Corbett’s Penn State Folly: Suing NCAA Will Not Save Him

July of 2012 was notable for several reasons: the hottest month on record, both parties gearing up for the presidential campaign, and the voluntarily acceptance of harsh NCAA sanctions by the Penn State Board of Trustees, which includes Governor Tom Corbett.
A half -year later, all have evolved predictably: it’s cold, the President won, and Corbett has flip-flopped in an ill-fated attempt to bolster his image in the PSU/Jerry Sandusky scandal. The Tom and Jerry Show — a tragic comedy — just keeps getting better.
*****
In a nakedly obvious political calculation, Corbett has reversed himself on the penalties, and is now suing the NCAA for “overreaching and unlawful sanctions.”
Wow. What a change of heart, since it was only last July when he stated, “part of the corrective process is to accept the serious penalties imposed by the NCAA on Penn State University and its football program.”
The $64,000 question is “Why?” Why the 180-degree change, and why now, instead of when the sanctions were announced? For those answers, let’s play Corbett’s version of Let’s Make A Deal:
Corbett answer behind Door Number One: “I wanted to thoroughly research the issue to make sure we were on solid legal footing.”  Uh, sorry, but no prize.  For months leading up to the announcement, even the most remote Eskimos knew severe sanctions were a certainty. The NCAA bylaws aren’t all that complicated, so Corbett (himself a former U.S. Attorney and twice the state’s Attorney General), his General Counsel, his attorney Chief of Staff, and an army of other Administration lawyers could have easily determined — way ahead of time — if A. the NCAA could legally impose sanctions; B. if so, what sanctions should be off the table; and C. if the Administration had legal footing to sue the NCAA should it impose them anyway.  And as a Trustee, Corbett clearly would have been party to discussions with the NCAA about the forthcoming sanctions.
Corbett’s Door Number Two: He waited so that the football team could avoid another distraction.  Wrong again! Football season doesn’t start in July, and the football team was already dealing with Sandusky fallout.  Ironically, a Corbett lawsuit in July would have had the opposite effect— becoming a rallying cry for the team that someone was standing up for them.
Door Three: “I didn’t want to make the same mistake the NCAA made by carelessly rushing in.” Well, that one fits, since Corbett, as the Attorney General investigating Sandusky, made absolutely no rush to get a serial predator off the street, taking a staggering three years to make an arrest, conveniently after his gubernatorial election. True “carelessness” was Corbett assigning two narcotics agents to investigate Sandusky, while scores of agents (including child predator units) pursued a headline-generating political corruption case in which no children were at risk.
Door Four:  “After months of research and deliberation, as well as discussions with alumni, students, faculty, business owners and elected officials, (Corbett) concluded that the NCAA’s sanctions were overreaching and unlawful.” So is the suit because the NCAA is violating its bylaws, or because souvenir shops aren’t selling as many Nittany Lion magnets? And, despite the vast legal knowledge of those constituencies, since when do they factor into whether a lawsuit should be filed?
Taxpayers should understand that the substantial cost of this lawsuit will be footed by them, since neither Administration lawyers nor the Attorney General will handle it. Instead, that prize goes to top-of-the-line law firm Cozen O’Connor.  Cozen (and its attorneys and family members) contributed almost $100,000 to the Governor’s campaigns, and is the former firm of Corbett’s new General Counsel.
*****
Now let’s get serious and look at the real reasons behind Corbett’s newfound love of Penn State. While he is now busy acting like its savior, let us not forget his grandstanding, doing his best impression of a Roman Emperor wanting to raze Penn State and sow its fields with salt, just like Carthage.
Has Corbett finally realized he is about to become the first governor to lose a second term? He is already one of the nation’s least popular governors, and, with the exception of demagoguing on Penn State (when convenient), is spotted in public less than Bigfoot. Now, he is at the point in politics where they separate the men from the boys, and he is frantically reaching for something with wide appeal.
Suing the NCAA won’t help Corbett, even if his lawsuit is successful, as Pennsylvanians see right through his ploy.  Many view him as part of the process which went overboard in destroying Penn State’s reputation and giving Joe Paterno a premature death. And even more think he deliberately understaffed the Sandusky investigation — leaving children to potentially suffer at Sandusky’s hands — so that he wouldn’t alienate Penn State alumni while running for governor. Corbett’s blatant pandering has only furthered the resolve of so many to end his tenure with a resounding sack.
And maybe Corbett is trying to distract incoming Attorney General Kathleen Kane, the first Democrat ever to hold that office, who not coincidentally wasn’t consulted about the Governor’s lawsuit.  Kane, it is worth noting, just won more votes than anyone in Pennsylvania history (including the President), a feat directly attributable to one issue: cleaning up Harrisburg, starting with an investigation into how Corbett handled the Sandusky investigation.
Put another way, would Tom Corbett have filed this lawsuit had his hand-picked candidate for Attorney General beaten Kane?
But we do have the lawsuit, and with it, two more major Corbett inconsistencies: 1. “conservatives” like the governor always rail against activist judges — until, like now, they need one.  And 2. Corbett stated that, if successful, he will urge the Board to use the $60 million to help groups working against abuse. While a nice thought, is that not completely undermining his argument that the fines are creating an unacceptable burden on so many in the PSU community? Is there anyone in the Governor’s office who has really thought this lawsuit through?
Truth is, this woefully miscalculated effort will accomplish only one thing: a major backfire.
*****
For the record, this author stated his opposition to the sanctions when they were first imposed. A courageous Board of Trustees would have fought the NCAA as former UNLV basketball coach Jerry Tarkanian did — who eventually won a multimillion settlement. But they, including Corbett, chose not to pursue action, voluntarily accepting the punishment from an organization to which Penn State voluntarily belongs.  One can debate the prudence of the Board’s decision, but the University’s message is clear: it wants to put the Sandusky matter behind it as quickly as possible, which is why it is not party to the lawsuit.
Corbett had his chance, but for whatever the reason — indecisiveness, incompetence, political motivations — he failed to act, and that ship has long sailed.
But the Tom and Jerry Show is far from over. The Governor is on a collision course with voters (especially his own Republicans) who demand answers about Sandusky — answers that Corbett refuses to give. These are questions that go to the very core of Tom Corbett’s true character. And they are questions that may well lead him to the dustbin of political history — or, depending on what Kane finds, worse.
How will this show end? Attorney General-elect Kane, the floor is yours.

