Pa. GOP Pondering Forgoing Electoral College

The Pennsylvania House Committee has scheduled a hearing at 11 a.m., today, March 12 regarding HB 1270 which was submitted by Rep. Tom Creighton (R-37) and would   change the way Pennsylvania casts its Electoral College votes for president by aligning them with the national popular vote. 

The bill has 34 co-sponsors, 24 of whom are Democrats.

The abolition of the Electoral College is a pet project of  George Soros.
The hearing will be streamed live www.RepCreighton.com

Pennsylvania Again Saves The World

Consider the thatched hut. The grass roof is primitive but practical. It doesn’t let in rain in but does let out heat — important considerations in sweltering tropical climes.

Tarantulas and scorpions like to live in them, however, and the development of the grasslands to farmland is making the material to build them less abundant.
Now, consider the 3-liter soda bottle. They take up eternal space in landfills and are expensive to recycle.
What to do? To the rescue comes Dr. David Saiia, a professor at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh who has developed a hand-cranked machine that shreds the bottles into roofing strips that are a big improvement over the thatch.
The strips are attached to bamboo slats and the panels are fixed to the rafters. They last 10 times as long as the organic thatch.
Life has gotten just bit easier for the people of the grasslands.


How Sensitive Are You?

Here is a pop quiz to determine your sensitivity.

What powerful, prominent figure said regarding an unempowered, working class woman: Drag a $100 bill through a trailer camp and there’s no telling what you will find.

A. Rush Limbaugh
B. Rick Santorum
C. Pope Benedict XVI
D. James Carville, in reference to Paula Jones, a low-level Arkansas state employee who said that a certain prominent Democrat politician had state troopers escort her to a hotel room where he exposed himself to her in the manner of a subway flasher?
The answer is D. I’m sure that you all got it right and that you are now demanding that no respectable politician ever again associate with Mr. Carville.
Of course, none of you sensitive souls would ever vote for a man who would expose himself to a young woman after having law enforcement officers escort her into his presence, right?

Jennifer Stefano To Guest On Hannity

Jennifer Stefano, who is the Pennsylvania Director of Americans for Prosperity and  a frequent guest of the Delaware County Patriots, is scheduled to be part of Sean Hannity’s Great American Panel, 9 tonight on Fox News Channel.

William Lawrence Charged With Craigslist Hit Try

William Lawrence of Maplewood, Mo. is facing federal charges of  of interstate commerce in the commission of a murder for hire after he allegedly placed an ad on Craigslist in which he said: “Wanted dead, all the maplewood (sic) city police officers, paying one million per head, two million for detective (name)” 

I don’t know the guy.
 

The charges were filed March 2. Apparently Lawrence was upset because a Maplewood police office used a TASER on him after a disturbance at his home in February and confiscated a rifle, shotgun and marijuana. 
He had been pestering the Maplewood PD with calls demanding the return of the rifle and shotgun.
If the Maplewood Police had Joel Braun’s  Non-Lethal Weapon Mount With Modular Weapon Components, they could have not just tased Lawrence, they could have pepper-sprayed him, blinded him with a light and shot him with a non-lethal bullet as well.

Holy NLWMWMWC Batman, Crimefighting Gets Easier

Let’s say you are just walking along minding your own business when all of a sudden up pops an assailant.


Should you stun him? Pepper spray him? Shoot him with a non-lethal bullet? Or blind him with a light?

Worry no more about difficult questions like that!  Inventor Joel Braun has come up with a device that gives you all four options. He calls it the Non-Lethal Weapon Mount With Modular Weapon Components.

Pretty catchy, eh.

You can strap it to your forearm.

In fact, put the NLWMWMWC on one arm and the The BodyGuard 9XI-HD01 on the other and you could be your own comic book.


Democrat Presidents

There have been five Democrat presidents in my life and I have memories of four: LBJ, Carter, Clinton and the present Occupy White Houser.

