House Slipped Vote Fraud Preventions Slipped Into Lame Senate Amendment In Pennsylvania— The Pennsylvania Senate passed, April 27, SB 106 which was to be an amendment to the state Constitution that would merely end separate elections for candidates for governor and lieutenant governor and have them run on a single ballot. It would be an unnecessary and insignificant change as to how we are governed but the inside-baseball types thought it neat.
Anyway, on Dec. 15, just before the session ended, the State House overwhelmingly approved it but with additions. These included:
— A 21-day limit on emergency declarations by the governor.
— A requirement to present “valid identification prior to voting, regardless of voting method”
— The auditing of elections, including the administration of elections, certification of election machines, the accuracy of the list of registered voters, the administration of voter registration and election results.
The bill is now back in the Senate where it sits.
Constitutional amendments in Pennsylvania require approval of the same wording in consecutive sessions of the legislature, and then approval by the voters via a ballot question.
Don’t expect them to happen anytime soon, but this shows that while there may be corrupt deep staters in the Republican Party, there are good guys too.
House Slipped Vote Fraud Preventions In Lame Senate Amendment In Pennsylvania
Voter ID Downside II — Probably more than 99 percent of our readers are strong proponents of photo voter ID and we recently carried a column by Bob Small that swims against that tide.
We are certainly not against a requirement to show a photo before voting, but we have become far less fanatical about it.
If the precinct workers are honest the rule is not needed and if the precinct workers are otherwise the rule is not going to matter.
The concern we have is that Pennsylvania patriots are ignoring far more crucial matters regarding election integrity with their zeal for photo identification, namely state-wide certification of poll watchers and transparent election machinery and software.
Long-standing Pennsylvania law restricts poll watchers to the county in which they reside. What is wrong with state-wide certification for them? Why shouldn’t an appropriately certified Philadelphia Democrat be allowed to make sure things are copacetic in the voting in Franklin County? And vice-versa, of course. Only a racist can oppose such a thing.
Regarding transparent election machinery, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania — which appears to be better described as the Supreme Court of Soros– has blocked an audit of Fulton County voting machines.
The State Legislature wanted it. Fulton County wanted it. Commonwealth Court was OK with it. Why block it?
Well, the Democrat Party opposed it as did Dominion Voting Systems, the supplier of the machinery.
But why would they oppose it? All an audit would show was that the system was honest and the results were fair, right? RIGHT?
It shouldn’t need to be said but voting transparency should always take precedence over the secrets of corporations.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is a white supremacist, and likely a homophobic misogynist who hates Mexicans.
Which gets us to a rather interesting thing going on in Pennsylvania legislature and might be the buried lead.
Anyway, in December, just before the session ended the State House added to the bill:
— A 21-day limit on emergency declarations by the governor.
— A requirement to present “valid identification prior to voting, regardless of voting method”
— The auditing of elections, including the administration of elections, certification of election machines, the accuracy of the list of registered voters, the administration of voter registration and election results.
The bill is now back in the Senate where it sits. The amendments require approval of the same wording in consecutive sessions of the legislature, and then approval by the voters via a ballot question.
Don’t expect them to happen anytime soon, but this does show that while there may be corrupt deep staters in the Republican Party, there are good guys too.
Delco Election Fraud Case Number — The lawsuit by Ruth Moton, Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes alleging substantial and significant election law violations in Delaware County, Pa. during the 2020 election now has a case number, CV-2022-000032 and title, Moton et al v. Boockvar, Kathy et al.
The filing date was Jan. 6.
The defendants include former Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, Delaware County, the Delaware County Board Elections, the Delaware County Bureau of Elections and numerous officials, including Chief Custodian and Voting Machine Warehouse Supervisor James Savage.
Defendants intentionally and fraudulently conspired to destroy, delete, secrete, and hide November 3, 2020, election data, materials, and equipment to prevent discovery of election fraud and election law violations in Delaware County, which the Defendants also conspired to commit and did commit while carrying out the November 3, 2020, election. In furtherance of this conspiracy, Defendants intentionally created chaos surrounding the November 3, 2020, election so that they would be able to then carry out the acts of election fraud and the election law violations described herein undetected.
