Mainstream Publications Now Airing Vote Fraud Suspicions

Mainstream Publications Now Airing Vote Fraud Suspicions — John Daniel Davidson of The Federalist points out that the poison injected into America’s veins in 2020 is not going away and that any Republican seeking to challenge Donald Trump for the 2024 nomination better recognize it as to have a prayer of a chance.

Even that would likely be futile.

Simple logic shows that the honorable thing is to support the one who was wronged, not attack him.

Davidson says the election wasn’t taken from Trump but from the American voter. He fudges a little about it having been stolen but is definitive that it was fixed.

“After all, the people and institutions that rigged it have freely admitted what they did,” he writes. “They suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored what Americans could say on social media, introduced unprecedented changes to our voting system under the pretext of pandemic precautions, and poured hundreds of millions of dollars into putatively nonpartisan local election offices through Mark Zuckerberg-connected nonprofits for the sole purpose of turning out Democrat voters in swing states.”

And he certainly doesn’t dismiss the possibility of out-and-out theft.

“Plenty of them will always believe, not without reason, that 2020 was stolen outright,” he says. “Many millions more believe, with even more reason, that it was rigged unfairly against Trump and that the same forces are at work now to rig it against whomever the GOP nominee turns out to be.”

Our leaders — especially in the judiciary — must leave their pleasant bubbles and see the seething anger held by the many who once considered FBI agents and federal prosecutors to be heroes.

Officials must bend over backwards regarding election transparency.

They must stop fighting right-to-know requests like cornered rats.

Why doesn’t Delaware County, Pa. want the public to see its correspondence with its ballot printer, Fort Orange Press of Albany, N.Y.?

Why can’t candidates verify that the ballot envelopes have proper signatures?

That these simple things are being fought can’t be taken as anything but proof that our votes are being stolen.

We are going to call out by name Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Justice Michael H. Wojcik.

Two days ago, he presided over a hearing concerning access to ballot envelope signatures.

Rather than resolve the matter by ordering access to these public records, he dumped it on Delaware County Common Pleas Court.

He accepted Delco lawyer Manley Parks argument that Commonwealth Court wasn’t the proper venue since only county officials were involved. This is despite the county seeking, and getting, direction from the Department of State.

Put all the cards on the table now. If it should turn out that nothing untoward happened, or if it did it was minor, a crisis is averted.

If it should be found that the vote fraud was real and decisive, don’t become a co-conspirator.

Mainstream Publications Now Airing Vote Fraud Suspicions

2 thoughts on “Mainstream Publications Now Airing Vote Fraud Suspicions”

  1. The May 2023 Primary included statewide seats on the ballot: State Supreme Court, Commonwealth Court, and Superior Court. This most assuredly should have decided by Commonwealth Court and access, to public records, granted. Period.

    Justice Michael H. Wojcik is a failure.

  2. I haven’t considered FBI agents and federal prosecutors as heroes since 1968.

    The FBI should have been disbanded even before 1968.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.