Powerful Pennsylvania Republicans Being Primaried

Powerful Pennsylvania Republicans Being Primaried — Powerful Pennsylvania incumbents have Republican Primary challengers, May 17, and we are pushing for the challengers.

Speaker of the House Bryan Cutler is facing Anne Weston, a chiropractic assistant from Quarryville, in the 100th Legislative District; John Lawrence, who is seeking his seventh term in the 13th Legislative District is facing Carmela Ciliberti, an attorney and regulatory compliance manager; and Senate Republican Caucus Secretary Ryan Aument is facing Mike Miller, a business owner and investment advisor, in the 36th Senatorial District.

The incumbents mouth the “conservative” platitudes they’ve been mouthing since starting their long careers but are far more interested in their power, per diems and pay than having what they claim to be their wants turn into reality.

Ms. Ciliberti boldly calls out Lawrence for this. (See screen shot.)

And they have been silent regarding the big elephant in the room that is election integrity.

Yes, the Senate attempted to audit the Dominion machines in Fulton County but it has been crickets since the state Supreme Court shot it down last week in a baldly partisan ruling.

“Well I guess that’s it then,” you can almost hear them doofusing.

Free clue: When the other side stops playing by the rules, the rules don’t exist.

Where are the outraged press conferences? Where are the angry speeches on the floors of the House and Senate?

Hey, how can you be angry when you are collecting $95G for what is basically a part-time job? Believe it or not, they have it set up so they don’t have to vote to get a raise.

Where are the brave and wise solons demanding that our voting machines and affiliated software be considered public property, and that certified ballot counting observers never be kept from observing counting?

They certainly aren’t in Harrisburg.

Vote for the new kids.

Carmela Ciliberti’s charges against John Lawrence. Click to expand
Powerful Pennsylvania Republicans Being Primaried

Cancelling Disagreeable Speech Is Anti Speech

Cancelling Disagreeable Speech Is Anti Speech

By Bob Small

Article 1 of the Bill of Rights,  often misquoted, states “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peacefully to assemble”. 

This is not an agreement by the rest of us, though it should be, whether for DT, or GLBT, or RT, etc

On March 10,  there was a to be a bipartisan panel on civil liberties, hosted by the Yale Federalist Society, featuring Monica Miller, of the progressive AHS ( American Humanist Society) , which supports the rights of atheists and  battled with the American Legion, etc.) and Kristen Waggoner of the ADF (Alliance Defending Freedom).  ADF is pro-Life, pro-marriage, pro freedom of religion (at least for Christians) and are seen by some as being anti-GLBT, etc.Though the event did proceed to the end, there were some eventus interruptus.

FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education), which has a Conservative bent, feels that, essentially, the forum was prevented from happening, in it’s intended format.

Cancelling Disagreeable Speech Is Anti Speech

Fire notes that forcing the cancellation of speech you disagree with isn’t free speech.

David Lat, from Original Jurisdiction, has a more nuanced view.  “The protesters were disruptive at the start of the event, both inside the classroom and after they repaired to the hallway . . .they did calm down (eventually) and they did not succeed in canceling the Yale event, which moved forward to completion.” 

He later amends this to indicate there was a level of “disruption”.

Is free speech in American Law Schools a lost Cause?

John Sexton in Hot Air seems to try and take both sides.

Mark Joseph Stern of Slate Magazine feels that the Washington Free Beacon article by Aaron Sibarium regarding Judge Laurence Silberman’s desire for judges to blacklist all participants in the disruption overstates the case.

Lastly, I’ll mention  Angus Johnston of Left Wing Rolling Stone and his 2015 article There’s No College P.C. Crisis: In Defense of Student Protesters

Johnston quotes Frederick Douglas saying “sometimes,  it is not light that is not needed, but fire”.

A couple thoughts on this.  Why would YLS members prevent people from hearing Monica Miller?!  If you use Duck Duck Go and type in free speech at Yale and in defense of Yale student protest,  you will get various opinions. including crooks and liars.com, reason.com, Washington Post, and yale.edu. Lastly thanks to Scott from Vermont for the Fire article which began the search.

Cancelling Disagreeable Speech Is Anti Speech

Probable impossibilities William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-29-22

Probable impossibilities — William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-29-16

Uxwp uron cx cqn marwtna.
Linlq Yaxenak

Probable impossibilities William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-29-22Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
Aristotle

Probable impossibilities William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-29-22

Pervs Druggies In Congress, And That Doesn’t Include The D’s

Pervs Druggies In Congress, And That Doesn’t Include The D’s — Madison Cawthorn, the 26 year old who represents North Carolina’s 11th District in Congress, confirmed in an interview with Warrior Poet Society podcast host John Lovell what many of us already believed, namely that we made really, really bad choices in picking who should write our laws.

