Legislation Would Gut Kayden’s Law –We posted reports a few hours ago that powerful persons in the legal community were seeking to gut Kayden’s Law which was signed into existence April 15 and took effect Aug. 13.
Kayden’s Law is named for seven-year-old Kayden Mancuso who was murdered by her father in 2018 during a visitation. It mandates courts to consider a parent’s history of violence when deciding custody.
Why would anyone want to have propensity to violence and abuse not be a prime, if not the prime, reason in deciding custody?
Who could even think of this?
A mercenary attorney seeking to maintain an avenue to making a buck? A child abuser?
Certainly no decent person.
Nor, did we think, a legislator concerned about his standing with his constituency.
We were wrong.
House Bill 2018 has been introduced in the Pennsylvania Legislature and it guts Kayden’s Law.
Prime sponsor is Montgomery County Democrat Liz Hanbidge who represents the 61st District.
It passed the House Judiciary Committee, Sept. 25. All Democrats voted for it and all Republicans voted no.
Why don’t these Democrats care about the safety of children? Why don’t they give a law that’s been in effect for only about six weeks a chance to work?
Feel free to try and answer these questions in the comments.
Legislation Would Gut Kayden’s Law
Judge Clifford of Montgomery County or Judge Klein of Delaware County should provide testimony under oath and full audit of their finances as judges
Hold their feet to the fire.
The laws are only as good as those responsible for enforcing/upholding them. Without transparency and authentic oversight, how does this happen?
Absolutely, let’s see who is financing them.
Maybe this had something to do with the rampant mental illness on the Left.
That’s horrible.
It seems to me, from what I’ve seen over the last 10 years, that the American Socialist Party (APSP), formerly known as the Democrat Party, is committed to legalizing the illegal, the profane and the immoral.
Even a cursory look at their actions shows this — from admitting criminal illegal aliens and enriching drug traffickers, wildlife traffickers and human traffickers to supporting the mutilation of children, legalizing theft and changing laws that allow judges (Calif.) to decide whether an adult convicted of having vaginal sexual intercourse with a minor should register as a sex offender in cases in which the minor is 14 years or older and the adult is not more than 10 years older than the minor, among other examples.
The question remains: Why?
HB 2018 – https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&sessYr=2023&sessInd=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=2018&pn=3674