Mullen Hangs Up

Mullen Hangs UpBy Joseph B Dychala 

In the April 3, 2015 Daily Times it mentions a news reporter getting hung up on upon reaching the Mullen household to inquired about a possible run for the seat in the 161st Legislative District vacated by Joe Hackett.

Around the same time, local 654’s own Business Report for Q1 2015, Paul Mullen solicited members to increase their funding for money earmarked to go directly to political candidates. Mr Mullen is quoted, “Relations within the political realm is important and helping candidates get elected is vital to us. ”

Mr Mullen has actively campaigned for Joe Sestak in his failed bid to unseat incumbent United States Senator Republican Pat Toomey. Mr Mullen also campaigned for Democrat John Kane. Kane, who happens to hold the same position as Mullen at his local, lost to Republican Tom McGarrigle in 2014. Kane now fully endorses Mullen complete with requisite yard signs. There have been accusations of misconduct and what happened remains unclear.

This raises many very important questions. The two most pressing however, is there some Quid Pro Quo involved with these campaigns, and why does Paul Mullen, a nearly two decade Republican, continually lend his endorsement and personal support to Democrats on a local and national level.

Paul Mullen has been very silent on his positions – liquor privatization, paycheck protection,property tax, pension reform, the Pennsylvania 10% corporate tax and the Governor’s plan to increase personal income tax and sales tax. These are the issues facing our great commonwealth today. He only provides vague platitudes on natural gas taxation and educational funding with no concrete stance. His opponents have made themselves not only clear and consistent but available to speak with the folks unlike the reclusive Mullen.

How are the voters of the 161st District supposed to to entrust their representation at the state house to Paul Mullen when he has been evasive on his positions and his intent since this house seat first opened.

 Mr. Dychala lives in Aston.

Mullen Hangs Up

Planned Parenthood Loses Coke, Ford, Xerox

Xerox, Ford, and Coca-Cola have asked that Planned Parenthood remove  them from a list of corporate donors the demonic, historically racist organization had been using. Planned Parenthood Loses Coke, Ford, Xerox

The three companies said they have never contributed to the group and do not match employee gifts to it.

The original list of donors  can be found here.  It received publicity after it was revealed Planned Parenthood was harvesting body parts for sale from the humans it was aborting

What is especially disturbing is the contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As government-sponsored enterprises one would think they would not be making contributions to any group much less one with Planned Parenthood’s history.

Of course, Planned Parenthood gets about a half-billion in tax subsidies anyway.

The money should not just be cut off.  The group should be treated as a criminal organization.

Planned Parenthood Loses Coke, Ford, Xerox

Wolf Plan Unpopular With Public

By Chris Freind Wolf Plan Unpopular With Public Wolf Plan Unpopular With Public Wolf Plan Unpopular With Public

Who’s afraid of the big, bad (Tom) Wolf?

Not the Republican Legislature.

Pennsylvania’s new governor submitted a budget proposal that would raise taxes by a whopping $4.5 billion. That plan was promptly bitten in half by the GOP, with both sides now light years apart. And since the June 30 deadline has passed with no resolution, the Keystone State finds itself in a drawn-out budget stalemate.

Good.

What the governor does not yet understand is that he has little public support for his plans, making him a lone Wolf on the impasse. And so long as the Republicans don’t cave, they will win the day, and by extension, so will the people.

Let’s review the major sticking points:

1. Taxes: Raising taxes is never the answer. Doing so takes money from productive citizens and businesses — who would spend it as they saw fit in the economy, generating more jobs and, ultimately, more tax revenue — and throws it into the never-ending black hole of government spending. It’s bad enough that our taxes are so high — Pennsylvania already has the nation’s 10th-biggest tax burden and will soon have America’s highest fuel taxes — but to make the sin mortal, whatever money raised would be completely squandered, especially on education. High taxes can never be justified, but the pill might not be so bitter if at least the money was wisely spent. But we all know otherwise.

