Rose McGowan Credit History Wiped — Actress Rose McGowan, the mother of the MeToo movement, has tweeted that she has been run off the road and had a break-in at her apartment during the last five days. She included a photo as evidence of the latter incident.
It’s easy to dismiss it. A cynic might says she’s making it all up because she’s not the center of attention that she was a few years ago, and she misses the drama.
And the door pix looks kind of stagey to be honest.
But yesterday afternoon, Sept. 27, she tweeted that her credit history has been wiped and posted screenshots of her application to Apple Card and a conversation with a service rep named Elizabeth.
Deep State Drag Net — Here is how to handle the mind-blowing, corrupt attempt to marginalize those who fully understand why the D.C. suburbs are among the richest places in the world and oppose lies, greed and general corruption in government and other institutions.
This meme that we found on Gab comes from a photo of suspected federal undercover officers at yesterday’s (Sept. 18) Justice for J6 rally.
The rally was to call attention to the plight of those arrested for participation in the Jan. 6 protests at the Capitol and the disparity in their treatment with those who participated in far more violent actions last spring and summer.
President Trump and many others warned sympathizers to stay away yesterday as it was suspected to be a set up by the corrupt corporatists to continue the narrative that those who opposed them were violent extremists, “right wing” white supremacists, pick-your-hate-label.
Rally participants, who were beyond peaceful, appeared to be far outnumbered by the media, police and, well, under-cover feds.
Ivermectin Being Withheld In Wilmington From ICU Patient — This was just sent to us with a request to pass it on. There is absolutely no reason to withhold ivermectin from someone suffering from Covid-19. And why wouldn’t “right-to-try” apply, especially if the patient has a prescription?
Wilmington Hospital won’t let David Demarco take one of these pills for just five days we are told.
My husband David DeMarco is a passionate 54-year-old man who was healthy and strong before contracting COVID. He is an accomplished video editor and has won four Emmy awards for his broadcast television work as well as awards for a feature-length documentary. He loves life and people! But today he is fighting for his life in the ICU at Wilmington Hospital (Delaware).
The care team has been compassionate and is doing everything in their power to help David and we sincerely thank them for their hard work and sacrifice in this terrible fight. But we are asking for one simple thing that they will not provide, and that is the ability to give him a medication that we believe will save his life: Ivermectin.
I am holding in my hand a legitimate prescription from a compounding pharmacy for Ivermectin/Vitamin D321 mg/5000U, in David’s name, and I just want to be able to give it to him. We have a right to try this medication since David is in dire need and suffering from a life-threatening disease!
MaryEllen DeMarco
Ivermectin Being Withheld In Wilmington From ICU Patient
Free Yourself From Google — Google — and the rest of Big Tech — have combined political activism with profit and only a fool would think them honest brokers who care a smidgin about your interests or making your life better.
At best they see you as cattle. At worst a parasite.
Look at the below screen shot from yesterday’s searches to this site.
Note that DuckDuckGo found us 14.5 times as often as Google Search and almost twice as often as Bing, Yahoo Search and Google Search combined.
We have calculated that Google is 50 times as big as DuckDuckGo, which is based in Paoli, albeit this site indicates Google is closer to 200 times as big.
That Google does not find us is not due to its algorithm but rather its filters it seems.
Millions more would be exposed to viewpoints that question the establishment narrative — and definitely not just us — if they ditched Google.
Obviously DuckDuckGo finds us so we recommend it albeit that there are other search engines that seem to give honest searches such as Mojeek.
Regardless, it is easy to make DuckDuckGo you default on either mobile or desktop. You can learn how here or elsewhere.
If you want to take it another step dump Chrome or Edge or Safari as your browser and move to Brave or Firefox.
Marketing Covid Panic In Carolina — NationalFile.com has obtained a copy of a Zoom call from Novant Heath New Hanover Regional Medical Center revealing that the administration is distorting Covid-19 data to panic the public.
They literally talked about involving the marketing department.
And they wonder why there is reluctance to take the jab.