So forgive me when I express puzzlement as to how someone can vote for a member of that party to lead this nation. How many times do you have to be bitten to become shy?
What inspires these thoughts is  The Day It Became the Longest War by the late Lt. Gen. Charles G. Cooper (USMC) who describes what happened at the meeting in 1965 where the the Joint Chiefs of Staff  attempted to dissuade Lyndon Johnson from the Vietnam War strategy that he was putting in place.
Read it yourself. Hopefully it cures you from voting Democrat — at least for president.

Winners, Losers In Rush Debate


By Chris Freind

In front of the entire nation, conservative radio giant Rush Limbaugh repeatedly called Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and “prostitute” for her support of an Obama Administration policy requiring health insurers to offer contraceptives.

Not surprisingly, the issue became, and still remains, the preeminent national story, pushing it front-and-center in the Republican presidential campaign.

Anytime a powder-keg situation ignites into a massive media firestorm, as this one did, it is always interesting to look at who comes out on top, and who is left burning in the ashes.

And the biggest loser, by far, may surprise you.


So here is a look at winners and casualties of Pill-Gate:

Winners

• Limbaugh The Entertainer. Rush has followed the cardinal rule in entertainment: there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Bet the ranch that his ratings will increase, and with that additional advertisers. This is not foreign territory to Rush, as he has been engulfed in numerous high-profile controversies in the past, since, let’s face it, controversy pays. To the tune of $40 million a year.

Remember too that Rush has the luxury of saying pretty much whatever he wants without fear of repercussion. With a net worth in excess of $350 million, he needn’t worry about paying the rent should he get fired. And how likely is Clear Channel Communications (his employer) to fire the most lucrative figure on the radio? It’s doesn’t take courage to tell and defend the truth when one stands to lose nothing. For those who idolize Rush in that regard, find a real hero to adore.

Oh, and his apology? It’s a stretch to even call it that, but all part of the game. Apologize while not really apologizing, and trash your enemies in the process. If nothing else, Limbaugh would be a great politician.

• Advertisers. Sure, some advertisers have “temporarily” suspended advertising, but most of those companies are also practicing the above rule. A business (very publicly) announcing that it will yank advertising from Limbaugh scores a huge coup by receiving untold millions in free publicity. And in a few weeks when the shelf life of this story dies, most, if not all, will quietly return to Limbaugh. It’s a win-win for advertisers, and Clear Channel knows it. And let’s face it – Limbaugh’s advertisers know he’s controversial, which is exactly why they pay top dollar to run commercials on his show. To them, occasional forays over the line of decency are acceptable risks.


• Sandra Fluke. There are hundreds of thousands of law students, but Fluke has broken through the ranks of obscurity to be forever known as the “Limbaugh slut girl” who wanted taxpayers to foot the bill for her sexual habits. She helped her issue gain political ground, and will never have to worry about landing a job. Fluke’s popularity – and notoriety – is her golden ticket. Who knew testifying at an unofficial congressional hearing could be so lucrative?

• Mandatory Contraception issue (perception). This issue gained significant momentum, unwittingly helped by a poor student being mercilessly – and personally – attacked by an ultra-wealthy bully. And what about the actual merits of the issue? To many in the Great American Middle, they don’t matter. Right or wrong, their mentality is that if Limbaugh is attacking this young girl for just trying to tell her story, she must have some valid points. Conversely, if Limbaugh has to demonize her, his position must be so weak that it can’t be won on its own merits.

Too bad, because on the issue, Rush was right.

Losers

• Mandatory Contraception issue on its merits The president is wrong in attempting to mandate contraception coverage from health insurers, as that is a case of government vastly overstepping its bounds. There are religiously affiliated entities that are opposed to providing certain services, directly or indirectly, such as contraception and abortion. To do so not only tramples on market freedom, but religious freedom as well.

