Congresswoman Scanlon Calls Black Constituents Stupid
By Sharon Devaney
Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon’s latest rant about the Save Act degraded many of her constituents in Pennsylvania’s 5th Dstrict. Not only did she defend the illegal aliens living here, but shrugged off those who have had crimes commited against them in Delaware County such as myself.
She also said that those in black communities would have trouble voting if identification should be required. Does she think blacks don’t know how to aquire ID? Black people don’t have bank accounts? What is this woman thinking? This is a racist comment. Mary Gay is literally calling blacks stupid.
Maybe she’s concerned that the black community is waking up, especially after her day of working class virture signaling at a Wawa that only succeeded in getting her hair in cutomers’ shortie hoagies.
She also stated that many don’t have a birth certificate, real ID or a passport and that the Save Act would destroy their ability to vote. This also sounds racist, and from a woman who constantly trashes the MAGA community, which is not a bit racist. We support each other regardless of race or religion.
Elitist Mary Gay has never had to worry about income or groceries. Her husband runs Ballard Spahr, after all.
Maybe she should sit down and have a chat with myself and Alfe Goodman — the former cop and military veteran who hopefully replaces her as congresswoman. She can see how really those are who are hardworking, God loving supporters of President Trump and JD Vance.
Oh, and regard to Mary Gay’s sneers at those concerned about election integrity: Why does Delaware County fight open record requests on election matters even when the state Office of Open Records rules against them?
There’s got to be a logical explanation, right?
Oh. Wait. There is.
Here is Mary Gay’s strange and bigoted rant against the Save Act:
And here is a chance to meet her opponent Alfe Goodwin.
Blacks are not stupid, Mary Gay
Congresswoman Scanlon Calls Black Constituents Stupid
Toothless Inky Pretends It Still Has Relevance In Propaganda Push — The Philadelphia Inquirer, yesterday, Sept. 11, published a story about how 1/6: A Graphic Novel is being sent to every public school in Pennsylvania.
The novel appears to be standard establishment propaganda as to how the protests of Jan. 6, 2021 about election concerns were an attempt to overthrow the government.
Granted just because the crap is being sent to the schools doesn’t mean the schools are asking for it, and granted The Philadelphia Inquirer has zilch influence today, but the smariness, stupidity and hypocrisy of the endeavor still turns the stomach.
Let us also note that the article’s subhead quotes co-author Alan Jenkins wgi warns the It’s possible the book will get banned, but we’re ready for that.
So the book is sent unsolicited to schools which deep six it and they call it getting “banned.”
LOL
Here’s a video of the most infamous J-6 protestor “overthrowing” the government.
Toothless Inky Pretends It Still Has Relevance In Propaganda Push
Keystone Town Hall Concerns Chesco Power Shift — A Keystone Town Hall, sheduled for tonight, Sept. 12, will concern the power shift in Chester County, Pa. over he last 10 years and whether Kamala Harris is losing momentum.
It starts 7 p.m. at The Desmond Hotel, 1 Liberty Blvd., Malvern, Pa. 19355.
Doors open at 6:30 p.m. The event will be in the third-floor amphitheater.
On Tuesday Night of April seventeenth of this year, seventeen year old Damien Hocker was run over while crossing the intersection of Fairview and Macdade in Ridley.
While shopping in Swarthmore, we saw this petition for pedestriansafety , with Damien’s photo. This has been organized by his father, Doug Hocker. They are requesting the following changes; creation of footbridges at two intersections on Macdade, more pedestrian crosswalks, “Enforce existing laws for both drivers and pedestrians “, and the banning of drivers using cellphones, among others. This should be seen as the beginning of the discussion.
In Philadelphia this year there were 65 total traffic deaths, 30 of them pedestrians, as per the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia, and these fatalities led to their petition demanding concrete barriers, which over 5,000 people have signed.. Other demands include replacing “no parking” signage with “no stopping” signs, etc.
The next change.org petition originates in Newark, Delaware, where we now visit two of our longtime movement friends. This is also the home of the University of Delaware where Noellia Gomez, an 18- year old freshman, was recently killed by a speeding motorcyclist. This petition — Ensuring Pedestrian Safety for University of Delaware — requests improvement of the bus service and visibility of the traffic lights, etc.
Pennsylvania is the 35th listed state for pedestrian safet while Philadelphia is listed as number 6.
