If you’re smart you know the world is warming and we must. do. something. about. it. now!
Right?
Wrong. A tax-funded study by the US National Science Foundation has revealed that the more scientific and mathematical knowledge one has the more skeptical one is regarding the dangers of climate change.
Why was it tax funded? The bureaucrats and globalists who have the keys to the treasury and who want to rule us by cooking up chicken-littleish fears to grant them power thought it would demonstrate the opposite.
Well, ho ho ho.
Since they can’t deny the data and can’t accept the possibility that global warming is not a crisis they attribute the results to selfishness and psychological issues on the part of the responders. To wit:
Members of the public with the highest degrees of science literacy and technical reasoning capacity were not the most concerned about climate change. Rather, they were the ones among whom cultural polarization was greatest. This result suggests that public divisions over climate change stem not from the public’s incomprehension of science but from a distinctive conflict of interest: between the personal interest individuals have in forming beliefs in line with those held by others with whom they share close ties and the collective one they all share in making use of the best available science to promote common welfare.
Hat tips: TrueBlueLiberty.com; The Register; and The Telegraph