War on Christmas Dangerous Consequences

 War on Christmas Dangerous Consequences

By Chris Freind

 

 

“This is the way the world ends … Not with a bang but a
whimper.

Does that famous quote aptly describe America’s future?  Time will tell, but indications are that this nation, the most powerful, benevolent and fair in the world, is crumbling before our very eyes.

Like Rome, it isn’t falling from outside invasion, but within.


And one of the biggest culprits is political correctness.


It’s all around us, but especially this time of year, as the assault
on “Merry Christmas” accelerates. It used to be a standard greeting, and people would reciprocate with a smile. Your religious denomination, or
whether you even had one, didn’t matter. It was simply a friendly expression in a nation where the vast majority celebrated Christmas.
Those who didn’t returned the sentiment anyway because it was just a nice thing to do during the jovial season.


But all that changed as Americans’ sense of entitlement exploded. And
yes, that included being entitled not to feel “offended” because
something may not be to your exact liking.


“Merry Christmas? Well, I celebrate Hanukkah or Kwanzaa or am an atheist, so how dare you presume to wish me your holiday? How offensive and rude!”


But it doesn’t stop there. Hypocritical retail stores woo Christmas
shoppers—you know, the 95 percent who do celebrate Christmas and spend a
half-trillion dollars doing so—but won’t put the word “Christmas” in
their ads or on their displays.


Nativity scenes are increasingly barred from public places. Residents call the ACLU because a development hangs simple white lights on its trees. Office Christmas parties are replaced by generic “holiday” events. And there are mayors like Michael Nutter, who last year deliberately removed the word “Christmas” from the holiday retail complex near City Hall (but subsequently was forced to replace it).


All of this is a brazen attempt to make America a more secular society through political correctness; those who dare question it are labeled “bigots.”


Several important points need to be addressed:


1) The push to make all things politically correct has been successful, as it is now entrenched in all aspects of society. Everyone gets a trophy in most youth sports leagues. We don’t keep accurate score when one team is winning over another, and all things must be racially, culturally and ethnically homogenous.


The problem is that’s not how the real world works. And it’s the basic principle that the Occupy movement doesn’t understand. You have to
work hard and fight for things you want, but when they are bestowed
upon us—without merit—from those who worship at the altar of political
correctness, things go downhill fast. Need proof? Just look at those who
engage in PC the most: Europe and the United States. Enough said.


2) This is a not call for “Thought Police” to mandate that everyone say “Merry Christmas.”
Quite the opposite. It’s a call for the silent majority to wake up and
shove it right back at the small but extremely loud minority who shout
“I’m offended” at every single thing. Saying “Merry Christmas” behind
closed doors doesn’t take guts. Saying it because you truly believe it
and not worrying that such an innocuous greeting will offend does—insane
as that is.


3) Most important, Americans need to remember that actions have consequences. And until we connect the dots and see the error of being so PC, those consequences can, and will, have devastating results.


When good folks start looking over their shoulders before uttering
“Merry Christmas” for fear of “offending,” it all begins to unravel.


Think the PC stops at that? Well, think about the fact that the next time you step foot on an airplane, it may be your last day on Earth because your government—we the people—absolutely refuse to non-invasively profile the very folks who openly state their intentions to blow up said aircraft. And it gets better, as the Transportation Security Administration just announced that children under 12 don’t have to take off their shoes for screening, and will not be subject to routine pat-downs like everyone else


Here’s the $64,000 question: What do we think al-Qaeda will do now?
Here’s a wild guess: start flying a lot more with children? What’s next?
Not screening foreign children at all?


So when your wife gets incinerated two minutes after takeoff, and the
wreckage of a jumbo jet falls on your child’s school because a
terrorist put the bomb in his 11-year-old’s shoe, courtesy of the red
carpet we provided, perhaps we shouldn’t wonder why it happened.


Or when your son gets his skull sliced in half by a bullet that
emanates from a mosque in Afghanistan that is “off limits” for
retaliation for fear of offending the very people who don’t like us
anyway, maybe we should think about where it all started coming apart.


Did it start from the reluctance to say Merry Christmas, or the
refusal to put a Christmas tree on a courthouse plaza? Did it originate
from the refusal to acknowledge Christmas on a public school calendar
while other religions’ holidays are clearly labeled as such? It’s
impossible to pinpoint, but it really doesn’t matter. That mentality is
here, and has in large part led to the Great Decline.


So when the inevitable tragedy happens again—one that could have been
prevented—and dumbfounded Americans stand around asking “How and why
did this happen?,” well, you’ll know why. The ’40s and ’50s were
certainly not perfect, but people spoke their minds, were respectful,
and America was a powerhouse. That attitude put a man on the moon a mere
60 years after the Wright brothers took flight, but is now a fleeting
memory—which is what happens when you bow to the wrong principles.


When Rome was at its zenith, it adhered to the simple principle that the well-being of its citizens was paramount. All of them.In
fact, so fervent was that belief that the Romans would literally go to
the ends of the Earth to hunt down any thug that violated the rights of
just a single Roman. They didn’t let political correctness rule the day,
and the Republic thrived. But when it abandoned that principle, it all
came crashing down.


They said Rome would never fall, but it did. Many say the same about America. Yet the whimper is at our door.


So if we are to ever return to our former glory, perhaps the path begins with good folks jettisoning political correctness and saying two small but incredibly joyous words without reservation:


Merry Christmas!

 

 

Save Philly Refineries? Get Pols Out Of The Way

 

 

Part 1 of a series on saving refinery jobs and getting America working again

For the tens of thousands whose livelihoods depend on the Sunoco and
ConocoPhillips oil refineries in Philadelphia, Marcus Hook and Trainer,
the Grinch arrived early this Christmas, announcing that all three
facilities would be closing in the near future.

But unlike the Grinch who delighted in causing misery for the sake of misery, the oil
companies seemed to have no choice. Their hand was forced by a
combination of market forces that saw them losing millions every single
day.

And now, short of the companies finding buyers, those
workers will be thrown out into the cold, unemployed in an America that
is plunging farther into the abyss. An America that doesn’t make a
bloody thing anymore. An America with the highest corporate taxes in the
world. And an America with trade policies that sell out its own
citizens.

Making matters worse, most of the workers will be
seeking new jobs in Pennsylvania, one of the least competitive states in
the nation when it comes to attracting new companies.

Doom and
gloom? No, just the hard truth. And here’s another one. Short of packing
up and moving to refinery-laden Louisiana, most of the laid off workers
will never find a job in this region close to the pay scale and skill
level that they are leaving.

Welcome to The New America, one that
too often puts the interests of its competitors – and even its
adversaries – ahead of its own citizens.

Compounding the problem
even further (if that’s possible) is the unwanted involvement of those
who caused our economic mess in the first place – the politicians. And,
as they continue to demonstrate, they don’t have the slightest clue as
to how to right the ship.

Politicians need to be taken out of the equation. Pandering for votes by holding pointless meetings with
refinery and union officials isn’t solving anything. It only gives false
hope (while providing them with 30-second sound bites).