Proven, malicious lies told during this global plandemic — just quoting Biden shill Jen Psaki — involved the denial of the successful use of hydroxychloroquine (Fox 26 Houston); that ivermectin is not meant for people (the FDA); that the possibility that Covid came from a Chinese lab was a conspiracy theory (The Lancet, Facebook, Google Scripps Research Institute, etcetera, etcetera); that gain of function research was not occurring at that lab and the U.S. wasn’t funding it (Tony Fauci); that Nobel Prize winning French virologist Luc Montagnier is promoting a conspiracy theory and mRNA vaccine inventor Robert Malone is promoting misinformation when they express concerns about the vaccine (Wikipedia and others); and masks are necessary (Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, etcetera, etcetera).
And now we have the Novant Heath New Hanover Regional Medical Center freely admitting they are purposely distorting the data.
8kun Responds To Congress — The lawyers for Jim Watkins, who owns the social media message board 8kun, have responded to a letter from the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol demanding he provide [m]isinformation, disinformation, and malinformation related to the 2020 election that appeared on 8kun.
The lawyers gave a excellence response that Watkins has posted on Telegram, Gab and Gettr that all should read so we are posting it with some minor formatting edits:
8kun Responds to Congress
September 7, 2021
One Hundred Seventeenth Congress Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol
U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515
Microsoft Word – 8kun Jan 6 Committee Response.docx
Re: Select Committee 8kun Inquiry
Chairman Thompson and Members of the Committee:
We write in response to your letter dated August 26, 2021 asking 8kun to produce a broad range of information related to “[m]isinformation, disinformation, and malinformation related to the 2020 election.” Without doubt, it is the duty of all citizens to cooperate with congressional efforts to obtain relevant facts needed for legislation. Equally so, it is incumbent upon Congress to respect the constitutional rights of the witnesses it calls upon. To be more direct, the “Bill of Rights is applicable to investigations as to all forms of governmental action.”1
8kun will respond to appropriate requests issued by this Committee. But as the Supreme Court reminded Congress just last year, congressional investigatory and subpoena requests are valid only when they are “related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of Congress and must serve a valid legislative purpose.”2 Because of constitutional and pertinence concerns, we seek to narrow and better identify the information this Committee would like produced.
1. Introductory Constitutional Principles
Congress has sporadically wrestled with contentious issues of the day by means of investigatory committees. Unfortunately, Congress also has a history of abusing that power through targeting disfavored political actors and associations.3 This is forbidden by the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.4
a. New Deal and “Un-American Activity” Analogues
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and Supreme Court struck down congressional investigatory attempts to chill political speech and association in U.S. v. Rumely. There, the New Deal Congress was irritated with the conservative agitator Dr. Edward Rumely and the Committee for Constitutional Government (“CCG”). They organized business opposition to New Deal legislation, perhaps too effectively.5 The House Committee on Lobbying Activity demanded the names of anyone who purchased books, pamphlets, or other literature from CCG.6 The D.C. Circuit found this inquiry to be outside the power of Congress.7
The Court concluded the House Committee could never be constitutionally empowered to generally investigate all aspects of lobbying. It could investigate particular abuses, particular people, particular records, or particular criminal endeavors. But the First Amendment would forbid Congress from examining, publicizing, or reporting the “names and addresses of purchasers of books, pamphlets and periodicals” because that would serve as a “realistic interference with the publication and sale of those writings.”8 The investigation into Rumely and CCG suffered from another malady: the congressional mandate to investigate was flawed. Congressional desires to examine attempts to influence, encourage, promote, or retard legislation or to influence public opinion are simply void under the First Amendment.9
Courts have sometimes upheld limited inquiries where authorizing resolutions are sharply focused about threats to overthrow the government. But the congressional power to investigate even serious threats to overthrow the government is not limitless. In Watkins I, Congress stressed the urgency of its need to root out domestic extremists and to “be informed of efforts to overthrow the Government by force and violence so that adequate legislative safeguards can be erected.”10 But the Supreme Court cautioned that broad congressional authorizations for investigations could produce disastrous results:
From this core, however, the Committee can radiate outward infinitely to any topic thought to be related in some way to armed insurrection. The outer reaches of this domain are known only by the content of ‘un-American activities.’ Remoteness of subject can be aggravated by a probe for a depth of detail even farther removed from any basis of legislative action. A third dimension is added when the investigators turn their attention to the past to collect minutiae on remote topics, on the hypothesis that the past may reflect upon the present.11
In short, congressional resolutions setting few boundaries on nebulous topics violate constitutional norms.12
b. Constitutional Limits at Hand: Watkins II13
Forcing raucous businessmen of the 1930s or unorthodox platforms of the 2020s to answer questions about the most nebulous of topics—the underlying causes of political violence—is an unworkable congressional command. Worse yet, prying into intimate ideologies and thoughts is a serious censorial chokehold. As courts have realized, the requirement that one reveal purchasers of books, pamphlets, or papers marks the start of a surveillance state. And just as courts would not embrace a surveillance state arising out of congressional investigations in the past, so too is this approach inappropriate today.