Wolf wants to raise the income tax, sales tax (and greatly expand the list of items covered by the that tax), and tobacco tax, and single out the natural gas companies for its own tax.

America’s 35 percent corporate tax rate is the highest in the world. Add in state and local taxes, and the burden becomes onerous. So in Pennsylvania, a company pays the highest federal corporate tax on the planet, on top of the nation’s second-highest state corporate net income tax (9.9 percent), on top of local taxes. (Philadelphia, which is always crying poor and which the rest of the state is always bailing out, is, cumulatively, the highest-taxed city in America).

Rather than lowering the sky-high rates that stifle innovation, cause job cuts, place a cap on new hires, and take capital from the free market, Wolf wants to expand such draconian policies. Instead of understanding why companies flee (and along with them Pennsylvania’s best and brightest), and figuring out what can be done to halt the exodus, the governor instead advocates penalizing the people and companies even more.

As an incredibly successful businessman, Wolf should understand the adage, “If you want less of something, tax it.” But he doesn’t.

2. Property Tax Red Herring: This is the biggest joke of all. Wolf’s tax hikes would allegedly provide some measure of property tax “relief.” The only problem is that it won’t work.

Even if taxpayers received a $1,000 rebate on their property taxes, how long do you think it will take counties and local school boards to raise property taxes after that? Try about five minutes. So Pennsylvanians would receive a small amount of temporary relief, yet be stuck with forever-higher sales and income taxes, all while watching their local property taxes continue to rise to fund a public school system that is failing our children.

Great plan, governor.

3. Education Black Hole: How many times does the obvious have to be stated, namely that throwing good money after bad isn’t just stupid, but ineffective.

Unless the teachers’ unions are reined in once and for all so that accountability can finally be instilled, thereby paving the way for reforms and competition, no amount of money will change a single thing. And this isn’t just a Philadelphia problem, but a statewide one.

There is no education funding “emergency.” The only crisis is the lack of educational achievement for the only ones who matter: our children.

The numbers tell the story:

School spending is over $25 billion annually, averaging nearly $15,000 per student (more than 39 other states), an amount that has doubled since 1996. Additionally, school district reserves grew by $445 million in 2013 to nearly $4 billion.

All this while the number of students has declined.

Despite a drop of 35,510 students since 2000, the public school system has added 35,821 employees in the same period. Therefore, by definition, increased funding, more personnel and decreased class size have not improved student achievement.

From SAT scores to literacy, Pennsylvania students rank near the bottom. Scores on standardized exams have not improved, and nearly one-third of all 11th-graders are not proficient in reading, while 40 percent do not achieve math proficiency on the dumbed-down PSSA tests. Yet, teacher salaries and benefits rank among the highest, and Pennsylvania leads the nation in school strikes every year.

So instead of fighting over more funding, which will produce squat, the governor and Legislature should focus on reforming the antiquated tenure and seniority rules and eliminating forced union dues that are used to wage multimillion dollar political campaigns to keep the status quo intact.

Then, and only then, will things start to improve.

4. Gov. Wolf vetoed bills that would have privatized Pennsylvania’s liquor stores and reformed the state’s exploding pension system. Both would have produced immense savings (negating the “need” to raise taxes), and, significantly, both had widespread public support. But taking a lesson from his incompetent predecessor (the other Tom), Wolf kicked the can down the road to our children. What a legacy after just six months on the job.

5. Taxing natural gas drillers: Once again, we’re told the energy industry needs to pay its “fair share,” an example of never letting facts stand in the way of fanciful political rhetoric.

First, taxing a particular industry is flat-out wrong. Second, that proposal implies the gas industry isn’t already being taxed. So the $600 million from the impact fee and over $2 billion in corporate taxes it has paid is make-believe? Imposing a job-killing severance tax on the grounds that other states are doing it is simply asinine. It would result in a production decline (thereby decreasing revenue) as the industry finds greener pastures elsewhere. And like all business taxes, it would be passed onto consumers.