But
here’s the good news. There is hope, more than can be imagined. Those
refinery workers could not be sitting on a better spot on Earth to reap
the rewards of a massive opportunity –  the correct utilization of the
Marcellus Shale natural gas bonanza. If the politicians do their most
important job –  and the only one they should be doing – of cutting
bureaucratic red tape and slashing stifling regulations, the free market
will take hold, creating jobs and wealth of unprecedented proportions.

But that’s a tall order.

Former
Gov. Ed Rendell, while certainly an affable chap, was never mistaken
for a genius, especially when it came to getting Pennsylvanians working
again. His mentality was that a paternalistic government knows best,
derived no doubt from the fact that he virtually never held a private
sector job in his life. Thus, he was wholly incapable of understanding
the difficult decisions that businesses must make to maintain
profitability.

So it was no surprise when, in 2009, Rendell
inserted his nose where it didn’t belong, publicly excoriating Sunoco
for its decision to lay off some of its salaried workforce. Sunoco
officials had stated the move was geared toward remaining competitive,
as the company was anticipating a “more difficult economic reality”
moving forward.

Taking his criticism even further, Rendell flatly
rejected the decision-making of Sunoco’s Chairman and CEO Lynn
Elsenhans, arrogantly saying he couldn’t take her at her word.
Incredibly, he went so far as to state the “real” reason for the
layoffs: “They are solely intended to make a profitable company more
profitable and helping pad the dividends paid to shareholders.”

So
if Ed was correct (which is always the case – just ask him), Sunoco’s
recent decision to shut down its refineries – permanently – must be
because it’s just making too much money.

Or…

Maybe the
folks at Sunoco had a slightly better idea than Ed Rendell of the
deteriorating market conditions coming down the pike, and maneuvered
accordingly to keep their head above water. Despite their best efforts
though, Sunoco did not meet with success, as the closures clearly
indicate.

Now the big questions loom – can the refineries be
saved, will a buyer be found, can they be converted to refine natural
gas, and, of course, what will be the fate of the thousands of families
whose livelihoods depend on the refineries?

While Rendell is out of the picture, the involvement of other elected officials still leaves a lot to be desired.

Earlier
this week, members of Congress emerged, extremely frustrated, from a
meeting with refinery officials, complaining that the company wouldn’t
reveal details about highly confidential strategic negotiations with
potential buyers.

Earth to Congress: Have We Met? Who
do these guys think they are that Sunoco owes them an explanation for
anything, let alone sharing privileged information of the highest
magnitude? And do we even have to mention that Congress hasn’t been able
to keep anything secret in 200 years?

And last month, a
bipartisan congressional delegation called on the U.S. Energy
Information Administration (along with the U.S. Department of Energy and
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) to conduct an impact analysis
on the potential of the refineries’ closure.

Uh, here’s a not-so-humble message to each member of that delegation: your proctologist called. He found your head.

Are they serious? Another Blue-Ribbon study to tell us what any sixth-grader already knows?

It
will be bad. Very, very bad. Jobs will be lost, families thrown into
chaos, houses foreclosed, businesses shuttered. The refining capacity
for the East Coast will suffer tremendously (not helped, of course, by
the fact that we haven’t built a new refinery in America since 1976).
Prices will increase. Volatility will spike. And America will, yet
again, find itself bent over the barrel, spending billions more petro
dollars buying oil from hostile nations because we (READ: Congress) will
not do the obvious – implement a policy of energy independence.

So
let’s save the tens of millions of taxpayer dollars on an absolutely
meaningless study, and do something novel: solve the problem!

And
to reiterate Step One, the politicians woefully short on private sector
experience and who lack the necessary vision to turn an unfortunate
situation into a positive one need to get out of the way and let
business-savvy entrepreneurs do what they do best: Create opportunity.

Energy
is the single most important industry in getting America back on her
feet again. And retooling the refineries here in our backyard – the
right way, for the right product, to fulfill the right vision – is the
blueprint to make that a reality.

And what a Christmas present that would be!

Catholic Mass, Andy Reid, School Choice and Dumb Security Measures

 

 

The best thing about being a columnist is that there’s never a
shortage of material—especially the kind that leaves you shaking your
head.  The bad part is that there isn’t enough time to cover all those
topics thoroughly.

So the following is a brief perspective on various events, many of which the media has missed:

Pennsylvania School Choice Disaster: For the last year, those fighting for educational reform (comprehensive choice in education) but against
Senate Bill 1, the fatally-flawed bill in Harrisburg that would have
neither educated nor reformed (and is now dead), were lectured on the
merits of “incrementalism” by SB 1 proponents. “You have to get a little
at a time,” they scolded.

Well, despite never actually trying to pass a
broader bill that would include the middle class—which is why school
choice failed—the SB 1 folks (pushing the incremental approach) were
smashingly successful.  They set the entire Movement back
incrementally.  Comprehensive school choice passed the senate in 1991,
and garnered 89 votes in the House (of the needed 102). In 1995, an even
broader bill had 101 votes—just one shy.  Yet in 2011, with a governor
who made vouchers a top priority, with Republican majorities in both
chambers and with millions of dollars for lobbying, the SB 1 forces
couldn’t even get 90 votes.

So let’s see. In 20 years, we went from 89 to 101 to 90.   Not exactly progress, but definitely incrementalism.

Political Motivation: The “politically motivated”
charge is an overused—and   meaningless—line uttered by those who refuse
to confront the truth.  Consider two recent examples, with the typical
lack of follow-up by the media to call the complainers on the carpet:

Herman Cain is certainly an affable chap, but had no business running
for president for two reasons.  First, he was clueless on the issues,
as his entertaining responses illustrated.  Second, if you’re going to
be under the most intense spotlight in the world, you need to be up
front with your skeletons so that they are revealed on your terms. But
Cain didn’t do that, and he got burned.

How could he possibly think that three sexual harassment suits
wouldn’t come to light? In his announcement speech, he could have denied
wrongdoing, blamed bloodthirsty trial lawyers and wimpy settle-happy
insurance companies, and moved on.  Instead, he just kept blaming Rick
Perry and later the Democrats for leaking it, self-righteously stating
that the story was “politically motivated.”

Hey, Herman, here’s a newsflash.  You were running for President of
the United States! Of course it’s politically motivated!  So what? It’s
not whether something is politically motivated but whether the allegations were true—which
the national media never seemed to ask. Politicians leak things about
their opponents all the time, motivated by their desire to win. If he had just been honest from the beginning, he might still be in the race.

And locally, we have all the Democratic leaders fuming about the new congressional districts,
redrawn every 10 years by the party in power in Harrisburg, which
happens to be the GOP.  Therefore—you guessed it—we have the Dems
leveling the charge that the gerrymandered districts were drawn that way
for political purposes (or, as one classicly described the new 7th District, “Meehan-mandered”).

Let’s see.  They are congressional seats, filled by … politicians.
They are designed by … politicians.  They will remain unchanged for the
next decade, so the drawing was done for … political purposes.  Where’s
the surprise?  That’s the way it’s always worked.  Interestingly, the
Dems’ statements could be swapped word for word with Republicans when
they were out of power.

