Inky Circ Gets Uptick But . . .

The Philadelphia Inquirer’s average daily circulation for the six-months ending in March 2011 was 343,710 making it the nation’s 13th largest daily while its Sunday circulation was 488,287 putting it in 12th place in that category.

This is an increase of 1,349 daily and 10,701 Sundays from the period ending in September.

There is a caveat regarding any celebration because the Audit Bureau of Circulations which tracks these things changed its main metric from “paid circulation” to “total average circulation” which allows for inclusion of digital products and “branded editions” which means different nameplates with different content, which in the Inky’s case would be the Philadelphia Daily News.

The Inky actually has been taking advantage of the “branded edition” policy for a year, and, in fact, fell a few places  in this tally because other newspaper companies are starting to do the same thing.

For this tally, the Daily News readers inflates the Inquirer daily circulation by 71,128.

Philly Abortion Outrage Hits Sour Note

The headlines of today’s dead-print publications in Philadelphia were filled with outrage regarding the revelations of what occurred in the West Philly arbortuary of Kermit Gosnell. “Butcher” screamed the Daily News. The Inquirer put his orange-tan face beneath the banner and headline saying he had been charged with eight counts of murder. They did politely refer to him as a doctor.

The abortuary at 3801 Lancaster Ave. was named the Women’s Medical Society. It was the site of about 1,000 abortions per year and served a mostly black clientele. It had been open since 1979.

The charges were announced yesterday. Gosnell is charged with third degree murder for the death of Karnamaya Mongar 41, a native of Bhutan who traveled from Virginia to die in his clinic in November 2009 after being overdosed with anesthetics by an unlicensed staff member. Gosnell is also charged with murders of seven babies born alive who he killed by sticking scissors in the backs of their necks.

The babies were born during the sixth, seventh or eight month of the pregnancy.

Four staff members are also charge with murder either for the death of Ms. Mongar or the death of a baby.

One staff member is charged with performing an abortion at 24 or more weeks in violation of state law.

Three are charged with conspiracy and/or perjury and related crimes.

Pretty sick stuff. Maybe the outrage should be considered social progress. But then the memory of how these same publications fought like cornered rats to keep Pennsylvania’s late-term abortion law from coming to pass, and the vicious, and often untrue, attacks made on its proponents.  They deserve no honor or praise. Their late epiphany just leaves a sick feeling in the stomach.

A thousand babies a year since 1979.

Wonder what Tony Auth’s cartoon will be tomorrow?

And one wonders how President Obama feels about Gosnell’s prosecution.  Twice as an Illinois state senator , Obama opposed opposed legislation to
define as “persons” babies who survive late-term abortions.

Philly Abortion Outrage Hits Sour Note

Philadelphia Inquirer Columnist Spreads Hate

Philadelphia Inquirer Columnist Spreads Hate — Annette John-Hall wrote in today’s Philadelphia Inquirer that “words matter” in trying to explain the Tucson shootings and then listed a litany of word crimes committed by opponents of President Obama and the Democrat Party.

Among the examples of hate she used were  calling the President “a liar, a socialist, a racist and an alien”.  It seems this sort of stuff became hate on Jan. 20, 2009. Must have missed that memo. It certainly wasn’t called “hate” before that. Then it was called patriotism.

In the next paragraph, however, she crosses the line from simple ninnyness to become a spreader of hate herself when she writes
It wasn’t Democrats who spit on members of Congress and called them vile names during the health-care debate.

Of the myriad of recording devices on the scene whether the expensive cameras of professional news crews or simple cell phones, not one managed to capture such a thing despite a $10,000 reward offer for each use of said vile name found. 

One wonders why Annette John Hall can’t see the irony of using an unfounded allegation to demean an entire group whose protest did not in the slightest involve a race issue.

Making things up to acquire power and destroy the innocent is certainly not a thing unknown to the self-proclaimed caring progressive .

Philadelphia Inquirer Columnist Spreads Hate

Inky Back In Free-Fall Mode

The Philadelphia Inquirer’s circulation fell to 342,361 weekday and 477,586 Sunday according to the  report released Oct. 25 by the Audit Bureau of Circulations. The report covers the months from April through September and compares circulation to the same period of 2009.