 

Jounalism Lives At Least Somewhere In Philly

Days before the election, Barack Obama flew to New Jersey to not let the crisis of Sandy go to waste and a photo of him comforting Donna Vanzant was widely circulated.

Ms. Vanzant is the owner of North Point Marina in Brigantine which was practically wiped out.

Well, here it is in January and Victor Fiorillo of The Philly Post contacted her for an update.

Ms. Vanzant notes that her insurance company is dragging its feet, FEMA is no where to be found and the President responded to her plea for help with a form letter thanking her for supporting the troops.

“When you get a hug from the President of the United States, you feel like there’s something there. A promise was made,” she said.

A big thank you to the emotion-driven, low-information voters who returned this incompetent phony to the White House.

2012 Bad Laws Listed By Liberty Index

2012 Bad Laws Listed By Liberty Index — Here are some laws passed in Pennsylvania that have a major and adverse affect on liberty as determined by Bob Guzzardi of LibertyIndex.Com

Act 13 of 2012 (HB 1950 signed into law Feb. 14) The Marcellus Shale Impact Tax/Fee
                                                                    
The Liberty Index scores Act 13 of 2012 a Tier 3 (Major Impact on Liberty)–  which means that it is against liberty and against the forgotten taxpayer –because the misnamed “Impact Fee” is, in reality, a tax. A real Impact Fee would be segregated in a fund to compensate people for damage from “externalities” of Marcellus Shale drilling. This phony fee does not do that but redistributes profits without regard to merit.  
 
One would think that if natural gas were discovered in your backyard, you would be thrilled. Instead we tax it. It’s Pennsylvania’s number one job creator. And we tax it more.  Lower energy costs mean a higher standard of living, more production of more goods and services for more people. And we tax it more.

Laura Olson Post-Gazette Harrisburg Bureau gives a good overview of the impact of the not-so-good law.

The money generated is not based on any real world damage or impact but on a formula unrelated to impact.

The Marcellus Shale Impact “Fee” is redistributed by the number of wells, yet  Philadelphia County and Bucks County, both of which have moratoriums (Act 87 of 2012 for Bucks County) get millions despite hostility to Marcellus Shale drilling:

 
State Rep. Kate Harper (R-Montgomery) says Pennsylvania’s five southeastern counties will receive more than $3.4 million in revenue from the collection of an impact fee on natural gas drilling activities in the Marcellus Shale.The funding awarded directly to the counties is just a small portion of the nearly $200 million in impact fees collected so far this year. Additional revenue is dedicated to municipalities where drilling is taking place; to state agencies for the regulation of drilling activities and administration of the impact fee law; and to environmental initiatives, such as the Environmental Stewardship Fund, Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund and county conservation districts. 

Here’s the county breakdown Rep. Harper provides:

Bucks: $530,461.69

Chester: $423,255.23

Delaware: $474,238.17

Montgomery: $678,613.66

Philadelphia: $1,294,664.55

     
Act 16 of 2012 (SB 1237 signed into law Feb 14) –Keystone Opportunity Zone for Shell Cracker Facility

The Liberty Index scores Act 16 of 2012 a Tier 3  because it is gives a special tax subsidy to one specific business. This is, in effect, a tax cut for one business not available to other productive businesses.
 