It would have been refreshing to hear a Democratic official be honest
and say, “Yes, the districts suck for us. Kudos to the GOP.  They got
slaughtered in 2006 and 2008, but won when it counted (2010), and now we
have to live with the results. It’s our party’s fault, so we’ll be sure
to gear up in 2020 to gerrymander them to our liking.”

But that type of honesty is just a pipe dream in politics.

Catholic Church changes: Church leaders decided that
it would be a nice idea to substantially change the liturgy using new
translations.  Brilliant move.  It took centuries for most Catholics to
even begin mumbling the prayers at Sunday Mass (though singing is still
nonexistent), and now they change the whole works?  You can hear the
crickets now …

Fair or not, it has also left many wondering why the Church spent so
much time and energy on such an endeavor while still not cleaning up its
own house regarding the (continuing) sex scandals. And not
coincidentally, more Catholic school closings will be announced next
month.  Sorry, that’s not because of the economy, demographics and
population shifts, but lack of leadership, very little transparency and
an image of arrogance that will be very hard to break. Amen.

Safe to Fly? Think Again: A hugely important story
that got very little attention is the new Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) rules that don’t require children under 12 to take
their shoes off for x-ray inspection. Additionally, children will
receive significantly fewer pat-downs. (Despite the inevitable claims by
one or two whining parents, these pat-downs are not intrusive and the
parents are never separated from their children during the procedure.)

Well, at least it’s reassuring that terrorists don’t know about this new policy.  Oh wait … they do.

Not only do we implement such an insane, politically correct
procedure, but gleefully announce it to the world.  And since there are
numerous examples of terrorists strapping bombs to their children’s
bodies in the name of God knows what, does anyone really think they
won’t gleefully accept this gift, change their strategy, and place
explosives in Junior’s shoe?

And when the next disaster occurs, we’ll all stand around wondering
how on Earth this could have happened.  For that answer, just look to
the TSA signs announcing the policy.

Of course, before that tragedy occurs, we could end the security
theatre and start profiling, make everyone take off their shoes, and
have no exceptions for pat-downs.

As always, those who don’t like it can take the bus to Europe.

And finally, for all the Eagles fans who have been praying for Andy Reid’s firing
at the end of the season, keep dreaming. The Birds will play just well
enough to keep the best three-quarter coach in football right where he
is.  After all, this is Philadelphia, and we revel in the misery heaped
upon us, year after year, by boneheaded decisions made by our teams.

And you can take that $10,000 bet right to the bank.

 

Pennsylvania Society In New York? Absolutely!

Pennsylvania Society In New York? Absolutely!


When the second weekend in December rolls around, you can set your watch to two things:

1) Politicians, business leaders and media executives from the Keystone State converge on the Waldorf Astoria in Manhattan for three days of receptions and parties in an event known as The Pennsylvania Society Weekend.

2) The news media will, verbatim, recycle their tired old story, criticizing the event and asking why it isn’t held in Pennsylvania.

Good point, right? Wrong. It’s articles like that which make a newspaper’s biggest value being the backup when you run out of toilet paper.

Instead of actually reporting on some of the newsworthy stories that emerge from the weekend, or, God forbid, using the opportunity to generate leads for future stories, most reporters choose the easy — read: lazy — way out by publishing last year’s article after simply changing the date.

Water is wet, the sky is blue and the Pennsylvania Society gala will always be in New York — as it should be. So for all the misguided good-government types, self-described “reformers,” and the chip-on-their-shoulder folks who sport a nose-pressed-against-the- glass attitude, here’s a newsflash: your self-righteous criticism is not just wrong, but factually incorrect about the PA Society. As a result, your comments are simply ignored as white noise.

Here is the truth rebutting many criticisms leveled at the year’s premier networking event and the “elite” who attend:

1) Why isn’t it held in Philadelphia or Pittsburgh? Uhhh, this is a no-brainer. Because, literally, no one would go. Period. Not only is there always an excitement in getting away for a weekend — which just isn’t the same when the destination is in your backyard — but there is the ultimate incentive to attend: it’s Manhattan at Christmas time. No city in the world comes close to matching the electricity flowing through New York in December. There is nothing better. End of story.

2) Why is the Pennsylvania Society event held in New York? In addition to the above, there’s a little thing called history. In an age when traditions are routinely scoffed, it is refreshing to see that some are still sacred. The weekend started a century ago when some of Pennsylvania’s successful businessmen living in New York (you know, the evil industrialists who had the gall to actually employ hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians and transform the state into one of the most dominant economic engines in the world) wanted to keep in touch with fellow Pennsylvanians.

Wow. Maintaining friendships, cementing business relationships and furthering the economic interests of Pennsylvania. What a crime. Maybe they shouldn’t have started the tradition and instead let the state fall into stagnation, decay, and malaise — kind of like it is now.

3) It’s all backroom deals in smoke-filled rooms: Not true. New York has one of those ridiculous, all-encompassing smoking bans, which is a shame. I saw a bunch of CEO’s and pols trying to finish their deal-making after getting thrown out of a mahogany-paneled restaurant for lighting up their Cubans, only to get ticketed for smoking in Times Square. Yep. That’s illegal too. The nerve of New York to interfere with Pennsylvania’s elite!

Of course, it hasn’t dawned on the critics that “schmoozing, networking, fund-raising, backslapping, wining, dining, and deal-making” (as the Inquirer described it) can and does take place outside of New York. It happens in Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and everywhere in between. As a matter of fact, these folks don’t even need back rooms anymore, as they can “make their deals” on cell phones, and, for those who prefer face-to-face conspiracies, Skype.

The truth is that the last time a candidate was “anointed” at the Pennsylvania Society was Bill Scranton for Governor. In 1962. And a check of the records will show there was in fact an election that year, so Mr. Scranton was not installed via dictate by the power elite.

4) The money would be better spent in Pennsylvania, and what kind of message does it send in this economy to have politicians attending lavish parties in New York?

It’s probably a bad image, but damn it’s a fun time!

Of course, both these points boil down to one of America’s biggest problems — and a major factor why we are in this mess. We are all about style and symbolism over substance.

Does it “look good” to spend money in-state? Sure. Would it make one bit of difference? None. Zero. Maybe if a fraction of the energy spent advocating for symbolism was actually spent on getting Pennsylvanians back to work through meaningful growth policies, we’d all be a lot better off. Ironically, many of the detractors are the same ones standing in the way of real progress, but that’s another column.

5) It’s so aristocratic…all the power elite playing in their privileged world.

Well, since this author attends, that theory is shot to hell. But beyond that, it’s simply not true. Here’s the biggest non-secret that will get me barred from the few events to which I’m actually invited: most “By Invitation Only” events are nothing of the kind. Put on a suit or nice dress, and you’re in. And once that happens, the preconceived notions disappear right before your eyes.

It’s not about backroom deals and the coronation of candidates. It’s about people enjoying the company of folks whom they see only this once the whole year. It’s about renewing long-lost friendships. It’s about swapping war stories, exchanging ideas, going shopping, seeing a Broadway play and taking in a show at Radio City.