Instead of penalizing the industry that has the best chance to revive Pennsylvania, Wolf should be embracing it. It has invested billions in capital projects, paid royalties to thousands of landowners, and created countless ancillary businesses, all of which produce jobs and fill government coffers.

If the GOP doesn’t stand its ground here, the goose that laid the golden egg will fly away.

Tom Wolf’s company makes cabinets efficiently and profitably, which is why it’s so disappointing to see the governor kowtow to special interests, forgetting all the lessons he learned in business.

If he had produced inferior cabinets, failed to hold his employees accountable, and lost money, CEO Wolf would have either gone out of business or changed things. That’s common sense. So why, as CEO of what should be a powerhouse state, has Wolf jettisoned those innovative ideas in favor of 20th-century “solutions” to 21st-century problems?

Tom Wolf has shown himself to be a sheep in wolf’s clothing. If he doesn’t start playing his cards right, he will soon be joining Tom Corbett in the one place he doesn’t want to be: the “One-Term Tom Club.”

Wolf Plan Unpopular With Public

Pension Cost Rising 800 Percent

By Sen. Scott Wagner Pension Cost Rising 800 Percent

The purpose of this column is to share with you why your school taxes keep going up.

The answer is: INCREASING PENSION COSTS.

The growing pension costs of the ten public school districts that are located within the 28th PA Senate District in York County are staggering.

On June 30th the PA House and Senate passed pension reform legislation and forwarded it to Governor Wolf – Governor Wolf vetoed the pension reform bill within days.

The elephant in the room continues to be the MASSIVE pension crisis facing Pennsylvania taxpayers.

I was recently forwarded the pension information contained in this email for the school districts in the 28th PA Senate District.

Listed below are charts showing the pension costs from the 2008-09 to 2019-20, a span of twelve years.

The first chart shows each school district’s actual pension costs for the 2008-09 year and the second chart shows the projected cost for the 2019-20 year of each school district.

The final chart shows the percentage increase from 2008-09 year to the 2019-20 year.

As you review the charts, please note that for the 2008-09 year the total pension costs for the ten schools districts WERE $12,535,778  , the projected costs for the 2019-20 year WILL INCREASE to $103,057,888  , an INCREASE over a twelve year period of $90,522,110   per year.

Pension Cost Rising 800 Percent

Pension Cost Rising 800 Percent

Pension Cost Rising 800 Percent

The information that I am sharing with you is for ten school districts in York, Pennsylvania – there are over 500 school districts in Pennsylvania.

Please review the charts – I am sure you will agree that the Pennsylvania pension system is a ticking time bomb.

Pennsylvania must join the rest of the real world and go to a 401K retirement system.

History is history – the past is the past – NOW is the time to correct this problem.

By the way, in this email I only talk about school district pensions – there are many other departments affected by this pension mess – State Police, Penn Dot, Judges, State Universities, and workers from all other state agencies.

Over the next 30 days I will be meeting with various people in the private sector – not Harrisburg insiders – to discuss new ideas and options for a plan to move forward to diffuse the ticking time bomb.

To review the year by year details for each school district please click here.

I also want to report that Senate and House leadership have been meeting with the Governor over the 2015 – 2016 budget.

As I have continued to report, the solution cannot be higher taxes and more spending.

In the event that a budget deal would be reached, the Senate is on a 6-hour call – we would promptly reconvene to vote on the budget.

Addendum:  A reader who follows my emails closely sent the following response:
“Scott–You are close to making a key point that appears to be missing in the debate about Wolf’s budget proposal.  He wants to increase the state’s contribution to education.  It sounds nice, like he is trying to help kids.  But the fact is all of that additional funding and more will be poured into the black hole of pension costs.  If he really wanted more for education and to relieve property taxes, he would start by repealing prevailing wage and tackle pension reform.  But his budget shows what he really cares about….not schools and students, but rather the unions and their constituents.”

Great points about where the money is really going.

Sen. Walker represents the 28th District in the Pennsylvania Senate.