Act 16 adds a new Keystone Opportunity Zones (KOZ), tax free areas designed to promote economic development.

Elizabeth Stelle of Commonwealth Foundation wrote on March 19, 2012  “Astute readers may remember that last month Pennsylvania earned the dubious distinction of the highest taxes for mature businesses and the second highest taxes for new businesses.

So how did Pennsylvania just beat out Ohio and West Virginia for the Shell Oil Co. cracker plant that is estimated to create more than 10,000 construction and 10,000 permanent jobs?

The Post Gazette has the answer, “Gov. Tom Corbett and his closest advisers spent months wooing the company.” In other words, “corporate welfare. “ Pennsylvania’s corporate taxes are so awful that the Corbett administration had to wine and dine company officials and hand over special tax exemptions and subsidies to seal the deal.”

The concept of Keystone Opportunity Zones is that lower taxes promote productive growth. KOZs are problematic in that it is difficult to measure whether the intended purpose has been achieved by targeted tax subsidy and if tax cut promotes jobs and an increased standard of living, why not tax cuts for all and let a decentralized, diversified and independent individual human actors in the Free Market make the decisions rather than a few statist elitist technocratic central planners?

ACT 85 of 2012 (HB 761 signed into law on July 2) which amends the Tax Reform Code of 1971 contains both EITC and the Shell Cracker Tax Credit and Subsidy.

The Liberty Index scores Act 85 a Tier 3  because this omnibus bill falls far short of what is needed to grow Pennsylvania’s productive economy. Like Act 25 of 2011 which gave the appearance of being taxpayer friendly, Act 85 of 2012 misdirects and does little to effect hoped for results. For example, although Act 85 doubles the Education Improvement Tax Credit to $150 million this is an infinitesimal percentage of the more than $26 billionspent by the unionized, government K-12 system. Omnibus Bills are a Mixed Bag – Three Card Monte – good mixed with bag to swindle The Forgotten Taxpayer.

Act 87 of 2012 (SB 1263 signed into law July 2) Fiscal Code –Marcellus Shale drilling moratorium Bucks County and Harrisburg Bond Bailout 

The Liberty Index scores Act 87 Tier 3  because of several special, target provisions that impact commerce despite statements that there is no fiscal impact. Omnibus Bills are difficult to score because of their complexity and because seemingly minor and innocuous provisions are hidden, stealth special and targeted legislation to benefit a particular narrow interest.

Act 87 also seems to violate the Pennsylvania Constitution’s Single Subject Rule which says No bill shall be passed containing more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title, except a general appropriation bill or a bill codifying or compiling the law or a part thereof.

The bill bans natural gas drilling in Bucks County. There is a great natural gas potential in a strata of rock stretching from Nockamixon State Park in Bucks County to Gettysburg called the South Newark Basin. In the waning late-night hours of this year’s passage of the state budget, Pennsylvania Republicans inserted an addition to the state’s fiscal code placing a moratorium on natural gas drilling there.
 
For at least three years, the phrase “drilling moratorium” has been political profanity among Republicans who control both chambers of the Legislature and the Governor’s Residence

The only thing more shocking than a
Republican-sponsored drilling moratorium was where it was located: suburban Philadelphia, far outside the gas-rich Marcellus Shale.

The bill also prevented the City of Harrisburg, from filing for bankruptcy from July 1, 2012, to Nov. 30, 2012.

2012 Bad Laws Listed
2012 Bad Laws Listed

Cryptowit

By William W. Lawrence Sr

Qeb axkdbop lc x zlkzbkqoxqflk lc xii mltbo fk qeb dbkboxi dlsbokjbkq lc x zlkcbaboxzv pl sxpq xp lrop xob qll lysflrp ql yb afpobdxoaba.

Coxkhifk Mfbozb


Answer to yesterday’s puzzle: People think I have an interesting walk. Hell, I’m just trying to hold my gut in.
Robert Mitchum

Journalist Criticizes Journalist

In November, child actor Angus Jones—one of the stars of the hit sitcom Two and a Half men—publicly criticized the show that has made him a multi-millionaire. In effect, he condemned the vulgar tone of the program.

Anyone who has seen this program knows that the kid is only confirming what they already have seen and heard themselves. The plots are about sex, the characters are sex-driven, and the dialogue is not so much sexual innuendo as it is crude and openly sexual remarks that one could hear in any junior high school yard. Yes, 13-year-olds laugh like hell at this stuff.

But the success of this long-running sitcom is testament to the depths to which our culture now stoops when looking for 22 minutes-worth of mindless entertainment. I confess that I watched this program the first two years of its existence, but soon grew tired of the ever-increasing focus on the bedroom and the bathroom—the two rooms about which Two and a Half Men seems to be concerned.