But perhaps most remarkable is that, just this one time of year in New York, you can walk into a room with no gatekeepers and have a relaxed, in-depth conversation with some fascinating people who are otherwise insulated. Current and former Governors, U.S. Senators, Attorneys General, Cabinet Secretaries, Congressmen, titans of industry, media publishers, authors… the list goes on and on. The overarching point of the weekend isn’t to lobby and politic (though clearly that takes place), but to have fun.

State Representative Mike Vereb said it best, “You can actually talk to someone for more than five minutes.” Too bad we can’t do that more often in Harrisburg, but it’s a start.

And here’s the best part. It’s civil. Democrats and Republicans actually talk to one another without hurling insults and fists. About the only folks hitting the floor are the ones who enjoyed the festivities a tad too much.

The media would do itself a huge favor by reporting on the true aspects of the Pennsylvania Society Weekend and not regurgitating the same trite garbage that only serves to further undermine people’s faith in their leaders.

So I raise my glass to keeping the Pennsylvania Society Weekend exactly where it belongs — New York City.

Cuban cigar, anyone?

 

 

Pennsylvania Society In New York? Absolutely!

Stockpile Chinese-made Christmas Gifts Until U.S. Policy Changes,

Stockpile Chinese-made Christmas Gifts Until U.S. Policy Changes,

By Chris Friend

 

 

After watching the latest segment of ABC World News’s “Made in America” series, several thoughts come to mind:
1) Don’t view it on a full stomach.
2) Once again, the media has failed to ask the right questions because
they, like our elected officials, don’t understand the problem.
3) Spending more money on a problem sounds great but is never the solution.

The series illustrates the astronomical amount of goods that are made
in China, and postulates how great it would be if only we could “buy
American.”

Gee, Diane Sawyer and Company, tell us something we don’t know.

Perhaps if the network did a little research as to the real reason why America manufactures virtually nothing anymore, thus identifying the problem, it could then report on the ways to bring back American companies, and the jobs and products they create.

But that would take foresight and initiative. And when it comes to the American media, those traits are in short supply.

In the latest segment, Sawyer states that the average American family
will spend $700 this Christmas season, and that if each just spent $64
on American-made goods, more than 200,000 jobs would be created.

If that’s the recipe for success, then why stop at just $64? Well,
ABC thought of that. Reporting that total Christmas spending would add
up to more than $465 billion, they did the math for viewers: “If that
money was spent entirely on U.S.-made products, it would create 4.6
million jobs.”

Great idea, if you’re playing make-believe. But in the real world, things don’t work that way.

First, we live in an ever-increasing global economy,
which is perfectly fine, as world trade is a good thing. But things
don’t work out so well when a country owns a mammoth trade deficit,
which, in our case, is north of $500 billion per year and exponentially
growing. You don’t need to be an economist to understand that when
manufacturing plants move overseas, exports drop significantly while
imports shoot skyward. That trend will only continue until the problem
is identified (let alone solved). But stating a pie-in-the-sky wish that
all products should or could be purchased in America is just plain
insulting.

Second, throwing more money at the problem won’t solve anything,
and, in fact, will make it worse by masking the real issues. Yet that’s
a lesson lost on America, as we continue to fall for the duplicitous
line that if we just open the wallet and increase the budget, all will
be well.

What do we do about the nation’s abysmal academic achievement, in
which U.S. students rank near the bottom of every category compared to
their global competitors? Spend more on “education”—a lot more. Of
course, we’ve been doing that every year at the local, state and federal
levels, yet the scores continue to go the wrong way, but so what? That
just means we need to spend even more money!

Too much crime on our streets? Hire more cops, despite the fact that
most municipalities are going under just trying to pay current salaries
and exploding pension and benefit costs. Forget that even the most
militarized police states still have crime, and that more money (and
thus more police) won’t deter crime. Smarter policing, and infinitely
more important, smarter kids, will. But since we still aren’t “spending
enough” on education, we continue to open the coffers for more cops.

Not enough jobs? Again, this wouldn’t be an issue if we had an
educated workforce and a solid manufacturing base. But since we have
neither, and refuse to make any meaningful attempt to change that
situation, we create money out of thin air, throwing trillions in
“stimulus” dollars (a.k.a., “taxpayer” money) at the problem. The fact
that it didn’t work has not deterred the politicians, as they seek yet
another round of stimulus spending.

And now, ABC would have us believe that spending $64 is the panacea
to America’s chronic unemployment problem, and one that will help
manufacturers stay in business.

When will we ever learn?

Such news reports only serve to divert attention from the real
problems that need addressing: our atrociously unfavorable trade
policies, the highest corporate taxes in the world, and the complete
lack of an energy policy. By understanding these problems, we could
begin to stave off the total loss of manufacturing. And here’s a
newsflash: No nation has ever prospered, let alone survived, without a
healthy manufacturing base. Without that, it’s lights out, and that’s
not conjecture, but mathematical certainty.

So what to do?

• Trade policies need to be wiped clean and rewritten from scratch,
with one overarching element above all else: America’s interests come
first. Period. China looks out for its own interests, as it should. We
need to do the same. At some point, we may not have the leverage to call
the shots, but we do now. So let’s do it.

• An immutable law of economics is that if you want less of
something, tax it—a concept lost on most elected officials. Hopefully
that will change with a new Congress that will incentivize companies to
keep jobs—and revenue—stateside by slashing the corporate income tax.
It’s easy to paint the CEO who moves operations to more favorable tax
environments overseas as greedy, but when faced with the highest tax
rates in the world, combined with shrinking profit margins, it becomes a
sound business decision. Given the choice, most would rather stay in
the U.S., but the government has taken that choice away from many.

• By far, the most effective solution to give manufacturing a
permanent rebirth and a competitive edge is simple and easy. It’s energy
independence. But it seems that drilling for oil and natural gas,
mining clean coal and expanding nuclear power is just too politically
incorrect for ABC’s focus.

America will never compete with the lowest labor costs in the world. So the only
way to offset that is to have the lowest energy costs in the world. And
more than any nation on Earth, America can do that, because it
possesses the greatest concentration of energy resources on the planet.

Lower fuel costs give manufacturing companies an edge, and that means
greater commerce and more jobs. Businesses can take the billions in
savings that cheap energy offers, and reinvest it so that operations are
expanded, more workers are hired, and new manufacturing doors in
America are opened.

And when all of the ancillary benefits are realized, the economy goes
into overdrive: homes are bought, restaurants thrive, small businesses
no longer face closure, and untold new ventures spring to life. All lead
to higher tax revenue.

Incomprehensibly, too many major media outlets and the majority of
politicians in both parties do not recognize these root causes of
America’s economic crisis. And you can’t solve a problem if you don’t
know what it is.

Connect the dots, and America thrives again. Keep the same policies in place, and we go the way of Europe.

And what a story that would be.

 

Corbett Role In Penn State Scandal

Pop Quiz: What’s the relationship between the following two statements which have appeared in recent news articles:

1) “Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett’s national profile rises in the wake of Penn State scandal.”