Pension Cost Rising 800 Percent

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 7-23-15

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 7-23-15

Murderer Gary Gilmore’s last words before his execution in 1977 were “Just do it.” That is what inspired the Nike advertising slogan. Really.

GOP Choice Fails Scrutiny Test

GOP Choice Fails Scrutiny TestBy Joseph B Dychala

Delaware County is about to make history…

Never before has the Grand Old Party had a union leader, and not just any union leader, but the president of a chapter AFL/CIO endorsed to run as a candidate in any election as a Republican.

Are the local party bosses telling us the most Republican candidate we have is someone involved in an organization that has been clearly antithetical to the Republican party for almost a century? Or perhaps they think this is their best chance to run a candidate who would certainly not pass the scrutiny of a primary election cycle? The candidate endorsed by the Republican party is AFL/CIO president Paul Mullen.

The logic presented by party leadership is that they need to be more inclusive. Where have we heard that argument before? We clearly see how dysfunctional our federal leadership is for these very same reasons. Time and time again on the national level conservatives are told they cannot be elected because they need to change their stance on illegal immigration, raising taxes, a whole host of social issues plus (insert cause du jour) many other reasons. This is simply false.

Voters want clear choices in a campaign. Yet at the same time voters seek middle ground and compromise when it come to governing. Compromise should never mean conservatives must abandon everything we hold true to appease the opposing viewpoint while receiving little or nothing in return. That is not compromise that is capitulation.

All of Delaware County is watching very closely the 161st Legislative District over the next few weeks, so too will most of Pennsylvania. This seemingly minor election in the Philadelphia suburbs also has the potential to affect politics on a national level. There is a true conservative choice with ‘write in’ candidate Republican Lisa Esler.

Delaware County will most certainly make history in a few short weeks but the question is how…

Will the voters of the 161st vote in favor of the GoP endorsed candidate to further blur the lines between the two major parties and contribute to a single party government under two separate names OR will we heed the clarion call to reject such a notion and stand firm in our opposition to bigger government and concentrated power that always leads to less liberty.

That choice is yours, my friends, and that choice is very clear…

Mr. Dychala lives in Aston

GOP Choice Fails Scrutiny Test

Katie McGinty, Is Selling Body Parts OK?

Katie McGinty, Is Selling Body Parts OK?
So Katie, is selling body parts from aborted babies OK?

Katie McGinty, who deserves the lion’s share of the credit for Gov. Tom Wolf’s accomplishments during his few month as governor,  has announced that she is stepping down as  his chief of staff to take on Joe Sestak in the Democrat primary for the 2016 U.S. Senate race.

The seat is now held by Republican Pat Toomey.

Hope someone asks Katie how she feels about selling body parts from babies.

Katie has been very critical about proposed pension reforms regarding public employees. Hope someone also asks her if she feels Gary “I Knew Jerry Sandusky” Shultz is worth a $330,699 public pension.

Katie McGinty, Is Selling Body Parts OK?

161st Debate Will Be Aug. 2

161st Debate Will Be Aug. 2
Leanne Krueger-Braneky, official Democrat

Two of the three candidates in the special election for the vacant 161st District Pennsylvania House Seat have accepted invitations to appear at the only public forum scheduled for the contest.

Committed to attend are Republican write-in candidate Lisa Esler of Aston and Democrat Leanne Krueger-Braneky of Swarthmore.

Paul Mullen, who had been supporting Democrats until the county Republicans tapped him as their candidate a few short weeks ago, has not responded as of this writing.

161st Debate Will Be Aug. 2
Lisa Esler, the traditional Republican

The event is sponsored by Delco Debates and will be 2 to 4 p.m., Sunday, Aug. 2 at Swarthmore Borough Hall, 121 Park Ave.

Candidates will make opening statements then accept questions from the audience. They will then make a closing statement.

Ms. Krueger-Braneky describes herself as a businesswoman and was the Democratic candidate in the race for the seat last fall losing to Republican Joe Hackett by 2,696 votes. Hackett’s resignation, April 30, prompted the need for a special election.

