Day: February 12, 2022

Promoting Confidence In Pennsylvania Courts With Essay Contest, LOL

Promoting Confidence In Pennsylvania Courts With Essay Contest, LOL —Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts is promoting an essay contest for second and third year law students on the topic of using social media to promote confidence in the workings of Pennsylvania’s judicial branch.

“Under the existing rules of judicial conduct, how might Pennsylvania’s courts utilize current communication tools, such as social media, to engage Pennsylvanians to install confidence in the workings of the judicial branch and its decisions?” says the group.

Winner gets $5,000.

Think we should enter?

Good friend Elaine Mickman, who has had considerable experience with Pennsylvania’s court system, is considering this as a submission:

Top Ten Reasons to NOT have Confidence in the Untrustworthy Judiciary

1. Judiciary operates “Court-Gate” whereby the Courts are “divorced from the law.”

2. The Judiciary accepts “in-kind” gifts and contributions which promotes case and party bias, prejudice, obstruction of impartiality, all amounting to “rigged” and “case-fixing” rather than Ruling by Law.

3. Judiciary does NOT comply with, and is at “war” with the Constitution.

4. Judiciary does NOT comply with and supersedes legislated laws.

5. Judiciary does NOT comply with, nor apply their own adopted Rules.

6. Judiciary does NOT comply with the Judicial Canons.

7. Judiciary is typically NOT held accountable for their misconduct.

8. Judiciary “talks out of 2 sides of their mouth” and does NOT enforce their own orders,  Nor do the lower courts comply with appeal court Opinions or orders.

9. Judiciary regularly denies procedural & substantive due process, and “gate-keeps” court access.

10. Judiciary is typically de-humanizing.

Hey, partisan Democrats pretending to be objective Supreme Court justices in Pennsylvania: Why are you putting the interests of private corporations over election transparency in Fulton County? The “strict protocol” argument is laughable, by the way. If an auditor makes a false claim — even an innocent one — those watching from the other side will easily pick it up and ruin that auditor’s career.

Promoting Confidence In Pennsylvania Courts With Essay Contest, LOL
Promoting Confidence In Pennsylvania Courts With Essay Contest, LOL

Anschluss Of Hedgerow Theatre; Sanctuary For Arts Goes Full Austrian With Vax Policy

Anschluss Of Hedgerow Theatre; Sanctuary For Arts Goes Full Austrian With Vax Policy

By Bob Small

The Austrian Bundesrat, Feb. 3, voted 47-12 for Europe’s first vaccine mandate and President President Alexander Van der Bellen signed it into law.

Sad to say, one of the parties backing it is the Greens.

This type of frightening authoritarianism was discussed  in one of my previous posts.

Police in Austria will begin monitoring the unvaxed starting March 15 after which fine of up to the equivalent of $4,109 will begin, possibly followed by prison.  Weekly Saturday protests in Vienna have attracted tens of thousands of people yet have been remarkably, or not, underreported.

Anschluss Of Hedgerow Theatre; Fabled Sanctuary For Arts Goes Full Austrian With Vax Policy

Reaction has come from all Austrian opposition Parties, from the Liberal NEOS Party to the far right Freedom Party (FP). 

“The law is unconstitutional and not proportionate,” said Herbert Kickl, leader of the FP, said

“What we are dealing with here is a vaccine mandate that comes into effect just as the government is making it possible for those who aren’t vaccinated to enter a bar with a subsidised free test result and raise a glass to their resistance,”   Gerard Loacker, Health spokesman for NEOS.

Previously there were obligatory vaccine checks at all retail shops. 

Other European Countries are watching this carefully.

And in Delaware County, Pa., the fabled Hedgerow Theatre is now requiring patrons to provide proof of vaccination.

With her kindly permission, I’m quoting  fellow Swarthmorean Carol Kennedy’s response to Hedgerow:

Both the WHO and the CDC have acknowledged that a person can both catch and transmit Covid-19 even if he/she has been fully vaccinated. There is no advantage to a vaccination in terms of transmission. So requiring proof of vaccination is not scientifically based and even provides a false sense of security in terms of likelihood of catching or transmitting the disease. In fact, both my husband and myself caught Covid even though we were fully vaxxed.

We do not believe in any kind of medical apartheid that places the privileges and rights of one segment of the population above another based on personal medical choice.”

The very last thing this, or any country needs, is further division between  people.

Anschluss Of Hedgerow Theatre; Sanctuary For Arts Goes Full Austrian With Vax Policy

Would not be a slave William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 2-12-22

Would not be a slave William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 2-12-22

Uff nby aifx qbcwb cm ohxyl il ojih nby yulnb cm hin yhioab ni acpy ch yrwbuhay zil pclnoy.
Jfuni

Would not be a slave William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 2-12-22Answer to yesterday’s William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit quote puzzle: As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy.
Abraham Lincoln

Would not be a slave William Lawrence Sr Cryptowit 2-12-22