This image courtesy of Cathy Craddock — whether it be of a real protestor or of a very good satirist — sums up why the Occupy Wall Street movement just didn’t work.
Chris Matthews’ Baby Bro Faces Perjury Charges
Chris Matthews’ Baby Bro Faces Perjury Charges — The not-really-conservative Republican brother of Obama-zombie MSNBC commentator Chris “Tingles” Matthews has been arrested and charged with perjury.
James R. Matthews, 62, the lame-duck chairman of the Montgomery County (Pa.) board of commissioners, allegedly lied to a county grand jury investigating corruption when he denied that Keenan Mortgage Co., which he owns, had not done business since 1995 with Certified Abstract Co., which was awarded a contract in 2010 to provide title insurance services with the county.
It was learned that Keegan Mortgage
had done business exclusively with Certified since early 2010, said the grand jury.
Matthews ran unsuccessfully as the GOP candidate for lieutenant governor in 2006.
Matthews was censored by the county GOP in 2007 when he entered into a power-sharing agreement with Democrat commissioner Joe Hoeffel 3rd cutting out fellow Republican Bruce Castor and giving the Dems effective control of the county.
Matthews declined to seek re-election to his commissioner seat in 2011.
Chris Matthews’ Baby Bro Faces Perjury Charges
Mansions Of Mitt
Mansions Of Mitt — Tea Party activist Bob Guzzardi informs us that GOP presidential nominee hopeful Mitt Romney is a man of many mansions.
Bob points out that Mitt has a townhouse in Belmont, Mass.; a $10 million home Wolfboro, N.H.; an 11-acre ski estate in Park, Utah; and $12 million home in La Jolla, Calif.
Man of the mansion does not equal man of the people.
Mansions Of Mitt
Stockpile Chinese-made Christmas Gifts Until U.S. Policy Changes,
After watching the latest segment of ABC World News’s “Made in America” series, several thoughts come to mind:
1) Don’t view it on a full stomach.
2) Once again, the media has failed to ask the right questions because
they, like our elected officials, don’t understand the problem.
3) Spending more money on a problem sounds great but is never the solution.
The series illustrates the astronomical amount of goods that are made
in China, and postulates how great it would be if only we could “buy
American.”
Gee, Diane Sawyer and Company, tell us something we don’t know.
Perhaps if the network did a little research as to the real reason why America manufactures virtually nothing anymore, thus identifying the problem, it could then report on the ways to bring back American companies, and the jobs and products they create.
But that would take foresight and initiative. And when it comes to the American media, those traits are in short supply.
In the latest segment, Sawyer states that the average American family
will spend $700 this Christmas season, and that if each just spent $64
on American-made goods, more than 200,000 jobs would be created.
If that’s the recipe for success, then why stop at just $64? Well,
ABC thought of that. Reporting that total Christmas spending would add
up to more than $465 billion, they did the math for viewers: “If that
money was spent entirely on U.S.-made products, it would create 4.6
million jobs.”
Great idea, if you’re playing make-believe. But in the real world, things don’t work that way.
First, we live in an ever-increasing global economy,
which is perfectly fine, as world trade is a good thing. But things
don’t work out so well when a country owns a mammoth trade deficit,
which, in our case, is north of $500 billion per year and exponentially
growing. You don’t need to be an economist to understand that when
manufacturing plants move overseas, exports drop significantly while
imports shoot skyward. That trend will only continue until the problem
is identified (let alone solved). But stating a pie-in-the-sky wish that
all products should or could be purchased in America is just plain
insulting.
Second, throwing more money at the problem won’t solve anything,
and, in fact, will make it worse by masking the real issues. Yet that’s
a lesson lost on America, as we continue to fall for the duplicitous
line that if we just open the wallet and increase the budget, all will
be well.
What do we do about the nation’s abysmal academic achievement, in
which U.S. students rank near the bottom of every category compared to
their global competitors? Spend more on “education”—a lot more. Of
course, we’ve been doing that every year at the local, state and federal
levels, yet the scores continue to go the wrong way, but so what? That
just means we need to spend even more money!
