William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-20-15

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-20-15

Jaws is the most common name for pet goldfish in the United Kingdom.

Andy Reilly Covers For Mullen

Andy Reilly Covers For Mullen
Delco GOP head Andy Reilly apparently thinks Paul Mullen (right) really didn’t want Democrat Joe Sestak (left) to win in 2010 when he strongly endorsed him. Apparently, the Delco GOP boss thinks that shows principle or something.

Delaware County Republican Chairman Andy Reilly appeared on the Dom Giordano show, Monday, (June 15) to defend the man the GOP picked to fill the vacant 161st District Seat in the Pennsylvania House.

Why the candidate himself couldn’t appear is certainly a point of wonder especially as Andy couldn’t answer questions about where the candidate stood.

The candidate is Paul Mullen, who is business manager of  IBEW Local 654 and until very recently was president of the county AFL-CIO. Mullen was a personal supporter of Joe Sestak, Toomey’s opponent, five years ago.

This is what Mullen said  in 2010 about Sestak: A lot of politicians say they’ll support you when they run, then they turn their backs on you. Joe’s the opposite. He stands tall with the IBEW. Members here—they know Joe. He’s been to the hall several times and he’s toured our training facility. He’s definitely one of us.

Will Mullen support Toomey this time? Andy  replied “I’ll bet you a steak dinner at a restaurant of your choosing that he will”.

Um, that’s not a yes.

Will Mullen support liquor privatization?

Andy: “I believe he does . . . it depends on how you define (privatization). What does that mean?”

C’mon Andy. Really?

One glaring issue that reveals why many of the loyal party workers are getting disgusted with the bosses is the claim that Mullen was picked by the grassroots.

“There is some kind of suggestion that the process of the endorsement of Paul Mullen was undemocratic,” Andy, who counts IBEW. Local 654 as among his law clients, told Dom. “The decision was made by the elected Republican committeepeople, one man and one woman from the neighborhoods in the district. Both candidates were provided with a list of committeepeople and addresses. They each sent a letter to the committeepeople along with their resume. We held a forum whereby both candidates were able to give their speeches, and then we handed a secret ballot,  and both candidates were there to witness the tabulation. This wasn’t a decision made by the party bosses. This was a rank and file election by committeepeople.”

The  forum and election tabulation was held 7 p.m., May 28 at Barnaby’s Heritage Ballroom in Ridley.

The results had been announced an hour earlier on Facebook.

The interview is 12:27 long and can be found here in Dom’s archives from June 15.

The 161st District seat was vacated by newly re-elected Rep. Joe Hackett, a Republican, on April 30. The election is Aug. 4.

Lisa Esler, the Pat Tooomey-supporting Republican, who  went door-to-door for our Senator and made phone calls for him in 2010 and stayed up nervously watching returns and is going to happily support his re-election, is also seeking election to the seat.

She is more than willing to personally take questions from Dom on the air.

Mrs. Esler won election to the Penn Delco School in 2011 and developed a reputation for tackling the corruption and  cronyism prevalent in state politics.

In  this year’s May 19 primary election, Mrs. Esler was the top vote-getter on both Republican and Democrat ballots to retain her seat.

She is running as a write-in candidate, something the new machines make easy to do.

The non-GOP supported Democrat in the race is Leanne Krueger-Braneky of Swarthmore who lost to Hackett last fall.

Andy Reilly Covers For Mullen

 

 

 

161st Race Getting State-Wide Attention

While all eyes are riveted on the looming state budget deadline in Harrisburg, the political story of the summer is now playing out in Delaware County where a special election for a seat in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has become the latest flashpoint in the ongoing internal GOP battle between union-leaning southeastern Republicans and the party’s pro-worker freedom grassroots.