It remains the 11th largest paper in the nation behind the Houston Chronicle which has a circulation of 343,952.

The Inquirer’s circulation rose to 356,189 from 288,298 in the ABC’s spring report after  the circulation of the Philadelphia Daily News, its Philadelphia Newspaper LLC stablemate, was included with it.

The only newspaper in the top 25 to gain circulation this period was Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal which rose 1.8 percent to 2,061,142 to remain the largest newspaper in the nation.

Murdoch also owns Fox News Channel which is the nation’s most watched cable news station.

What Christopher Coates Told Commission

Justice Department official Christopher Coates told the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, yesterday, that prejudice and racial bias run rampant in the department from leadership to staff, and civil rights violations against white voters are routinely  and premeditatedly ignored.

Coates is a former ACLU lawyer and long-time Justice Department investigator who ran the Department’s Voting Section from 2008 until December 2009 when he was transferred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in South Carolina.

Coates was subpoenaed by the Commission about the time of his transfer to testify regarding the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case but was directed not to comply by his superiors.

Coates told the commission he is finally testifying to correct information Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Thomas Perez had supplied the Commission, the final straw apparently being an Aug. 11 letter in which he again denied a request that he be allowed to testify.

Coates is claimed “the protections of all applicable federal whistleblower statutes” before testifying.

The New Black Panther Party case stems from an incident Election Day 2008 at a polling place at 1221 Fairmount St., PhiladelphiaSamirShabazz,  and Jerry Jackson made racially disparaging remarks to voters while dressed in military garb, with Shabazz carrying a nightstick.

The Justice Department filed suit and won a default judgment against them when they ignored the charges. This judgment, however, was dismissed in May 2009.

Coates said he believed the case was dismissed due to “deep-seated opposition to the equal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act against racial minorities and for the protection of whites who have been discriminated against”.

Coates had earlier described his experiences prosecuting Ike Brown, a black  who chaired the Democratic Executive Committee of Noxubee County, Mississippi. White voters and candidates had complained to the Justice Department in 2003 that elections had been administered in a racially discriminatory manner and asked that federal observes be sent to the primary run-off elections.  Coates said that what he observed during the election was some of the most “outrageous and blatant racially discriminatory behavior at polls” in his 33-plus years as a voting rights litigator.

He wrote a preliminary memorandum summarizing the evidence and recommended an investigation under the Votes Right Act with a civil injunction against Brown and the local Democrat committee to stop the pattern of discrimination.

This was forwarded to Joe Rich, who was then chief of the Voting Section, who sent it on without the part in which an injunction was recommended. He said he later learned that the Rich had said he omitted the information because he didn’t believe an investigation should be made. Approval, however, was obtained albeit finding personnel willing to perform the investigation was not easy.

Coates said one social scientist responsible for researching a jurisdiction’s history flatly refused to participate. An attorney with whom Coates had previously worked told hm that he had not come to the Voting Section to sue African American defendants. Still another attorney told him that he was opposed to bringing voting rights cases against blacks until the socio-economic status of blacks in Mississippi was that same as whites there.

Still, with the help of one attorney and paralegal new to the Voting section, and the support of the Civil Rights Division front office a suit was filed and Ike Brown was removed from superintendent of the Democratic Executive Committee of Noxubee County.

Coates said, however, that a young black paralegal who volunteered to assist on the case was the subject of vicious harassment by co-workers including an attorney, as was  his mother who was also Civil Rights Division employee.

Coates said because of his experience in the Ike Brown case he began to ask new applicants for trial attorney positions if they would be willing to ignore color and prosecute claims of discrimination against white voters. Word got back to Loretta King who had been appointed Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights by President Obama. Coates said she called him to her office and specifically prohibited him from asking such questions. He said Ms. King had been highly critical of the filing of the Ike Brown case.

Coates also explained that the reasons cited by the Justice Department for dropping the New Black Panther Party case were unreasonable. He said, for instance, that citing the determination of a local police officer who ordered Shabazz to leave but allowed Jackson to stay because he was a certified Democrat Party poll watcher was something he had never seen in his 13 years with the Department of Justice. He said police officers are not trained in what constitutes a voting rights violations and that local police have on occasion had sympathy for the persons who were violating the voting rights act.