2) “Tom Corbett has been mentioned as a possible Vice Presidential candidate.”

Strangely,
they are inversely proportional. When one’s profile rises, that’s
typically a good thing. But as the nation learns about some very
disturbing actions of Corbett related to the Penn State scandal, his
Veep chances are plummeting. As a direct result, his chances of ever
being a heartbeat away are between zero and forgetaboutit.

At this rate, he may be lucky just to survive his first term.

Why
the cover-up, and how far up the ladder did it go? Why the lack of
swift action, from not just the University, but from law enforcement?
And how could football — no matter how storied a program — have
risen above the protection of innocent children?

These questions
were supposed to be answered by a thorough and unbiased investigation by
the state Attorney General’s Office. But as more information emerges
on that front, the less faith people have that justice has been — or
will be — served.

Enter Tom Corbett.

For better or
worse, Corbett has been a quiet, behind-the-scenes governor during his
first year in office. Yet he felt compelled to address the state and
national media on the scandal. In doing so, he said more in one press
conference than he had in his entire governorship, despite the fact that
he declined to answer most questions.

Interestingly, Corbett is
wearing three hats. He is the Governor of a state that contributes
millions to Penn State. He is a Penn State Board Trustee who
participated in Board decisions, including the firings of Joe Paterno
and University President Graham Spanier. And most significantly, he is
the former Attorney General who launched the child molestation
investigation of former football coach Jerry Sandusky in 2009.

Corbett has attempted to have the
best of both worlds: national publicity where he touts the virtues of
morality, and a free pass on accountability because of alleged
confidentiality issues. But that tactic has backfired, as the media
spotlight turned on Corbett himself. The more that is learned about
Corbett’s actions — and inactions — regarding the investigation, the
more his credibility tanks.

Consider:

1) It took
substantially longer for the Attorney General’s office to bring charges
against Sandusky than it did for numerous politicians to be indicted in
the Bonusgate corruption probe. Bonusgate was a very complex
investigation involving crafty politicians with the best lawyers money
could buy. Since much of what was being investigated in Bonusgate was
not run-of-the mill illegalities, the investigators had to overcome a
hefty, time-consuming learning curve to understand the subject matter.

So
how can such a complicated investigation come to fruition more quickly
than a black-and-white child rape case? And where is the rule against
making an initial arrest to get the molester off the street — and warn
the public — while continuing to build the case?

Given the
appalling nature of the alleged crimes, and the real possibility that
more young children were molested during the three year investigation,
why did the Attorney General wait so long to make the staffing level as
robust as it should have been from the start?

If the answer is
that resources were limited — sorry, try again. As bad as other
crimes may have been, such as those committed in Bonusgate, no one was
physically hurt and the welfare of children was never an issue. Giving
priority to children who are at risk of rape and molestation is a
no-brainer. But inexplicably, that wasn’t done.

The Governor
continues to defend his actions — scolding those who dare question him
— by stating that it takes time to build such a case and that he
can’t comment further, but three years? That’s an insult to everyone,
especially the victims. Again, you can’t have it both ways,
grandstanding for political points but clamming up when the questions
get tough.

And fair or not, many are now asking if the
investigation was delayed so that Corbett could avoid being the
gubernatorial candidate who took down Joe Paterno and Penn State —
both wildly popular among the hundreds of thousands of alumni living in
the state.

2) This one is simply incomprehensible.

In yet another instance of Corbett finishing what former Democratic Governor Ed Rendell started (others being $20 million of taxpayer money to renovate the Yankees’ AAA stadium, and $42 million to bail out the Philadelphia Shipyard to build ships with no buyers), the Governor personally approved a $3 million taxpayer-funded grant to Sandusky’s Second Mile charity — just four months ago!

That bears repeating. Tom Corbett,
with full knowledge that Sandusky was under investigation for multiple
child rapes, still approved the money to his charity.

How is that possible? And why on earth is the national media not yet running with this?

In
a response that was offensive to any rational person, here’s what his
spokesman said, as reported in the Pittsburgh Tribune Review:

“He
(Corbett) couldn’t block that (grant) from going forward because of
what he knew as attorney general…He couldn’t let on to anyone (including
the governor’s office) what he knew….”

That is so wrong that it begs the question as to the real motivation behind approving the grant.

First,
the fact that so many people had been interviewed by the grand jury
made the investigation anything but a secret. Second, the Harrisburg
Patriot News reported on the grand jury investigation —- in March.
Corbett approved the funds — in July! So not wanting to “let on” was
clearly bogus. The investigation was already well-established in the
public domain.

Secondly, there was an incredibly easy way to deal
with the grant without tipping off anyone: simply strike it. After
all, the budget Corbett signed cut everything else, so a grant to a
charity would have been seen as just another casualty of financial
cutbacks.

Veto the grant (why taxpayers are funding that in the
first place is obscene, but that’s another story) and be done with it.
It should have been that easy. But it didn’t happen.

Why?

Well, consider if the following may have had anything to do with it. According to the sports website Deadspin.com,
past and present board members of the Second Mile, along with their
businesses and families, have donated more than $640,000 to Corbett
since 2003.

That interesting — and massively
significant — point seemed to have slipped the Governor’s mind during
his press conferences. Go figure.

Something is rotten to the
core about how this whole affair has been investigated. It’s time for
the Feds to take the lead role in uncovering the whole truth, and that
includes possibly looking into the Attorney General’s investigation.

It’s
clear the Board of Trustees cannot be counted upon to conduct an
unbiased investigation, nor can the local police, and, sadly, even the
Attorney General’s office. And nothing emanating from the Governor’s
office on this issue can be taken at face value.

In discussing
why Paterno and Spanier were fired, the Governor said, “…the Board lost
confidence in their ability to lead Penn State through this time and
into the future.”

With all the opportunities Tom Corbett has had
to play it straight with the people of Pennsylvania — especially the
victims — on his dealings with the Penn State issue, he hasn’t done
so.

And that has caused an ever-increasing number of people to lose confidence in his ability to lead.

There
is a great scene in the movie The American President where Richard
Dreyfuss suggests that being president “was, to a certain extent, about
character.” And in classic Michael Douglas style, he replies, “I can
tell you, without hesitation, that being President is entirely about
character.”

Well, character isn’t limited to the Oval Office. It
resides in every one of us — and that includes Governors, Trustees,
coaches, police and investigators.

Moving forward, let’s demand that a basic legal and moral principle be followed to the very end:

Fiat justitia ruat caelum —“Let justice be done though the heavens fall.”

The victims deserve no less.

 

Corbett Role In Penn State Scandal

Fumo Judge Disgrace To Federal Bench

Fumo Judge Disgrace To Federal Bench 

 

Get a hit just one out of three times, and you’re in the Hall of Fame. Get nine out of ten problems right on a math test and you’re a star student. Nail one of the biggest political dirtbags in Pennsylvania history with 100 percent success — gaining convictions on every one of 137 federal counts — and you’re the bad guy. You’re the one who gets roundly reamed out in very public fashion. You’re the one criticized for disregarding the law.

