GOP Leadership Wants Tax Hikes

GOP Leadership Wants Tax Hikes
By Leo Knepper

Not much has changed on the budget since last week. On the plus side, Governor Wolf changed his position on using fund transfers to balance the budget. He went from saying all of the money proposed in the fund transfers (see here) was promised to other projects and there was no way it could be used to balance the budget; his current position is that $500 million is available to use to balance the budget.

On the downside, Republican leadership in both chambers of the General Assembly seem dead-set on making Pennsylvania less competitive by raising taxes on targeted industries. The first target, which now seems to be off the table, was commercial warehousing. According our sources, Rep. Dave Reed (R-Indiana County) was advocated for making lease payments on warehouse space subject to the sales tax. The fact that this tax would have made Pennsylvania non-competitive and put thousands of people out of work seems to have eliminated this proposal from consideration. The latest proposal would be to nearly double the Commonwealth’s hotel tax rate. Again, one of the chief advocates for the higher tax rate is Rep. Dave Reed.

As we have repeatedly noted, a better long-term solution would be to actually cut spending rather robbing from Peter to pay Paul. We’ll let you know about any changes as they develop.

Politicians have long used Orwellian double-speak to hide their true intentions. The latest iteration of this trend in Pennsylvania is the Governor’s, Senate’s and House Democrat’s insistence on including “recurring revenue” in any budget agreement. Recurring revenue sounds much more pleasant than what they’re really talking about: tax increases.

Roughly three months ago Republican leadership in the Senate, ceded their super-majority when fourteen Republicans voted with twelve Democrats to pass a Fiscal Code that balanced the budget on the backs of taxpayers. The Senate’s plan, supported by Governor Wolf, would raise taxes on heating bills, cell phone bills, and online purchases. As our friends at the Commonwealth Foundation noted in a recent blog post, the General Assembly has raised taxes four times in the last eight years. These previous tax hikes haven’t solved Pennsylvania’s financial problems. Instead, it has been like a death from a thousand cuts for taxpayers.

Departing from the usual routine of raising taxes, House Republicans offered alternatives to the status quo. The first plan we told you about would have reduced overhead expenses and saved tax payers $370 million. A second plan, which ultimately passed the House would have used surplus, off-budget funds to fill the gap. Unfortunately, only seven Senators sided with taxpayers and voted in favor of using funds already in state coffers.

The next step in the budget process is House and Senate leadership will establish a conference committee and try to work out their differences. The deals hashed out by conference committees rarely work out in taxpayer’s favor because it is a closed-door process. The public, and most lawmakers, usually do not have time to review the finished product. Remember the 2005 middle-of-the night pay raise? That legislation came out of a conference committee too.

Please, take a few moments and email the General Assembly. Let them know that you will be watching their actions closely and that they need to cut spending and use money already collected by the Treasury in order to balance the budget.

Mr. Knepper is executive director of Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania.


GOP Leadership Wants Tax Hikes

GOP Leadership Wants Tax Hikes

6 thoughts on “GOP Leadership Wants Tax Hikes”

  1. How come nobody’s talking about spending reductions or, more significantly, ending regulations that pointlessly increase spending?

    Prevailing wage is the one the jumps most quickly to mind. It is estimated that repealing this law would save 20 percent on the cost of public projects.

    In other words, simply repealing this law would save taxpayers $30 million on a high school costing $150 million.

    1. So why aren’t these Property Tax Elimination people pushing to repeal the prevailing wage? They certainly SHOULD be!

      1. Priorities don’t seem to be well thought out. Real pension reform would do even more for the budget than prevailing wage — and might end the property tax debate entirely.

    2. I ask that same question, Bill, in discussions about school property taxes. Every argument in favor of replacing a property tax with something else, neglects to mention that the reason the taxes are so high in the first place is fiscal irresponsibility on the part of the districts.

      Reduce spending, apply principles of fiscal responsibility, and there’s little need to collect taxes to pay for it. It couldn’t be any simpler.

  2. Am amazed that the two people who have announced to run for the 18th Congressional seat vacated by Tim Murphy voted against the taxpayer and with Gov Wolf..
    Kim Ward & Guy RESCHENTHALER both voted NO on the latest version of HB453 Looking forward to a CAP Governor >>> Governor Wagner come Jan 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.