In a December 1, 2012 column in the Philadelphia Inquirer, their television columnist found fault with Angus Jones, saying that he sabotaged his career by this “bizarre” rambling of his. Of course the columnist also noted that the 19-year old is “newly evangelized.”

Well, well…I think we’re finally getting to the meat of the criticism. How critical would the television critic have been if Jones say, spoke out against the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms, or passed negative judgment on the pro-life movement, or defended atheism as sober way of life? Personally, I think Jones would have been painted as a hero for speaking his young mind.

But the moment you announce that Christianity is the impetus behind your stand, you’ve committed one of the news media’s seven deadly sins: Thou shalt not try to profess your belief in God—at least not if you make your living in the entertainment industry. Morals be damned.

The columnist even went so far as to say that if the young actor was truly appalled at the bawdy nature of the show, shouldn’t he give away his hefty salary to the more needy, since this would be the truly Christian thing to do?

Just as the columnist gives his salary to the needy, I suppose.

(Read more at Good Writers Block)

Journalist Criticizes Journalist

 Journalist Criticizes Journalist

Pa GOP’s State Capitalism: The Shell Subsidy

By Bob Guzzardi

Efficient and economical energy production lowers the cost and raises the standard of living for all.

Free market pricing, where misallocations are penalized, is the most efficient system to develop energy. Government is not a venture capitalist.

What the government giveth, the government taketh away. With Act 13 of 2012, the Republican General Assembly and Governor imposed at tax, obscuring it with the rhetorically inaccurate description “Impact Fee” which distributes tax revenues to all counties including counties, like Philadelphia and Bucks which have banned Marcellus Shale drilling (see Act 87 of 2012 below)  and on the very same day, Feb. 14, 2012, the same Republican General Assembly and governor gave billion dollar private business Shell Oil a huge tax break by targeting a tax free “Keystone” zone for a Shell Cracker plant. 

Again, with Act 85 of 2012 and on the same day, July 2, 2012, Republican Leadership again “privileges”, as the Leftists say, Shell Oil with billions in tax subsidies.

Link

New World Disorder

A group called Team Black Sheep posted this video of a homemade drone buzzing a helpless French police car in Paris. One does not need the imagination of Stephen King to be a tad concerned about how our ever-advancing technology is going to affect the future.

Maybe the Occupy Wall Streeters and “anonymous” hackers in their Guy Fawkes masks have the right idea. Fawkes, after all, had the goal of returning Catholicism to England.

There can be only one permanent revolution — a moral one; the regeneration of the inner man.
–Leo Tolstoy

Cryptowit

By William W. Lawrence Sr


Kzjkgz ocdif D cvqz vi diozmznodib rvgf. Czgg, D’h epno omtdib oj cjgy ht bpo di.

Mjwzmo Hdoxcph

Answer to yesterday’s puzzle: In Science, it is when we take some interest in the great discoverers and their lives that it becomes endurable, and only when we begin to trace the development of ideas that it becomes fascinating.
James Clerk Maxwell

China Projected To Pass Japan In Ad Spending

China is expected to pass Japan in 2014 to become the world’s second largest ad market behind the United States, according to eMarketer.com.

Asia-Pacific now has the second-largest advertising economy worldwide after North America.

The Milk Cliff And Other Scares

By Bob Guzzardi

The “Milk Cliff” scares us as milk prices, supposedly, will skyrocket unless Farm Subsidies for privileged few producers are imposed . Farm Subsidies are, essentially, Republican ‘earmarks’ for their constituents.

James Bovard, in WSJ, lays out the problem. This is legislative dereliction of duty to the Forgotten Taxpayer, and the forgotten consumer, who is hammered with farm price subsidies. Will Republican Leadership sell us out again? Odds makers are giving odds they will. What do you think?

All tax cuts are not created equal; some are more equal than others in Obama’s State Capitalist word. To be accurate, though, it is a bipartisan Big Government State Capitalist Weltanschauung that infects the lawmakers in Washington and Harrisburg.

Billionaires benefit General Electric, inheritor of Enron’s wind energy program, German based Siemans, and, of course, Warren Buffet and his band of billionaire Big Government Socialists distributing wealth to themselves.

Wind subsidies, and other ‘renewable energy’ subsides,  a bipartisan assault on The Forgotten Taxpayer, lobbyists swarm to save privileged tax cuts for billion dollar businesses while the rest of us taxpayers are Forgotten as the bipartisan Fiscal Cliff and Obamacare, an avalanche of new taxes, crushes the rank and file taxpayers, who is us.

Bipartisan, another word for Big Government Tax Increase.

Tim Carney of the Washington Examiners eloquently informs us here.