161st Debate Will Be Aug. 2
Paul Mullen may be a tough man to find but here he is campaigning for Joe Sestak.

Ms. Krueger-Braneky is endorsed by United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776, which represents the Pennsylvania state stores; the Education Voters Action Fund, which seeks more tax money for school employees; and Delaware County United for Sensible Gun Policy, a gun control group.

Mrs. Esler is a Penn Delco school director and an optician. She is endorsed by the Associated Builders and Contractors. She has declared herself to be a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. She believes state stores should be privatized and feels that the state will be bankrupted if the pension systems for school and state employees are not changed. She notes that education spending has consistently increased and could be reduced by eliminating unfunded mandates which do not improve outcomes for students and hurts the taxpayer with ever-increasing property taxes.

It should be interesting.

161st Debate Will Be Aug. 2

William Lawrence Sr. Omnibit 7-22-15

William Lawrence Sr. Omnibit 7-22-15

Russians have a specific word for “one and a half”.

Common Core Opposition Creates Strange Bedfellows

Outspoken Common Core and PSSA opponent Joanne Yurchak of West Chester sent the below email with a request for broadcasting it expressing her concerns regarding United Opt Out which will be hosting its Fifth Annual conference in Philadelphia, Feb. 26-28. Common Core Opposition Creates Strange Bedfellows

If you click on the link for it, one will understand her concerns.

When one finds oneself allied with Bill Ayers, one does start to question one’s precepts.

Anyway here is Joanne’s email:

At the outset I will tell you that some of you receiving this E-Mail might disagree with my statements.  If ANYONE wishes to be off my distribution list, please let me know.

As you know, I and many others have been active in encouraging students to opt out of the PSSA’s and Keystones for a variety of reasons.  I am attaching a Letter to the Editor that was published in three local newspapers that encourages parents to opt out of these tests, which could, if enacted in large numbers, prompt Harrisburg to “devise a less disruptive and more appropriate assessment system in which students are the prime beneficiaries, in contrast to the current system which exploits students and uses them as unwilling “operatives” for rating educators and schools.”

So…that’s where I’m coming from.  There are different groups with very diverse political viewpoints working on this worthwhile opt out movement.  Political agendas should NOT be involved in an educational effort of this sort which is why I thought it would be no problem for all of us to work together.  Something that came to my attention yesterday changed my mind.  I will explain below.

I was sent an E-Mail yesterday by an activist in the Philadelphia opt out movement that stated: “UOO (United Opt Out) will be hosting its fifth annual meeting here in Philadelphia in February. We’re coming to the issue from a pretty radical left position, which might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but if you are interested, here’s the link to the event:  http://unitedoptout.com/2015/06/29/uoo-conference-february-26-28-2016-transcending-resistance-igniting-revolution/

There will be keynote speakers, panels, and working groups on a variety of topics and it will draw education activists from across the country.”

The phrase “radical left position” got my attention and after accessing the web site for United Opt Out I found that the description of UOO was an understatement.  I urge you to read information on the web site so you can decide for yourself.  The event has the inflammatory title “Transcending Resistance, Igniting Revolution,” and on the fundraising page (http://www.gofundme.com/yhb5cb3) has such seditious comments as: “It is time for revolution,” and “It is time for non-negotiable demands.”  Although I realize that Bill Ayers has had his hands on educational “reform” for years, eschewing individualism and promoting collectivism, the fact that this domestic terrorist was selected as a Keynote speaker is simply beyond my comprehension.

I will say that I agree with many of the contentions of UOO such as the inappropriateness of the massive testing and their well-founded assertions and concerns that educational (and other) corporations are making huge profits on the backs of our children.  That said, after reviewing the biographies of the speakers, the titles of the breakout sessions and the terminology on the web page, it is apparent to me that United Opt Out is just one of a variety of radical-Left groups that have political agendas that extend beyond education and that are collaborating to break down our current political system as we know it.  Believe me, I’m NOT saying there aren’t problems and deficiencies in our system that need to be addressed, but these groups, in my opinion, are out to demolish it and remake it to fit their far-Left agenda.  I believe that continuing to work together with revolutionary groups such as this, even for an issue on which we agree, could facilitate their efforts in other areas which is why I have determined not to do so.