In the Congressman’s words:

Pervs Druggies In Congress, And That Doesn't Include The D's
Congressman Madison Cawthorn

The sexual perversion that goes on in Washington, I mean being kind of a young guy in Washington with the average age of probably 60 or 70 and I look at all these people, a lot of them that I, you know, looked up to through my life. I’ve always paid attention to politics, that you know, then all of a sudden you get invited to like well, hey, we’re going to have kind of a sexual get together at one of our homes. You should come. And I’m like ‘what did you just ask me to come to?’ And then you realize they are asking you to come to an orgy.

Or the fact that you know, there’s some of the people that are leading on the movement to try and remove addiction in our country and then you watch them doing a key bump of cocaine right in front of you and it’s like wow this is wild.”

Remember Cawthorn is talking about Republicans here.

And you wonder why the sexual mutilation of children is defended. And you wonder why the wall is not built to stop fentanyl smuggling and child trafficking.

Everybody has to get involved, especially those who don’t want to. Bribes, blackmail and bullying are a real thing. Assume the worst about office holders. This includes the ladies too. If they aren’t practitioners, they are enablers.

Here is the snippit from Cawthorn’s interview.

Hat tip Tracy Beanz

Pervs Druggies In Congress, And That Doesn’t Include The D’s

Do not be afraid William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-28-22

Do not be afraid William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-28-22

Xzwjijtm quxwaaqjqtqbqma izm bw jm xzmnmzzml bw quxzwjijtm xwaaqjqtqbqma.
Izqabwbtm

Do not be afraid William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-28-22Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. He is not here; he has risen, just as he said.
Matthew 28: 5-6

Do not be afraid William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 3-28-22

After two days he will revive us Cryptowit 3-27-22

After two days he will revive us Cryptowit 3-27-22

Kv uva il hmyhpk, mvy P ruvd aoha fvb hyl svvrpun mvy Qlzbz, dov dhz jybjpmplk. Ol pz uva olyl; ol ohz ypzlu, qbza hz ol zhpk.
Thaaold

After two days he will revive us Cryptowit 3-27-22Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will restore us, that we may live in his presence.
Hosea 6:2

After two days he will revive us Cryptowit 3-27-22

Hunter Snared $$ For Biolab Contractor

Hunter Snared $$ For Biolab Contractor— A story that you can bet your bippy is not going to be covered by the U.S. nightly news is the revelation that Hunter Biden really did secure financing for biological laboratories in Ukraine.

Hunter Snared $$ For Biolab Contractor
Defend this family. We dare you.

The claim was initially made Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the Russian Duma, widely mocked for being Russian, and now confirmed by emails found on Hunter’s laptop which ironically was initially mocked as a Russian plot yet now found to be real.

As per the New York Post: Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners invested $500,000 in the San Francisco pathogen research company Metabiota and raised millions more through firms that included Goldman Sachs, according to the e-mails found on the computer, which was abandoned at a Delaware repair shop in April 2019 as Joe Biden ran for president.

Hunter introduced Metabiota to officials at Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where he was a board member, for a “science project” involving biolabs in Ukraine, the e-mails show.

Joe Biden has to be impeached. Defending him at this point is almost treasonous.

And what else is on that laptop?

Hunter Snared $$ For Biolab Contractor

New Batch of H-1B Workers Arriving Soon

New Batch of H-1B Workers Arriving Soon

By Joe Guzzardi

On April 1, employers will learn which among them will gain access to H-1B visas, and also the total number of visas each will be awarded. Now entering its fourth decade of aggressively displacing qualified U.S. tech workers, and often presenting insurmountable employment roadblocks to recent U.S. college graduates seeking jobs, the H-1B is the meal ticket that enriches corporate America on the backs of cheap foreign-born labor.

Created as part of the Immigration Act of 1990, the visa’s major flaws, among many, are its low-wage component and that the visa holders are powerless to look elsewhere for better, higher paying jobs because their employers control the visas – modern day indentured servitude or a form of 21st century slavery.

Over a 32-year-long time span, regardless of Republican or Democratic-held White Houses, little has changed in the H-1B dialogue. Employers preposterously claim that without foreign-born tech workers, their solvency would be at risk. In truth, tech companies are flush with cash, and native-born tech workers are readily available for hire. A Census Bureau analysis dated June 2021 found that among the 50 million employed college graduates ages 25 to 64 in 2019, 37 percent reported a bachelor’s degree in science or engineering, but only 14 percent worked in a STEM occupation. Less than one-third of STEM-educated students work in the STEM field. Translation: thousands of U.S. STEM workers are available. What’s missing is employers’ willingness to hire them.

Congresses, year after year, have ignored sound testimony and criticism from credible witnesses, including Democrats, that the H-1B is an American job killer that generously lines the pockets of craven employers. Those employers have adopted the heartless practice of forcing the U.S. employees they fire to first train their H-1B replacements or lose severance benefits.