Defendants did this, in part, by placing incompetent or underqualified individuals with no training in positions of responsibility so that they would be able to hide their fraud under the pretense of the incompetence of election day workers/volunteers in the event the election fraud and election law violations were discovered.
Moreover, when a May 21, 2021 Right to Know (RTK) request for election information and data was made with respect to information that is by federal and state law to be kept and preserved, the Defendants fraudulently and intentionally deleted, changed, adulterated, manipulated and/or obscured the information, data, and materials produced in response to the RTK request in order to hide their fraud and election code violations because they knew that they could not reconcile the previously fraudulently reported November 3, 2020 election results with the actual responsive information that they had in their possession and which they were required to preserve and produce in response to the Right to Know request.
Plaintiffs know this to be the case and can document this and demonstrate this by showing, among other things, that November 3, 2020 election, data materials, and equipment was destroyed including but not limited to V-Drives, Return Sheets, machine tapes/proof sheets/result tapes, Mail-In Ballots, Ballots Destroyed, voting machines, hard drives, paper documentation, Blue Crest data, correspondence concerning the November 3, 2020 election.
Further the suit notes that Delaware County was the last count to submit its presidential vote total in Pennsylvania “potentially changing November 3, 2020 election results in numerous races”.
The suit says that before Delco’s submission, Donald Trump was leading Joseph Biden by 7,515 votes, and that Delco’s tally showed a difference of 88,070 votes between the candidates favoring Biden.
DelcoRepublicans Silent On Election Lawsuit — It’s Nov. 23, five days after numerous Delaware County agencies and individuals were sued over election misconduct relating to the 2020 General Election.
Nary a peep has been heard from the traditional media, which we expected as the traditional media has long since stopped being the means of informing the public, and is now merely a puppet for protecting the powerful.
What we did hope, granted a scant hope, was that the Republican leadership would start making some noise.
So much for that. Their silence is loud.
You would think they could find it in themselves to bring this up:
123. On and after November 3, 2020, the Delaware County Return Board was missing necessary November 3, 2020, election data, materials, results, and equipment which was needed to reconcile all Delaware County precincts and certify the November 3, 2020, election. [Exhibit J].
Or this:
124. On or about November 3, 2020, the Delaware County Return Board (and individual members including various Defendants) discovered numerous election law violations, and/or incidents of election fraud, and referred numerous precincts to the District Attorney for investigation. [Exhibit K].
Or this:
162. Specifically, James Allen conspired with James Savage to “get rid” of the “pads and second scanners” from the November 3, 2020, election. [Exhibit GG]. 163. James Savage encouraged a private conversation to continue the conversation of the removal of the pads and scanners due to other Delaware County employees and Regina Miller who were present and witnessed James Savage state that he was aware that the plan of destruction of November 3, 2020, election “was a felony.” [Exhibit GG].
Or especially this:
177. The Delaware County Right to Know Response Revealed that there were 125 out of 428 missing tally tapes scanner 1; 138 out of 428 precincts had 2 scanners and out of 138, 42 were missing tally tapes; out of the 428 precincts, 137 are missing ballot count tapes for scanner 1; out of 138 precincts with two scanners, 49 are missing ballot count tapes for scanner 2; 108 out of 428 precincts are missing write-in report tapes for scanner 1; 44 out of 138 that had two scanners are missing write-in reports for scanner 2; 255 out of 428 are missing open poll tapes for scanner 1; there are 92 out of 138 precincts missing open poll tapes for scanner 2; there are 233 out of 138 precincts missing open poll tapes for scanner 2; there are 233 out of 428 precincts missing zero report tapes for scanner 1; there are 89 out of 138 missing “zero” report tapes, which means that the machines may not have been zeroed out from a previous election; there are 41 out of 428 precincts that are not reconciled; 82 out of 428 precincts that submitted return sheets with no provisional ballot numbers; there are 73 out of 428 precincts that submitted return sheets with no spoiledballot count; there are 53 out of 428 precincts that submitted return sheets with no spoiled ballot count; there are 53 precincts out of 428 that had unused ballot return counts and had a discrepancy of plus or minus 20. [Exhibit N].
Do the Republicans ever want to win in this county again? Do the citizens want to allow San Francisco-style looting to come here?