In becoming the new poster boy in the “What the F&*# was he thinking?!” category, United States District Judge Ronald Buckwalter did the unthinkable — again — by giving former State Senator Vince Fumo a Get Out Of Jail (Almost) Free card.

Convicted of charges in 2009, ranging from public corruption to tax offenses, and from fraud to
obstruction of justice, Fumo received the appallingly light sentence of
just 4 ½ years. People routinely get sentenced to a whole lot more for a
whole lot less.

But this Judge, who before the trial was viewed
as somewhat competent, made a series of mistakes after conviction,
including incorrectly reading the sentencing guidelines. So he was
forced by an appeals court to re-sentence Fumo.

Despite the fact that:

A) Every one of the convictions still stood,

Federal sentencing guidelines called for 17 to 22 years,

C) The public and legal community had been outraged at the original lenient punishment, and

D) Fumo showed absolutely no remorse — none —, which the Judge acknowledged,

E)
Buckwalter gave Fumo six more months. That’s not a typo. Not six more
years, which itself would have been woefully inadequate, but six short
months.



Just writing that is enough to make you vomit.

Ronald
Buckwalter is an absolute disgrace to the federal bench, and his
flagrant disregard for justice calls into the question the very nature
of lifetime judicial appointments. There is simply no rational
explanation for his pig-headed decisions regarding Fumo, but making the
sin mortal was chastising the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

That’s like a parent blaming the teacher because his child bombed the test.

The
investigation, which started under then-U.S. Attorney Pat Meehan, was
thorough and professional, without so much as a single black mark. The
investigators brought what they believed to be an iron-clad case against
Fumo, and a jury of Fumo’s peers obviously agreed.

In appealing
Buckwalter’s original sentence, the Office again acted responsibly,
correctly noting Buckwalter’s mistakes, and seeking the only thing that
everyone but Fumo and his dwindling posse wanted: justice.

An
appropriate punishment at the original sentencing should have ended the
Fumo saga, but like the referee who feels compelled to upstage the
players and become the center of attention, Buckwalter seemed to want
the headlines for himself.

Mission accomplished Judge. But at what price?

His
disparagement of the U.S. Attorney’s office without a doubt provided
ammunition for future defendants to argue that they too are the victims
of overzealous, politically-motivated prosecutors. Wittingly or not,
Judge Buckwalter opened a Pandora’s Box that will be very difficult to
close.

In calling the prosecution excessive, Buckwalter stated
that Fumo should not have been charged with so many counts, when in
reality, he could have been charged with more. He even went so far as to
label the prosecution’s efforts “unfair.”

Unfair?



No, the prosecution was more than
fair. They didn’t commit the crimes. Vince Fumo did. What’s patently
unfair is letting him off easy because he was an “effective” legislator
(which, by the way, is one of the biggest myths in all of Harrisburg,
but that’s another story.) and because he was involved in charitable
works.

Excuse us, Judge, but what does that have to do with anything?

You
do the crime, you do the time. It’s that simple. And for the other
factors that may have played a role in leniency, they too should have
been irrelevant.

If, because of poor health, Fumo would have died
in prison if given a longer sentence, so be it. If, because he would
have been a very old man getting out of prison had he gotten the lengthy
punishment he deserved, that’s his problem. No one held a gun to Fumo’s
head to embark on a life of crime.

To give Fumo what is
perceived by most to be special treatment is, in some respects, the
biggest crime of all. Not illegal, of course, as sentencing is at
Buckwalter’s discretion, but criminal in the sense that justice was not
adequately served.

Perhaps more than any other city, Philadelphia
has a reputation for rampant, institutionalized corruption. For
decades, the bad guys always seemed to operate with impunity. From
rigged elections to pols illegally living it up on the taxpayers’ dime,
the perception, rightly so, was that the politically-connected could
operate above the law, and the average Joe got the shaft.

But
then a funny thing happened. After witnessing numerous convictions at
the city, county and state levels, most notable in the Bonusgate
scandal, the public started to believe again. Hope was renewed. Turns
out that the people, through their honest, hard working prosecutors,
were fighting City Hall — and winning.

Faith in truth, justice
and the American way, now restored, hit its pinnacle when Vince Fumo,
once untouchable, was brought back down to Earth, led away in handcuffs.
But when the original sentence was announced, the collective breath of
our society was forcibly expelled, the result of an immense kick to the
gut.

Yet hope remained, if by a delicate thread. It wasn’t over.
Maybe, just maybe, things would be made right, and Vince Fumo would
finally “get his” at the re-sentencing. But as before, the people were
left devastated, angry, and dumbfounded. Somehow, Fumo escaped the fate
he deserved.

And with that, all the goodwill and hope that had
been cautiously accumulating evaporated in a heartbeat. Fool me once,
shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.



The bitter hardness that is
Philadelphia’s attitude just got stiffer. As a direct result of the Fumo
travesty, no longer do folks believe in fairness, but instead have
reverted back to the “they’re all corrupt, they’re all in it together”
mentality. And who can blame them?

No matter how you slice it,
the bad guys came away with the better hand, and the good guys finished
last. Thank you, Judge Buckwalter.

There is no worse death that the end of hope. And more than anything, that’s why Philadelphia is dying.

Case closed.

Euro Debt Crisis? Not Greek To Me

Euro Debt Crisis? Not Greek To Me

 

Greece. What a country!

From being the cradle of democracy to leadership in modern security (allowing stray dogs to sleep atop airport x-ray machines – no joke), from novel solutions to reduce speeding (traffic lights are routinely ignored, resulting in a seven miles-per-hour average speed in Athens) to having a good old-fashioned rivalry (hating the Turks), there’s something for everyone in Greece.

Topping it all, the legendary Greek work
ethic (clock in, coffee, siesta, set up construction cones, break,
coffee, siesta, lunch, siesta, ouzo, siesta, afternoon break, double
shot ouzo, siesta, remove construction cones, baklava (with ouzo),
siesta, clock out) has resulted in Greece being the catalyst for the
coming Dark Age. Far be it for anyone to suggest increasing retirement
age to something beyond what seems like 37.

Pay no attention that those asking for commonsense reforms are the ones footing the bill for that lavish lifestyle.

Because
of runaway spending and immense entitlements bestowed upon Greek civil
service workers, the government had a problem. The Piper finally came,
but there was no more money.

So the European Union (EU)
braintrust decided to bail out Greece, a combination of increasing the
money supply (contributing to inflation) and using OPM (Other People’s
Money).

And in return for the sacrifice others made for the
“greater good” (such as the request to forgive 50 percent of Greece’s
debt), what was asked of that nation? Reforms that would, in theory, get
Greece back on solid financial footing, if that is possible for a
nation whose debt exceeds an unfathomable 180 percent of its GDP.

The bailout was made, with self-congratulating, albeit clueless, Euro-technocrats preaching that all would be well.

And
things were great, at least in Greece, as the message of austerity was
received loud and clear, with a wink. Translation: “we’ll just continue
with Business As Usual.”

However, as any fifth grader could have
deduced, the Greeks ran out of money –  again and again and again. Not
willing to cut their losses, the EU did exactly what Greece knew it
would – open up its coffers, again and again and again.

