Raffensperger Fears Testifying About Georgia Voting System — Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is appealing an order from a judge that he defend under oath Georgia’s computerized voting system.
A lawsuit is seeking to find before the presidential primary if it’s vulnerable to hacking.
Raffensperger was ordered to defend it by U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg and Raffensperger is asking the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to please don’t make him.
Raffensperger is the Republican who infamously rejected President Trump’s request to act on obvious election discrepancies in the 2020 election that would have flipped the state from Biden.
A tape of Trump’s phone call to him was leaked to the public, distorted by the mockingbirds and is now being used in the indictment against The Donald alleging that he committed racketeering by questioning the election.
Judge Totenberg is a Democrat appointed by Barack Obama.
Which gets us to one huge, glaring, unpleasant question which has only one huge, glaring unpleasant answer.
Why is Raffensperger afraid to testify under oath about Georgia’s election system?
And why are the powers that-be desperately fighting the simplest and most reasonable attempts to investigate our elections?
Dominion officials refused to tesify before the Pennsylvania House just after the 2020 election, an action that was either defended or ignored by the establishment media.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that neither Fulton County nor the Pennsylvania Senate can audit Dominion voting machines, a ruling that was just peachy with those who still give many Americans their news.
That’s kind of unexpected, don’t you think?
The traditional media defending business instead of election transparency? A corporation instead of voters?
So we ask why and are left with one huge, glaring unpleasant answer.
People get ready. People get mad, ask questions and demand answers. You are allowed.
Raffensperger Fears Testifying About Georgia Voting System
I didn’t think our laws allowed someone to refuse to respond to a court, without penalty, eg, being held in contempt, and allowing for 5th Amendment protection against being forced to testify against oneself. If he refuses to answer, will there be a penalty? There should be.