The drama began to unfold when state Rep. Joe Hackett, R-161 of Ridley Township, resigned at the end of April. Despite having been re-elected just months earlier, Hackett decided he wanted to return to his old career in law enforcement. That set the stage for a special election which will be held on Aug. 4. Nominees in legislative special elections are chosen by the respective political parties rather than by voters in a primary. Thus, a candidate not selected by committee members has no recourse other than to run a write-in campaign. Such write-in campaigns had previously proven to be fruitless, until state Sen. Scott Wagner scored a historic write-in victory in a special election in York County last year.

The Delaware County Republican committee members participating in the selection of a nominee for Hackett’s 161st district seat chose a candidate who has riled grassroots conservatives across the commonwealth. They picked as their candidate Paul Mullen, who is president of the Delaware County AFL-CIO and business manager of IBEW Local 654. In doing so, the committee passed over Lisa Esler, a local school board member and co-founder of the Delaware County Tea Party Patriots.

As a labor union boss, Mullen can be expected to oppose most of the pro-worker freedom agenda being advanced by the Republican-controlled Legislature in Harrisburg. Pension reform, liquor privatization and paycheck protection are but three important issues that enjoy widespread support among the GOP grassroots and in the Republican caucuses in the Legislature. Progress on all three of these reforms has been blocked by the labor unions. Worse, Mullen supported Democrats Barack Obama, Joe Sestak against U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, and Tom Wolf over Gov. Tom Corbett, making his selection by the GOP even more curious.

The Mullen pick lit a power keg of fury among conservatives. Esler has stepped forward and will challenge the union boss in the upcoming special election by running a write-in campaign. Her efforts should be taken seriously for two reasons: The Wagner win proves it can be done; and the district is almost evenly divided by party registration meaning this is more than just a GOP intramural competition.

Sen. Wagner’s election has changed the political landscape in a number of ways. Most notably party domination of special elections is now a thing of the past. With active and highly effective conservative groups now operating in the state, a write-in candidate such as Esler now has access to funding, consultants and grassroots workers previously unavailable to such challengers.

The Wagner write-in victory in York County, the first time in state history a write-in candidate won a special Senate election, proved the playing field has been leveled. Wagner was well funded, had substantial grassroots support from the local tea party and benefitted from a voter backlash over the high-handed campaign run by those supporting the party’s nominee.

All of those factors are at play in the Delaware County race. In what will be a low turn-out election in a small geographic district, Esler will be a force with which to be reckoned. The outcome will have no impact on party control of the Legislature. The GOP has a historically large majority, but it will impact the GOP caucus. A small group of southeastern Pennsylvania Republican representatives, out of step with a majority of their caucus, have sided with Democrats on labor power issues. Those looking to enhance worker freedom in the state will be anxious to prevent another member from being added to their number.

And that is how what should have been a routine, sleepy special election in the dead of summer could turn out to be the political battle of the year.

Lowman S. Henry is Chairman & CEO of the Lincoln Institute and host of the weekly Lincoln Radio Journal. 

161st Race Getting State-Wide Attention

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-19-15

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-19-15

You body weight changes from minute to minute.

Pa Stays Open If Deadline Missed

By Sen. Scott Wagner Pa Stays Open If Deadline Missed

Everyone is under the assumption that the state budget MUST be completed by June 30 or the State of Pennsylvania shuts down.

This is an outright lie that has been used in the past and will be used again to intimidate the citizens of Pennsylvania.

Putting on my private sector business owner hat – every Wednesday our payroll departments electronically transfer the deducted employee state taxes to the PA Department of Revenue.

In addition, every day transactions occur throughout Pennsylvania that generate sales tax and other taxes – so the cash flow to Harrisburg does not stop.

Governor Wolf’s budget does not address any cost cutting, expense controls or efficiency projects  – Governor Wolf’s budget is very simple – RAISE REVENUE THROUGH MORE TAX REVENUE.

It is the goal of the PA State Senate to have a balanced budget without tax increases completed by June 30th to be sent to the Governor.

Let me be clear – Harrisburg does not have a revenue problem – it has a spending problem.