Delco Election Suit Bombshell — Suit Filed By Greg Stenstrom, Leah Hoopes, Ruth Moton Against Delaware County, Numerous Officials
Delco Election Suit Bombshell — A lawsuit by Gregory Stenstrom, Leah Hoopes and Ruth Moton was filed yesterday, Nov. 18, in Delaware County Common Pleas Court against Delaware County, Pa., former Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, the Delaware County Board Elections, the Delaware County Bureau of Elections and numerous officials, including Chief Custodian and Voting Machine Warehouse Supervisor James Savage.
Stenstrom and Ms. Hoopes were Delaware County Board of Elections certified poll watchers and observers at the counting center. Ms. Moton, was a 2020 candidate for the 159 District in the State House.
The suit claims that:
Defendants intentionally and fraudulently conspired to destroy, delete, secrete, and hide November 3, 2020, election data, materials, and equipment to prevent discovery of election fraud and election law violations in Delaware County, which the Defendants also conspired to commit and did commit while carrying out the November 3, 2020, election. In furtherance of this conspiracy, Defendants intentionally created chaos surrounding the November 3, 2020, election so that they would be able to then carry out the acts of election fraud and the election law violations described herein undetected.
Defendants did this, in part, by placing incompetent or underqualified individuals with no training in positions of responsibility so that they would be able to hide their fraud under the pretense of the incompetence of election day workers/volunteers in the event the election fraud and election law violations were discovered.
Moreover, when a May 21, 2021 Right to Know (RTK) request for election information and data was made with respect to information that is by federal and state law to be kept and preserved, the Defendants fraudulently and intentionally deleted, changed, adulterated, manipulated and/or obscured the information, data, and materials produced in response to the RTK request in order to hide their fraud and election code violations because they knew that they could not reconcile the previously fraudulently reported November 3, 2020 election results with the actual responsive information that they had in their possession and which they were required to preserve and produce in response to the Right to Know request.
Plaintiffs know this to be the case and can document this and demonstrate this by showing, among other things, that November 3, 2020 election, data materials, and equipment was destroyed including but not limited to V-Drives, Return Sheets, machine tapes/proof sheets/result tapes, Mail-In Ballots, Ballots Destroyed, voting machines, hard drives, paper documentation, Blue Crest data, correspondence concerning the November 3, 2020 election.
Further the suit notes that Delaware County was the last count to submit its presidential vote total in Pennsylvania “potentially changing November 3, 2020 election results in numerous races”.
The suit says that before Delco’s submission, Donald Trump was leading Joseph Biden by 7,515 votes, and that Delco’s tally showed a difference of 88,070 votes between the candidates favoring Biden.
Maybe the most shameful thing is the silence of the Delaware County Republican Party leadership. Truthfully, you can have an easy life in second place if it’s an easy life you want. See: Philadelphia Republican Party.
Please don’t equate Republican with good. Political parties are means, not ends, and being active in one does not automatically confer virtue, or imply that you love truth, justice and this nation.
Also, not every one mentioned in the suit is a villain. Regina Scheerer, Cathy Craddock and Marilyn Heider are good citizens, grandmoms and patriots, and were most certainly doing their best.
Tip to the plaintiffs: We are confident that they are as convinced the election was stolen as any of us.
Delco Vote Fraud Case Before Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court — Leah Hoopes and Gregory Stenstrom will have their appeal heard 9:30 tomorrow morning at Commonwealth Court in Harrisburg of a Jan. 11 ruling by Delaware County Common Pleas Court Judge John Capuzzi that was hoped by the powers-that-be would shut up all discussion of massive voting irregularities in Delco in the 2020 election.
Leah and Greg — who were Delaware County Board of Elections certified poll watchers and observers at the counting center — say that they were prevented by Capuzzi of having an evidentiary hearing and discovery regarding their claims that that the chain of custody for ballots was shattered in Delco, and the USB drives containing records from voting machines disappeared.
They said that Capuzzi would not allow discovery to see ballots and envelopes.
Capuzzi dismissed the case with prejudice and awarded attorney fees to the county Board of Elections, which was the defendent.
Leah says the fees are now up to $50,000.
Leah says she and Greg are also defendants — along with President Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, Phil Kline and The Thomas More Society — in a defamation suit filed by James Savage of Chester, who is head of the Delaware County Voting Machine Office.