Examples of on-target critiques from otherwise pro-immigration advocates:

  • Ray Marshall, President Jimmy Carter’s labor secretary: “One of the best con jobs ever done on the American public and political systems…If you’ve got H-1B workers, you don’t have to do training or pay good wages.”
     
  • 60 Minutes: “…(W)e discovered more and more are taking advantage of loopholes in the law to fire American workers and replace them with younger, cheaper, temporary foreign workers with H-1B visas.”
     
  • New York Times: “Former [Disney] employees said many immigrants who arrived were younger technicians with limited data skills who did not speak English fluently and had to be instructed in the basics of the work.”

In their recent article titled “Biden Can Fix the Anti-Worker, H-1B Immigration Visa Scam,” authors Ron Hira, Daniel Costa and Hal Salzman argue that President Joe Biden has “a clear roadmap, the legal authority, and the duty…” to clean up the H-1B program that, the authors correctly emphasize, allows big business to earn billions of dollars by, in part, stealing from employees through wage underpayment.

The H-1B and many other guest worker programs don’t have the necessary safeguards to protect either immigrant or U.S. workers. Some programs, like the H-1B or its cousin the L-1 for international transfers, are designed for the high-skilled worker. Other programs were created for low-skilled workers. That includes the H-2A for agricultural workers or H-2B for seasonal, non-ag workers. All categories of temporary or guest worker programs employ international laborers who are at their new employers’ mercy – an open invitation for abuse should unscrupulous employers choose to take advantage when safeguards are missing.

New Batch of H-1B Workers Arriving Soon

Protections are paramount since the H-1B is the largest temporary work visa program with nearly 600,000 workers currently employment-authorized in the U.S. and approximately 140,000 new guest workers who will receive visas for fiscal year 2023, and still another 300,000 receiving three-year renewals.

Assuming labor protections and a fair pay scale for the vastly underpaid foreign-born workers were in place, and enforced, hiring H-1Bs would become less appealing to employers who would eventually turn to U.S. tech workers.

Hira, Costa and Salzman make the important observation that in today’s corporate world, labor safeguards are more vital than ever. Since 1990, corporations have moved ruthlessly to slash labor costs, cut pensions, hire short-term contract workers to replace full-time employees and bust unions.

Legislative reform, no matter how desperately needed, is a long-shot. Biden is president in large part because Silicon Valley worked tirelessly on his behalf, and dumped $5 million into his 2020 campaign coffers. On the other hand, protecting American workers and at-risk guest workers is one of the most necessary functions of the Executive Office. Even though taking a pro-America stance on visa reform would give Biden a much-needed bump in his poll ratings, it is improbable that Biden is brave enough to stand up to his advisors and Silicon Valley donors.

Joe Guzzardi writes about immigration issues and impacts. Follow him on joeguzzardi.substack.com.

New Batch of H-1B Workers Arriving Soon

Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father Cryptowit 3-26-22

Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father Cryptowit 3-26-22

Glzkx zcu jgey nk corr xkbobk ay; ut znk znoxj jge nk corr xkyzuxk ay, zngz ck sge robk ot noy vxkyktik.
Nuykg

Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father Cryptowit 3-26-22Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father.
John 14: 8-9

Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father Cryptowit 3-26-22

Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa

Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa — The partisan Democrat Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled four days ago (March 21) in favor of Dominion Voting Systems that neither Fulton County nor the Pennsylvania Senate can audit their machines as they saw fit.

This overturned a Commonwealth Court ruling.

The Supremes said the audit must be done in a specified lab.

This ruling at first glance seems reasonable until it dawns on one that the restrictions will likely lead to a predetermined outcome and they really aren’t necessary to safeguard a false positive.

And that there really isn’t a lab available with the accreditation insisted upon by the court.

What would be a legitimate concern would be if the audit was not transparent and recorded, and unobservable by Dominion and other opponents.

That was obviously not the case.

That Dominion was allowed to be a party is especially troubling. Why would there even be a question that election transparency takes precedence over the intellectual property, or any concerns, of a private corporation.

Those machines should be considered public property. Anybody, much less a government, should be allowed to look at every bell and whistle on the machine, and every percent sign and parenthesis on the software.

When a media consortium investigated the Y2K Florida election, there was no fuss.

That an investigation into Dominion is being inhibited is almost proof positive something is hidden.

So where are the screams of outrage coming from Republican leaders? Why hasn’t Silent Joe Gale said something? Tom McGarrigle? Anybody? Maybe they did. If so they just whispered. That is not good enough.

Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa
Dem Supremes Back Dominion In Pa -- The partisan Democrat Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled four days ago (March 21) in favor of Dominion Voting