Coates also testified that Voting Rights section was willfully refusing to enforce the National Voter Registration Act, which includes a requirement that states ensure voter registration list remove the names of those no longer eligible to vote in a jurisdiction.

Coates said that Julie Fernandez who was appointed as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights by Obama said that “the Obama Administration was not interested in that type of issue.”

The Voting Section began filing cases under the list maintenance provision during the Bush Administration. Coates said that there were states that had reported that no voters had been removed from the list in the last two years.

“I do not believe that Voting Section has recently been involved in any list maintenance enforcement during the Obama administration,” Coates said.

According to Coates’ testimony, acts of intimidation are far more common that is popularly believed. Coates testified that during his tenure as chief of Voting Section a prolonged investigation concerning Wilkinson County, Mississippi, a majority-black county, reveled that the home of a white candidate for local office was burned. No one was ever prosecuted for the burning.

He said a bank that was being used to store absentee ballots in majority-black Hale County, Alabama was burned in attempt at election theft. Again, no one was ever prosecuted for the arson.

A pdf file of Coates testimony can be found here .

And despite, the strong Philadelphia angle there was nary a mention of what Coates said in either today’s Philadelphia Inquirer or Delaware County Daily Times.

PMN Wins Inky Again

Web reports say that Philadelphia Media Network (PMN), a coalition of holders of the debt of bankrupt Philadelphia Newspapers LLC were again the winners of an auction for its media properties beating Rayco L.L.C., a group consisting of investor Raymond G. Perelman and the Carpenters Union pension fund.

Reuters is now also reporting it.

The auction began this morning before Chief Bankruptcy Judge Stephen Raslavich

Reportedly, PMN bid $105 million for the properties which are The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Philadelphia Daily News  and Philly.com while Rayco bid $85 million.

Including the Inquirer building and other property brings the price to $139 million which is what PMN bid in April.

The first deal fell through , Sept. 14, after Teamsters Local 628 rejected PMN’s final contract offer. It was the only union to reject a contract from PMN.

PMN CEO Gregory Osberg said at the time that if they should win again contract terms would be imposed on the Teamsters for the company would be closed until a contract is reached.

A group of local investors, led by Brian Tierney, bought the company for $515 million in 2006.


Inky Sale Sinks On Teamster Reef

Teamsters Local 628, which represents the drivers of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News, rejected  by 191-4 vote Sunday the  Philadelphia Media Network Inc.’s (PMN) final contract offer.

PMN is seeking to take over the company, which also includes the website Philly.Com, from Philadelphia Newspapers LLC, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Feb. 21, 2009.

Philadelphia Newspapers is a subsidiary of Philadelphia Media Holdings LLC.

Local 628 is the only one of the company’s unions not to have a agreed with a contract with PMN, a group of 16 financial institutions
that bought the properties at auction in April for $139
million. Philadelphia Newspapers, however, maintains control until things are finalized.

The sticking point with the Teamsters is the pension plan.

So, is the sale sunk? Well, a deadline imposed by Bankruptcy Judge Stephen Raslavich was noon, today,  and the drivers didn’t budge.

What is likley now is another auction, and if that should happen PMN will bid again according to PMN CEO Gregory Osberg, and if PMN should win he says contract terms would then be imposed on the drivers or the company would be closed until a contract was reached.

Gonzo The Bigot

Philadelphia Inquirer sports columnist John “Gonzo” Gonzalez wrote a column today on how Eagles lineman Todd Herremans was duly chastised for tweeting an opinion about a television show.

“So.. caught up on Trueblood last nite,”  Herremans wrote on Twitter. “Not a fan of how they get u hooked with the 1st 2 seasons then bring on a barrage of homosexuality.”

Gonzalez caught the comment immediately and took issue with it even faster. He tweeted Herremans asking if he wanted to take it back or apologize.

Herremans responded by tweeting “@gonzophilly I have no issues with homosexuality to each his/her own… Its jus not for me.. #jussaying”

This was not good enough for Gonzalez, who described the opinion as “insulting”. He asked  Herremans how a gay Eagles employee might feel about what he wrote.