Compelling online platforms to share information about users who posted about efforts to “overturn, challenge, or otherwise interfere with the 2020 election or certification of electoral college results” chills the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans who were concerned about electoral integrity during the 2020 election. They have every bit as much a First Amendment right to peacefully gather with others, exchange ideas, and let their discontent be known by public officials as Rumely and CCG did. 14 Demanding that platforms produce mal-, mis-, or disinformation—terms that are undefined but that are usually euphemisms for speech the powers that be disagree with—works an equally pernicious chill against political speech in America. Once government is free to demand the names of users espousing unpopular, unorthodox ideas, free speech and free press rights on the internet disappear.
Like the problematic scope of inquiry in Watkins I, the present inquiries at hand here in “Watkins II” are just as troubling. Where Congress sets out to investigate nebulous topics like “subversion and subversive propaganda,” unlimited “influencing factors” behind the January 6 attack, or how misogyny and racism might impact political violence, constitutional problems grow exponentially.15 But the scope of this authorization is beyond Congress’s power due to its invasion into protected First Amendment rights and its failure to offer pertinent queries related to its otherwise legitimate concern—the spread of real political violence. Much like Rumely, particular queries focusing on particular people, particular records, or particular criminal acts may be examined. Fishing expeditions into the closely-held thoughts and beliefs of the American people rest beyond Congress’s prying eyes. The controversies surrounding the 2020 election, well settled within the Beltway, are hardly settled for many Americans. Roughly one-third of Americans—almost 110 million people—believe that President Biden’s 2020 victory was the result of widespread voter fraud.16 The First Amendment encourages citizens to debate and talk about issues of self-government—without fear of the government collecting and pouring over their communications. As Congress continues in this direction, some citizens will fear to espouse, and some will fear to read, messages that those in power dislike. The million-fold eyes of Argus Panoptes become a reality by congressional fiat.17 The resulting shadow the government will cast over online discussion that does not conform to the dominant party’s narrative should frighten every American.
2. Past Compliance with the Committee on Homeland Security
Mr. Watkins, as a representative of 8kun (formerly 8chan) freely appeared before the House Committee on Homeland Security in September 2019 to address that committee’s concerns over the proliferation of online extremist content. In doing so, 8kun produced relevant documents and Mr. Watkins answered relevant inquiries about the site’s operations. We attach the submitted “Congressional Primer on 8chan” for your reference as ADDENDUM A. Notably, 8kun included more than fifty pages of voluntary interactions with law enforcement about particular criminal investigations. Where requests are focused and particular and do not run afoul of constitutional norms, 8kun is enthusiastic to aid Congress and law enforcement in their operations. We hope we may be equally helpful here.