We are on the sixth installment of the bailout, still predicated on austerity measures that simply aren’t happening.

And are the Greek politicians enacting unpopular but necessary reforms to avoid default?

Uhhh…put
it this way. Predicting Kim Kardashian would be divorced after only two
months was a better bet than thinking the Greeks would do the right
thing.

The latest development, mistakenly called a “bombshell”
but an obvious next step to all but the Euro-Geniuses, was the decision
to pass the buck by calling for a referendum on austerity measures.

So
the Greeks, who have been rioting because they don’t want the party to
end, are now being asked to voluntarily turn off the free-money spigot.
Sure they will.

To be fair, the vote won’t be unanimous. There are probably 30 Turkish expats who will vote Yes just for spite.

Oh to be Greek!

The
European Financial Stability Facility (a great oxymoron) and Central
Bank continue their insane polices of bailouts and bond-buying
initiatives. Portugal and Ireland have also received bailouts that
haven’t worked, so more money will be heading their way.

The big boys of Italy and Spain are next, and their financial needs are exponentially greater than the other nations combined.

The
most significant, yet least discussed, issue in this debacle is that no
one is offering solutions. Instead, they are merely buying time so that
the can is kicked down the road again, praying the implosion occurs on
someone else’s watch. Throw more imaginary money at the problem, say the
right things to keep sheep-like investors duped, and don’t get caught
holding the bag.

 

That has worked for decades, but too many
fundamental economic principles have been violated to keep the Piper at
bay much longer. The Ponzi scheme of socialist-leaning Western economies
is quickly approaching implosion status, and when it blows, the Great
Depression will look like a walk in the park. That’s what happens when
socialism and laziness trump free markets and personal initiative.

The
referendum is being labeled a high-stakes gamble, with Prime Minister
George Papandreou betting the Europeans are in so deep that even if
austerity is rejected, bailouts will continue. Default, we are told, is
far worse.

But the truth, which no one seems willing to admit, is
what transpires in Greece doesn’t matter. Given the complete lack of
will in America and Europe (and the absence of an even basic
understanding of economic principles), an unprecedented crash and
massive social unrest is inevitable.

That is the reality grounded in cold, hard facts.

Ultimately, even Bernie Madoff was forced to confess to a Ponzi scheme. When will reality force our leaders to do the same?

 

 

Euro Debt Crisis? Not Greek To Me

Romney Must Address His Mormonism Now

Romney Must Address His Mormonism Now

He is Republican, pro-defense and hawkish on the War. He is also an unabashed Christian, although his particular sect is viewed with suspicion and prejudice. Oh, and he’s running for president. Based on the recent firestorm that erupted when a pastor called a presidential candidate’s religion a “cult,” it seems clear that we’re talking about Mitt Romney and his Mormon faith. But we’re not. The above description referred to none other than Dwight D. Eisenhower–a Jehovah’s Witness for most of his life.

Eight years later, it was John F. Kennedy defending his Catholicism.

Now, it’s Romney’s turn. But he is taking a “leap of faith” by deliberately avoiding discussion about how his Mormonism influences his values, and how he views the relationship between religion and government.

During the last presidential campaign, Romney made a strategic mistake on the religion issue. It wasn’t that he didn’t address his Mormonism, because he did. The problem was his timing. And he seems about to make the same mistake.

*****

In the run up to the 2008 primaries, there was an intense battle inside Romney’s camp over whether Mitt should address the Mormon issue head-on. That the debate even took place demonstrated political naivete on Romney’s part, as well as a lack of historical knowledge.

Romney and some of his advisers actually thought they could avoid discussing his Mormonism. Since he was the frontrunner, how could they have believed that the “Mormon issue” would disappear?

Romney finally made his Mormon speech, but it was too late. Had it been delivered three months earlier, he would have been ahead of the curve, proactively talking about Mormonism on his terms. But that didn’t happen.

Instead, it looked like an act of desperation.

Romney, who had been leading in the early states (in both money and polls) suddenly found himself trailing the surging Mike Huckabee in Iowa, who was also breathing down his neck in New Hampshire and South Carolina. It was only after losing momentum that Mitt decided to address the questions that had long been swirling about his faith. The result was that he looked desperate and disorganized.

Apparently, Romney’s staff thought they could put the issue to rest by emulating Kennedy’s famous Texas speech to Protestant ministers, where he adamantly stated that he would not be taking orders from the Pope. That was a miscalculation on several counts. First, common perception is that Kennedy ended concerns about his Catholicism after that speech. Wrong. JFK felt obliged to address the issue on several other occasions.

More importantly, Catholicism was the largest single religion in the nation, and Catholics made up a substantial and powerful voting bloc in many key states. Conversely, Mormons make up just a fraction of the electorate, and a significant number of voters, especially evangelical Christians, view Mormonism as a non-Christian “cult.”

Romney’s unexpected slip in the polls four years ago was his first major crisis, and how he reacted–some say over-reacted–led to questions about the candidate. Were people put off by a potential commander-in-chief who seemed to panic at the first sign of trouble? Could America afford a president who was seen as indecisive? And just how much of Mitt Romney’s “strong faith” was believable, since his former positions on abortion and gay rights stood in contradiction to the tenets of his religion?

As we know, Romney failed to win the nomination that many experts said was his to lose. Now he’s back in the same frontrunner position, yet is again choosing to remain silent on the Mormon issue.

He sidestepped Rev. Robert Jeffress’s cult remark made at the Values Voter Summit, and failed to directly address another evangelical leader who questioned whether Mormonism was even a Christian faith. A Romney spokesman said he would not address the Mormon issue because he did so four years ago.

Given that the memory span of the average voter is about three months, that’s ridiculous. Failure to act quickly on this matter will undoubtedly cause history to repeat itself.

Like all religions, Mormonism has some tenets that seem quirky to non-adherents. As the primaries draw near, expect those aspects to become front and center on the national stage, both directly and indirectly. With all of Romney’s crisis-management experience in business, he ought to know that it’s always better to take the bull by the horns to define a difficult issue–and being the first to do so. If you allow the issue–or your opponents–to define you, you’re always playing catch-up.

By refusing to address an issue that clearly isn’t going away, Romney is playing with fire. No one remembers his speech from four years ago, but even if they did, he should innately understand that addressing an issue–any issue–just once is meaningless. In the same way that he hammers home his economic plan time and again, so too should he proudly discuss both Mormonism and his personal thoughts on how it affects his life. Not doing so only raises more questions and, by default, gives credence to unsubstantiated hearsay about “strange” Mormon beliefs.

Interestingly, but not unpredictably, several of Romney’s GOP competitors had the opportunity to state that Mormonism was a Christian religion. They took a pass. Why? Because they believe they’ll lose part of their evangelical base, some of whom view Mormonism with animosity.

That’s proof-positive that this issue isn’t going away. All the more reason for Romney to address it, and turn the tables on his competition.