Too much crime on our streets? Hire more cops, despite the fact that
most municipalities are going under just trying to pay current salaries
and exploding pension and benefit costs. Forget that even the most
militarized police states still have crime, and that more money (and
thus more police) won’t deter crime. Smarter policing, and infinitely
more important, smarter kids, will. But since we still aren’t “spending
enough” on education, we continue to open the coffers for more cops.
Not enough jobs? Again, this wouldn’t be an issue if we had an
educated workforce and a solid manufacturing base. But since we have
neither, and refuse to make any meaningful attempt to change that
situation, we create money out of thin air, throwing trillions in
“stimulus” dollars (a.k.a., “taxpayer” money) at the problem. The fact
that it didn’t work has not deterred the politicians, as they seek yet
another round of stimulus spending.
And now, ABC would have us believe that spending $64 is the panacea
to America’s chronic unemployment problem, and one that will help
manufacturers stay in business.
When will we ever learn?
Such news reports only serve to divert attention from the real
problems that need addressing: our atrociously unfavorable trade
policies, the highest corporate taxes in the world, and the complete
lack of an energy policy. By understanding these problems, we could
begin to stave off the total loss of manufacturing. And here’s a
newsflash: No nation has ever prospered, let alone survived, without a
healthy manufacturing base. Without that, it’s lights out, and that’s
not conjecture, but mathematical certainty.
So what to do?
• Trade policies need to be wiped clean and rewritten from scratch,
with one overarching element above all else: America’s interests come
first. Period. China looks out for its own interests, as it should. We
need to do the same. At some point, we may not have the leverage to call
the shots, but we do now. So let’s do it.
• An immutable law of economics is that if you want less of
something, tax it—a concept lost on most elected officials. Hopefully
that will change with a new Congress that will incentivize companies to
keep jobs—and revenue—stateside by slashing the corporate income tax.
It’s easy to paint the CEO who moves operations to more favorable tax
environments overseas as greedy, but when faced with the highest tax
rates in the world, combined with shrinking profit margins, it becomes a
sound business decision. Given the choice, most would rather stay in
the U.S., but the government has taken that choice away from many.
• By far, the most effective solution to give manufacturing a
permanent rebirth and a competitive edge is simple and easy. It’s energy
independence. But it seems that drilling for oil and natural gas,
mining clean coal and expanding nuclear power is just too politically
incorrect for ABC’s focus.
America will never compete with the lowest labor costs in the world. So the only
way to offset that is to have the lowest energy costs in the world. And
more than any nation on Earth, America can do that, because it
possesses the greatest concentration of energy resources on the planet.
Lower fuel costs give manufacturing companies an edge, and that means
greater commerce and more jobs. Businesses can take the billions in
savings that cheap energy offers, and reinvest it so that operations are
expanded, more workers are hired, and new manufacturing doors in
America are opened.
And when all of the ancillary benefits are realized, the economy goes
into overdrive: homes are bought, restaurants thrive, small businesses
no longer face closure, and untold new ventures spring to life. All lead
to higher tax revenue.
Incomprehensibly, too many major media outlets and the majority of
politicians in both parties do not recognize these root causes of
America’s economic crisis. And you can’t solve a problem if you don’t
know what it is.
Connect the dots, and America thrives again. Keep the same policies in place, and we go the way of Europe.
And what a story that would be.
Pileggi Drops Out
Pennsylvania Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi (R-9) announced yesterday that he will not seek the Republican nomination to face incumbent Democrat Bob Casey Jr. in next fall’s U.S. Senate race.
This leaves in the race Republicans:
Tim Burns, the Washington County businessman — he was the founder of the pharmaceutical company TechRX — who ignominiously lost to Democrat underdog Mark Critz in a 2010 special election to fill the 12th District Congressional seat held by the late John Murtha. Burns is close to state GOP Chairman Rob Gleason.
