Media Incest Illustrated

A remarkable column by Richard Fernandez at PJMedia.com compares  the establishment American media to an establishment Reformation-era church, noting that both were mere tools of state interest and protectors of the ruling class.

The relationship is perfectly illustrated in the below jpg.

Media Incest Illustrated

 

It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so
express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so
far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe
his professional belief to things he does not believe he has prepared
himself for the commission of every other crime.

Thomas Paine

 

Hypocrisy
in anything whatever may deceive the cleverest and most penetrating
man, but the least wide-awake of children recognizes it, and is revolted
by it, however ingeniously it may be disguised..
Leo Tolstoy

 

When
you see a great deal of religion displayed in his shop window, you may
depend on it, that he keeps a very small stock of it within.

C. H. (Charles Haddon) Spurgeon

Media Incest Illustrated

 

Eric Snowden Open Letter

Eric Snowden Open LetterHere is an open letter to the people of Brazil from whistleblower Eric Snowden published, Dec. 17, 2013 on the website of Folha de Sao Paulo.

Six months ago, I stepped out from the shadows of the United States Government’s National Security Agency to stand in front of a journalist’s camera.

I shared with the world evidence proving some governments are building a world-wide surveillance system to secretly track how we live, who we talk to, and what we say.

I went in front of that camera with open eyes, knowing that the decision would cost me family and my home, and would risk my life. I was motivated by a belief that the citizens of the world deserve to understand the system in which they live.

My greatest fear was that no one would listen to my warning. Never have I been so glad to have been so wrong. The reaction in certain countries has been particularly inspiring to me, and Brazil is certainly one of those.

At the NSA, I witnessed with growing alarm the surveillance of whole populations without any suspicion of wrongdoing, and it threatens to become the greatest human rights challenge of our time.

The NSA and other spying agencies tell us that for our own “safety” –for Dilma’s “safety,” for Petrobras’ “safety”– they have revoked our right to privacy and broken into our lives. And they did it without asking the public in any country, even their own.

Today, if you carry a cell phone in Sao Paolo, the NSA can and does keep track of your location: they do this 5 billion times a day to people around the world.

When someone in Florianopolis visits a website, the NSA keeps a record of when it happened and what you did there. If a mother in Porto Alegre calls her son to wish him luck on his university exam, NSA can keep that call log for five years or more.

They even keep track of who is having an affair or looking at pornography, in case they need to damage their target’s reputation.

American Senators tell us that Brazil should not worry, because this is not “surveillance,” it’s “data collection.” They say it is done to keep you safe. They’re wrong.

There is a huge difference between legal programs, legitimate spying, legitimate law enforcement –where individuals are targeted based on a reasonable, individualized suspicion – and these programs of dragnet mass surveillance that put entire populations under an all-seeing eye and save copies forever.

These programs were never about terrorism: they’re about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They’re about power.

Many Brazilian senators agree, and have asked for my assistance with their investigations of suspected crimes against Brazilian citizens.

I have expressed my willingness to assist wherever appropriate and lawful, but unfortunately the United States government has worked very hard to limit my ability to do so –going so far as to force down the Presidential Plane of Evo Morales to prevent me from traveling to Latin America!

Until a country grants permanent political asylum, the US government will continue to interfere with my ability to speak.

Six months ago, I revealed that the NSA wanted to listen to the whole world. Now, the whole world is listening back, and speaking out, too. And the NSA doesn’t like what it’s hearing.

The culture of indiscriminate worldwide surveillance, exposed to public debates and real investigations on every continent, is collapsing.

Only three weeks ago, Brazil led the United Nations Human Rights Committee to recognize for the first time in history that privacy does not stop where the digital network starts, and that the mass surveillance of innocents is a violation of human rights.

The tide has turned, and we can finally see a future where we can enjoy security without sacrificing our privacy. Our rights cannot be limited by a secret organization, and American officials should never decide the freedoms of Brazilian citizens.

Even the defenders of mass surveillance, those who may not be persuaded that our surveillance technologies have dangerously outpaced democratic controls, now agree that in democracies, surveillance of the public must be debated by the public.

My act of conscience began with a statement: “I don’t want to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is recorded.