Romney would be wise to study how Kennedy handled the religion issue. By consistently hammering away, JFK made it seem that voting against a Catholic was bigotry, plain and simple. Kennedy smashed a religious barrier that many said would never be broken, not by remaining silent and taking the high road, but with a take-no-prisoners approach in his quest to become America’s leader.

As both Eisenhower and Kennedy proved, it’s the man, not the religion, who will carry the day. But that distinction doesn’t come from rolling over. It is earned. Time will soon tell whether Romney understands that lesson.

 

Romney Must Address His Mormonism Now

Nutter Nuts About Philly Murder Rate

By Chris Freind


If the CEO of a Wall Street firm announced that revenues were up 22
percent, he would be lauded for his leadership and undoubtedly receive a
hefty raise.

By contrast, if it was revealed that the CEO was
playing games with the books and basing his figures not on a
year-to-date comparison from the prior year, but from four years ago, he
would probably be shown the door.

But that’s precisely the
situation with Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey, the
city’s highest-paid employee. The argument can be made that
Commissioner Ramsey is deliberately misleading the public on the city’s
murder rate.

A visit to the Philadelphia Police website Crime Stats page (http://phillypolice.com/about/crime-statistics)
verifies what we already know: shootings, violence and murder are out
of control throughout the city. As of this writing, there have been 259
murders since January 1, as one can plainly see from the highlighted
2011 figure on the webpage. Beside that is a number with a down arrow.
Currently, it’s 18 percent, but last week it stood at 22. It purports
to represent the percentage that murders have decreased.

And therein lies the problem. A big one.

Murders
aren’t down 18 or 22 percent. As a matter of fact, they’re up.
Comparing year-to-date statistics, they’ve increased ten from last year,
a whopping 24 from 2009 (a ten percent jump), and eight from 2008.

But
Chief Ramsey has decided to hide these numbers and instead compare
today’s murder rate with that of 2007, the high-water mark for killings.
That’s like the Phillies claiming a playoff victory because they beat
the Cardinals half a decade ago.

It’s interesting to note that
Ramsey was hired at the end of 2007, which perhaps explains why he is
using that blood-soaked year as his benchmark— all the easier to pass
the buck and make himself look better.

Maybe the Chief, and Mayor
Nutter, who hired him and remains his boss, missed their callings. They
seem better suited for Wall Street firms that rely on misleading
investors (in this case, the citizens) for their own personal gain
(re-election, job security and bloated pensions).

So residents
get the screws two ways: they walk away with a false sense of security,
mistakenly believing that murders are down. And when they realize the
truth — that their leaders are deliberately misleading them — they
feel betrayed.

Unlike the Wall Street CEO, Nutter and Ramsey get
away scott-free. And like some robber baron execs, they each make a
pile of money, courtesy of a duped public, with little accountability
and oversight.

In fact, Chief Ramsey is rolling in it, to the tune of $255,000/year.

You
may recall that earlier this year, the Commissioner was actively
courted for the top police job in his hometown of Chicago. Despite
pleas that he stay, it was almost a done deal, but for one small
sticking point: his $400,000 per year total compensation asking price,
according to press reports. You know it’s greedy when even a liberal
Democrat like Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel balks at such an obscene
amount, which, by the way, is the salary of the President of the United
States.

Ramsey’s reason for ultimately staying in Philadelphia?
“…the support I got here at home from the business community — and the
media, even — and, of course, Mayor Nutter, made the difference.”

Well,
that, and the $60,000 pay raise he was promised from the Mayor as a
reward for not leaving the city, courtesy of the taxpayers. That
increase makes the Commissioner the highest — repeat, highest — paid
city employee. Even more than the Mayor himself.

Ramsey was
right about one thing. He did get quite a bit of support, from city
councilmen (“we won the big prize” by retaining Ramsey) to the gushing,
sycophant media. Notably, neither entity bothered asking the right
questions before, or after, the lavish pay hike was doled out to the
Chief.

Questions such as:

1) How can the city afford to
shell out a $60,000/year salary increase to anyone when it can’t even
pay its current bills, has an insolvent pension, and continues to see
its tax base — what’s left of it — flee? In fact, it was just
reported that there is yet another tax revenue shortfall, adding to the
budget deficit. What a surprise.

And for the record, there are
plenty of qualified people who would have gladly accepted the
Commissioner’s previous salary of $195,000 had he chosen to leave.

2)
When will Philadelphia realize that paying exorbitant salaries to
government officials is not just financially foolhardy, but doesn’t
guarantee results? Just look at Arlene Ackerman, the now former School
Superintendent who made $325,000/year (with incentives allowing for a
half-million dollar payday) to preside over an ever-worsening school
district. For the privilege of leaving her post, she banked $905,000,
all footed by the public.

And don’t forget scandal-plagued former
Housing Authority chief Carl Greene, who, with his bonus, was making
$350,000. In addition, residents are still paying sky-high legal bills
related to the mess he left behind.

3) Was any quantitative, or
better yet, common sense analysis done to see if Ramsey merited such a
large salary bump? Murders are increasing, out-of-control flash mobs
have led to curfews, police corruption is rampant, and there is growing
fear on the streets, leading many suburbanites to stay away.

According
to the Chief’s 2008 “Crime Fighting Strategy,” the big goal that year
was to “reduce homicides by twenty-five percent,” yet the Department was
way short, overseeing only a 15 percent drop from 2007 to 2008. And
what of the stated overall plan of reducing homicides by 30 to 50
percent, as outlined in a public letter from Ramsey to Nutter? Not even
in the ballpark. As noted above, homicides have been rising, not
falling.

While certainly not all these things can be attributable
to the Chief, the buck stops with him. He is responsible. Just like a
CEO often receives no bonus when numbers are down, the Chief of Police
should have pay raises tied to performance. But since the Mayor deals
in Other People’s Money, that isn’t the case.

Is the city is
safer? You can play with statistics to bolster any desired conclusion.
Yet ask those in Philadelphia whether they truly feel secure, and most
would simply laugh. And that’s the only statistic that matters.

Is
the Chief doing a good job? In some respects, yes. But so stellar that
he commands a raise three times more than the city’s per capita income?
Not even close. The fact that the city can’t afford the money is just
salt in the wound.

OK, fine. Ramsey got his money. It is what it is, and he isn’t relinquishing it. But that bolsters the point all the more.

The leader of the Police Department should epitomize transparency and honesty.

Instead,
in what can only be assumed to be a deliberate attempt to deceive
Philadelphians, games are being played with the city’s increasing murder
rate. And there is no excuse for that. None.

The culture of any
organization is established by the conduct of its top leaders. In the
Philadelphia Police Department’s case, its culture of honor, values and
integrity has taken a hit. And when the rank and file — the guys on
the street chasing down the murderers — see their top brass skirting
the truth for political gain, perhaps they too cut a corner where they
shouldn’t be. They take on the persona of their leadership.

It’s
time for the Mayor and Chief to do the right thing by telling the
truth, no matter how difficult that may be. Let’s see more honesty in
the most trusted institution in Philadelphia — its police department.

Only when the city’s leaders regain the trust of the people will Philadelphia begin its journey back to respectability.

 

Nutter Nuts About Philly Murder Rate