Herremans response was “@gonzophilly like I said .. To each his/her own”

Of course what happened next was Eagles management got involved and Herremans had to write an apology.

Gonzalez said he wasn’t sure if Herremans was sincere, which is rather flabbergasting to think that someone might actually think it possible he was.

Gonzalez also said he knew members of the Eagles who are gay and thought it a shame that they must remain in the closet because  some might not like True Blood.

So let’s summarize: we have a fellow who makes a living expressing his opinion attacking someone else for expressing an opinion, and a rather mild — and in a sane world inconsequential — one at that. Remember, Herremans was not mocking those who like the show nor was he demanding it be removed from HBO he was simply giving an honest opinion as to why he stopped liking it.

And for this an apology was forced.

Here is the definition of bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices. The correct use of the term requires the elements of intolerance, irrationality, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.

Who is the bigot in this matter? Hint, it is not the one who says “To each his/her own”

A Creeping Lawlessness In Government

The J. Christian Adams matter is getting a little traction. Even the Philadelphia Inquirer felt obliged to put an AP version on its website.

On Election Day 2008, a couple of thugs at polling place at 1221 Fairmount St., Philadelphia made racially disparaging comments and brandished weapons at poll watchers and voters. The thugs were black and members of a group called the New Black Panther Party.

After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter intimidation case against them. Adams was among the attorneys who pursued the case and won an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before the final judgment could be rendered though, the case was ordered dismissed. This was in May 2009,

On May 14, 2010, Adams resigned from the Department and went public a few weeks later with what has been occurring. He wrote that “the dismissal is part of a creeping lawlessness infusing our government institutions” and that “citizens would be shocked to learn about the open and pervasive hostility within the Justice Department to bringing civil rights cases against nonwhite defendants on behalf of white victims”.

Adams noted that this put “core American principles of equality before the law and freedom from racial discrimination . . . at risk”.

Adams has talked about this at length on Fox News and it has been a matter of discussion on talk radio. Still, there is a sheep-like segment of this country that will dismiss what Adams is saying out-of-hand solely because he has used those venues. To them, I say prepare to be sheared.

The corruption on display in the New Black Panther Party matter isn’t that much different than that which occurred in the Gerald Walpin matter.

A Looming War But Blue Devils’ Work Won’t Be Ignored

Today’s front page of the Philadelphia Inquirer carried stories on the latest attempt to plug the Deepwater Horizon leak, the squelching of a no-bid development deal for Family Court building in Philadelphia, girls lacrosse, puffing repeal of “don’t ask don’t tell”, the Academy of Natural Sciences, and Harrisburg corruption.

On page 2, they carries an update piece from Obama sources about how China is “likely to join rebuke of N. Korea” — which does not seem to be available on their website and has a markedly different slant than  this piece this morning from Bloomberg.Com: China May Shield North Korea As Lee, U.S. Seek Action.

On March 26, the South Korean frigate Cheonan was sunk by a North Korean submarine. Today, South Korea held a major naval exercise featuring anti-submarine drills, and U.S. Gen. Walter Sharp — who heads the U.S.-South Korean combined forces command which includes the 28,500 U.S. troops stationed there — raised the watch level from 3 to 2 one notch below the highest level.

North Korea responded by ending an agreement designed to prevent armed clashes at  maritime border with South Korea and warned of “immediate physical strikes” if any South Korean ships enter its waters.

North Korea is an impoverished dying nations but armed with nuclear weapons developed during the Clinton years. It’s military also has an enormous artillery component and South Korea’s capital of Seoul is within range of those guns.

Meanwhile, President Obama is meeting with the Duke Blue Devils basketball team to honor their sacrifice and effort  in winning the NCAA championship. He leaves for Chicago tonight to chill out over the Memorial Day weekend, which unfortunately will mean he is unavailable for the traditional presidential Memorial Day visit to Arlington Cemetery to honor the sacrifice and effort that involved keeping America free.

I hope he doesn’t chill out so much he can’t handle any 3 a.m. phone calls.