This is a problem but we need to consider how we try and make the streets safer for pedestrians, while not unduly burdening drivers of all vehicles. We have to also consider how much of this is the personal responsibilities of both drivers and pedestrians, i.e. driving and walking while aware and sober. We also have to decide how much is required of government and vehicle makers.
It’s also mentioned, in this article, that “Pedestrian deaths rose a staggering 77% between 2010 and 2022, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data, while all other traffic fatalities increased just 22%.”
Dating myself, as Sargeant Phil Esterhaus used to say in “Hill Street Blues”., “Be careful out there”.
Viewers who tuned in to the highly anticipated Donald J. Trump versus Vice President Kamala Harris debate were, regardless of their favorite candidate, disappointed. Harris’ supporters wished that she had taken the opportunity to clear up why she has U-turned on so many issues like fracking, the border wall, universal health care, and her mandatory gun buy-back program. The pro-Harris contingent would also like to have seen their preferred presidential choice face the tough questions more forthrightly rather than bob and weave, a show of weakness when what’s required of a president is strength.
ABC Co-host David Muir posed the first question to Harris: “…are you better off than you were four years ago? When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?” Harris completely dodged the question and instead launched into a long non-response that included references to her middle-class upbringing, her plan for an “opportunity economy,” and her “love for small businesses.” Such an abstract reply that evaded the question entirely converted no on-the-fence voters.
The pro-Trumpers hoped that the former president would have consistently reverted to Americans’ top two concerns, and the issues that polls show him leading Harris comfortably. Among probable voters who said jobs and the economy were “very important” issues, 86 percent said they planned to vote for Trump, compared to 64 percent who said they intend to vote for Harris, an Economist/YouGov poll taken Aug. 25-27 found. Trump had an even more substantial lead on immigration. Trump led Harris by fifty-one points among adults who said immigration was “very important” in the same Economist/YouGov poll, with 83 percent saying they planned to back Trump compared to just 32 percent who said they will vote for Harris.
Instead of hammering Harris with hard data about his strengths, Trump got suckered into silly back and forth squabbling about whose campaign events drew larger audiences or defending his J6 behavior. A survey that Pew Research conducted found that J6 does not appear in any of Americans top sixteen concerns. The same poll showed that probable voters felt that the GOP was more likely to resolve what they considered “very big problems” like inflation, illegal immigration, international terrorism, and violent crime. Moderators Muir and Linsey Davis asked only a handful of immigration-related questions. In all, slightly more than five minutes was spent discussing immigration even though it worsens a host of serious problems like a weak economy, education, housing, and crime.
Trump failed to bring the economy back into his spotlight even though the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports provide him with ample fodder. Measuring average hourly earnings from February of the first year of each presidency through July of their fourth year, specifically wage gains for production and non-supervisory workers, Trump’s gains were 6.54%; Biden-Harris gains, 0.00%. What’s more, immigration-driven population growth has displaced American workers or helped prevent recent college graduates from entering the work force. Foreign-born workers as a percentage of all employment under Trump, 17.4%; under Biden-Harris, 19.6%. Under Trump, foreign-born employment growth increased 7.5%; under Biden-Harris, 14.2%. Another voters’ worry: inflation. Cumulative inflation during Trump’s administration, 5.9%; in the Biden-Harris White House, 19%.
Harris exceeded her low expectations, and Trump missed several opportunities to put distance between him and his rival. Having to debate not only Harris but the meddlesome moderators Muir and Davis, Trump had to deal with three rivals at once. Muir and Davis continuously “fact checked” Trump but let Harris’ misstatements stand, unchallenged. Trump, who won the pre-debate coin flip, chose to deliver the last words. He asked why Harris, during her 3-1/2 years in the White House, had not accomplished “all the wonderful” things she promised to do during the debate. Harris could, Trump noted, proceed directly back to the White House and “do the things you [said] want to do.”
When the debate ended, Harris’ team emailed the Trump camp to ask for a second debate. Trump waffled, claimed that he won the Philadelphia face off, and said “Let’s see what happens.” The Vice-Presidential candidates Tim Walz and J.D. Vance will face off on October 1.
Joe Guzzardi is an Institute for Sound Public Policy analyst. Contact him at jguzzardi@ifspp.org
Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: The Mohammedan religion too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness? Adolf Hitler