Thanks for listening.  I have provided the resources and web sites for you in this E-mail and urge you to read them and make your own decision about this group — United Opt Out.   It is truly a shame that individuals in Philadelphia and elsewhere, in conjunction with UOO, have interjected such far-Left partisan agendas into the legitimate opt out effort.

Joanne Yurchak
West Chester, PA

Here is the attached letter.

It is crucial that our state legislators and the PA Department of Education (PDE) immediately address the numerous problems created by the excessive testing that is currently inflicted on our public school students – the PSSA’s for grades 3-8, and the three Keystones for the higher grades (Algebra I, Literature and Biology, which students in classes of 2017 and beyond must pass to graduate from high school).  The deleterious educational and fiscal impacts of the Keystone graduation requirement leave no doubt that it must be removed ASAP, but that is a discussion for another day.  The purpose of this current letter is to clarify issues related to the PSSA’s – the testing procedures, the makeup of the tests, and how they are used.
The primary function of these Common Core-aligned, time-consuming assessments is to satisfy the federal government’s mandate for evaluation of teachers, principals and schools;  providing educational feedback regarding students’ strengths and weaknesses is secondary and minimal.  There is no transparency or “audit” of the PSSA test questions and scoring.  Teachers and school administrators can NEVER see these tests, even after they’ve been administered and graded.  Also, the individual Student PSSA Report provided to parents months after the test presents only a negligible educational analysis of their child’s academic progression and skill sets which precludes them from recognizing specific areas in which their child needs help.
The inordinate amount of lost instructional time and the extra personnel required for administering the tests are extremely disruptive to the learning process and to school districts.  Most school calendars have four testing weeks blocked out for Grades 3-8 PSSA’s.  Moreover, a large amount of class time is often necessary to prepare students for the tests.  The stressful effects of the PSSA’s are illustrated on the website [talesfromthetest.org] which presents pictures and descriptions of the toxic atmosphere that permeates PA’s schools during this lengthy testing period.
The fact that the English Language Arts (ELA) and math PSSA’s have been aligned to the Common Core for the first time this year has made them far more ambiguous, complex and developmentally inappropriate, according to math and English specialists.  A Sampler posted on the PDE’s web site reveals many questions that are likely to cause frustrations and distress to young test-takers.  One reading passage in the third grade ELA PSSA is THREE PAGES LONG and contains different types of multiple choice questions, some of which have more than one correct answer and depend upon answering a previous question correctly.  Try explaining THAT to a third grader!  Many of the sample third grade math problems are extremely wordy, and some require written explanations which could cause a child with language arts deficiencies to be inaccurately assessed in math.  One subjective (non-multiple choice) four-part math question contains over 150 words!  In addition, some of the problems require abstract algebraic-type thinking that is well beyond a third grader’s developmental age.
Who grades the subjective portions of these tests that are used to evaluate teachers and schools?  Astoundingly, it is not teachers, but college-degreed, temporary employees who are reported to earn $11-$14/hour.
It is puzzling that although the adverse effects of this excessive testing on our students, teachers and educational system are irrefutable, objections from the PSEA (teachers’ union) have been noticeably absent.  Why???  Their silence is both deafening and disturbing!
PA must devise a less disruptive and more appropriate assessment system in which students are the prime beneficiaries, in contrast to the current system which exploits students and uses them as unwilling “operatives” for rating educators and schools.  To put a stop to this fiasco, parents should opt their children out of these tests.  For information on PA’s opt-out procedure, contact jyurchak@comcast.net.
Joanne Yurchak, West Chester, PA
Common Core Opposition Creates Strange Bedfellows