BillLawrenceOnline

The Boockvar Timeline —Greg Stenstrom sent us the below timeline of Stenstrom & Hoopes v. Boockvar, Delaware County et al, which is the last outstanding case relating to vote fraud in the 2020 election. Please share.

Stenstrom & Hoopes v. Boockvar, Delaware County et al, is the last active legal challenge in the nation that contains direct, physical evidence of systematic election fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Unlike cases dismissed on procedural grounds, this lawsuit presents irrefutable proof of fraud, including:

• Video and audio recordings of election officials admitting to destroying election records.
• Emails and internal correspondence proving officials conspired to cover up illegal actions.
• Right-to-Know (RTK) and FOIA responses confirming manipulation of election data.
• Sworn affidavits and direct testimony documenting fraudulent vote counting, ballot tampering, and procedural violations.
• This is NOT an election challenge. It is a fraud and tort lawsuit exposing criminal actions by government officials to falsify and conceal election results. Our only request: a jury trial.

---

Key Timeline & Procedural History

Initial Filing & Judicial Obstruction

• October 18, 2021 – Case filed in Delaware County Court of Common Pleas.
• January 4, 2022 – Delaware County Court delayed docketing the case for three months before officially recognizing it.
• July 6, 2022 – Judge Jack Whelan of Delaware County Court of Common Pleas dismissed the case as “moot”, without a hearing or any review, refusing to consider fraud evidence.

Appeal to Commonwealth Court (August 2022 – Present)

• August 5, 2022 – Appeal filed with Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
• August 7, 2022 – December 8, 2024 – Commonwealth Court and PA Attorney General attempted to quash the case and obstruct hearings multiple times for 857 days. Stenstrom and Hoopes successfully fought back, keeping the case alive and securing oral arguments.
• December 9, 2024 – Oral arguments held before Judges Leadbetter, McCullough, and Wolf.
• February 24, 2025 – Judge Wolf issued an opinion dismissing the case as “moot,” claiming the 2020 election had already been decided.
• February 24, 2025 – Judge McCullough filed a scathing dissent, stating the dismissal was improper and the case contained overwhelming fraud evidence.
• February 25, 2025 – Stenstrom and Hoopes immediately filed a Praecipe to Strike Wolf’s Opinion under Pa. R.A.P. 1701(b)(3) due to jurisdictional violations.
• February 26, 2025 – Commonwealth Court Prothonotary improperly closed the docket and rejected the Praecipe, obstructing appeal rights. Stenstrom and Hoopes fought back, forcing the docket to be reopened and filings to be accepted.
• March 11, 2025 – Stenstrom and Hoopes submitted five (5) additional filings to secure the case, including a Motion to Compel Ruling on the Praecipe, but the Commonwealth Court has refused to docket the filings or respond to inquiries.
• March 13, 2025 – Stenstrom and Hoopes filed a Notice of Obstruction and Demand for Sanctions, notifying the court of their intention to file disciplinary complaints to the PA Supreme Court.

Legal Mandate for McCullough’s Action

• As a strict matter of law, dissenting Judge Patricia McCullough MUST vacate and strike Judge Wolf’s unlawful order due to jurisdictional overreach and remand the case to a jury trial—unless she is obstructed from reviewing the filings.

---

Key Issues in the Case

Massive Election Fraud & Cover-Up

• Delaware County officials admitted on video and audio that they:
• Destroyed election records to prevent an audit.
• Tampered with electronic vote data to manipulate outcomes.
• Violated Pennsylvania election laws by failing to secure ballots.
• Emails and internal communications confirm a deliberate plan to conceal these crimes.
• Unlawful Judicial Suppression
• The trial court dismissed the case as “moot” without considering the evidence.
• The Commonwealth Court delayed ruling for over two years despite holding oral arguments.
• The Prothonotary illegally rejected a properly filed Praecipe to obstruct appeal rights.

Procedural & Due Process Violations

• The Commonwealth Court’s delays exceed judicial standards under Pennsylvania law.
• The courts are suppressing fraud evidence instead of adjudicating it.
• Sanctions and intimidation tactics have been used against litigants seeking election transparency.

---

Next Steps

• Await Court’s Response – Commonwealth Court (Judge Patricia McCullough) must rule on Motion to Strike / Vacate and Remand to Trial by March 17, 2025.
• Escalate to En Banc Commonwealth Court review if the ruling is unfavorable.
• Expose Judicial Misconduct – The obstruction of this case must be made public.
• Secure a Jury Trial – The only requested relief is a jury trial, where fraud evidence can be reviewed.

---

Why This Case Matters

The Last Stand for 2020 Election Transparency

• This is the last remaining case nationally with physical evidence of election fraud.
• Every other case has been dismissed on procedural grounds without reviewing evidence.
• If this case is shut down, the truth about 2020 may never be fully exposed.

A Fight for Judicial Integrity

• This case exposes corruption within the judiciary itself:
• Courts are deliberately refusing to adjudicate election fraud cases.
• Procedural delays and obstruction tactics are being used to suppress fraud evidence.
• Sanctions and intimidation tactics have been weaponized against those seeking transparency.

---

How You Can Help

• Share this update – The public needs to know courts are suppressing fraud evidence.
• Support independent legal efforts – We are fighting this battle without institutional backing.
• Contact media and elected officials – Demand fair adjudication and judicial transparency.
•  This case is our last chance to expose the full truth about 2020.  We will not stop until the evidence is reviewed in a jury trial.

---

Consolidated Case Filings for Public Review

• High-resolution (120MB): Download Link
• Low-resolution (50MB): Download Link