3. ClarificationofExistingRequests
It is Mr. Watkins’s desire that we continue 8kun’s practice of responding to lawfully issued requests and to provide as much respectful cooperation with your committee’s investigation as the First Amendment allows. However, the requests contained in your form letter dated August 26, 2021 are an unworkable starting point for cooperation. For example, item 1 requests production of “All . . . data . . . regarding your platform . . . .” Even if this sentence is read in conjunction with the items described in items “i.” through “iv.,” this request is so broad as to render compliance impossible. Other form requests, such as requests for “internal or external reviews and reports” regarding 8kun’s “algorithms” seem misdirected. 8kun is a small organization and a relatively simple website. There are no “internal or external reviews” nor are there website “algorithms.” This is but an entrée of errors— the requests, as written, need substantial clarification and focus for 8kun to attempt cooperation.
Please contact Mr. McDonald at your convenience to discuss your requests and determine if there is any specific information that the Committee is constitutionally empowered to seek and that Mr. Watkins is capable of producing. Alternatively, 8kun may be accessed through the internet at https://8kun.top/index.html. All of the information the Committee appears to seek is likely available in an open manner for viewing on the website. Should any substantive issues arise over related constitutional concerns, please contact Mr. Barr directly.
Benjamin Barr BARR & KLEIN PLLC 444 N. Michigan Ave. Ste. 1200 Chicago, IL 60611 Telephone: (202) 595-4671 ben@barrklein.com
Stephen R. Klein BARR & KLEIN PLLC 1629 K St. NW Ste. 300 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 804-6676 steve@barrklein.com
Tony McDonald The Law Offices of Tony McDonald 1501 Leander Dr., Ste. B2 Leander, Texas 78641 Telephone: (512) 923-6893 tony@tonymcdonald.com
Footnotes
1 Watkins v. U.S. (“Watkins I”), 354 U.S. 178, 197 (1957). 2 Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, 140 S.Ct. 2019, 2031 (2020). 3 Barsky v. U.S., 167 F.2d 241, 263 (D.C. Cir. 1948) n.8 (“‘Hollywood Fires 10 Cited in Contempt. Film Heads Rule They Must Swear Theyre Not Reds To Be Rehired’. Washington Post, Nov. 26, 1947, . 1, col. 4.”). 4 See Rumely v. U.S., 197 F.2d 166, 173 (D.C. Cir. 1952) (Congress “represents the people, and its power comes from the people. It is not a source or a generator of power; it is a recipient and user of power”); see also U.S. v. Rumely, 345 U.S. 41, 46 (1953).
5 Rumely would not disclose donors after being served with a congressional subpoena asking him to do so. See 96 CONG. REC. 13882 (Aug. 30, 1950) (statement of Rep. Buchanan); see also 95 CONG. REC. 6431 (May 18, 1949) (statement of Rep. Sabath) (“[M]any more millions have been spent on the part of many corporations and businesses who are endeavoring to . . . stop legislation which they are opposed to . . . . I have attacked these professional lobbyists for years. . . .This committee will recommend ‘teeth’ that can properly be enacted into law thereby eliminating these abuses”).
6 Particularly pernicious for the House Committee were sales of “The Road Ahead,” “Labor Monopolies and Freedom,” “Compulsory Medical Care and the Welfare State,” and the “Constitution of the United States.” Rumely, 197 F.2d at 169–70. 7 Id. at 173.
8 Id. at 174. 9 Id. at 173–74. 10 See Watkins, 354 U.S. at 204; compare with H.Res. 282, 117th Cong., 1st Sess. (legislative purpose to examine “facts and circumstances surrounding the domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol and targeted violence and domestic terrorism relevant to such terrorist attack”). 11 Watkins, 354 U.S. at 204.
Microsoft Word – 8kun Jan 6 Committee Response.docx
12 See Watkins, 354 U.S. at 214 (congressional subcommittee related to rooting out risk of Communist overthrow of government could not rest its basis for information on the need to learn about “subversion and subversive propaganda” because such a request was overbroad and indefinite); compare with H.Res. 282, 117th Cong., 1st Sess. (racism, misogyny, and Islamophobia may be drivers for domestic violence extremism; listed congressional purpose includes an examination of “influencing factors that fomented such an attack on American representative democracy while engaged in a constitutional process”).