That’s not something I’m willing to support, it’s not something I’m willing to build, and it’s not something I’m willing to live under.”

Days later, I was told my government had made me stateless and wanted to imprison me. The price for my speech was my passport, but I would pay it again: I will not be the one to ignore criminality for the sake of political comfort. I would rather be without a state than without a voice.

If Brazil hears only one thing from me, let it be this: when all of us band together against injustices and in defense of privacy and basic human rights, we can defend ourselves from even the most powerful systems.

Eric Snowden Open Letter

Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

By Chris Freind Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

There’s both good news and bad.

The bad: Phoenixville Area School District has a need to expand, but has had trouble finding space it likes.

But fear not. There is good news that might solve the problem.

Eminent domain could be used to seize the houses of all the district’s school board members, thereby meeting the necessary classroom space requirements.

That may seem unfair, but hey, the rights of the individual are trumped by what’s deemed by the elite to be in the public’s (or their own) best interest. And it would be perfectly legal, since the government can take private property in order to develop both public and other private property, pretty much any way it sees fit.

Seem far-fetched? Too intrusive in a free country?

Think again.

The tragic reality is that the Phoenixville School District already has found a solution. Jettisoning the possibility of developing any of the 95 other tracts of land it considered, the District decided to instead seize the Meadow Brook Golf Club in order to build a new school, one that can be located near the high school so that a “learning village” can be created. Whatever that means.

In doing so, the district is seizing an 80-year old business — albeit one that might have been on the market anyway — and kicking property owners off land that had been in their family since 1896. And don’t hold your breath that there will be just compensation, since the district is willing to pay substantially less than what the owners had requested. The family was asking $8 million for the site and wouldn’t budge from that number, despite a recent district assessment of $3.725 million. The district offered $5 million.

Here’s the worst part: On Nov. 14, the school district voted to invoke eminent domain without even informing the property owners beforehand — who only discovered what had happened by reading it in the local newspaper. Pending a successful appeal (the prospect of which seems extremely bleak), the property changes hands on Dec. 15.

So because of Big Brother’s ever-increasing reach, over a century’s worth of memories, not to mention numerous jobs, will be obliterated in the span of just 30 days.

If that’s not the definition of classless, what is?

The truly disturbing part is that, while immoral and wrong, this is legal. But even more frightening is that no one is safe from eminent domain’s reach. In the past, government would seize property only for public works projects, but in 2005, the ball game changed — big time.

In a ruling that many consider one of the worst U.S. Supreme Court decisions in history, five mind-numbingly obtuse justices decided that citizens’ land could be taken by the government for private economic development, even if those properties were not in areas of blight or decay.

The criteria? When local or state officials think the public would benefit That’s enough leeway to dock a battleship.

Forget the original intent of eminent domain, which actually had the public’s best interest in mind when considering public projects, such as utilities, railroads and highways.

It seems those things, while necessary, just aren’t sexy enough for some of today’s pols.

Where’s the fun in just building a road when you can construct a mall with all the perks that come with being mayor or councilman in that location?

And when houses are bulldozed to make way for a plush resort — with wealthy land developers lining the campaign pockets of politicians who decide such matters — is that in the public’s interest?

As then-Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her dissent to the eminent domain decision, the “specter of condemnation hangs over all property. Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory.”

In other words, the rich and powerful get what they want, the politicians make out, and small property owners — 99.9% of Americans — get squashed.

Somehow, it’s doubtful the Founding Fathers had this in mind.

Most home and business owners are neither wealthy nor influential, so their options are extremely limited.

Fighting City Hall means huge legal fees with no guarantee of success. Loans are still difficult to obtain, so those victimized by misguided eminent domain judgments often are forced to tap into their retirement accounts to survive. And those on fixed incomes, many of whom previously only worried about property taxes, face the prospect of writing a mortgage or rent check for the rest of their lives, because self-interested politicians want their pet projects to come to life.

The use of eminent domain in America was supposed to be a last resort. When it had to be employed, landowners were to be given fair compensation, and, in most cases, the greater public good was easily recognized. The Blue Route (I-476) is a prime example. After years of court battles, the project was finally given the green light, and the highway remains one of the most important infrastructure improvements in Pennsylvania history.

