Guzzardi Decision Revealed Fear

Guzzardi Decision Revealed FearGuzzardi Decision Revealed Fear

Yesterday’s (May 1)  Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision throwing retiree Bob Guzzardi off the GOP gubernatorial primary ballot was 5-2 with Max Baer and Debra McCloskey Todd dissenting.

The ruling overturned an April 15 decision by Commonwealth Court Judge  Mary Hannah Leavitt,

The Supreme Court’s rationale was that Guzzardi  did not timely file a Statement of Financial Interests with the State Ethics Commission.

It was the type of petty reasoning that ended for most of us with grade-school playground games, and indicated that Guzzardi’s no-money campaign — he was purposely refusing all donations — actually might have beat the incumbent Tom Corbett.

Guzzardi had initially filed the statement with the Department of State.

Judge Leavitt had  noted that the procedure changed this year;  the directions for submission were confusing; and Guzzardi’s campaign was given incorrect information by “a Department of State employee with apparent authority” that he only needed to file with that department rather than submit a separate filing to the Ethics Commission.

She  noted the Department of State issued a receipt to Guzzardi that it shouldn’t have as he was filing with them the original rather than the required copy.

She noted that Guzzardi promptly corrected the omission upon learning of the problem.

The Supreme Court, solidly in the pocket of the state’s power brokers, found none of these things mattered. It was better that thousands of Pennsylvanians be disenfranchised over a laughable technicality than the status quo of the money flow be threatened.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, a house organ of the establishment, reported Guzzardi as raising less than $5,000. Great journalism. The phrasing should be that he spent less than $5,000. The campaign was entirely self-funded. As noted, he was not raising money. He was refusing donations.

Corbett’s faction spent close to six figures in their fight to keep Guzzardi off the ballot.

The two weeks the Court took in making the decision forced many counties to issue absentee ballots including Guzzardi’s name. Votes cast for Guzzardi on those ballots will be counted as write-in votes for him.

For those wishing to write in Bob’s name  use Robert Guzzardi.

You know a lot of Republicans are going to pointedly not hit Corbett’s button at the polls and Pennsylvanians are sure learning how to use that write-in option. It would be cosmic humor of the highest magnitude if Guzzardi ends up beating him.

 

 

 

Pit Bull Steals Softball Show

Pit bull steals softball show or why maybe it’s a bad idea to bring your pit bull to a college softball game.  Actually, the dog looks like a lot of fun.

 

 

Giving Vapors

By The Editors of National Review

The FDA is proposing broad new regulations on the sale of so-called electronic cigarettes, which are devices that provide their users with a jolt of nicotine in the form of vapor. The sole sensible regulation contemplated by the FDA — forbidding sales to minors — is itself superfluous, such sales already being forbidden in every state.

Every state but Oregon, that is. In a strange little twist, the FDA’s proposed regulation may end up enabling the very business it is intended to restrict: Oregon does not specifically prohibit the sale of e-cigarettes to minors (which is probably a legislative oversight) but rather has categorically prohibited the sale of such products until such a time as the FDA should issue regulations.

E-cigarettes are the new Public Enemy No. 1 for anti-tobacco and anti-smoking activists, even though they contain no tobacco and produce no smoke. States and localities have been aggressive about policing the sale and use of them (some, such as New York City, rather too aggressive), but the nation’s self-appointed health police will be satisfied with nothing less than national action against the menace of silly-looking nicotine vaporizers. The health effects of vaporizers relative to cigarettes are the subject of some debate; some doctors suggest them to patients who wish to quit smoking. But the proposed FDA rules go well beyond health and safety concerns. They would prohibit, among other things, the sale of flavored nicotine vaporizing fluids, on the theory that bubblegum-flavored nicotine vapor will act as a gateway drug and our kindergartens soon will be full of toddlers puffing away on Cohibas during recess. This is an example of the FDA’s being confused about its mission, which is to ensure the safety of products that are sold to the public, not to decide which products the public should prefer. Smoking is unhealthy, but it is not the role of the FDA to substitute its own judgment, or the judgment of anti-smoking activists, for private judgment. Likewise, proposed regulations that would ban the offer of free product samples to adults, censor advertisements, and restrict the channels of retail sales are not intended to make the product safer but to discourage its use.