13 “Watkins II” is the authors’ nomenclature for the impending dispute over the present congressional inquiry into Mr. Watkins and 8kun. 14 The National Park Service authorized a gathering of up to 30,000 people for the Washington, DC pro-Trump rally. Stephanie Dube Dwilson, How Many Were at the MAGA Trump March & Protest in DC? Crowd Size Photos, HEAVY, Jan. 6, 2021, available at https://heavy.com/news/maga-march-trump- dc-rally-crowd-photos/ It is currently unknown what small percentage of the peaceful rally attendees committed acts of political violence at the Capitol.
15 U.S. v. Peck, 154 F.Supp. 603, 608–09 (D.D.C. 1957).
Microsoft Word – 8kun Jan 6 Committee Response.docx
Ivermectin Recommended For Refugees By The CDC — Dr. Simone Gold, the founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, tweeted an hour ago that the CDC is recommending administering ivermectin as presumptive therapy (giving medication without a diagnosis) to refugees.
Sick, twisted monsters are in charge of this nation’s health care.
Government Rationing Regeneron It’s Revealed — The establishment media is not a watchdog of government but its mere mouthpiece so we will share this Twitter thread from Jim Jackson, who describes himself as Urgent Care specialist, golf addict, UTMB + TAMU, life member #NRA, #RuleofLaw, #MAGA forever.
Jackson reveals that the government is now rationing monoclonal antibody distribution, and claims it is specifically aimed at areas with low vaccination rates.
Monoclonal antibodies treatment i.e. Regeneron has been proved to be successful against Covid-19.
So ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are stridently discouraged, and now Regeneron is rationed.
They’re still pushing the barely tested vaccines, though.
What kind of monsters have we put in charge of our health?
See where West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice just said that Covid deaths of vaccinated people have increased 25 percent? Of course not. Thank you Jamie Dlux for reporting this.
Here’s Jackson’s Tweets in case they should disappear.
Here’s a screen shot of the announcement from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Emergency site.
HCQ and ivermectin — well, cough, not if you have a, cough, horse — may be hard to get but Vitamin D and C are sold OTC as is zinc and Quercetin, which Dr. Zev Zelenko says is an emergency substitute for the prescription drugs.
Dr. Zelenko is selling a convenience pack here. Note that Zelenko has been outspoken that you can buy the ingredients elsewhere online and at most drug stores, and is quite open with how you should take it.
Recognize Propaganda And Think Freely — Usually we don’t know but often we do regarding certainties.
The Covid crisis is an example. Consider the vaccines. Officialdom endorses them. Normally, that’s good enough to trust. The problem is there are highly credentialed dissenters. Are their concerns being respectfully considered? Not accepted, just being allowed to be considered? No. They are being dissmissed.
Dr. Robert W Malone, who is considered the inventor of mRNA vaccines, says the endorsed Covid vaxes appear to be backfiring and should be stopped. We obviously can’t say he is right but just as obviously his claim should not be rejected out of hand as Wikipedia does. This influential gatekeeper of information implies he is “promoting misinformation.”
Nobel Prize winning French virologist Luc Montagnier is also a huge critic of the vaccines. Wikipedia says he is a “promoter of the conspiracy theory” that Covid was created in a lab.
Who are you going to believe anyway: Wikipedia or the French Nobel Prize guy?
At this point, the default should be if it’s official it’s a lie.
Wikipedia claiming that the inventor of mRNA vaccines is spreading misinformation about mRNA vaccines. From Aug. 25, 2021Wikipedia claiming that a Nobel Prize winner is a promoter of a conspiracy theory regarding a subject in which he won the Nobel Prize.
Social Media Click Farms Manipulate Opinion — This video showing a click farm being used to get topics trending on social media. The idea is to get average folk to think that the mainstream beliefs they hold are somehow out of step if not out-and-out evil.
Hopefully, knowing this impels you to fight back. Yes, you can wax superior to those who conclude that social media consensus makes right.