The suit has been strangely filed in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, despite nobody involved living in Philly and the matter occurring in Delaware County.
Chesco GOP Seeks Audit Of 2021 Election — Despite a pretty good showing by Republicans state-wide, Nov. 2 — note Drew Crompton appears to be losing his Commonwealth Court seat — voting irregularities are being found.
Chester County GOP Chairman Gordon Eck is calling for a full forensic audit of his fiefdom.
Where were you last November/December/January, Gordon?
Anyway, election mistrust is the greatest crisis this country is facing and the audit should be done.
Poll watchers should be given state-wide jurisdiction, rather than be limited to the county in which the reside.
Certified ballot counting observers should be allowed as close as they want to be to the ballots being counted.
Election transparency should indisputably takes precedence over corporate intellectual property (IP). Amazingly enough, the IP claim was used to stifle investigation into voting machines in the 2020 election. It’s just one of the reasons many of us think Trump is the rightful winner.
Here is the letter the Chesco GOP sent to its committee members:
Good Morning Committee Members, I wanted to give you a quick update on the election process. As you have probably seen by now, Chairman Eck is calling for a full forensic audit of Chester County due to the many irregularities that we have witnessed over the past week. As of this morning, all eligible mail-in, provisional, and overseas ballots have been scanned. This process has occured in many stages and over several days. Voter Services has updated their totals online occassionally, but not fully as each stage was completed. Therefore, this morning they will zero out the total mail-in ballots received and counted numbers on the Voter Services Election Portal. Then, all mail-in, provisional, and overseas ballots will be uploaded at one time and final numbers will be posted. They are completing the process in this way because reconciliations between systems on the number of ballots were not tying. The county is hopeful that uploading everything at once will provide them with a better figure to which they can reconcile. It is my understanding that these figures will be provided as “unofficial results” to the PA Department of State today. People want to know what they can do at this point. I would recommend that people call Commissioner Marian Moskowitz’s office at 610-344-6691 Commissioner Josh Maxwell’s office at 610-344-6151 to demand an audit of the election process that took place this year. Commissioner Michelle Kichline has already expressed concern over irregularities, but you can always contact her office as well (610-344-6031) asking her to fight for transparency and clear processes. Additionally, you could attend the Commissioners Meeting today at 3:30 to address them in public comment. Finally, thank you for hanging in there over the past week. I know everyone has wondered what’s been happening. I’ve tried to provide updates as often as I could. Thanks also to the many volunteers who have participated in the observer process over the last week. Felice FeinVice Chair
Commonwealth Court is the intermediate appellate court where cases involving state agencies are heard along with some in which the Commonwealth is a party.
Last minute votes broke for Ms. Dumas 37, 143 to 5,246.
Funny, how that seems to happen for Democrats. Montgomery County School Board races that had been thought won by freedom-lovers are now in question due to bad ballots.
And of course there are those magically found 12,000 ballots in the New Jersey’s 3rd state Senate District, in which Republican truck driver Edward Durr appeared to upset long-time Senate President Steve Sweeney.
When the races was called for Durr, he was up 32,742 to 30,444.
But, hey, magic happens in South Jersey, right.
We hope the Republican establishment fights for Durr like a rabid wolverine, and we hope Durr’s voters rise in outrage at this obvious theft attempt.
Granted the former hope might be magic based.
There is a big upside to this, though. Pennsylvania’s other GOP court victories seem secure, which means your votes did count. Maybe not as much as they should have, but you weren’t wasting your time voting.
Election mistrust is the greatest crisis this country is facing.
By-right mail voting should end.
If chains of custody are violated, criminal prosecutions should occur.
In Pennsylvania, poll watchers should be given state-wide jurisdiction, rather than be limited to the county in which the reside.
Certified ballot counting observers should be allowed as close as they want to be to the ballots being counted.
It should be made clear that election transparency automatically takes precedence over corporate intellectual property (IP). Amazingly enough, the IP claim was used to stifle investigation into voting machines in the 2020 election. It’s just one of the reasons many of us think Trump is the rightful winner.
Arizona Audit Finds Huge Discrepancies In County Claim Of Honest Election –Yesterday (Sept. 24) afternoon’s release of the results of the Maricopa County Election Audit ended a painstaking endeavor into reports of vote fraud that began in April.