But it is unfathomable that in today’s “Amerika,” eminent domain has evolved into the weapon of choice for greedy, corrupt or simply misguided politicians and school boards.

It’s time for the newly comprised high court to revisit this contentious issue. In doing so, it would have the historic opportunity to right a huge wrong, and put the “c” back in “America.”

Chief Justice Roberts, the floor is yours.

Eminent Domain Equals Oppression

Audrey Hudson Home Raided By Feds

Audrey Hudson Home Raided By FedsThe home of Audrey Hudson, a reporter for The Washington Times, was raided the pre-dawn of Aug. 6 by Maryland State Police and the Department of Homeland Security’s Coast Guard Investigative Service. They apparently were looking for a “potato gun” belonging to her husband, Paul Flanagan, who was a Coast Guard employee.

Flanagan has yet to be charged with anything although raiders did take notes pertaining to Ms. Hudson regarding stories she had written exposing problems in the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Air Marshals Service, and questioned her as to whether she was the Audrey Hudson who was writing those nasty stories.

The raid occurred at 4:30 a.m. and the raiders were wearing full body armor.

Have you read about this in the establishment mouthpiece papers? Silly question.

Audrey Hudson Home Raided By Feds

Fort Belvoir Golf Course Closed? Nope.

Fort Belvoir Golf Course Closed? Nope. — Today’s mull: With the government shutdown having started are the golf courses at which President Obama likes to chill, such as at Fort Belvoir, going to be closed?

Ha

Ha Ha

Hahahahahahahahahahaahaha

Really, we checked. They remain open.

Fort Belvoir Golf Course Closed? Nope.Meanwhile did you see what the morons did to our World War II veterans? A group of them from a Mississippi Honor Flight arrived on a long-scheduled trip to see their memorials today only to find the normally unmanned World War II Memorial barricaded. Well, if the Germans and Japs couldn’t stop them, the Park Police were no match. They just used their wheel chairs to knock them over. Remember, the average age of an Honor Flight participant is about 90.

Something else to mull: the government can reopen in two hours if the Democrats who run the Senate and Obama cooperate just a little.

Fort Belvoir Golf Course Closed? Nope.

Washington Faces Unexpected Reality

Washington Faces Unexpected Reality — Here’s some good news — an unexpected political reality is being imposed on Washington. The American people are realizing they don’t need government as much as those in government claim they do, according to Scott Rasmussen writing for Real Clear Politics.

Rasmussen cites Nicco Mele’s book, “The End of Big” which claims: “The devices and connectivity so essential to modern life put
unprecedented power in the hands of every individual — a radical
redistribution of power that our traditional institutions don’t and
perhaps can’t understand,”

Rasmussen points out that is demonstrated in the reaction to the minor budget trimming known as the sequester. Those in The Beltway were certain it would inspire  outrage among the populace.  Most Americans, however, considered it “a baby step in the right direction.,”

Hopefully, this bit of info gives some of our squishier Republicans some spine.

And here’s a link showing a perspective on education that you aren’t going to get in the establishment media. Paula Bolyard writing for PJMedia.com shows the surprising way homeschooling leads to healthy,  happy and well-educated children and families. Any family that could homeschool would be nuts not to, if what she writes is accurate.

Washington Faces Unexpected Reality

Establishment Wants Two Americas

Establishment Wants Two Americas — That the establishment wants two Americas is the only explanation. One would be poor, frightened and dependent, the other would be themselves and living safe and at leisure.

Christopher Orlet, who spent two years living in the inner city, wrote a wonderful yet painful to read article for The American Spectator about the culture of poverty. He says:

The culture of poverty is many things. Actually it is an accumulation of things. Having one of those things doesn’t necessarily mean you are part of that culture. One characteristic of the culture of poverty is the single-parent household. But there are many middle class and even upper class (though fewer) single-parent households that are doing just fine. That is because they have resources unavailable to the poor. Like savings. Lawyers. Reliable transportation.
But if you are a single parent with multiple children by multiple fathers, and a high school dropout, with a record, then chances are you are part of that culture. If you move to a new rental every six months, yanking your kids out of school after school, and if you do drugs in front of your children, and sell your food stamps for cash, then chances are you are part of that culture. If you are 20 years old, living with your grandmother, with no interest in ever getting a job, or getting married, or doing much of anything, chances are you are part of that culture. If you do not have a kitchen table, but you do have a big flat screen TV, and when the social worker comes to visit someone yells, “The social worker is here, go get the light bulb,” then chances are you are part of that culture.