Other proposed FDA regulations, such as requiring manufacturers to register with the federal government and to comply with an onerous federal product-review process, will be quietly welcomed by the larger firms in the industry, because they will help to clear the field of competition from smaller firms that cannot afford the high costs of compliance.

Regulation is generally handled more sensibly at the state and local level, but we federalists and localists must appreciate that some of our states and cities are run by fanatics. On Tuesday of next week, new rules in New York City will ban the use of e-cigarettes wherever smoking is banned — which is effectively every public space in the city short of street corners — even though the traditional health rationale for smoking restrictions does not apply in the case of vaporizers. New York in May will raise the age of majority to 21 as far as tobacco and nicotine products are concerned. The city’s nannies are blissfully immune to the irony that e-cigarettes gained popularity in part as a response to restrictions on traditional tobacco products, including their banishment from bars and restaurants.

The FDA is also proposing regulations on cigars, which the Western world has managed to consume without the oversight of Washington since at least the 15th century.

Nearly three-fourths of the population of this country not only does without smoking but has never smoked, according to the American Lung Association. The campaign of public education about the health effects of smoking has been won and then some. But the nation’s nannies must have a vice to decry, and e-cigarettes give them the vapors.

 

BillLawrenceOnline.com Giving Vapors

 

 

Visit BillLawrence Dittos for Giving Vapors

Supremes Kill Guzzardi Campaign

Supremes Kill Guzzardi CampaignSupremes Kill Guzzardi Campaign

 

The insurgent primary challenged that terrified Pennsylvania’s feckless incumbent governor is over.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has thrown Bob Guzzardi off the ballot for May 20, Guzzardi just announced .

The Pennsylvania Republican leadership challenged the 68-year-old retired businessman’s petitions scant minutes before the deadline forcing the self-funded campaign to hire a lawyer to show that those who signed had been eligible to do so and to defend a bizarre claim that the phrase “semi-retired businessman and lawyer” as his job description was somehow fraudulent as he was no longer practicing law.

Oh, and that he violated a technicality as to which paper-please bureaucracy he was supposed to file his stuff.

His lawyer, Gretchen Sterns, did a fantastic job at the hearing before Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt who found rather conclusively in Guzzardi’s favor on April 15.

But apparently the fix was in. An appeal was filed and the decision desired by the party powers came though.

Expect a Democrat to be in the Governor’s Mansion next January. Power-hungry fools whose arrogant stupidity leads to shooting fleas with cannons deserve to lose.

What did they have to fear from a retiree who was pointedly refusing campaign donations?

By the way, did you see where the same bunch is trying to take out man-of-the-people Republican State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rich Corrupt Democrat Hypocrites

Rich Corrupt Democrat Hypocrites

Imagine a secret meeting in a ritzy hotel ballroom between unnamed billionaires and high ranking government officials gathered for the purpose of coordinating hundreds of millions of dollars to sway governmental policies, so writes Jerry Rogers at PJMedia.com

Rogers is describing a meeting recently held at the Ritz Carlton in Chicago by The Democracy Alliance, an organization of millionaires and billionaires designed to advance government’s control over the rest of us.

They want to bring back feudalism, basically.

They call in “progressivism” though.

Read Rogers story here.

 

Rich Corrupt Democrat Hypocrites

 

 

Visit BillLawrence Dittos for Rich Corrupt Democrat Hypocrites

Pothole Fixing Time

With this rough bout of global warming winding down crews are out fixing pot holes and State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) reminds motorist that those who fail to turn on headlights in posted work zones face a $25 fine.

He also says that motorists caught driving 11 mph or more above the posted speed limit in active work zones automatically lose their license for 15 days.
Active construction projects are listed at  511PA.com.