Prevailing wage mandates on public school districts, out of control benefit costs, and zero accountability for money being spent are a few examples.

I will be a NO vote on any tax increases – we MUST address the expense side of Pennsylvania Government first.

Governor Wolf continues to beat his drum that he wants to DUMP (and I use the word DUMP) $1 billion  in the public school system.

I am in total agreement that education for our children is the number one priority – the public school system has many components that need to be fixed, changed or eliminated before a billion dollars is thrown at the problem.

In the private sector, throwing money at a problem without stopping the leak that is causing the problem is called throwing money down a black hole.

Until the structural problems in the public school system are fixed – the $1 billion  that Governor Wolf wants to throw at the problem – the money will disappear – next year and every year to follow there will be some group who will be asking for more money to be DUMPED into the public school system.

Enough is enough !

Sen. Wagner represents Pennsylvania’s 28th District.

Pa Stays Open If Deadline Missed

Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don’t

Pope Francis, yesterday, June 18, released Laudato Si the first encyclical addressing the environment in Catholic Church history. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't. Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don't.

Most of it is hard to argue with. Greed is bad. Waste is bad. Pollution is bad.

Oh yeah, and abortion and euthanasia are bad.

However, Francis also felt obliged to chime in that global warming is primarily man-made and is an oppressive burden on the poor.

Taking that to its logical conclusion means those living in poor nations should no longer aspire to have global-warming producing things like refrigerators and air conditioners and computer networks, much less cars.

Saying people with brown skin should end their dreams of having these blessings strikes us as kind of mean.

Anyway, we remain global warming skeptics for the same reasons we stated in January:

1. The leading supporters hid data that contradicted their public conclusions and treated dissenters politically with attempts to punish and silence them rather than in accordance with the canons of science which would be giving them full and fair hearing then refuting them openly.

2. Falsities have been found in the arguments of those claiming anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

3. Hypocrisy has been found in the lifestyles of those claiming AGW. Really, if you believe that a particular behavior is going to destroy the lives of your children you don’t charter jets to catch New Year’s shows on different continents.  Nor do you live in energy-wasting villas. Either the activists don’t believe in what they say or they don’t care. We find this strange if one is talking about the end of the world.

4. The commonsense and practical actions that would drastically alleviate the claimed causes of AGW have been ignored, and even opposed by the supporters of AGW. When was the last time  you heard an AGW claimer exhorting for more telecommuting? How about nuclear power? If the effort was made circa Y2K to replace every coal plant in this nation with a nuke, alleged AGW gases would be half diminished by now. Even more bizarrely why do AGW claimers support the removal of hydro-electric dams to be replaced by AGW producing plants?

We can go on noting opposition to streamlining the removal of traffic bottlenecks by ending Davis-Bacon requirements, and toll roads.

Frankly, any of these by themselves is damning to the argument. As there are four of them color us extremely skeptical.

Also, while arguments from authority are anything but definitive, we will note that highly accredited and accomplished persons in the field of climate study doubt it is occurring. These include Joe Bastardi, longtime of Accuweather, and John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel; and Dr. Roy Spencer, who pioneered temperature-based satellite monitoring.

For those who accept Francis’ declaration, we can find common ground regarding point 4. Are you green activists ready to fight to save hydro-electric dams and replace our coal plants with nukes? How about ending Davis-Bacon and other prevailing wage laws so we can free up some cash to remove traffic bottlenecks?

Another point: If you are willing to accept his declaration on global warming are you willing to accept his declarations on abortion and gay marriage?

Pope Accepts Global Warming, We Don’t.

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-18-15

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-18-15

The first pie ever to be thrown into someone’s face in a movie happened 102 years ago. It was flung by Mabel Normand in 1913’s A Noise from the Deep.

Evil Demeaned By Political Correctness

Dylann Roof -- Evil Demeaned By Political Correctness
Dylann Roof, suspected mass murderer

A 21-year-old twisted soul named Dylann Roof last night, June 17, reportedly murdered nine persons during a prayer service at Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C.