At least a chapter anyway.
Maricopa County includes Phoenix. Trump “lost” Arizona by 10,000 votes.
The audit is damning, but the damning stuff is found at the bottom.
Cyber Ninjas, the firm that ran the audit, foundthat the county purged the election management system database, deleted election files and corrupted ballot images (see section 6.2). The Ninjas say these things have a severe impact on the election results and the ability to audit them.
The Ninjas also say that Early Voting Return Files (EV33) don’t have entries for 255,326 early voters that are recorded in the Final Voting File (VM55).
“Individuals that vote as part of Early Voting, either by mail or in person, should have an EV33 entry related to their casting of a vote containing details as to when and how that vote was cast,” say the Ninjas. ” Without an EV33 these details are unavailable, and it could make some types of audits impossible.
The county denied the auditors access to the voter registration system and records of authorized or unauthorized access to the system despite two subpoenas, the last one directing it provide “all reports findings and other documents concerning the voter registration breach.”
The Ninjas also say that the county commingled damaged and original ballots requiring hours of examination to unravel inaccurate documents. They point out that they have not be able to determine if the damaged ballots had been duplicated and tabulated as ballots as required by law.
Maricopa officials directed the printer of the mail ballots, Runbeck Election Services,, not to cooperate with the state-directed audit, the Ninjas note. (Section 5.7)
The county also failed to properly identify duplicate ballot batches; would not assign unique serial numbers to damaged ballots sent to duplication; and did not resolve discrepancies between number of voters and votes cast before acceptance of the canvass.
What the Ninjas could find regarding votes were:
23, 344 ballots cast under voter registration IDs for people who may not have received their ballots by mail because no one with that name was at the address to which the ballot was sent.
9,041 more ballots returned by voters than received.
5,295 people who potentially voted in multiple counties.
3,432 ballots that do not match the official results as to who voted.
2,592 more duplicate ballots than original ballots
2,382 people who had moved out of Maricopa County but recorded as voting in-person
1,551 votes counted in excess of voters.
The Ninjas offered recommendations as to how to improve things and provided explanations as to why these issues could have occurred without it being orchestrated election theft.
The alternative explanations lose all credibility, however, considering the behavior of the county. Why fight an audit when there is nothing to hide? The establishment media mouthpieces were certainly giving the Ninjas credence when a partial draft of the audit was leaked on Thursday that indicated that Biden had gained votes.
Pennsylvania Vote Fraud Investigation Will Include Sworn Testimony, Subpoenas For Ballots, Maybe Machines — Leo Knepper of Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania interviewed state Sen. Chris Dush (R-25), Sept. 7, regarding the investigation into the numerous irregularities in the 2020 Election in the Keystone State.
Knepper only distributed via email yesterday, Sept. 17.
Dush chairs the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee.
Dush was insistent on his preference about calling what his committee was doing an investigation rather than an audit.
“I understand Arizona did what they called a forensic audit. Arizona’s constitution and laws are different than Pennsylvania’s,” Dush said. “For the (Pennsylvania) Senate to conduct an investigation it has to be an investigation. Audits are a form of investigation but not all investigations are audits.”
Dush said his committee will have a “deep and thorough dive” into what happened in 2020 and in the 2021 primary election.
Dush cited the numerous, unprecedented problems that occurred in the state.
He said he is going to be handling the matter like an investigator.
“It’s in my background,” he said.
He said he is going to demand sworn testimony. He cited the Nov. 25 hearing in Gettysburg as being problematic as witnesses to vote fraud and election law violation had not been under oath.
He said the committee has established this website at which those who witnessed irregularities may report them and apply to testify.. All wishing to testify must do so under oath and subject to penalties of perjury, Dush said.
“This is going to be done as a legal investigation so that if necessary, the testimony, the evidence, everything will stand up in court,” he said.
He also said subpoenas will be issued to examine the ballots and, likely, the machines.
He says he will treat the matter more as a district attorney rather than a politician and will not reveal findings until appropriate.
Here is the interview on YouTube. As of now, it has only 25 views. It’s about a half-hour long and worth watching at least in part.
Pennsylvania Vote Fraud Investigation Will Include Sworn Testimony, Subpoenas For Ballots, Maybe Machines