Pothole Fixing Time

 

 

Visit BillLawrence Dittos for Pothole Fixing Time

Things For Which The NBA Won’t Ban You

The always brilliant Ben Shapiro at Brietbart.com has written a great piece concerning things for which you can do without being subject to a lifetime ban by the NBA.

Check it out.

Things For Which The NBA Won't Ban You

Things For Which The NBA Won’t Ban You

 

 

 

50 Amateur Fencers vs 3 Olympians

50 Amateur Fencers vs 3 Olympians

A Japanese TV program pit three Olympians against 50 amateur fencers. You’ll be surprised who wins.

Or maybe not.

 

 

50 Amateur Fencers vs 3 Olympians

 

 

Visit BillLawrenceTrivia.com for Omnibits

Pa Tax Code Changes Pondered

State Rep. Jim Cox (R-129) reports that the Pennsylvania Legislature is considering changes to the tax code to benefit small business.

Cox says “like-kind exchanges” would be allowed so a small business can sell property and reinvest the proceeds into similar property without immediately having to pay taxes on these proceeds. Pennsylvania is the only state which does not currently allow for this provision.

Also small businesses would be granted the ability to use the Net Operating Loss deduction when filing their Pennsylvania taxes. Only large businesses can use this deduction. I

Also a technical change would be made to allow small businesses to have access to the same Section 179 deductions as large businesses. A Section 179 deduction is one that can be made toward a business’s tax liability when the business purchases new property, equipment or even software.

Pa Tax Code Changes Pondered

 

 

Visit BillLawrence Dittos for Pa Tax Code Changes Pondered

Napoleon Salvation

This Off the Internet for April 30 is by Bill Federer of American Minute and comes courtesy of Carris Kocher.

The size of the U.S. doubled on April 30, 1803, with the Louisiana Purchase.

Nearly a million square miles at less than three cents an acre – it was the greatest real estate deal in history!

The Louisiana Territory had belonged to France since 1699, being named after Louis XIV, ‘the Sun King’, the longest reigning monarch in European history.

Louis XIV had a global empire stretching from the Far East to the Caribbean, Africa to America.

Centralizing power, Louis XIV was reputed to have said “L’État, c’est moi” (“I am the state”) and “It is legal because I wish it.”

His grandson, Louis XV, lost the French and Indian War in 1763, leaving Britain to control of the French Territory east of the Mississippi.

As the war was ending, France ceded the Louisiana Territory west of the Mississippi to Spain in the secret Treaty of Fontainebleau, 1762, to keep Britain from getting it.

France’s next King, Louis XVI, sent his navy during the Revolutionary War to help America win the Battle of Yorktown and gain independence from Britain.

Ironically, France’s accumulated enormous war debt weakened the monarchy.

The French Revolution began in 1789, and on January 21, 1793, a mob beheaded 38-year-old Louis XVI.

A Reign of Terror began in France with 40,000 beheaded in Paris by the Committee of Public Safety, and hundreds of thousands killed across France who refused to embrace the new secular government.

Out of this chaos, Napoleon staged a coup d’état in 1799 and installed himself as First Consul of France.

Napoleon pressured Spain to sign the secret Treaty of San Ildefonso in 1800, giving the Louisiana Territory back to France.

In 1802, Jefferson sent James Monroe and Robert Livingston to France to purchase land in New Orleans to dock ships.

Needing cash to fight Britain and the other European countries, Napoleon offered to sell the entire 828,000 square miles of Louisiana Territory to the United States for $15 million dollars.

President Thomas Jefferson agreed to the purchase and sent Lewis and Clark to explore it.

Not everyone in America was happy. The State of Massachusetts threatened to secede from the Union, arguing that the adding of so large a territory would dilute the influence of existing States.

Jefferson brokered a compromise with Daniel Webster and Henry Clay, commenting in his Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1805:
“I know that the acquisition of Louisiana has been disapproved by some from a candid apprehension that the enlargement of our territory would endanger the union, but who can limit the extent to which the Federative principle may operate effectively?”
The rush to turn the Louisiana Purchase into new States, either slave or free, was a factor leading up to the Civil War.

