Obamacare Ends Volunteer Services

Obamacare ends volunteer services, basically, if the IRS rules that they are businesses with more than 50 employees as many expect them to do. Obamacare Ends Volunteer Services

It’s something that those who fought so hard to save the Springfield (Pa) Ambulance Corps should realize.

The fights not over though. A bill has been introduce in Congress — The Protect Volunteer Firefighters and Emergency Responders Act (H.R. 3685) — that would exempt volunteer services from the requirement. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa) is leading the charge in the Senate. The Pennsylvania House unanimously passed a resolution (HR 584) sponsored by Gordon Denlinger (R-99) endorsing the federal action.

Still, why should we have to walk on pins and needles to fight to keep our standard of living from giving way to hopeless change? Didn’t anybody read Obamacare before they passed it? Oh yeah, sorry.

State Rep Jim Cox (R-129) note that 71 percent of fire departments in the nation are staffed by volunteers.

“In Pennsylvania, that number jumps to 97 percent,” he says.

Obamacare Ends Volunteer Services

Omnibit Of The Day 12-21-13

December 21 Omnibit Trivia by William W. Lawrence Sr.

Hard working scientists have proven that the mating call of the Mediterranean fruit fly has exactly the same frequency as lower F3 on your harmonica. Play masestro play!

 

Jetsli.de

Website owners and bloggers have been getting a huge uptick in traffic from a crawler at  Jetsli.de,  a rather mysterious German site.

Jetsli.de  is a blank page loaded with hidden script that link to  www.parkingcrew.net/t.

Parkingcrew.net is an almost blank page loaded with hidden script that link to n.otavirus.net/ a page that merely contains the words An asset is a resource controlled by the entity as a result of
past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow
to the entity.

Parkingcrew.net was registered on Jan. 24, 2011 and is based in Germany. It is a nameserver for 292,894 domains which appear to be dedicated to spam of various sort.

Visit BillLawrenceDittos.com for Jetsli.de

 

Visit BillLawrenceTrivia.com for Omnibits

 

PennDOT Winter Driving Tips

One of the most common causes of accidents in the winter is driving too fast for conditions. Just because the speed limit sign says 65 does not mean it’s always appropriate to drive at that speed, says State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129).

Cox says PennDOT as recommendations for winter travel. They include:

  • Checking all fluid levels and installing winter wiper blades.
  • Checking   the heating system, lights and tires.
  • Have a winter emergency kit in the vehicle in case of an accident or being stranded during a winter storm. The kit should include, among other items, extra warm clothing and gloves, a flashlight and batteries, jumper cables, cell phone and charger, ice scraper and bottled water.

More information is available on the PennDOT Just Drive PA website.

PennDOT Winter Driving Tips

Omnibit Of The Day 12-19-13

December 19 2013 Omnibit Trivia by William W. Lawrence Sr.

The American Medical Assoiciation tells us that the common cold carries an annual $1.5 billion (in 1987) in lost wages and medical costs. The 30 million days lost of work or school are figured into the heavy price of 100 million yearly colds.

 

Eric Snowden Open Letter

Eric Snowden Open LetterHere is an open letter to the people of Brazil from whistleblower Eric Snowden published, Dec. 17, 2013 on the website of Folha de Sao Paulo.

Six months ago, I stepped out from the shadows of the United States Government’s National Security Agency to stand in front of a journalist’s camera.

I shared with the world evidence proving some governments are building a world-wide surveillance system to secretly track how we live, who we talk to, and what we say.

I went in front of that camera with open eyes, knowing that the decision would cost me family and my home, and would risk my life. I was motivated by a belief that the citizens of the world deserve to understand the system in which they live.

My greatest fear was that no one would listen to my warning. Never have I been so glad to have been so wrong. The reaction in certain countries has been particularly inspiring to me, and Brazil is certainly one of those.

At the NSA, I witnessed with growing alarm the surveillance of whole populations without any suspicion of wrongdoing, and it threatens to become the greatest human rights challenge of our time.

The NSA and other spying agencies tell us that for our own “safety” –for Dilma’s “safety,” for Petrobras’ “safety”– they have revoked our right to privacy and broken into our lives. And they did it without asking the public in any country, even their own.

