Penn Delco Mocks Reason With Definition Of Biological Sex — More than 75 concerned parents packed yesterday’s (Oct.25) Penn Delco’s school board meeting protesting the proposed resolution to give boys access to girls’ private places.
These include bathrooms and locker rooms with their showers and changing stations.
The policy — which includes the middle and elementary schools as well — unabashedly laughs at reason.
“‘Biological sex’ means the sex assigned by a doctor at birth” it says. “For intersex individuals or others with genetic anomalies, ‘biological sex’ refers to gender identity”
This arbitrary twisting of meaning would awe Humpty Dumpty.
The night was to be the first reading of the policy but it was neither read nor were copies available.
It was a first reading without a reading.
Humpty Dumpty would be beside himself.
Again, they are laughing at you.
The board said they’d have it online by the next morning. This would be after everyone has left, of course.
Parents do not have to be told that their child is having emotional troubles over his or her gender, under the policy, and the child gets to pick his or her pronouns. These might not necessarily be his or her, by the way.
The board denied that boys have already been allowed into girls spaces. Female students in attendance shouted that wasn’t true.
A mechanism long in place for students with emotional issues is the individual education plan (IEP). These would not be necessary for children confused about their sex under the new policy.
The board did not address whether the Sun Valley students protesting the policy would suffer consequences for yesterday’s walk out/lock out.
Parents, either get new school boards or get your children out of government-run schools into schools that you control.
The next Penn Delco Board meeting is the Nov. 15 study session followed by Nov. 20 business meeting.
The election by the way is Nov. 7.
Penn Delco Mocks Reason With Definition Of Biological Sex
Here’s a thought – – Since biology no longer has a place in determining sex, perhaps we can take this insanity to its next illogical level and agree that biology also does not determine species. We are already part way down that path with the recognition of “Furries” by some schools. Now, stay with me for a moment and you will see how this can work in all of our favor. “People” are required to pay taxes (not our dogs, cats, chickens, cattle and other non-people species). Therefore, once you’ve declared yourself to be a non-person species, you will no longer owe any taxes! If enough of us become non-people species, the lunatics running the asylum we call government will be defunded, we can convert back to being people and bring rational thinkers back into government. So simple when you think about it, just fight stupid with more stupid.
So a friend called to challenge the above theory by reminding me that the schools are funded by real property taxes and that if they aren’t paid, whether by people or non-people, the lunatics running the asylum will take the real property and sell it at auction. Fair enough, but easily solved. Real property is a legal term usually used to describe an interest in land and riparian rights. If biology is no longer relevant to gender or species, then the customary definition of real property is also suspect. We simple need to reclassify our real property as “not real property” and, viola, real property taxes no longer apply. See how much fun it is to have the sort of fluid terminology our Leftist leaders love so much?
SCOPA ruled that Pennsylvania funding the school districts via property taxes us unconstitutional.
I’m still waiting for the Harrisburg to do something about this…
As an adult resident and taxpayer who funds the schools via my (recently ruled unconstitutional) property taxes I attended both the walkout protest and subsequent school board meeting in support of the students.
The young folks were amazing. Organized, knowledgeable, polite, well spoken. The adults on the school board however were just dull and seemed detached and uninterested during the public comments.
We absolutely need new leadership in the PDSD board however the RINO/DUC powers that be have a stranglehold over the electorate. They are essentially running, once again, unopposed.
In addition, the one contested seat, was not on the ballot in the May Primary and there are suspicions about how the two candidates were on the ballot at the last minute.
PDSD board is corrupt to the core.