Judge Finds That Obama Should Stay On Ga. Ballot

Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia’s Office of Administrative Hearings issued a 10-page finding yesterday, Feb. 3, in which he declared the evidence to remove President Obama from his state’s November ballot on the grounds that he is not a natural born citizen and hence violates the Constitutional requirements to hold the office to be “unsatisfactory” and “insufficient to support the plantiffs’ allegations.”

Malihi said that those who testified about alleged fraud concerning the President’s birth certificate were never qualified as experts in forged documents or document manipulation, and that a 2009 ruling by the Indiana Court of Appeals declared that children born within the United States are natural-born citizens, regardless of the citizenry of their parents.

Malihi did harshly criticize the behavior of the president’s attorney, Michael Jablonski of Atlanta, who declined to attend the hearing on his client’s behalf.

“By deciding this matter on the merits, the court in no way condones the
conduct or legal scholarship of defendant’s attorney. This decision is entirely based on the law, as well as
the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing,” Malihi wrote.

The final decision as to whether the President should remain on the ballot, however, rests with Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

I will go out on a limb and say that this story will be reported prominently in today’s Philadelphia Inquirer, and that for most of their readers it will be the first they hear about it.

Hat tip Cathy Craddock

One thought on “Judge Finds That Obama Should Stay On Ga. Ballot”

  1. Very concise and accurate wrap-up of another unprecedented court ruling, which resembles a buy off rather than justice, by Cathy Craddock. Good job.

    While Judge Mahili discredited his robe, there still is a very good chance that Obama will not be on the Georgia ballot since it is up to Georgia’s Sec. Of State to make that decision. And thankfully, the election consists of fifty independent State elections and not one huge national one.

    This ruling reflects upon the enormity of our contest and to the influential and controlling reach of our enemies.
    Jim Bowman

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.