Roof is white and the people he killed were black.

“We believe this is a hate crime; that is how we are investigating it,” said Charleston Police Chief Greg Mullen, in what might have been the dumbest  quote ever made by a law enforcement official.

Mullen’s politically correct statement demeans evil. It wasn’t name calling that Roof is alleged to have done but cold blooded mass murder of kind people.

In Mullen’s defense, he probably had other things on his mind when he said it but what happened last night is no different that what ISIS does routinely in the Mideast. You want to call what they do “hate crime”? The phrasing of Pope Francis is far better.  What happened at the Emanuel AME Church was not a “hate crime” but Satanic barbarism.

Racism appears to be Roof’s motive but don’t consider the victims black or Roof white. The victims are persons as is Roof. Roof is one who has (allegedly) chosen evil.

Skin color is meaningless. The only people to whom it matters are those who want to manipulate others for their own gain.

Forgive the fudging i.e “allegedly” regarding Roof but we remember initially misidentifying the shooter from Sandy Hook.

Evil Demeaned By Political Correctness

 

 

William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-17-15

Eilmer of Malmesbury, an English Benedictine monk, built a glider in the 11th century when he fastened wings to his hands and feet. He jumped off the tower at Malmesbury Abbey and glided for 200  yards before crashing and breaking his legs. In old age, he'd say he only crashed because he forgot to make a tail.William Lawrence Sr Omnibit 6-17-15

Eilmer of Malmesbury, an English Benedictine monk, built a glider in the 11th century when he fastened wings to his hands and feet. He jumped off the tower at Malmesbury Abbey and glided for 200  yards before crashing and breaking his legs. In old age, he’d say he only crashed because he forgot to make a tail.

Rachel Dolezal Truth Matters

Rachel Dolezal Truth Matters -- What’s black and white and red all over? An embarrassed Rachel Dolezal. Or at least she should be. Had she not resigned, Dolezal should have been fired, but not because she is white. There is no reason a non-black could not perform extremely well in that capacity; as a matter of fact, according to reports, Rachel Dolezal did just that. The reason she deserved termination is simple: She lied, and in doing so, destroyed her integrity and damaged the reputation of the organization. No matter how well-intentioned she was, deliberately misleading people was unacceptable, and keeping her in that position would have set a terrible example.
By Chris Freind

What’s black and white and red all over? An embarrassed Rachel Dolezal. Or at least she should be.

But the former President of the NAACP chapter in Spokane, who resigned under fire after it was revealed that she was, in fact, white, isn’t blushing at all. Despite duping so many by being a racial chameleon, leaving supporters feeling betrayed, Dolezal stated that she would have done nothing differently, calling her actions ones of “survival.”

Given that this is giving the Bruce/Caitlin Jenner saga a run for its money as the year’s best “you-can’t-make-this-stuff-up” story, where does one begin?

Consider:

1. When asked by the press if she was black, Dolezal replied, “That question is not as easy as it seems. There’s a lot of complexities … and I don’t know that everyone would understand that.”

Sure there are, Rachel. Yep. There are just so many complexities in answering such an extremely simplistic question. Thanks for the patronizing non-answer, but let’s cut out the psycho-babble. The answer is simple: You are white. Period. There are no subtleties here, nor should there be. If the NAACP wouldn’t have hired you because of your skin color, then shame on them. But playing coy with something so obvious serves only to make you look like a lunatic, destroying whatever credibility you have left.

2. Had she not resigned, Dolezal should have been fired, but not because she is white. There is no reason a non-black could not perform extremely well in that capacity; as a matter of fact, according to reports, Rachel Dolezal did just that. The reason she deserved termination is simple: She lied, and in doing so, destroyed her integrity and damaged the reputation of the organization. No matter how well-intentioned she was, deliberately misleading people was unacceptable, and keeping her in that position would have set a terrible example.