Today, if you carry a cell phone in Sao Paolo, the NSA can and does keep track of your location: they do this 5 billion times a day to people around the world.

When someone in Florianopolis visits a website, the NSA keeps a record of when it happened and what you did there. If a mother in Porto Alegre calls her son to wish him luck on his university exam, NSA can keep that call log for five years or more.

They even keep track of who is having an affair or looking at pornography, in case they need to damage their target’s reputation.

American Senators tell us that Brazil should not worry, because this is not “surveillance,” it’s “data collection.” They say it is done to keep you safe. They’re wrong.

There is a huge difference between legal programs, legitimate spying, legitimate law enforcement –where individuals are targeted based on a reasonable, individualized suspicion – and these programs of dragnet mass surveillance that put entire populations under an all-seeing eye and save copies forever.

These programs were never about terrorism: they’re about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They’re about power.

Many Brazilian senators agree, and have asked for my assistance with their investigations of suspected crimes against Brazilian citizens.

I have expressed my willingness to assist wherever appropriate and lawful, but unfortunately the United States government has worked very hard to limit my ability to do so –going so far as to force down the Presidential Plane of Evo Morales to prevent me from traveling to Latin America!

Until a country grants permanent political asylum, the US government will continue to interfere with my ability to speak.

Six months ago, I revealed that the NSA wanted to listen to the whole world. Now, the whole world is listening back, and speaking out, too. And the NSA doesn’t like what it’s hearing.

The culture of indiscriminate worldwide surveillance, exposed to public debates and real investigations on every continent, is collapsing.

Only three weeks ago, Brazil led the United Nations Human Rights Committee to recognize for the first time in history that privacy does not stop where the digital network starts, and that the mass surveillance of innocents is a violation of human rights.

The tide has turned, and we can finally see a future where we can enjoy security without sacrificing our privacy. Our rights cannot be limited by a secret organization, and American officials should never decide the freedoms of Brazilian citizens.

Even the defenders of mass surveillance, those who may not be persuaded that our surveillance technologies have dangerously outpaced democratic controls, now agree that in democracies, surveillance of the public must be debated by the public.

My act of conscience began with a statement: “I don’t want to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is recorded.

That’s not something I’m willing to support, it’s not something I’m willing to build, and it’s not something I’m willing to live under.”

Days later, I was told my government had made me stateless and wanted to imprison me. The price for my speech was my passport, but I would pay it again: I will not be the one to ignore criminality for the sake of political comfort. I would rather be without a state than without a voice.

If Brazil hears only one thing from me, let it be this: when all of us band together against injustices and in defense of privacy and basic human rights, we can defend ourselves from even the most powerful systems.

Eric Snowden Open Letter

Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

By Chris Freind Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

The Christmas Season is finally here, that festive time of eggnog and good cheer, where “it’s better to give than to receive.”

OK. Scratch that last one, for at least two big constituencies would strongly disagree.

1. Children, since there’s nothing better than ripping open presents after interminably waiting for Santa.

2. Every country on Earth, all salivating at receiving the mother lode of U.S. government intelligence operations, courtesy of Mr. “Secret” Santa himself, former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

At first, Snowden’s actions — exposing the NSA’s massive domestic spying operations — merited him a big Christmas gift, but as the extent of his security breeches become known, he deserves nothing but coal and a jail cell.

The scope of Snowden’s actions, and ultimately who received what information, may never be known, but it is clearly the largest exposure of intelligence secrets in history. Like most stories that garner huge attention, however, many of the major points are being overlooked in favor of juicier, albeit less important, angles. Worst of all, actions are now being contemplated that should not even be on the table, from amnesty for Snowden to severely curtailing U.S. intelligence capabilities.

Let’s review the situation:

1. The NSA is wrong to spy on Americans without probable cause. Period. It is unacceptable that the agency hacked into (or outright demanded) the private data of phone carriers, Internet providers and search engine companies for domestic intelligence-gathering activities. If government agencies need information related to an individual being investigated, they should use the proper — aka legal — channels to conduct their operations. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court (FISA) was established in 1978 for just that purpose.