See anybody trying to change it? Sure, but they are the Sarah Palins of the world and the Ted Cruz’s and the Rick Perrys and the Rush Limbaughs. The people who are actually care about these people are the ones the establishment attacks as uncaring. It’s the ones who don’t see skin color as an impediment to success and happiness but rather culture and mores who are attacked as racists.

Persons of any skin can end up living lives of permanent despair, it should be noted. Maybe that’s the intent. It should scare you.

Establishment Wants Two AmericasAnd who is this establishment anyway? Some guy who owns a car dealership or a pizza shop? An accountant who goes to work in a suit? The local lawyer or doctor?

Don’t be silly. The ones that set the agenda are the ones that control the old media, the entertainment industry and the educational system. They’re supported by those who run places like Goldman Sachs and Brown Brothers Harriman.

It wouldn’t be that hard to change the culture. Once upon a time the vast majority of black kids were born into two parent households.
But rather than being condemned, the ghetto is romanticized in music and film. “The dawg” with a lot of ladies is praised as is the single sassy mom who needs no man. The drug dealer is just a businessman. About the only taboo is to be a “snitch”.

The establishment tells white boys that all you need is tat to make you worthy of approval. White girls get to watch their one-time Disney heroes become sex jokes all while being encouraged to emulate them.

Without love, nobody cares. Without anybody caring there is none to challenge those who lust for power.
Those that do care have a fight on their hands. May God grant us strength.

Hat tip Ed Driscoll at PJMedia.com

Establishment Wants Two Americas

Montco Dem Activist Allegedly Took Boy’s Photo In Restroom

Montco Dem Activist Allegedly Took Boy’s Photo In Restroom — A Lansdale man has been charged  by Orange County, Fla.,  with one count of felony video voyeurism against a child younger than 16 years of age for taking a photo of a young boy in a restroom stall at Walt Disney World on Aug. 2
The charge was duly reported by NBC10. Certain things, however, were left out that one is confident would otherwise would not have been if things had not been just a tad different — namely his political affiliation.

The accused, Joseph M. Cionzynski, 59, you see, is active with Friends of Lansdale, a left-leaning political action committee that supported the Democratic Party establishment against a couple of of party mavericks, according to RedState.com, which notes that he is also works for the National Labor Relations Board.

Cionzynski allegedly placed his cell phone under the stall and took several photographs of the boy, age 8, who was sitting on the toilet. The boy saw what was occurring and ran from the room crying. He got his mother and the two re-entered the room where the boy was able to identify Cionzynski by his shoes.

Cionzynski voluntarily turned the phone over to a sheriff’s deputy who did not find pictures of the child but did find two pictures of adult genitalia. The phone was seized  and Cionzynski was given a trespass warning but not arrested.  Investigators later found pictures of the boy, however, according to BayNews9.com.

An arrest warrant was issued Aug.15 and Cionzynski was arrested in Montco for extradition.

Wonder where Cionzynski stands on gay marriage? You think he might have supported D. Bruce Hanes for Montgomery County Register of Wills?

Hat tip Rights-right.com


George Zimmerman Question Of The Day

George Zimmerman Question Of The Day — If Trayvon Martin was beating George Zimmerman because he was gay, would those who get their news from MSNBC, Comedy Central and the Philadelphia Inquirer still call Zimmerman a murderer?

George Zimmerman Question Of The Day

Hep C, Hipsters And Tats

Hep C, Hipsters And Tats — A recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine estimated that the number of people in the United States infected with the  Hepatitis C virus is between 3.2 and 3.5 million.

The disease may go for years without  symptoms but if left untreated
producse chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and cancer. About 85 percent
of people infected with the virus develop such things. Hep C, Hipsters And Tats

And what are the primary causes of the disease? Intravenous abuse of drugs and tattooing.

Just something to consider when making unforced lifestyle choices.

Hat tip Dr. Theodore Dalrymple.

Hep C, Hipsters And Tats