3. Dolezal’s parents stated that they are puzzled as to why she would misrepresent her race. Rachel responded by saying that she doesn’t understand why her parents “are in a rush to whitewash some of the work that I have done.”

If that pun was intended, good one! But one has nothing to do with the other. The parents aren’t whitewashing the work Rachel has done, but questioning why she would lie about her racial heritage. Simply put, the end doesn’t justify the means.

4. Following the theme of Jenner’s “transgender” soap opera, the term “transracial” has quickly become the newest politically correct buzz term, ostensibly because Rachel Dolezal said, “I identify as black.” But what does that mean?

You’re white, but because you have an affinity for black culture or history, it’s now perfectly acceptable to represent yourself as black? Because if that’s the case, life just took a turn for the better! If you love Hawaii, and call yourself a native Hawaiian, then that must mean you get all the special privileges afforded to those folks. Same for Native Americans. And while you’re at it, throw in being an American Samoan, because that’ll really help get the kids into college. And of course, being formerly-white-but-now-transracial will make getting minority-only loans infinitely easier, as well as landing a job where minority-hiring quotas are in effect.

America’s entitlement mentality is out of control, but thinking you’re “entitled” to being another race, ethnicity or gender just because you feel like it takes the cake.

5.Rachel Dolezal attended Howard University, a historically all-black college. Did she represent herself as black to gain admission? And did she do the same to obtain government loans, aid, or any type of benefits? If so, losing her job will be the least of her worries, as fraudulently representing your ethnicity for financial gain isn’t just unethical, but illegal.

6. The NAACP is way behind the times, as the “C” stands for “colored” people — a term long since considered offensive to blacks. And while the organization should correct that, maybe it’s time to go all the way and change the name to NAAAP — the National Association for the Advancement of All People. Advocating special treatment for some — not all — smacks of discrimination, especially reverse discrimination, and has a counterproductive effect. When other races feel alienated, the racial gap widens, which has a detrimental effect on everyone, including, and sometimes especially, blacks.

To achieve racial harmony, we must start viewing ourselves as Americans, and only Americans. Not Hispanic, African-American, Asian-American, or white. Just Americans, with equal opportunity for all, and special treatment for none.

But unfortunately, selective discrimination has been deemed acceptable, even trendy. Far from creating racial accord, as its advocates naively believe, it has created a flashpoint in the powder keg of America’s race relations.

There are no white caucuses in our legislatures or NAAWPs, nor should there be. By their nature, they would be divisive and exclusionary. Yet they are just as divisive, and just as exclusionary, when used by other ethnicities. Once a race — any race — feels that it is not afforded equal rights, tensions flare, often uncontrollably.

Rather than learning our lesson, we are marching in the opposite direction, with too many — on all sides — playing the race card at the drop of a hat, often for ulterior motives.

The solution is for strong leaders of all races to unite and demand colorblindness in America, from policing to entertainment, and from education to the workplace. Tragically, though, too many succumb to cowardice, eschewing tough stands in favor of feel-good rhetoric, which placates the masses but solves nothing.

As a result, we are reverting to when people were judged by skin color. Resurrecting such barriers, however well-intentioned, has no place in an America striving to right the wrongs of its past.

Trumpeting color is demeaning to the very people it is designed to help. Instead of uniting, it divides. Instead of equality, it promotes the notion of special privilege based on color. Instead of building upon the American spirit of competiveness and achievement — may the best person win — it robs all people of dignity and respect.

Sadly, we are coming full circle: separate and unequal; separate but equal; equal; and now separate again. That’s not why so many — both black and white — sacrificed so much in the fight for civil rights.

Let’s whitewash the controversy about Rachel’s Dolezal’s race and instead focus on building a nation where people are not judged by their skin, but, as a famous man once said, by the content of their character.

No principle could be more … black and white.

Rachel Dolezal Truth Matters