Truth be told, most insurers are more inclined to offer contraception services anyway because it makes financial sense. Paying for the Pill is infinitely cheaper than shelling out thousands for OB-GYN visits, ultrasounds, pregnancy complications, child births, vaccinations and, of course, the regular medical bills that accompany a new child throughout his life.

But the market should determine that coverage, not government.

• Limbaugh The Movement Leader. Entertainers do whatever is necessary to entertain and make money. But when they cross the line and represent themselves as serious leaders of a political movement, there are problems. Most Rush fans can’t discern the difference, and that endangers their conservative cause when their iconic leader does something that benefits himself but vastly sets back a core issue.

It’s not that he doesn’t care, but that he puts his own interests ahead of the Cause, even if that means hurting the Movement. This is nothing new, and it isn’t just Rush. Ann Coulter calling John Edwards a “faggot” was another example of needlessly providing red meat to the Left. And make no mistake, this issue will be back in the general election, with Obama and the Democrats painting all Republicans as extremist, mean-spirited Rush Limbaugh-types. Not a winning image for the GOP.

• The Republican Party. Another fantastic issue in which the Republicans could have differentiated themselves from Obama and the Democrats – and another opportunity squandered. What else is new?


Not one Republican leader – and not one GOP presidential contender – transformed this into what it is: the lack of common sense health care reform. And God forbid any of them tell the truth by pointing the finger at themselves as to why we find ourselves having this debate at all.

But here’s the truth. This is the fault of George W. Bush, along with the sizable GOP majorities he had in both Houses for six straight years. Did they make any real attempt to solve the problem of skyrocketing health care costs? No. Had they done so, Sandra Fluke wouldn’t be begging the taxpayers to pay for her contraceptives.

As it now stands in America, if you don’t like your employer’s health insurer, you can either pay for a different insurer out of pocket (totally impractical since there are so few options and far too expensive), or change jobs (more impractical). Notice that there is no option to buy insurance across state lines, since that is illegal. So while we can buy auto insurance from any state in the country, we are banned from doing so for health insurance.

Why such a stranglehold on the free market? Because it’s not in the interests of the big insurance players to have such consumer choice, as they would be forced to actually become competitive. Thankfully for them, they have deep pockets which they use to fund the coffers of politicians. Result? Consumers are held hostage to skyrocketing rates and decreasing coverage, while the insurers laugh all the way to the bank.

Then there are the flexible spending accounts that still have a “use it or lose it” policy. Instead of encouraging savings, such plans only serve to have consumers making a mad dash to the pharmacy so they can buy 27 bottles of aspirin before their money – yes, their money – disappears.

Medical malpractice reform? Did the Republicans and President Bush – while riding an unprecedented wave of popularity – have the guts to take on the trial lawyers who, more than anyone, are the cause of massive increases in health insurance premiums? A look at how many Republicans took big money from these scourges of society is all you need to know.

And the GOP failed miserably throwing the Left’s hypocrisy back in its face. These are the people who advocate unrestricted abortion, screaming that government has no place in the uterus, while asking the same government to fund their contraceptives (which, I believe, affects that very same uterus). The inconsistency of those folks was a gimme, a political homerun for the Republicans. But their silence has been deafening.

Had the Republicans did what they had promised – what they surely could have achieved with just a bit of political will – this whole Rush/slut/contraceptive debate would never have taken place, because there would never have been Obama, and hence, no Obamacare. But that is a lesson lost on way too many Republicans, who find it convenient to blame everyone but their own Party.

Perhaps those on the Right would do well to 1) realize that the Limbaughs of the world are entertainers, not Movement leaders, and treat them as such, 2) refuse to defend the indefensible when such entertainers cross the line, 3) stop blaming Obama for the things he very clearly told the nation he was going to do – make government-run nationalized health care a priority, and 4) hold the Republican Party accountable for its deliberate failures to fix America’s problems (offshore drilling, border walls, health care reform, smaller government), as promised in its Party Platform.


Maybe then this nation could have a constructive dialogue on the pressing issues of the day.

And what a Rush that would be.