BillLawrenceOnline

Senate Again Introduces E-Verify

By Joe Guzzardi

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) reintroduced legislation to help businesses comply with immigration laws by certifying that their employees are legally authorized to work in the United States. The “Accountability Through Electronic Verification Act” would permanently authorize and expand the E-Verify program, an internet-based program. The bill requires employers to use the program within one year of enactment to determine workers’ eligibility. Employers must terminate workers that E-Verify cannot confirm as legally work-authorized, and those employers are subject to increased penalties.

Grassley said that businesses nationwide use E-Verify to help them comply with our immigration laws, reduce illegal immigration incentives, and provide Americans and other legal workers job safeguards. Expanding the system to every workplace, Grassley added, will improve all businesses’ accountability “and take an important step toward putting American workers first.”

In addition to the most obvious E-Verify advantage – protecting U.S. jobs – the program has countless other indirect benefits. Illegal border crossings and visa overstays would be dramatically reduced or eliminated once unscrupulous employers could no longer hire illegal aliens.

Because E-Verify would eliminate the jobs magnet, Customs and Border Protection agents, as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement, would be, in large part, relieved of the headaches of asking for identification from non-English speaking foreign nationals. Freed from the tedium of dealing with job seekers, law enforcement personnel could, assuming the White House and the Department of Homeland Security allow them to carry out their duties, including pursuing and arresting cartel criminals and human traffickers. With E-Verify in place at work sites, people who can’t get jobs will move home voluntarily. Family separation would become a thing of the past.

A Carnegie Mellon University study confirmed that Arizona’s mandatory E-Verify law played an important role in self-deportation among illegal immigrants coming from and returning to Mexico. The study noted that, after E-Verify was mandated, the average return migration rate to Mexican states nearly quadrupled over the time period observed. Mexican states like Sonora, where roughly 50 percent of migrants had previously settled in Arizona, experienced 30 percent larger growth in its return migration rate compared to a state with weaker connections to Arizona.

Another E-Verify advantage is that implementing the program would help end identity theft, a huge problem which in 2020 created losses to unsuspecting consumers that totaled $56 billion. Employee information taken from an I-9 form, the paper-based employee eligibility verification form used for all new hires, is compared against existing Social Security Administration and DHS databases. If the data doesn’t match, then the probability is that the SSN doesn’t belong to the applicant. Nancy Berryhill, in 2018 an Acting Commissioner of Social Security, testified to the House Subcommittee on Social Security. She concluded: “Mandatory use of EVerify by employers would help reduce the incidence of fraudulent use of SSNs.”

With the protections that E-Verify offers for American workers, and the deterrent that creates against illegal immigration, the wonder is why past bills, similar in most respects and dating back more than three decades, haven’t received congressional traction. The harsh, but inescapable, truth is that the donor class wants cheap labor, and Congress’ objective is to keep donors happy, U.S. workers be damned.

Senate Again Introduces E-Verify

DC Voting Subverts Sovereignty

By Joe Guzzardi

Bit by bit and with considerable assistance from their advocates, illegal aliens are inching their way toward nationwide voting privileges. In 2018, San Francisco began to register illegal immigrants and other noncitizens over age 18 whose children attend K-12 public schools. The noncitizens could then vote in school board elections. Although San Francisco’s bill was struck down in August 2022, similar benefits have been granted in Chicago, as well as some cities in Maryland and Massachusetts.

Vermont, another example, approved noncitizen voting legislation in 2021, and overrode Republican Governor Phil Scott’s veto. Advocates’ arguments, whether in Vermont, San Francisco, Chicago or Maryland, are consistent. The illegal immigrants have students in the school district, and as community members, they may pay taxes. They claim that they therefore have a right to participate in the decisions that affect their children and their lives. The reality that the Vermont constitution expressly states that “every person… who is a citizen of the United States…” shall have the right to vote is, to the state legislature, insignificant.

The highest profile effort to grant noncitizens, including aliens, voting rights is playing out in sanctuary city Washington, D.C. Last fall, the City Council passed a bill that would allow the district’s approximately 42,000 voting age noncitizens the privilege to cast a ballot. The residency requirement was set at a mere 30 days, meaning that potentially anyone can vote, including foreign diplomats, visiting professors, au pairs and summer interns. The bill passed by a 12-1 margin. True to form, Councilmember Charles Allen said that the noncitizens “deserve a right to have a say in their government.”

Unlike the cases in Maryland, Illinois and Vermont, the Constitution grants Congress exclusive control over the district’s city council-passed laws. In other words, D.C. voting laws are valid only to the extent that Congress tolerates them. Showing the common sense that Congress is too often missing, on February 9, the House voted down the district’s proposal 260-162, with 42 Democrats joining Republicans.

Concerns about noncitizen voting are twofold. Specific to D.C., Muriel Bowser won the 2022 Democratic mayoral nomination by 11,000 votes. The Migration Policy Institute found that D.C.’s 2019 illegal alien population was about 24,000, more than enough to have altered the election’s results. Looking ahead and evaluating D.C. dysfunction, citizen voters might not want to elect Bowser to a fourth term; the district has no term limits. Violent and property crimes are up under Bowser, and 98 percent of U.S. cities are safer than D.C. Homelessness is so pervasive in D.C. that National Park Service officers and Washington, D.C.’s police department evicted dozens of people from the District’s largest homeless encampment. Despite the D.C. chaos, noncitizen votes could sway the election toward Bowser, or another similarly minded candidate.

The second and broader concern is that, as Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy said, “These elections can set the laws that cover the White House, Congress and even government agencies. If we set this precedent, other cities will follow, and faith in our elections will plummet.”

History proves McCarthy’s theory that once noncitizen and illegal alien rewards begin, turning back is tough. Consider that driver’s licenses and in-state university tuition, once reserved for citizens, are now readily available to illegal immigrants. Bank accounts, which once required Social Security numbers, can be obtained with a foreign national’s unexpired passport or the easy-to-acquire Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN). Licenses, instate tuition for residents and banking relationships have been quietly incorporated into illegal immigrants’ welcome-to-America package.

The stakes in the House effort to preserve constitutional voting rights for citizens alone are high, and the consequences of letting them slip away are dire. The bill requires the Senate’s approval and President Biden’s signature. Since the administration’s goal is D.C. statehood, district-wide voting is a step in that direction.

DC Voting Subverts Sovereignty