Trolling through millions of records of law-abiding citizens, just because the agency has the capability, should unequivocally be a violation of the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable search-and-seizure provision. And it’s unnecessary, as FISA courts are highly effective: In 33 years, only 11 of 34,000 FISA warrants were rejected.

Ironically, there’s significant doubt that the NSA’s domestic spying efforts are even productive. Just this week, a federal judge, in stating that the NSA’s actions were likely unlawful, concluded that the government didn’t cite a single instance in which the program “actually stopped an imminent terrorist attack,” according to the Associated Press.

When our government becomes as intrusive as those we fight, it’s time for major changes. So let’s recap — no more unregulated domestic spying.

2. For everyone and everything else, it’s fair game. There should be no restrictions — none — on intelligence-gathering operations conducted outside the United States. And that includes even our staunchest allies.

It is dangerously naïve to believe that our friends will always do the right thing. Self-interest and greed are powerful motivators, and can quickly erode the integrity and common sense of otherwise reasonable people.

Because national security and the lives of millions hang in the balance, the NSA must always adhere to a “trust but verify” approach, achieved through 24/365 surveillance and eavesdropping operations, not just on the bad guys, but everyone.

If it didn’t engage in such operations, we might never have known about the individuals, companies, and yes, friendly governments, that have jeopardized global security by deliberately violating treaties and laws. A good example is those who have secretly helped build Iran’s nuclear program.

And just last week, numerous entities, from Ukraine to the Philippines, were nailed by the U.S. for violating sanctions placed on Iran. That type of information doesn’t come out of thin air, but from aggressive, hard-nosed spying, both human and electronic. Any changes in how we collect and share intelligence as a way to mitigate international fallout from the Snowden leaks would be disastrous and should be resisted at all costs.

3. Hey allies — stop whining! So you got spied upon. So what? Deal with it, but at least be honest. You spy on America, or at least attempt to, on a regular basis. You’re just not very good at it.

Don’t get your underwear in a twist because we’re so much better at it than you. Of course, our status as world leader also makes us your protector, not because we have to, but because it’s the right thing to do. Much the same way that America saved you — and all of humanity — by winning two world wars.

Since no one ever looks to China to save the day when things get dicey, how about this? If any country steps up and fully takes over America’s place on the world stage — militarily, economically, politically — entirely on its own, we’ll stop spying on you.

What’s that? No takers? Well then, maybe you should stop pouting over the NSA listening to your phone calls and eavesdropping on the unfathomably exciting G8 Summit conversations.

The lesson? “Mr. Ed” (Snowden) notwithstanding, don’t kick a gift horse in the mouth.

How Edward Snowden, (a contractor, not even an NSA employee), was permitted access to so many classified documents is something that needs thorough investigation, as well as why his computers were configured to hide his movements.

That aside, had he exposed the domestic spying operations only, one could make the case that his actions were rooted in patriotism and liberty. But he didn’t.

Instead, he has put the security of the world in serious jeopardy, and without question needs to be held accountable and brought to justice.

And that would be the best present of all.

Let NSA Spy Sans Limits Overseas

New Special Ed Funding Formula Recommended

The Special Education Funding Commission, created by Act 3 of 2013, released its findings after a series of seven public hearings held this summer and fall, says State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129). New Special Ed Funding Formula Recommended

The commission recommends a new funding formula for special education based on three levels of student needs. The formula would be based on factors including small and rural school districts, income/market value and equalized millage rate. Nearly 270,000 children – one out of every seven students – receive special education services in the state’s public schools. Current state funding for special education is slightly less than $1 billion per year, and the “census formula” currently in use pays districts on calculations based on 15 percent of students having mild disabilities and 1 percent having severe disabilities. Since 2008-09, Pennsylvania has not increased special education funding, which effectively ended the use of the formula.

In a similar effort to address basic education funding inequities, the House Education Committee this week approved a bill to create a Basic Education Funding Commission. The proposed group, made up of representatives from the Department of Education, Office of the Budget and the four legislative caucuses, would be tasked with conducting hearings and reviewing the current funding formula and working to create a new model to address current challenges. The commission’s basic education funding recommendation would determine only the distribution of any increase in funding.

 

New Special Ed Funding Formula Recommended