Sam Rohrer, the proven budget hawk and Berks County resident who long represented the 128th District until he stepped down to scare the Republican establishment in the 2010 gubernatorial primary campaign.
Laureen Cummings, a nurse and the founder of the Scranton Tea Party.
John Kensinger, pharmacist
from Bedford County.
Marc Scaringi, attorney from Camp Hill who was a staffer for Sen. Rick Santorum.
Steve Welch, a resident of Malvern, Chester County who founded the Phoenixville pharmaceutical firm Mitos and the “business accelerator model” Dreamit Ventures. Welch sought the GOP nomination for the 6th District congressional race in 2010 but was talked out of a primary fight when incumbent Jim Gerlach changed his mind about seeking re-election.
Colonel John Vernon, of Jackson Township who recently retired after a distinguished career with the Army.
David Christian of Bucks County, a successful businessman and highly decorated Vietnam veteran. He is a noted veterans advocate.
Tom Smith of Armstrong County, a coal executive and advocate for a commonsense energy policy.
Socialism Off The Internet
Socialism Off The Internet Courtesy of Cathy Craddock
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery..”
— Winston Churchill
These are possibly the 5 best sentences you’ll ever read: Unfortunately, most voters don’t know this.
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them; and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
Can you think of any reason for not sharing this?
Neither could I.
United Nations Arab Voting Unbelievable
United Nations Arab Voting Unbelievable Courtesy of Judy McGrane
How they vote in the United Nations:
Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records:
Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time
Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time
Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time
United Arab Emirates votes against the United States 70% of the time.
Jordan votes against the United States 71% of the time.
Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time.
Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.
Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Oman votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time.
Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time.
Lebanon votes against the United States 80% of the time.
India votes against the United States 81% of the time.
Syria votes against the United States 84% of the time.
Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of the time.
US Foreign Aid to those that hate us:
Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States ,
still receives $2,000,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
Jordan votes 71% against the United States
And receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
Pakistan votes 75% against the United States
Receives $6,721,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
India votes 81% against the United States
Receives $143,699,000 annually.
WHY?
WHO IN THE HELL
STARTED THIS AND WHY?
THEY ACTUALLY BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS THEM.
Perhaps it is time to get out of the UN and give the tax savings back to the American workers who are having to skimp and sacrifice to pay the taxes.
Pass this along to every taxpaying citizen you know, party lines irrelevant!
GO GREEN- RECYCLE CONGRESS IN 2012 ! ! !
(If you don’t know any taxpayers just delete it!)
United Nations Arab Voting Unbelievable
The Difference
The Roar
The Difference
The year was 1962, the same year in which this writer graduated from high school. I must admit that as momentous as the Engel v. Vitale Supreme court decision would become, my interests were far from that fateful outcome which banned school prayer in the New York State school system. With next year marking its fiftieth anniversary, the results from that Constitutional blunder are now in plain sight.
Through these intervening years, society’s journey has consistently traveled down the road of rack and ruin. From the perspective of then verses now, the denouncing of religious attention and instruction within the confines of our educational system, seems to have been the single most detrimental legal ruling against our cohesive society and our Founder’s original intent.
During the intervening years, current speculation has thus floundered to the point which now even questions our Nation’s Christian foundations. In my previous “A Day For Prayer,” which detailed George Washington’s proclamation, setting aside a day for thanksgiving and prayer, the devious intent to this anti-Christian debate becomes clear. Adding to his 1789 proclamation is his Presidential Address which explains the importance to which our founding rested upon what our modern day Jurists outlawed. To quote the Father of our Country, “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports.
This discrepancy between our beginning beliefs verses today’s secular contentions lays bare the road which should have never been traveled. And it is to this one individual effect, from our apathy and disloyal slumber, which has inspired and continues to strengthen the thousands of Tea Party formations nationwide. Our slumber is now over.
