Pennsylvania Supremes Laugh At Constitution With Mail-In Decision

Pennsylvania Supremes Laugh At Constitution With Mail-In Decision — The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, yesterday (Aug. 2), declared that mail-in voting as per Act 77 is allowed under the state Constitution.

The vote was 5-2 with all Democrats voting yes and the Republicans dissenting.

Here’s the wording regarding absentee voting in the State Constitution:

§ 14.  Absentee voting.
        (a)  The Legislature shall, by general law, provide a manner
     in which, and the time and place at which, qualified electors
     who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the
     municipality of their residence, because their duties,
     occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on
     the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their
     proper polling places because of illness or physical disability
     or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance
     of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election
     day duties, in the case of a county employee, may vote, and for
     the return and canvass of their votes in the election district
     in which they respectively reside.

Either our Supreme Democrats are illiterate or they just don’t care about the rule of law.

The process for amending the Pennsylvania Constitution requires approval in consecutive legislative sessions followed by a referendum. A law like Act 77 doesn’t suffice.

When judges say round is square and black is white and can’t tell the difference between men and women, whitecaps are on the water.

The case decided was Doug McLinko vs Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State et al. No. J-18A-2022, J-18B-2022, J-18C-2022, J-18D-2022, and J-18E-2022

Hat tip Breitbart.com.

Pennsylvania Supremes Laugh At Constitution With Mail-In Decision
Pennsylvania Supremes Laugh At Constitution With Mail-In Decision

3 thoughts on “Pennsylvania Supremes Laugh At Constitution With Mail-In Decision”

    1. Hope that it is stronger than the blue wave of phony mail in ballots like in 2020 that is coming as well, thanks to the PA Supreme Court.

  1. “Either our Supreme Democrats are illiterate or they just don’t care about the rule of law.”

    I would say that both those options are true. And they are true for every level court justices. It is frightening how judges and lawyers are unaware of the law. Remember, judges are chosen from the pool of lawyers. And usually it is the least successful lawyers in private practice who vie for the position of judge.

    I think William Shakespeare said it best in his play, Henry VI, Part 2, when the character, Dick the Butcher, states, “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

    It is offered as the best feature imagined of yet for utopia.
    A very rough and simplistic modern translation would be “When I’m the King, there’ll be two cars in every garage, and a chicken in every pot” “AND NO LAWYERS”. (Wikipedia)

    I must concur. My experience with our court system leads me to the same conclusion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: