry Weathers R.I.P.

Blame For School Closings Belongs To Catholics

The Philadelphia Archdiocese announced, yesterday, that the 49 of its schools will be shut forever come June.

The schools are Monsignor Bonner and Archbishop Prendergast high schools in Upper Darby, and elementary schools Annunciation BVM in Haverford Township; St. Cyril of Alexandria in East Lansdowne; Our Lady of Fatima in Secane, Ridley Township; St. Gabriel in Norwood; Holy Savior-St. John Fisher in Lower Chichester;  St. Francis de Sales in Aston and St. John Chrysostom in Nether Providence.

Some of their students will go to other Catholic schools. Others will enter the public school system further increasing the tax burden on property owners in those unlucky districts.

Who is to blame? A lot, maybe most, of the parents who send their kids to these Catholic schools are dyed-in-the wool Democrats who’d rather have a toenail ripped out than vote Republican, as are a lot, maybe most, of the teachers at these places. They cannot even begin to get their minds around the fact that their party is the puppet of the PSEA, the union that represents most Pennsylvania public school teachers (and nurses and librarians etc.) and that fights like a rabid badger for every penny of the education budget regardless of who it hurts.

They cannot even start to fathom that their party is the toy of the trial lawyers who get warm and fuzzy at the notion of seeing criminal acts treated as civil torts so their wallets get fatter and who cares if all it does is harm the schools and hospitals and turn the victims into male prostitutes.

Who is to blame? Catholics, look in the mirror.

A Needed Respite

The Roar

A Needed Respite

I must ask, what has and is happening to us as a free people?  I ask this, with regards to this current political assault season against the Presidential challenging party.  What has happened to our American decorum?

Questions flit through my “windmills” and often I am at a loss to answer.  Just where did this debating season originate?  I seem to remember debates of a chosen candidate from one party against the opposition’s chosen candidate.  But when did this endless prime time primary debating sessions begin?  I am at a loss.  Is it just a profitable moment for the networks?  Is the  damage inflicted upon one’s character and reputation the going price?  Or are Presidential contests nothing more than a Sunday/Monday night political contest of survival?  Is the quest for TV ratings now into our leadership selections?

As I watch what is happening to those who for some reason put their personal lives on hold in order to serve our Country, I recall when such devotion precluded all of this intricate inspection.  Not only precluded but such individuals were treated with respect.

Questions remain from the recent accusations which have already reshaped our primary leadership ledger.  Were those accusers in it just to take Cain out of contention?  More importantly, where is the journalist’s integrity to finish a story which is only half written?   It seems that after Cain dropped out, so did the media’s quest for truth and closure.  But, what about those poor victims?

This obvious ruse against Cain is a sad asterisk to our free elections.  Whether one supported his candidacy or not, this sort of character assassination is third world.  If this behavior is not addressed properly, it will become a political weapon and will eventually discourage the qualified to run.

To say that corruption has entered our election process would be an understatement.  The signs are everywhere.  So is the public’s quiet apathy.  In response to this apparent primary sham, we need to become jealously protective of our American system, regardless of our party affiliations.  We also need to understand what has led us to this election subterfuge.  We must to take an active part in all that makes America strong and we can start by acting like that rare breed that we are.  Americans!  Free and forever freedom loving.

Jim Bowman, Author of,
This Roar of Ours

Democrats Hit All-Time Low Says Pollster

Rasmussen Reports reports that the percent of Americans who claim to be Democrats hit an all-time low in December at 32.7. The previous low was 33 percent in August.

The percent  of us claiming to be Republican hit 35.4 just shy of the year high of 35.6 recorded in May.

The percent of us claiming to be independents was 32.

And some really  think that Santorum, Perry or Gingrich can’t beat Obama, and Little Bobby Casey is going to be re-elected.

As long as those of us who believe in commonsense speak out loud and proud the America-hating Alinksyites who now lead us are doomed.


Pa. Faces Tax Shortfall

Pennsylvania collected $2.3 billion in state taxes in December which was $141.5 million  less than anticipated for the month. Year-to-date revenue collections are now $11.6 billion which is $487 million less than expected.

Yes, it’s the economy stupid.

Keep an eye on the imaginative ways our legislatures start coming up with to save pensions, salaries and benefits of themselves and their true constituents namely government workers.

Hat tip Tom C

Another Provocateur of Thought

The Roar

Another Provocateur of Thought

Behold, there appears to be another lamplighter on the horizon.  His forthcoming brilliance will be uniformly measured by a fed up public viewership/readership brought about by other media luminaries.  In the short span of twenty-four hours, this local provocateur has produced a lengthy anti-Santorum discourse which he no doubt has been waiting to vent.

Chris Freind authored an essay which left little doubt as to his political sentiments.   Labeling  his treatise as anti-Santorum just doesn’t quite do it or him justice.  Within one day of Santorum’s rise in Iowa, Freind spouts forth a diatribe from an inconsequential funeral appearance which he then determines is an example of Santorum’s “arrogance,” as he briskly by passed the line of mourners waiting to pay their respects.   Astounding, as to his recall of what obviously occurred so long ago.  This writing was deemed so pertinent and accurate that it was immediately published by a local paper.  Such attention is indicative against any and all who may present a challenge to Obama,  and in itself, has drawn the public’s attention and mounting ridicule.

Freind is not alone with his venomous journalistic attack.  He is arm in arm with many well known thought provocateurs.  For too long, these semi/self anointed opinion “experts” have ruled the day.  Not any longer since the 2010 midterms seemed to impart a second giant step for man and womenkind.  The army of thought soldiers, whether from a televised format or the written dailies, began to lose their public following as one by one they showed their hidden designs.  This desertion continues as alternate sources, such as this venue, now attract the frustrated and curious.

This election year will no doubt  continue with the character assassinations of Republican candidates.  Since the press is a liberal industry, this one sided assault is now understood and expected.  However, with this recognition, a hardened insulation begins to form.  As a result,  the yesterdays of effectiveness from these provocateurs lessen.

Emerging from the mid terms, certain insiders of thought became identified as many challengers presented threats to their established order.  This necessity, from an emerging Tea Party influx, not only uncovered what is now termed a RINO presence, it laid bare for all to see just how manipulative the speak masters had become.

To quote Freind, “true leaders actually lead because they are following a vision.”  While I have problems with the word “vision,” in the context with leadership which I’ve witnessed, I also understand that good and bad “visions” exist.  Maybe this literary wannabe should devote as much effort with evaluating Obama’s personal “vision,” which is sadly on display.

In the final Republican primary cut, I am sure that the selection will not be without faults, which the opposition will gleefully detail.  However, where were these primary investigations and spinning provocateurs during the 2008 Presidential race?  I guess Obama never caught their inquisitive nature by jumping in front of a funeral line.

Jim Bowman, Author of
This Roar of Ours

Santorum Arrogance Will Be His Downfall – Again

Santorum Arrogance Will Be His Downfall – Again

By Chris Freind

The deceased had been incredibly beloved:
successful businessman, political activist, philanthropist and the
ultimate family man. Friends and colleagues from far and wide came to
pay their respects to one who had touched their lives.

Predictably,
the line at the viewing was long that night — more than two hours.
But hundreds dutifully stood, passing the time as best they could under
the circumstances. Millionaire CEO’s conversed with blue collar workers,
reunited grade school friends embraced, and many reminisced of good
memories with their mutual friend.

Standing for hours while
barely moving is tough for anyone, but especially the elderly, as many
were. And yet all persevered, because that is what’s required when
paying final respects to a good friend.

Well, almost everyone.

Turns
out one person didn’t feel like waiting in line like everyone else. A
person who thought of himself as above the “masses,” someone in a class
by himself. Someone to whom the rules didn’t apply.

That person? Rick Santorum.

Instead
of honoring his friend by waiting in line, he glad-handed some
“politically connected” people in the vestibule while ignoring others
who, for some reason, were enthralled to see an ex-senator. After
wrapping up his political agenda at that “event,” Santorum proceeded to
walk right down the center aisle to greet the widow and her family —
completely bypassing the line snaking all the way around the Church.

Incredibly,
to the astonishment of those watching, he then turned around and strode
away, winking and waving to those poor souls stuck in line. Total time
in and out: less than 15 minutes.

Good thing too, for he had to
fly back to Washington to vote on the all-important appropriations bill
and defense budget and… oh wait. That couldn’t have been it, since he
had lost his senate re-election by a whopping 18 points several years
prior.

Santorum’s behavior offered more insight into his true
character than any vote could provide. His selfish actions disrespected
every person in that Church, but most of all the deceased, who, despite
being a big Santorum supporter, apparently wasn’t worth two hours of
Rick’s time.



So why would Santorum deliberately
thumb his nose at the hundreds in line, many of whom had been his
biggest financial and grassroots supporters? The same people, by the
way, that he would later court for his presidential run.

Arrogance.
Plain and simple. (That’s the second unofficial definition of
“Santorum,” and given the vulgarity of the first, we’ll leave it at
that.)

In large part, Santorum’s arrogance led to his shellacking in 2006, yet, as we will see, it was a lesson lost.

It
was arrogance that led him to publish his book before that election,
despite advisors begging him to wait until later, since many parts, they
warned, would be taken out of context by his opponent (which they
were).

It was arrogance that led him to become a big-spending,
big-government Republican while labeling himself a fiscal
“conservative.”

It was arrogance to claim he was a “Pennsylvania”
senator while effectively living year-round — with his family — in
Virginia.

And most damaging, it was arrogance which led Santorum
to endorse liberal Republican Arlen Specter over conservative icon Pat
Toomey late in the 2004 primary election— which many Pennsylvania
Republicans credit as the final push that delivered Specter his razor
thin victory.

For those who claim Santorum had to make that
glowing endorsement because of his Leadership position, think again.
True leaders actually lead because they are following a vision; simply
doing the bidding of others makes one a Leader in name only.

More
significantly, it was Santorum’s portrayal of himself — contrasted
with his subsequent actions — that eventually became a sticking point
for so many of his supporters. He asked people to believe in him,
selling them on the idea that he was not a typical politician, but
instead a man of integrity, for whom principle always came before Party.

Since
political backbone is extremely rare, it’s no surprise that most
politicians do exactly what their Party tells them to do. But Santorum
represented himself as something different. As a result, his repeated
failures as a leader — coming up small when he was needed most — run
deep, and can be attributed more than anything to an arrogance that
playing both sides is a winning strategy.



Nothing has changed.

Fast
forward to 2012. Lost in the media spotlight of the Iowa Caucuses is
the fact that Santorum sold his soul right out of the gate, playing both
sides on one of the most important issues to Iowans — ethanol
mandates.

Santorum voted against the subsidies his entire
legislative career, which included four years as a congressman. Yet
because he felt that he needed the Iowa “corn vote” to be viable, he
changed his tune and pathetically pandered to the ethanol crowd in the
Hawkeye State.

Forget the fact that corn-based ethanol as a fuel
is an unmitigated disaster that has led to higher fuel costs,
skyrocketing food prices, inflation, and hunger, since a staggering 40
percent of America’s corn crop is used for ethanol production. And
disregard the fact that, primarily because of ethanol mandates, the
price of corn hit an all-time high just a few months ago. And ignore
the painfully obvious fact that natural gas — from the virtually
limitless Marcellus Shale under Santorum’s now-adopted home state of
Pennsylvania — is the single biggest key to solving America’s foreign
energy dependence problem.

The biggest red flag for candidate
Santorum is not a policy issue but a question of character. No one held a
gun to Santorum’s head to run for President, nor to compete in Iowa. So
when he made the decision to run, and campaigned as a man of principle,
the very least voters should have expected was a campaign of conviction
— not a politically-calculated flip-flop right from the get-go on the
single-most important issue of our time.

Rather than speaking
the truth and advocating a principled stand — which, ironically, are
what voters are thirsting for more than anything — Santorum chose the
easy way out by becoming that which he claims to abhor. And once one
opens the door of political expediency, rationalizing that it’s the only
way to achieve the next level, the door never shuts, and the slope
becomes too slippery to ever regain one’s footing.

Rick Santorum
worked as hard as any of the GOP candidates in Iowa, but much of his
“success” in that state’s archaic caucuses was based on a false premise
— that he has the character necessary to be a President of true
leadership.

Santorum’s sound bite line after the Iowa results was
“game on.” But as America learns about the real Rick, it will soon be
“Game Over.”

And that’s no corn.

 

 

Santorum Arrogance Will Be His Downfall – Again