All is not lost. Along side these Tea Party uprisings comes the home school phenomenon, which elevates the welfare of the child over the glitz of this materialism craze. A supportive companion to this inherent sacrifice brings the recognition that Christian values and beliefs will strengthen our life’s journey. Yesterday, one national figure, brought into focus what has been ignored within his professional football genre. The missing ingredient is that of being humble.
Professional sports, with football leading the charge, has also undergone sweeping changes which in retrospect bring questionable results. How many viewers and fans witness these personal on field tributes after almost every play? No matter the score, or if the team is winning or losing, these me, me, me exhibitions have diluted the game’s integrity and worth. Well, yesterday, a winning QB returned to the days when winning brought out the best in a person.
When Tim Tebow, won his fifth straight game, this one at the buzzer, his humble presence shone through his interview when stating, “I know that I had a lot of help. Offensive line did a great job, and receivers stepped up and made me look better than I really am.”
One might ask, what makes Tebow such a humble throwback to bygone days? Could it be his Christian upbringing and spiritual guidance throughout his life. This one instance brought back a clear recall of what was the order of the day before that 1962 Supreme Court ruling.
This recollection to a lost societal trait can be used to canvas today’s demographics. As our view centers on the younger generations, it becomes apparent that being humble is not on their agenda. People today try to draw attraction similar to those football players during a game. The only difference is instead of chest thumping and gyrating, we now revel in nose rings, tattoos and an assorted mix of colored hair.
As George Washington also said, “True religion affords to government its surest support.” The same can be said for its aiding human decency and self respect.
Jim Bowman, Author of
This Roar of Ours
Tea Party Problems For Pileggi
State Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi’s (R-9) bid to replace incumbent Democrat Bob Casey in the U.S. Senate is not warming the cockles of the hearts of some Tea Partyers this Christmas season.
Montco activist Bob Guzzardi has sent an email blast saying that Pileggi is “The Establishment’s Guy” and noting that he has a perfect rating with the National Federation of Independent Business (a small business advocacy group) and a 75 percent rating with the AFL-CIO.
Frankly, that’s a rather impressive trick.
Lisa Esler of the Delaware County Patriots has published a list of problems with Pileggi which note, among other things, that he has neither adequately addressed the crushing burdens of teacher strikes in Pennsylvania nor the ever-increasing burden of public pensions.
In fact, some suspect he has been keeping these issues from being addressed.
While I do think Pileggi has his good points, one does kind of wonder why the fair and commonsense reforms that would make life a lot easier for the average Pennsylvanian never seem to happen in this state.
Unemployment Benefits For Filthy Rich
Unemployment Benefits For Filthy Rich — The headlines last week were filled with outrage over the revelation that former Philadelphia School Superintendent Arlene Ackerman has filed for $573 a week in unemployment compensation, the maximum amount in Pennsylvania.
Ms. Ackerman, who was contracted to receive a $348,000 salary through 2014, was bought out of it for a $905,000 lump-sum payment plus $83,000 for unused vacation and personal days.
In other words, her job performance was not exactly satisfactory.
Leaving aside the point that the buyout means that Ms. Ackerman is being employed to basically sit on her butt and watch TV for the next three years, why should anyone be able to get $573 a week in unemployment comp?
Is it to allow our dainty betters to live in the style to which they have become accustomed?
Sorry, that’s not the way most of us think the social safety net is supposed to work.
The idea of an unemployment safety net is that a working stiff with a run of bad luck can still feed his kids and keep a roof over their heads until he finds another job. Nobody is against that.
But if you’ve been pulling down a good income and lose your job you presumably have assets that you can start selling off before you come to the rest of us — or at least to those business owners still trying to save their existing employees — with your hand out.
My proposal — cap the benefits at $150 per week; and add a $50-per month SNAP (food stamp) card, along with an exemption from the residential property tax.
Also, cut the time for receiving them from 99 weeks to 16 weeks.
The cost of unemployment insurance would drop drastically for employers. This means it will cost them less to hire people which means they will start hiring people and very likely increase their pay.
What could possibly be the objection?
Government would lose power?