Another contributing factor to Napoleon selling the Louisiana Territory was the slave rebellion in Haiti.

Christopher Columbus discovered Haiti, calling the island Hispanola, with the capital city of Santo Domingo named for Columbus’ father, Dominic.

The French took half of the Island in the year 1660, and calling it Saint-Domingue, and later Haiti.

It was one of the wealthiest colonies in the world, producing sugar, indigo, cotton and coffee.

Plantations deplorably used slave labor.

While the French Revolution abolished slavery in France, they let it continue in Haiti.

Slaves revolted from 1791-1804, with tens of thousands of French, Mulattos, Blacks, and even Polish, dying with horrible brutality on all sides.

After losing Haiti, France wanted another tropical colony so Napoleon invaded Egypt, 1798-1801.

Napoleon’s fear that Haiti’s slave rebellion might spread to the Louisiana Territory was a contributing factor in his rush to sell it.

During his career, Napoleon fought in over 100 battles conquering large areas of Europe.

When Napoleon put his brother Joseph, a future resident of New Jersey, on Spain’s throne in 1808, Venezuela declared independence in 1810, followed by Central American countries of Chili, Argentina, and eventually Mexico.

On June 23, 1812, Napoleon invaded Russia with nearly a half million men. Six months later he retreated with less than 50,000.

This disastrous loss forced him to abdicate the throne and he was exiled to the Mediterranean Island of Elba.

Napoleon escaped February 26, 1815, and returned to rule France for 100 days.

After losing the Battle of Waterloo, June 18, 1815, Napoleon was permanently banished to the tiny island of St. Helena in the South Atlantic.

The Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815) had resulted in an estimated 6 million deaths from battle and related diseases, starvation and exposure.

On the island of St. Helena, Napoleon began to reflect on his life and even began reading the Bible.

A few years before dying at the age of 52, Napoleon commented to General H.G. Bertrand, as recorded in “On St. Helena,” 1816:

“The Gospel possesses a secret virtue, a mysterious efficacy, a warmth which penetrates and soothes the heart. One finds in meditating upon it that which one experiences in contemplating the heavens.

The Gospel is not a book; it is a living being, with an action, a power, which invades everything that opposes its extension. Behold it upon this table, this book surpassing all others (here the Emperor solemnly placed his hand upon it):

I never omit to read it, and every day with new pleasure. Nowhere is to be found such a series of beautiful ideas, and admirable moral maxims, which pass before us like the battalions of a celestial army…The soul can never go astray with this book for its guide…”

Napoleon continued:
“Everything in Christ astonishes me. His spirit overawes me, and His will confounds me. Between Him and whoever else in the world there is no possible term of comparison; He is truly a Being by Himself. His ideas and His sentiments, the truth which He announces, His manner of convincing, are not explained either by human organization or by the nature of things.

Truth should embrace the universe. Such is Christianity, the only religion which destroys sectional prejudices, the only one which proclaims the unity and the absolute brotherhood of the whole human family, the only one which is purely spiritual; in fine, the only one which assigns to all, without distinction, for a true country, the bosom of the Creator, God.”

Napoleon concluded:
“Christ proved that He was the Son of the Eternal by His disregard of time. All His doctrines signify one only and the same thing-eternity. What a proof of the divinity of Christ! With an empire so absolute, he has but one single end – the spiritual melioration of individuals, the purity of the conscience, the union to that which is true, the holiness of the soul…

Not only is our mind absorbed, it is controlled; and the soul can never go astray with this book for its guide. Once master of our spirit, the faithful Gospel loves us. God even is our friend, our father, and truly our God. The mother has no greater care for the infant whom she nurses…”

Napoleon ended by telling General H.G. Bertrand: “If you do not perceive that Jesus Christ is God, very well: then I did wrong to make you a general.”

Napoleon Salvation at BillLawrenceOnline.com

Visit BillLawrence Dittos for Napoleon Salvation